Search

Background: Histologic transformation (HT) is an important event with adverse prognosis in the natural history of indolent lymphomas. There are minimal data on HT in the Australian setting., Aims: To characterise patients with biopsy-proven HT and their outcomes identified at a tertiary Australian Hospital., Methods: All patients with biopsy-proven HT during a 15-year period (2002-2017) were included. Clinico-pathological data were systematically collected from review of patient records. Survival estimates were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. Associations between variables and clinical outcomes were evaluated using Cox's proportional hazards model., Results: A cohort of 45 patients was identified with a median age of 66 years and the majority (59%) having high-risk disease (Revised-International Prognostic Index score ≥3). R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisolone) induction was used in 69%, with an overall response rate of 82% (complete response (CR), 75%). Sixty-one percent of these induction responders received consolidation, with autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) performed in only 17% and rituximab maintenance given to 31%. With a median follow up of 47 months (range: 4-136), the 5-year overall survival (OS) was 69% (95% CI: 52%, 81%). Chemotherapy-naivety at HT was associated with a superior rate of CR (84% vs 54%, P = 0.057) and 5-year OS (82% vs 46%, P = 0.012). Rituximab maintenance was associated with a durable progression-free survival in induction responders., Conclusions: Excellent OS was observed in this modern cohort of patients treated with rituximab-containing induction and low rate of consolidation by ASCT, particularly in those who were chemotherapy-naïve at HT., (© 2020 Royal Australasian College of Physicians.)

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is an uncommon and typically aggressive form of lymphoma. Although often initially chemosensitive, relapse is common. Several induction and conditioning regimens are used in transplant-eligible patients, and the optimal approach remains unknown. We performed an international, retrospective study of transplant-eligible patients to assess impact of induction chemoimmunotherapy and conditioning regimens on clinical outcomes. We identified 228 patients meeting inclusion criteria. Baseline characteristics were similar among the induction groups except for some variation in age. The type of induction chemoimmunotherapy received did not influence overall response rates (ORRs) (0.43), progression-free survival (PFS) (P > .67), or overall survival (OS) (P > .35) on multivariate analysis (PFS and OS). Delivery of autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) was associated with favorable PFS and OS (0.01) on univariate analysis only; this benefit was not seen on multivariate analysis-PFS (0.36) and OS (0.21). Compared with busulfan and melphalan (BuMel), the use of the carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine, melphalan (BEAM)-conditioning regimen was associated with inferior PFS (HR = 2.0 [95% CI 1.1-3.6], 0.02) but not OS (HR = 1.1 [95% CI 0.5-2.3], 0.81) on univariate analysis only. Within the limits of a retrospective study and modest power for some comparisons, type of induction therapy did not influence ORR, PFS, or OS for transplant-eligible patients with MCL. International efforts are required to perform randomized clinical trials evaluating chemoimmunotherapy induction regimens., (© 2019 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.)