Search

Gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO), is an anti-CD33 monoclonal antibody, approved for AML CD33 + , those patients with low and intermediate-risk who obtain a complete response may also be candidated for consolidation with autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). However, there are scant data on the mobilization of hemopoietic stem cells (HSC) after fractionated GO. We retrospectively studied data from five Italian centers and identified 20 patients (median age 54 years, range 29-69, 15 female, 15 NPM1 mutated ) that attempted HSC mobilization after fractionated doses of GO + "7 + 3" regimen and 1-2 cycles of consolidation (GO + HDAC + daunorubicin). After chemotherapy and standard G-CSF, 11/20 patients (55%) reached the threshold of 20 CD34 + /µL, and HSC were successfully harvested, while 9 patients (45%) failed. The median day of apheresis was Day + 26 from the start of chemotherapy (range 22-39 days). In good mobilizer patients, the median circulating CD34 + cells were 35.9 cells/µL and the median CD34 + harvested were 4.65 × 10 6 /kg of patients' body weight. With a median follow-up of 12.7 months, at 24 months from the first diagnosis, 93.3% of all 20 patients were alive and the median overall survival was 25 months. The 2-year RFS rate from the timepoint of the first CR was 72.6%, while the median RFS was not reached. However, only five patients underwent ASCT and achieved full engraftment.In conclusion, in our cohort of patients, the addition of GO reduced HSC mobilization and harvesting, which was reached in about 55% of patients. Nevertheless, further studies are warranted to evaluate the effects of fractionated doses of GO on HSC mobilization and ASCT outcomes., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Background: In our Center, the cell viability, the integrity of the bag, and the clonogenic assay were evaluated before the reinfusion of hematopoietic progenitor cells-apheresis (HPC-A). This quality control (QC) should be made 14 days before the reinfusion to the patient to have the result of the functional test on the proliferative capacity of hematopoietic progenitors., Study Design and Methods: This study was designed to assess the potential of an automatic cell counting system (NucleoCounter NC-3000, ChemoMetec) in our clinical routine as a support of the clonogenic assay and the cytofluorimetric analysis for the QC of the cryopreserved HPC-A. The cell viability was evaluated by flow cytometry using the modified International Society of Hematotherapy and Graft Engineering protocol. The proliferative potential was assessed by specific clonogenic tests using a commercial medium. Furthermore, we evaluated the cellular functionality with NucleoCounter NC-3000, by using two protocols: "vitality assay" and "mitochondrial potential assay.", Results: The evaluation of the total nucleated cells in preapoptosis measured by 5,5,6,6-tetrachloro-1,1,3,3-tetraethylbenzimidazol-carbocyanine iodide (JC-1) assay showed a negative correlation (r=-0.43) with the total number of colonies (colony-forming unit [CFU]-granulocyte-macrophage progenitors plus burst-forming unit-erythroid progenitors plus CFU-granulocyte, erythroid, macrophage, megakaryocyte progenitors) obtained after seeding of 50 × 10(6) /L viable total nucleated cells. We observed a significant difference (p<0.0001) comparing the median number of colonies (166.70; SD, ± 136.36) obtained with a value of JC-1 less than 30% to the number of colonies (61.75; SD, ± 59.76) obtained with a value of JC-1 more than 30%., Conclusion: The evaluation of cell functionality by the use of the NucleoCounter NC-3000 is in agreement with results from clonogenic assay and can be considered an effective alternative in the routine laboratory., (© 2013 American Association of Blood Banks.)

Background: Immunomagnetic cell selection (ICS) cells is increasingly used in allogeneic hematopoietic transplantation in order to reduce the T cells quantity. The aim of this study was to evaluate an protocol based on Ficoll method before ICS., Study Design and Methods: The automated procedure was compared with the standard method. In the group 1 the cell processing involves the extraction of the buffy-coat by Ficoll before incubation with antibodies. This procedure was performed with the Sepax S-100 device. The efficacy of this automated procedure was compared with the group 2. In this group, the cell washing and the incubation were performed through the standard method. The CD34+ cells collected by apheresis (HPC-A) were selected with ICS., Results: The results obtained after Ficoll procedure, showed a total nucleated cells (TNCs) and CD34+ cells recovery of 85.73% (75.90-90.63; SD 4.25) and 79.31% (51.77-112.31; SD 18.40), respectively. The TNC and CD34+ cells recovery after the pre-incubation washing performed through the standard method, was 75.54% (38.36-97.76; SD 22.5) and 61.51% (30.87-81.79; SD 19.3), respectively. The CD34+ cells recovery after ICS was 79% (51.77-100; SD 18.40) and 44% (15.57-88.24; SD 25.91) in the group 1 and the group 2, respectively. This difference was statistically significant (p=0.001)., Conclusion: The efficacy of the ICS which resulted to be higher in the group 1 compared to the group 2. Overall, our data suggest that the Ficoll procedure before incubation is suitable for the clinical routine in the ICS for haploidentical transplantation in patients affected by thalassemia., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background Aims: Immunomagnetic cell selection (ICS) of CD34(+) cells is being used increasingly in allogeneic transplantation in order to reduce T-cell quantity. The aim of this study was to evaluate an automated washing protocol before immunomagnetic selection., Methods: The automated method was compared with a conventional washing procedure. In the study group the cell processing using the automated procedure, both before and after antibody incubation, was performed with a Sepax S-100 device. The efficacy of the automated procedure was compared with the control group, where washing were performed using a standard method., Results: The results obtained after pre-incubation washing performed using the automated system showed a total nucleated cell (NC) and CD34(+) cell recovery of 84.87% (71.80-105, SD 8.62; range, standard deviation) and 83.45% (47-109, SD 16.12), respectively. The NC and CD34(+) cell recovery after the pre-incubation washing cycle was performed using the standard method was 75.54% (38.36-97.76, SD 22.5) and 61.51% (30.87-81.79, SD 19.3), respectively. The CD34(+) cell recovery after ICS was 51.27% (13.77-98.82, SD 24.97) and 48.89% (15.57-88.24, SD 25.91) for group 1 and group 2, respectively. The average purity in group 1 was 86.46% (67.4-96.10, SD 13.07) and in group 2 84.97% (58.1-97.8, SD 15.58)., Conclusions: The efficacy of the ICS led to an optimal purity without affecting cell recovery, which was higher in group 1. Overall, our data suggest that the automated method is suitable for washing hematopoietic progenitor cell apheresis (HPC-A) concentrates before immunomagnetic cell selection in daily clinical routines.

γ/δ T cells represent a subset of T cells expressing a T cell receptor (TCR) variant composed of gamma and delta chains. The γ/δ TCR is expressed by 2-10% of all T cells in human peripheral blood, whereas the majority of T cells express α/β TCRs. γ/δ T cells display a range of innate effector functions including rapid secretion of chemokines and cytokines, as well as target cell lysis. Recent interest has focused on the function of γ/δ T lymphocytes in allogeneic transplantation in the onco-hematology field. Several studies, in vitro and in vivo, suggest that γ/δ T lymphocytes are potential beneficial effector cells in the context of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). In addition, in this review, we discuss the depletion of α/β T lymphocytes in the graft for allogeneic transplantation. In fact, an efficient TCR α/β cell depletion potentially reduces the risk of GvHD. Furthermore, TCR α/β T cell depletion, especially with immunomagnetic negative selection, retains other potential beneficial effector cells in the graft, such as γ/δ T cells, NK cells, and stem cells. These "facilitating" cells might facilitate engraftment, exert GvL effects, and reduce the risk for infections., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.)

BACKGROUND: Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is commonly used to treat several oncohematologic diseases. The autologous hematopoietic progenitor cells collected through apheresis (HPC-A) must be cryopreserved and stored before use in vivo. Cell processing that precedes cryopreservation of HPC-A includes volume reduction aimed at reducing the amount of dimethyl sulfoxide used, as well as storage space. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The aim of our study was to assess the effectiveness of volume reduction performed with an automated closed system, namely, the Sepax S100 cell separation device (Biosafe SA). A total of 165 procedures were carried out on concentrates collected from 104 adult and pediatric patients. As a control group, 30 HPC-A units processed according to the standard method (i.e., centrifugation at a speed of 850 × g for 10 minutes, followed by manual plasma reduction) were evaluated. RESULTS: The volume reduction obtained was 59% (range, 20.54%-84.21%; standard deviation [SD], ±12.19%), going from 236 mL (range, 100-443 mL; SD, ±80.41 mL) to 97 mL (range, 33.00-263.00 mL; SD, ±47.41 mL); recovery of nucleated cells was 90% (range, 64.84%-105.93%; SD, ±8.76%), while that of CD34+ cells was 91% (range, 59.30%-119.37%; SD, ±13.30%). These values did not differ from those obtained using the standard method. Automated processing required 20 minutes versus 40 minutes of manual processing. DISCUSSION: Our data demonstrate that volume reduction carried out with the Sepax S100 automated system was particularly effective; cell recovery was excellent and the time spent was short. Moreover, the closed system allows cell processing to be carried out in a contamination-controlled environment, in accordance with good manufacturing practice guidelines. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]