Search

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) is a potentially curative treatment for both malignant and nonmalignant hematologic diseases; however, reported rates of treatment-related mortality approach 30%. Outcomes are worse in patients who begin HCT with functional impairments. To detect such impairments, a geriatric assessment (GA) is recommended in adults age ≥65 years. Younger HCT candidates also may be impaired because of chemotherapy regimens pre-HCT. Therefore, we hypothesized that GA can be beneficial for adult patients of all ages and subsequently created a clinical pretransplantation optimization program to assess all HCT candidates using a modified GA. One-hundred fifty-seven patients were evaluated in 4 functional domains- physical, cognitive, nutritional, and psychological-at 2 time points prior to HCT-new patient evaluation (NPE) and sign-off (SO)-between October 2017 and January 2020. At NPE, 80.9% of the patients had at least 1 domain with a functional impairment, and physical (P = .006), cognitive (P = .04), and psychological (P = .04) impairments were associated with an increased likelihood of not proceeding to HCT. In addition, patients age 18 to 39 years were more likely than older patients to have a physical function impairment (P = .001). Between NPE and SO, 51.9% of the patients had resolution of 1 or more impairments, and nutritional impairment at SO was predictive of worse overall survival (P = .01). Our study shows that GA can identify functional impairments in patients of all ages. Early identification of impairments could facilitate referrals to supportive care and resolution of impairments prior to HCT, suggesting that GA could be recommended for HCT candidates of all ages., (Copyright © 2022 The American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background Several professional societies have established nutrition guidelines for patients undergoing HSCT. We surveyed HSCT programs to understand how these compare with clinical practice. Methods Qualitative surveys were emailed to HSCT dietitians. Surveys addressed malnutrition screening; dietary recommendations including nutrition support, graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), immune enhancing nutrients, and prebiotics/probiotics; and nutrition-related preventive care screening. Results Twenty adult programs (19 United States (US), 1 Australia) and 3 pediatric programs (3 US) responded. Annual volume across the 22 US programs was 5405 patients, representing 25% of all transplants in the US. Nineteen programs (83%) follow guidelines for nutrition screening and fourteen for nutrition therapy in the inpatient setting (Table 1); six (26%) follow guidelines for screening and therapy in the outpatient setting. All programs adhere to food safety recommendations and 5 (22%) have additional institutional precautions. However, only 2 programs (9%) report frequent adherence to guidelines for use of enteral nutrition. While there are no guidelines for GVHD diet and uncertainty over alternative nutrition practices, 8 programs (35%) follow a stepwise GVHD diet; 4 (17%) allow immunonutrition supplements; 2 (9%) allow prebiotics, and 7 (30%) allow probiotics after the resolution of neutropenia. With regard to adherence to preventive screening recommendations, only 4 programs (17%) screen for diabetes, 6 (26%) screen for hyperlipidemia, and none screen for abdominal obesity. There are no guidelines for vitamin D deficiency screening, but 10 programs (43%) screen for this. Discussion Wide variations in nutrition practices exist across HSCT programs. Similarly, with the exception of food safety recommendations, there are also wide variations in adherence to established nutrition guidelines. The use of enteral nutrition and preventive screening is particularly varied. Efforts are needed to understand barriers to guideline implementation and their correlation to patient outcomes. Further research is needed regarding new interventions such as immunonutrition, prebiotics, and probiotics. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) is an increasingly common and curative treatment strategy to improve survival among individuals malignant and nonmalignant diseases, with over one million HCTs having been performed worldwide. Neurocognitive dysfunction is a common and untoward consequence of HCT for many recipients, although few studies have examined the profile of neurocognitive impairments in HCT or their association with clinical features, such as frailty. We examined the pattern and correlates of pre-transplant neurocognitive dysfunction in a prospective sample of adults undergoing HCT. Neurocognition was assessed using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment Battery. Frailty was assessed using the Short Physical Performance Battery. Linear regression analysis was used to examine the associations between neurocognitive performance and frailty. Profiles of neurocognitive performance were also examined by partitioning MoCA scores into relevant domains of interest, including Executive Function and Memory. Regression analyses controlled for age, gender, education, and disease type. One hundred and ten adults were evaluated across a wide age range (range: 19-75; mean age = 54.7 [SD = 14.1]). Neurocognitive performance tended to fall below published normative levels (mean MoCA = 25.5 [SD = 4.1]), with 20% of participants demonstrating impaired performance compared with medical patients (score < 24) and 34% exhibiting impaired performance relative to healthy normative samples (score <26). Examination of cognitive profiles revealed that while mild impairments in Executive Function were common across the entire sample, greater age was most closely associated with worse Memory performance (r = -0.33, P<.01) and greater levels of short physical performance battery score were most strongly associated with worse Executive Function (r = -0.39, P<.01). Neurocognitive impairments are common among adults undergoing HCT and the pattern of performance varies by age. Frailty is a strong correlate of neurocognitive function and particularly Executive Function components. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]