Search

Patients' with a hemiplegic gait and difficulties with activities of daily living may improve through intensive training of their paretic lower limbs. This study examined the possibility of improving their gait by immobilizing the non-paretic knee joint in extension and promoting weight shift toward the paretic side. Single-case ABABA studies were conducted, involving three patients with hemiplegia. The patients walked with their non-paretic knee joints immobilized in extension using a dial-lock knee orthosis during the intervention (B1 and B2) periods. Measurement items included (1) temporal and distance factors and (2) hip, knee, and ankle joint angles during gait. In all subjects, the stance phase was significantly prolonged on the paretic side during all intervention periods following the first baseline (A1) period. In Subject 1, hip extension in the stance phase improved during all intervention periods following the A1 period, and, in Subjects 2 and 3, the knee hyperextension in the stance phase, which was observed during the A1 period, was resolved during the second (A2) and third (A3) baseline periods. Gait training with non-paretic knee immobilization may promote weight shift toward the paretic side to overcome a swing limitation on the immobilized side, consequently providing an opportunity for training in weight bearing for the paretic limb and an improved, more symmetrical gait pattern.

Background: The objective of this study was to determine the effects of different visual stimuli during visual-motor illusion on sit-to-stand in people with hemiplegia following stroke.Methods: This was a randomized crossover controlled trial. Twenty people with hemiplegia following stroke were randomly divided into groups. The video images used for visual-motor illusion were ankle dorsiflexion without resistance (standard visual-motor illusion [standard illusion]) and maximum effort dorsiflexion with resistance (power visual-motor illusion [power illusion]). People with hemiplegia following stroke underwent both illusion interventions with a 1-week washout period in between; group A started with the standard illusion intervention and group B started with the power illusion intervention. Outcomes included the sit-to-stand duration, maximum weight-bearing value, trunk movement during sit-to-stand, ankle joint movement during sit-to-stand, and active ankle dorsiflexion movement on the paralyzed side.Results: The angular velocity of the trunk and ankle joints increased significantly during sit-to-stand, and sit-to-stand duration decreased significantly in response only to power illusion. In addition, the change in angular velocity of active ankle dorsiflexion was significantly greater in response to power illusion than was the change in response to standard illusion.Conclusion: Power illusion induces a greater improvement in paralyzed ankle dorsiflexion function than standard illusion, resulting in shorter sit-to-stand duration. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]