Search

Introduction: This study explored the efficacy of repeat blood cultures in bacteremic acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT)., Methods: This was a retrospective study of AML patients who experienced febrile neutropenia (FN) and bacteremia following HSCT at the Taussig Cancer Center from January 1, 2019, to December 31, 2022. The primary endpoint was the rate of positive repeat blood cultures following initial positive blood culture., Results: Fifty patients were included in the study. There were 50 occurrences of FN with positive initial blood cultures that were diagnosed following HSCT. Fifty initial sets of blood cultures and 96 sets of repeat blood cultures were drawn between the 50 occurrences of FN. Twelve of 96 (12.5%) repeat blood culture sets were positive for a pathogen, which occurred over nine of 50 (18.0%) episodes of FN. Three of 96 (3.2%) repeat blood culture sets grew a pathogen that differed from the pathogen that grew in the preceding positive blood culture., Conclusion: Among bacteremic AML patients in the post-HSCT period, the yield of repeat blood cultures for detecting previously detected and new pathogens was low., (© 2024 The Author(s). Transplant Infectious Disease published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Recently there has been a growing interest in evaluating body composition as a marker for prognosis in cancer patients. The association of body composition parameters and outcomes has not been deeply investigated in patients with autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) recipients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 264 NHL patients who received autologous HSCT. PreHSCT abdominal CT scans at the levels of L3 were assessed for body composition measures. We evaluated sarcopenia, myosteatosis, high visceral adipose tissue (VAT) and high visceral adipose tissue density (VATD). Using multivariable Cox proportional regression, we analyzed the association of clinical and transplant-related characteristics with overall survival (OS), relapse-free survival (RFS), and non-relapse mortality (NRM). In a multivariate regression model, patients with higher VATD had worse OS (HR 1.78; 95% confidence intervals CI 1.08-2.95, p = 0.02) and worse NRM (HR 2.31 95% CI 1.08-4.95, p = 0.02) than with lower VATD. Patients with lower levels of VAT also had worse RFS (HR 1.49 95% CI 1.03-2.15, p = 0.03). Sarcopenia and myosteatosis were not associated with outcomes. High pre-transplant VATD was associated with lower OS and higher NRM, and low pre-transplant VAT was associated with worse RFS in patients with NHL undergoing autologous HSCT., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.)

Systemic Light chain (AL) amyloidosis is a monoclonal plasma cell proliferative disorder characterized by deposition of amyloidogenic monoclonal light chain fragments causing organ dysfunction. It is a fatal disease and if not diagnosed and treated early can lead to organ failure and potentially death. The renal system along with the cardiovascular system are the most common organs involved but other organs such as gut and liver can be involved as well. The initial evaluation of patients requires confirming the diagnosis with tissue biopsy and staining with Congo red followed by confirmatory typing with mass spectrometry of the Congo red positive tissue. Then establishing the extent of the organs involvement by various staging and biomarkers testing. The treatment options and the tolerability of therapy depend on the disease staging, frailty, and co-morbidities. The autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) after high dose melphalan therapy is an effective strategy which is usually done after initial bortezomib induction therapy. Unfortunately, most systemic AL amyloidosis patients are not candidate for HCT due to frailty, old age, multi-organ involvement, renal and heart failure at the time of diagnosis. While it is widely accepted that the patients need to be treated until they achieve complete hematologic response, the maintenance therapy after HCT is not well established in AL amyloidosis. In this review, we report the literature on the latest treatment updates of AL amyloidosis and the ongoing clinical trials highlighting the future treatments.

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) is indicated in pediatric patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) who have relapsed or are at a very high risk of relapse during first complete remission. Two types of myeloablative conditioning are employed before allogeneic HSCT: total body irradiation (TBI)-based regimens and chemotherapy (CHT) alone. This study compares the efficacy and safety of TBI-based regimens and CHT-based conditioning in pediatric, adolescent, and young adult patients with ALL (0-24 years old). TBI-based and CHT-conditioning regimens were evaluated in 4262 and 1367 patients, respectively, from 15 studies. Compared to CHT alone, TBI-based regimens were associated with better overall survival (OS), relative risk (RR) 1.21, better event-free survival (RR 1.34), and a reduced risk of relapse (RR 0.69). Both approaches had comparable risk of acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), grades 3 to 4 acute GVHD, chronic GVHD, and nonrelapse mortality (NRM). In the subgroup analysis for patients in first complete remission, TBI-based regimens and CHT alone had comparable OS and NRM. Our results demonstrate the superiority of TBI-based regimens compared to CHT alone in pediatric patients with ALL., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Light-chain (AL) amyloidosis is a type of plasma cell neoplasm with abnormal monoclonal immunoglobulin light-chain production and their subsequent deposition in tissues causing end-organ damage. In addition to existing treatments including autologous stem cell transplantation, there is a need for other approaches for eradicating abnormal plasma cells and amyloid tissue deposits. Treatment strategies of AL amyloidosis are mostly based on medications that are effective in multiple myeloma due to similar cell of origin. Daratumumab along with proteasome inhibitors and corticosteroids has become standard of care for AL amyloidosis. Another appealing approach is disassembling amyloid deposits with hope to potentially reverse the damage done by the disease. This was met with promising results for CAEL-101 and birtamimab. Although still in early stages, novel treatment options in pipeline, including antibody-drug conjugates, bispecific T-cell engagers, and chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy may diversify the treatment armamentarium of AL amyloidosis in the future., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest declaration Faiz Anwer - Consultant and Speaker for BMS. Shahzad Raza - Advisory Board - Kite, Incyte. The other authors do not have any financial or non-financial potential conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

ALLO-715 is a first-in-class, allogeneic, anti-BCMA CAR T cell therapy engineered to abrogate graft-versus-host disease and minimize CAR T rejection. We evaluated escalating doses of ALLO-715 after lymphodepletion with an anti-CD52 antibody (ALLO-647)-containing regimen in 43 patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma as part A of the ongoing first-in-human phase 1 UNIVERSAL trial. Primary objectives included determination of the safety and tolerability of ALLO-715 and the safety profile of the ALLO-647-containing lymphodepletion regimen. Key secondary endpoints were response rate and duration of response. Grade ≥3 adverse events were reported in 38 (88.0%) of patients. Cytokine release syndrome was observed in 24 patients (55.8%), with 1 grade ≥3 event (2.3%) and neurotoxicity in 6 patients (14%), with no grade ≥3 events. Infections occurred in 23 patients (53.5%), with 10 (23.3%) of grade ≥3. Overall, 24 patients (55.8%) had a response. Among patients treated with 320 × 10 6 CAR + T cells and a fludarabine-, cyclophosphamide- and ALLO-647-based lymphodepletion regimen (n = 24), 17 (70.8%) had a response including 11 (45.8%) with very good partial response or better and 6 (25%) with a complete response/stringent complete response. The median duration of response was 8.3 months. These initial results support the feasibility and safety of allogeneic CAR T cell therapy for myeloma., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature America, Inc.)

Background: Hepatic veno-occlusive disease (VOD), also termed as sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS), is a lethal complication after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Various factors put patients undergoing allogeneic HSCT at an increased risk for VOD. Thrombomodulin (TM) is an important factor which has a wide range of effects, including anticoagulant, anti-inflammatory, angiogenic, and protective effect, on endothelial cells. It plays a role in preventing excessive coagulation and thrombosis by binding with thrombin and inhibiting the coagulation cascade. There are a limited number of options for the prevention of this fatal complication. Recombinant thrombomodulin (rTM), an endothelial anticoagulant co-factor, as prophylactic therapy might be able to prevent veno-occlusive complications after stem cell transplantation., Methods: A literature search was performed on PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science. We used the following Mesh terms and Emtree terms, "Hepatic Veno-Occlusive Diseases" OR "Sinusoidal Obstruction" OR "Stem Cell Transplantations " AND "Thrombomodulin" from the inception of data up to April 1, 2021. The PICO (Patient/Population, Intervention, Comparison and Outcomes) framework was used for the literature search., Results: For the VOD incidence after HSCTstem cell transplantation, the result was in favor of rTM with a risk ratio (RR) of 0.53 (I 2 = 0%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.32-0.89). The incidence of transplant-associated thrombotic microangiopathy (TA-TMA) after HSCT was reduced in rTM group. The RR for incidence of TA-TMA was 0.48 (I 2 = 62%, 95% CI = 0.20-1.17) favoring rTM. The RR for incidence of graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) was also lower in rTM group, 0.48 (I 2 = 64%, 95% CI = 0.32-0.72)., Conclusion: In our meta-analysis, we evaluate the efficacy and safety of rTM in the prevention of SOS after HSCT. According to our results, rTM use led to a significant reduction in SOS episodes, TA-TMA, and GvHD after HSCT.

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a serious complication commonly experienced in cancer patients. Incidence of VTE typically brings poor prognosis as it represents the second most common cause of mortality in cancer patients just after the malignancy itself. Studies suggest that multiple myeloma (MM) is among the malignancies with further enhanced risk of VTE, especially in patients undergoing autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (AHCT). However, risk factors and preventative approaches remain poorly explored. Here, we explore the incidence of VTE in MM patients undergoing AHCT, while also highlighting risk factors and preventions that may aid in preventing VTE in patients who are at higher risk.

Engraftment syndrome (ES) is a non-infectious complication seen both in autologous and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplants and is characterized by the presence of non-infectious fever, diarrhea, skin rash, pulmonary infiltration, pulmonary edema, and deranged renal and liver function tests This review will be delineating the incidence of ES, important differential diagnoses to be considered and management options. The literature search was done through various databases like PubMed, Google scholar, Cochrane library, and EMBASE. The incidence of engraftment syndrome was ranging from 8 to 50% in patients undergoing Autologous stem cell transplantation while the incidence was 10-77% in patients undergoing Allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Fever was the most commonly observed symptom of ES in both Autologous and Allogeneic stem cell transplantation while the second most frequently reported symptom was non-infectious diarrhea in patients undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation and Skin rash in patients with Allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Pro-inflammatory cytokines and immune response dysregulation were highlighted as the mechanism behind ES development. The significant difference between ES and aGVHD was observed based on cytokines, with IL-12, IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α, and IFN-γ levels in plasma being higher in patients with ES as compared to patients with aGVHD. Intravenous methylprednisolone was used as the treatment of choice in the majority of the studies. Overall the incidence of ES was high in patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cells transplantation. The survival in patients developing ES was less compared to those who did not develop ES. Engraftment syndrome is one of the complications following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation that need early identification, differentiation from infectious complications, and aGVHD and timely initiation of corticosteroids therapy., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

There is increasing evidence regarding the role of various maintenance therapy (MT) strategies after initial induction to treat newly diagnosed transplant-ineligible patients with MM. We reviewed the literature on available regimens for patients with transplant-ineligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM). Lenalidomide (R)-based regimens are still the front-line therapy, but there is an increasing use of bortezomib-based regimens. The MT regimen is mainly based on the initial induction regimen. MT has shown survival benefits compared with patients without maintenance therapy. The most common adverse effects of MT include anemia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, infections, and peripheral neuropathy. In conclusion, induction followed by maintenance based on lenalidomide, bortezomib, ixazomib, or daratumumab-based regimens has shown promising results. Therefore, it is essential to conduct more clinical trials to better understand the role of MT in the treatment of NDMM patients who are not candidates for autologous stem cell transplantation., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Despite routine evaluation of cytogenetics in myeloma, little is known regarding the impact of high-dose therapy (HDT) consolidation on overall survival (OS) or progression-free survival (PFS) in patients who have high-risk cytogenetics. The authors performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to assess the heterogeneity of HDT efficacy according to cytogenetic risk., Methods: All RCTs in patients who had newly diagnosed myeloma from 2000 to 2021 that compared upfront HDT versus standard-dose therapy (SDT) consolidation were included. The primary objective was to assess the difference in HDT efficacy between standard-risk and high-risk cytogenetics in terms of the OS or PFS log(hazard ratio) (HR). The pooled OS and PFS HR was calculated according to cytogenetic-risk subgroup using a random-effects model, and heterogeneity (I 2 ) (the percentage of total observed variability explained by between-study differences) was assessed using an interaction test., Results: After screening 3307 citations, 6 RCTs were included for PFS analysis, and 4 were included for OS analysis. The median follow-up ranged from 3.1 to 7.8 years. The pooled OS HR for HDT versus SDT consolidation in patients with standard-risk and high-risk cytogenetics was 0.90 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.70-1.17; I 2 = 0%) and 0.66 (95% CI, 0.45-0.97; I 2 = 0%), respectively. The difference in HDT efficacy in terms of OS between standard-risk and high-risk patients was statistically significant in favor of the high-risk group (P for interaction = .03). The pooled PFS HR for HDT versus SDT was 0.65 (95% CI 0.56-0.76; I 2 = 0%) versus 0.52 (95% CI, 0.33-0.83; I 2 = 55%), respectively. The difference in HDT efficacy in terms of PFS between standard-risk and high-risk patients was not significant (P for interaction = .25)., Conclusions: The magnitude of OS benefit with upfront HDT is cytogenetics-dependent. Patients with high-risk cytogenetics should preferably receive upfront rather than delayed HDT consolidation., Lay Summary: Upfront autologous stem cell transplantation improves overall survival in patients with newly diagnosed myeloma harboring high-risk cytogenetics., (© 2022 American Cancer Society.)

Objective/background: Relapse is the most common cause of treatment failure after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT). No standard of care exists, and a wide range of treatments are used for post-alloHCT relapse. In the recent era, several novel therapies including targeted agents are available for acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL), acute myeloid leukemia (AML), and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS)., Methods: We reviewed outcomes after alloHCT relapse, with or without use of these newer agents for ALL, AML, and MDS. In total, 115 adults with relapsed or refractory ALL (n = 17), AML (n = 67), and MDS (n = 31) at median 5 (range, 1-64) months after their first alloHCT in 2010-2018 were included., Results: Median follow-up was 19 (range, 6-80) months after relapse from alloHCT. Targeted agents were given to 29 (25%) patients. In multivariable analysis, use of targeted agent at any time point after relapse was not associated with survival. Matched unrelated (vs. matched sibling; hazard ratio [HR] 1.70; p = .027) or haploidentical donor grafts (vs. matched sibling; HR 2.69; p = .003), presence of grade II-IV acute graft-versus-host disease before relapse (HR 2.46; p < .001), and less than 12 months from HCT to relapse (<6 vs. > 12 months; HR 6.34; p < .001; 6-12 vs. > 12 months; HR 3.16; p = .005) were adverse prognostic factors for post-relapse survival., Conclusion: Outcomes after alloHCT relapse remain poor regardless of the novel agent use. Innovative treatment strategies are needed to improve outcomes after relapse post-alloHCT., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2020 King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Treatment options for newly diagnosed aplastic anemia (AA) patient includes upfront allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) or immunosuppressive therapy (IST). With recent advances in supportive care, conditioning regimens and post-transplant immunosuppression the overall survival for HSCT approaches 70-90%. Transplant eligibility needs to be assessed considering age, comorbidities, donor availability and probability of response to immunosuppressive therapy (IST). Upfront HSCT should be offered to children and young adults with matched related donor (MRD). Upfront HSCT may also be offered to children and young adults with rapidly available matched unrelated donor (MUD) who require urgent HSCT. Bone marrow (BM) graft source and cyclosporine (CsA) plus methotrexate (MTX) as graft versus host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis are preferable when using anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) based conditioning regimens. Alemtuzumab is an acceptable alternative to ATG and is used with CsA alone and with either BM or peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC). Cyclophosphamide (CY) plus ATG conditioning is preferable for patients receiving MRD transplant, while Fludarabine (Flu) based conditioning is reserved for older adults, those with risk factors of graft failure and those receiving MUD HSCT. For haploidentical transplant, use of low dose radiotherapy and post-transplant cyclophosphamide has resulted in a marked reduction in graft failure and GVHD., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Management of rare hematological disorders pose unique diagnostic and therapeutic challenges due to unusual occurrence and limited treatment options. We retrospectively identified 45 patients receiving matched related donor transplant for rare hematological disorders from 2006 to 2019. Patients were divided into two groups (1) malignant and (2) non malignant. The malignant disorder group included four patients while the nonmalignant group included 41 patients divided into immune dysregulation (n = 23), bone marrow failure (n = 10), metabolic (n = 5), and bleeding diathesis (n = 3). Twenty-six (57.8%) patients received myeloablative conditioning (MAC) and 16 (35.6%) received reduced intensity conditioning (RIC), while 3 (6.6%) patients with severe combined immunodeficiency received stem cell infusion alone without conditioning. The cumulative incidence (CI) of grade II-IV acute GVHD (aGVHD) was 39.1% (n = 18) and chronic GVHD (cGVHD) 15.2% (n = 7). There was no primary graft failure while CI of secondary graft failure was 9%. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) was 82.2% and 77.8% respectively. Group wise OS was 75% in the malignant group, 82.6% in the immune dysregulation group, 80% in patients with metabolic disorders and bone marrow failure, while 100% in patients with bleeding diathesis. This retrospective analysis shows that hematopoietic stem cell transplant can be a feasible treatment option for rare hematological disorders.

Cyclosporine (CsA) combined with short-course methotrexate is considered standard-of-care graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis for patients with severe aplastic anemia (AA) who undergo transplantation using cyclophosphamide (Cy) plus anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) conditioning. However, there is no consensus on optimal post-transplant GVHD prophylaxis for patients undergoing matched related donor (MRD) transplantation using fludarabine (Flu)-based conditioning. We conducted a single-center retrospective analysis of patients with acquired AA (n = 106) undergoing MRD transplantation from July 2007 through January 2019. All patients received Flu-Cy-ATG conditioning and single-agent CsA as GVHD prophylaxis. Median age of the study cohort was 20 years (range, 3 to 52) and male to female ratio was 3.8:1. Median time from diagnosis to transplant was 11.5 months (range, 2.8 to 62). Graft source was bone marrow harvest in 71 (68%), combined bone marrow and peripheral blood stem cells in 34 (31%), and peripheral blood alone in 1 (1%) patient. Cumulative incidence of neutrophil engraftment at day 28 was 93.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 87.3% to 97.1%) while that of platelet engraftment at day 100 was 90.5% (95% CI, 84% to 96%). Cumulative incidence of primary graft failure at day 28 was 6.6% (95% CI, 4% to 8%) while secondary graft failure occurred at a median of 190 days (range, 90 to 415) at a cumulative incidence of 3.7% (95% CI, 2% to 5%). Cumulative incidence of grade II to IV acute GVHD at day 100 was 3.8% (95% CI, 1.4% to 9.9%), while a 1-year probability of chronic GVHD was calculated as 7.5% (95% CI, 2.6% to 15%). Median follow-up post-transplant was 61 months (range, 6 to 144). Overall survival was 84.9%, disease-free survival was 80.2%, and GVHD-free relapse-free survival was 76.3%. This study indicates that single-agent cyclosporine is a feasible option for GVHD prophylaxis in MRD hematopoietic stem cell transplantation using Flu-Cy-ATG conditioning and is associated with very low rates of acute and chronic GVHD., (Copyright © 2020 American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. All rights reserved.)

Relapse after stem cell transplantation for Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) remains a significant challenge. In this systematic review, we compare survival outcomes of second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) nilotinib and dasatinib with first-generation TKI imatinib when these agents are used after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) in Ph+ ALL. In addition, we review the literature on TKI use to prevent relapse in patients who proceed to allo-HSCT beyond first complete response (>CR1). We performed database searches (inception to January 2018) using PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase. After exclusions, 17 articles were included in this analysis. Imatinib was used post-transplant either prophylactically or preemptively in 12 studies, 7 prospective studies and 5 retrospective studies. Overall survival (OS) for most prospective studies at 1.5 to 3 and 5 years ranged between 62% to 92% and 74.5% to 86.7%. Disease-free survival at 1.5 to 5 years was 60.4% to 92%. Additionally, imatinib failed to show survival benefit in patients who were >CR1 at the time of allo-HSCT. The cumulative OS for most retrospective studies using imatinib at 1 to 2 and 3 to 5 years was 42% to 100% and 33% to 40% respectively. Event-free survival at 1 to 2 and 3 to 5 years was 33.3% to 67% and 20% to 31% respectively. Dasatinib was used as maintenance treatment in 3 retrospective studies (n = 34). The OS for patients with Ph+ ALL using dasatinib as maintenance regimen after allo-HSCT at 1.4 to 3 years was 87% to 100% and disease-free survival at 1.4 to 3 years was 89% to 100%. Ninety-three percent of patients with minimal residual disease (MRD) positive status after allo-HSCT became MRD negative. Three prospective studies used nilotinib. In 2 studies where investigators studied patients with advanced chronic myeloid leukemia and Ph+ ALL, the cumulative OS and event-free survival at 7.5 months to 2 years were 69% to 84% and 56% to 84%, respectively. In the third study (n = 5) in patients with Ph+ ALL, nilotinib use resulted in OS at 5 years of 60%. Our review showed that use of TKIs (all generations) after allo-HSCT for patients in CR1 improved OS when given as a prophylactic or preemptive regimen. Limited data suggest that second-generation TKIs (ie, dasatinib) have a better OS, especially in patients with MRD-positive status. Imatinib did not improve OS in patients who were >CR1 at the time of allo-HSCT; for this population, no data were available with newer generation TKIs. The evaluation of survival benefit with newer generation TKIs and their efficacy in patients in >CR1 needs further study in large randomized clinical trials., (Copyright © 2019 American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Despite excellent transplant outcomes of aplastic anemia (AA) in developed countries, management in developing countries is challenging because of delay in the diagnosis, use of family donors for transfusions, and higher infection risk pretransplant. These factors can lead to allo-immunization, increased risk of graft failure, graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), and transplant-related mortality, leading to unfavorable outcomes. Conventional cyclophosphamide (Cy) and antithymocyte globulin (ATG) are associated with inferior overall survival in such high-risk patients. We conducted single-center retrospective analysis of high-risk AA patients (N = 147) enrolled consecutively and undergoing matched related donor transplant from March 2002 through October 2018. We included high-risk AA patients receiving fludarabine (Flu)-based conditioning. Median patient age was 20 years (range, 3 to 52). The median time from diagnosis to transplant was 11 months (range, 3 to 63). High-risk features included age ≥ 20 years in 55.8% of patients (n = 82), disease duration more than 3 months in 95 % (n = 140), RBC concentrates transfusions > 20 in 79.6% (n = 117), random donor platelet transfusion > 50 in 64.6% of patients (n = 95), and second hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) in 7.4% (11). We divided patients into 2 groups based on different conditioning regimens. Flu group 1 (Flu1) received Flu 120 to 150 mg/m 2 , Cy 120 to 200 mg/kg, and ATG 20 mg/kg, and Flu group 2 (Flu2) was given Flu 150 mg/m 2 , Cy 300 mg/m 2 , and ATG 20 mg/kg. Bone marrow stem cells were used as graft source in 97% of patients (n = 144) (alone in 52% and with peripheral blood stem cells in 45%). Cyclosporine alone was used for GVHD prophylaxis in 75% (n = 110) and cyclosporine plus methotrexate in 25% (n = 37). Median total nucleated cell dose was 5 × 10 8 /kg. Median days for neutrophil engraftment was 13 (range, 10 to 20) and platelet engraftment 20 (range, 14 to 43). Day 100 mortality was 7.5% (n = 11). Sustained successful engraftment was achieved in 87.8% of patients (n = 129). Most graft failures (40%) occurred in Flu2 conditioning (P = .000) and in patients with >2 risk factors (P = .000). Overall incidence of acute and chronic GVHD was 11.6% (n = 17) and 12.9% (n = 19), respectively, in Flu1 and Flu2 groups. Overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and GVHD-free relapse-free survival (GRFS) was 83.7%, 78.2%, and 70.7%, respectively. A trend toward improved OS was observed in patients receiving Flu1 conditioning but was statistically nonsignificant (P = .256), whereas DFS and GRFS were significantly better in Flu1 versus Flu2 (P = .004 and .001, respectively). When stratified per number of risk factors (age > 20, RBC concentrate > 20 or platelet > 50 random, duration > 3 months, previous HSCT), OS and DFS decreased significantly with increasing number of risk factors (P = .000 and .001, respectively). Patients are able to tolerate Flu-based conditioning well with lower rates of rejection and excellent long-term survival in high-risk AA patients. Cyclosporine alone as GVHD prophylaxis and marrow source stem cells as graft source are preferable options. Use of Flu plus low-dose Cy conditioning is associated with inferior survival outcomes. A randomized trial of Flu-based versus conventional Cy-containing conditioning would be helpful in establishing a standard of care conditioning regimen in high-risk AA patients., (Copyright © 2019 American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. All rights reserved.)

Blinatumomab and donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) combination is a promising cancer therapy, whereby blinatumomab might achieve an initial reduction in leukemic-cell burden using T cells, and after tumor clearance, DLI can potentially stimulate the donor immune system to achieve longer lasting remission. Here, we present a 51-year-old female with mixed phenotype acute leukemia who had a hematologic relapse 3 months after she received total body irradiation-based myeloablative allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation from an unrelated human leukocyte antigen matched (10/10) donor and achieved complete remission with minimal residual disease negativity by multi-parameter flow cytometry using the combination of blinatumomab and DLI. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report to describe the use of blinatumomab and DLI combination therapy in the treatment of B/myeloid mixed phenotype acute leukemia.

Investigators are using checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) to treat aggressive hematologic malignancies in patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) and in some patients with relapsed disease after allo-HSCT. CTLA-4 inhibitors and PD-1 inhibitors are 2 main types of CPIs, which work through activation of the immune system. On one hand, CPIs can achieve graft-versus-tumor effect, and on the other hand, there is a risk of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). After a comprehensive literature review, we included data (n = 283) from 24 studies (11 original manuscripts and 13 case reports or case series) and evaluated the results to assess the safety and efficacy of CPI use in conjunction with allo-HSCT. Among the 283 patients, 107 received CPI before allo-HSCT, and 176 received CPI after allo-HSCT. The most common indication for CPI use was for Hodgkin lymphoma. The CPIs used in various studies included ipilimumab, nivolumab, and pembrolizumab. Among the patients exposed to CPI before allo-HSCT, 56% developed acute GVHD and 29% developed chronic GVHD. Investigators reported 20 deaths, 60% of which were GVHD-related. The overall mortality risk with GVHD is 11%. In this group, investigators noted an objective response rate (ORR) in 68% of patients, with complete remission (CR) in 47%, partial remission (PR) in 21%, and stable disease in 11%. Among the patients who received a CPI after allo-HSCT for disease relapse, 14% developed acute GVHD and 9% developed chronic GVHD. Investigators reported 40 deaths, 28% of which were GVHD-related. The mortality risk with GVHD is approximately 7%. Investigators reported ORR in 54% of patients, with CR in 33%, PR in 21%, and disease stabilization in 5%. After careful evaluation of collective data, we found that CPI use both before and after allo-HSCT can be highly effective, but exposure can lead to a significantly increased risk of GVHD-related morbidity and mortality in this patient population. Despite limited availability of data, there is need for extreme caution while making decisions regarding the use of CPIs. Detailed discussions and prospective well-designed clinical trials are needed to explore this issue further., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Patients undergoing allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) are at a very high risk of hepatitis B virus reactivation (HBVr). Lamivudine is commonly used as prophylaxis against HBVr in high-risk patients undergoing allo-HSCT. Unfortunately, its efficacy is diminishing due to the development of HBV mutant drug-resistant strains. With the availability of newer antiviral agents such as entecavir, telbivudine, adefovir, and tenofovir, it is important to assess their role in HBVr prophylaxis. A comprehensive search of 7 databases was performed to evaluate efficacy of antiviral prophylaxis against HBVr in allo-HSCT patients (PubMed/Medline, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CINAHL, and ClinicalTrials.gov (June 21, 2017)). We identified 10 studies, with 2067 patients undergoing allo-HSCT; these primarily evaluated the use of lamivudine and entecavir as prophylaxis against HBVr in patients undergoing allo-HSCT because there were little or no data about adefovir, telbivudine, or tenofovir as prophylaxis in this specific patient population. Thus, included studies were categorized into 2 main prophylaxis groups: lamivudine and entecavir. Results of our meta-analysis suggest that entecavir is very effective against HBVr, although further clinical trials are required to test efficacy of new antivirals and explore the emerging threat of drug resistance., (Copyright © 2018 The American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory lymphoma may require allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT), but treatment of post-transplant relapse disease remains very challenging. Donor lymphocyte infusion and blinatumomab have been used with limited success for the treatment of relapse. Initial data on donor-derived CAR T cells has shown this modality to be safe and highly effective in various hematological malignancies. We present a case of a patient with highly refractory, transformed follicular lymphoma who failed both autologous and allogenic HSCT. Patient achieved long-lasting complete remission with the use of donor origin CD19 CAR T-cell therapy, without any evidence of graft-versus-host disease flare. Our patient later developed disseminated coccidioidomycosis and persistent hypogammaglobulinemia. Immunotherapy using CD19 CAR T cells can be a highly effective salvage modality, especially in cases of focal lymphoma relapse. Long-term immunosuppression secondary to B cell lymphopenia, hypogammaglobulinemia, immunoglobulin subclass deficiency, fungal infections and other infectious complications need to be monitored and promptly treated as indicated.

Purpose of Review: Chemotherapy remains the first-line therapy for aggressive lymphomas. However, 20-30% of patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) and 15% with Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) recur after initial therapy. We want to explore the role of high-dose chemotherapy (HDT) and autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) for these patients., Recent Findings: There is some utility of upfront consolidation for-high risk/high-grade B-cell lymphoma, mantle cell lymphoma, and T-cell lymphoma, but there is no role of similar intervention for HL. New conditioning regimens are being investigated which have demonstrated an improved safety profile without compromising the myeloablative efficiency for relapsed or refractory HL. Salvage chemotherapy followed by HDT and rescue autologous stem cell transplant remains the standard of care for relapsed/refractory lymphoma. The role of novel agents to improve disease-related parameters remains to be elucidated in frontline induction, disease salvage, and high-dose consolidation or in the maintenance setting.

Background: High-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell rescue is commonly used for the treatment of relapsed germ cell tumors. We report the first case of delayed rhabdomyolysis with paclitaxel, ifosfamide, carboplatin, and etoposide regimen., Case Presentation: We report a case of a 21-year-old African-American man diagnosed with relapsed non-seminomatous germ cell tumor who received high-dose chemotherapy with carboplatin and etoposide following TIGER trial arm B off-protocol. His course was complicated by muscle pain and rhabdomyolysis after cycle 4 on day +12 after infusion of autologous stem cells. To the best of our knowledge, this complication has not been reported with this regimen. A differential diagnosis of sepsis and neutropenic fever along with side effects of high-dose chemotherapy were considered, but based on the timing of events, it was concluded that the etiology of rhabdomyolysis is high-dose chemotherapy. Rhabdomyolysis was successfully treated with hydration and did not recur during subsequent cycle 5., Conclusions: Delayed rhabdomyolysis after high-dose chemotherapy with paclitaxel, ifosfamide, carboplatin, and etoposide regimen has not been previously reported and needs to be considered for preventive strategy and prompt diagnosis and treatment to avoid renal complications. Physicians should have a low threshold to check creatine kinase enzymes in patients with unexplained muscle pain or renal insufficiency after high-dose chemotherapy.

CD19, CD20 chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR T) cell therapy has shown promising results for the treatment of relapsed or refractory hematological malignancies. Best results have been reported in acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients with a complete response rate above 80%. Patients who received donor-derived CAR T cells for the relapsed malignancy after stem cell transplantation (allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplant) were identified from the published trials. A total of 72 patients from seven studies were treated with donor-derived CAR T cells. Only five out of 72 patients (6.9%) developed graft versus host disease. Use of donor-derived CAR T cell for relapse prophylaxis, minimal residual disease clearance or salvage from relapse is therefore highly effective, and risk of graft versus host disease flare is very low. Side effects include cytokine release syndrome, tumor lysis syndrome, B-cell aplasia along with CNS toxicity.

Initial treatment of chronic phase chronic myeloid leukaemia is straightforward in today's era of tyrosine kinase inhibitors. However, managing refractory cases remain a major challenge due to the multiple factors that can influence decision-making, including medication tolerance, disease burden, mutation status, comorbidities, availability of donor, and fitness for an ablative conditioning. We report a male patient presenting with chronic phase chronic myeloid leukaemia who was treated with 5 different tyrosine kinase inhibitors either due to intolerance and/or failed response. He subsequently received 2 haploidentical haematopoietic stem cells transplants before achieving complete remission. This case highlights various treatment options, need for vigilant disease monitoring, and the possibility of complete positive response even after many lines of therapy failure., (2016 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.)

A second allogeneic (allo) hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) is an important therapeutic consideration for patients relapsing after their first. We conducted a retrospective review of 41 pediatric patients with leukemia that underwent a second allo-HCT at our institution. Overall, 53.7 and 43.9 % of patients were alive and disease-free at 1 and 5 years, respectively, after the second allo-HCT. The factors affecting outcome by both univariate and multivariate analysis were interval between transplants and the use of a myeloablative conditioning (MAC) regimen prior to second transplant. Outcomes were inferior in patients who received their second transplant <6 months from their first HCT when compared to patients in whom the interval between HCTs was 6-12 or more than 12 months. Interval between HCTs was also significant when each type of leukemia (acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) n = 21, acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) n = 11, and chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) n = 7) was analyzed separately. In univariate analysis, use of the same donor and use of a matched sibling donor resulted in significant improved outcome. There was not a significant association between disease-free survival (DFS) and age, remission status, use of total body irradiation (TBI) before second HCT, or type of leukemia. Second allogeneic HCT can be a curative therapeutic option for leukemia patients relapsing after their first transplant. As more targeted therapies have become available, patients that relapse after first HCT are more likely to achieve remission. Therefore, it is anticipated that there will be more candidates for second HCT with improved performance and remission status, ultimately leading to a better outcome with the second HCT.

Data on real-world outcomes of axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) therapy for relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma (R/R LBCL) are limited. In this intent to treat (ITT) analysis, we reviewed records of 38 consecutive patients with R/R LBCL for whom axi-cel was intended. Twenty-seven (71%) patients received axi-cel and 11 (29%) did not. Patients in the non-axi-cel group had a higher hematopoietic cell transplantation comorbidity index (HCT-CI) (median 4 vs. 2, p =.04). Median overall survival for the ITT, axi-cel and non-axi-cel group was 10 (95% CI, 3.7 to 13), 13 (95% CI, 7.7 to N.R.) and 1 (95% CI, 0.4 to 3.7) month(s) respectively. Factors limiting axi-cel use were disease progression, sepsis, manufacturing failure and socioeconomic barrier in 6 (55%), 3 (27%), 1 (9%) and 1 (9%) patient(s) respectively. Additional strategies are needed to ensure all LBCL patients for whom chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy is prescribed can receive this treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background. Relapsed Ewing’s sarcoma (RES) is an aggressive malignancy with poor survival. Although high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) with autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) given after conventional chemotherapy (CC) has shown survival benefits, it is not generally used in the United States for RES. We performed a systemic review to evaluate the benefits of HDCT for RES. Methods. Literature search involved Medline, Embase, and Cochrane database. We included studies with RES patients treated with HDCT/ASCT. Results. Twenty-four studies with total of 345 reported RES patients that got HDCT were included in final analysis. Seventeen studies had patients with multiple malignancies including RES, while seven had only RES patients. At 2 and 3–5 years, event-free survival (EFS) in studies with only RES patients ranged 42–47% and 20–61% and overall survival (OS) ranged 50–66% and 33–77%, respectively. In studies with combined patients that reported outcomes of RES separately, the EFS at 1–3 and 4 years was 36–66% and 17–50%, respectively. The OS at 1-2 and 3-4 years was 40–60% and 50–70%. Conclusions. Most studies using HDCT/ASCT as consolidation regimen showed improved survival benefits compared to CC. Randomized controlled studies are needed to determine true clinical benefits of HDCT followed by ASCT in patients with RES. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Primary plasma cell leukemia (PCL) is a rare and aggressive variant of multiple myeloma (MM). PCL is characterized by peripheral blood involvement by malignant plasma cells and an aggressive clinical course leading to poor survival. There is considerable overlap between MM and PCL with respect to clinical, immunophenotypic, and cytogenetic features, but circulating plasma cell count exceeding 20% of peripheral blood leukocytes or an absolute plasma cell count of >2000/mm3 distinguishes it from MM. After initial stabilization and diagnosis confirmation, treatment of PCL in a fit patient typically includes induction combination chemotherapy containing novel agents typically, with proteasome inhibitors (such as bortezomib) and immunomodulatory drugs (eg, lenalidomide), followed by autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) and multidrug maintenance therapy using novel agents post-HSCT. Long-term outcomes have improved employing this strategy but the prognosis for non-HSCT candidates remains poor and new approaches are needed for such PCL patients not eligible for HSCT. Here, we report a case of primary PCL, and a comprehensive and up to date review of the literature for diagnosis and management of PCL. We also present the findings of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) scan. Since PCL is often associated with extra-medulary disease, including PET scan at the time of staging and restaging may be a novel approach particularly to evaluate the extra-medullary disease sites. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Transplant donors and recipients should be current on their vaccination schedule. • Post-transplant vaccination is crucial to prevent infections. • Transplant recipients should be vaccinated again endemic diseases before travel. • Live vaccines should be avoided in those in close contact with transplant patients. Vaccination is an effective strategy to prevent infections in immunocompromised hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients. Pretransplant vaccination of influenza, pneumococcus, Haemophilus influenza type b, diphtheria, tetanus, and hepatitis B, both in donors and transplant recipients, produces high antibody titers in patients compared with recipient vaccination only. Because transplant recipients are immunocompromised, live vaccines should be avoided with few exceptions. Transplant recipients should get inactive vaccinations when possible to prevent infection. This includes vaccination against influenza, pneumococcus, H. influenza type b, diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, meningococcus, measles, mumps, rubella, polio, hepatitis A, human papillomavirus, and hepatitis B. Close contacts of transplant recipients can safely get vaccinations (inactive and few live vaccines) as per their need and schedule. Transplant recipients who wish to travel may need to get vaccinated against endemic diseases that are prevalent in such areas. There is paucity of data on the role of vaccinations for patients receiving novel immunotherapy such as bispecific antibodies and chimeric antigen receptor T cells despite data on prolonged B cell depletion and higher risk of opportunistic infections. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Conditional survival (CS) is defined as the probability of surviving an additional x years given a patient has already survived y years since diagnosis or a time-point of interest. Although there are readily available overall survival (OS) estimates in multiple myeloma (MM) from the time of diagnosis or autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT), data on CS in those who had already survived a landmark time since ASCT are lacking. Our objective was to investigate 5-year CS rate and standardized mortality ratio (SMR) in 1-, 3- and 5-year survivors after front-line ASCT in MM. Method We reviewed the institutional transplant database at Cleveland Clinic to identify 340 patients who underwent frontline ASCT (≤18 months from diagnosis) for MM between 1996 and 2013. OS was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Relapse mortality (RM) and non-relapse mortality (NRM) were estimated with cumulative incidence. SMR was defined as the ratio of number of deaths in the study patients to that in an age, sex and race-matched healthy population. Estimates of outcomes and SMR are presented with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results We identified 309 survivors at 1 year, 246 at 3 years, and 178 at 5 years from ASCT. The median age at ASCT was 56 years (range, 22-76) in all 3 cohorts. The median time from diagnosis to ASCT was 7.9 months in 1- and 3-year and 8.2 months in 5-year survivors. Approximately 40%, 35%, and 25% of patients had ISS stage I, II and III disease respectively at diagnosis in all cohorts. Median follow-up from ASCT in surviving patients was 88 months, 90 months and 100 months in 1-, 3- and 5-year survivors respectively. Estimated 5-year CS was 59% (53-64) in 1-year survivors, 60% (53-67) in 3-year survivors and 62% (53-70) in 5-year survivors. The respective cumulative incidence of 5-year conditional RM was 34% (28-39), 29% (23-35) and 25% (18-33) and that of NRM was 7% (5-11), 11% (7-16) and 13% (8-19). The SMR of 1-year, 3-year and 5-year survivors was 6.9 (5.8-8.2), 6.1 (5.0-7.5) and 5.6 (4.3-7.3) respectively, indicating significantly worse survival compared to demographically-matched healthy population irrespective of the duration of survival after ASCT. Survival curves for the 3 cohorts are shown in Figure I. Conclusion The probability of surviving an additional 5 years in patients with MM undergoing front-line ASCT does not improve with time, as shown in 1-, 3- and 5-year survivors, with estimated 5-year CS staying constant at around 60%. However, a decrease in the magnitude of SMR was observed with increase in the number of years already survived after ASCT. Information on CS and SMR is a pragmatic resource for long-term survivorship and beneficial at an individual level for counselling patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Busulfan (Bu) based conditioning regimens are associated with serious toxicities including myelosuppression, hepatotoxicity, and sinusoidal obstructive syndrome (SOS). Previous literature reports increased risk of toxicities when the daily AUC concentrations exceed 6000 uM-minute. Bu TDM has also been associated with improved overall and progression free survival in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) recipients. We implemented real time pharmacokinetic (PK)-guided therapeutic dose monitoring (TDM) of Bu for myeloablative conditioning (MAC) regimens. Compare toxicity of IV Bu before and after implementation of TDM. The primary endpoint was incidence of hepatotoxicity, defined as days of elevation of AST or ALT > 3 times the upper limit of normal (ULN) or total bilirubin >1.5 times ULN. Secondary outcomes included time to neutrophil and platelet engraftment, duration of IV opioid administration, breakthrough antiemetic use, incidence of SOS, hospital length of stay (LOS), incidence of Bu dose adjustment, and repeat Bu PK. A Bu PK-guided TDM program was implemented in April 2018 for patients receiving busulfan/ cyclophosphamide (BuCy) MAC regimens for allo-HSCT. Medical records were retrospectively reviewed with weight-based dose (WBD) BuCy conditioning from August 2017 through March 2018 (N=14) and TDM from April 2018 through December 2018 (N=22). Bu was given at a fixed dose of 0.8 mg/kg/dose every 6 hours for 16 doses on days -8 to -4 for WBD patients. For TDM patients, after a WBD of 3.2 mg/kg/dose on day -7 (Bu 1), serial plasma Bu concentrations were used to calculate Bu area under the curve (AUC) for subsequent dose adjustment on days -6 to -4 to target a daily AUC of 5000 μM-minute. If the AUC actual /AUC target exceeded 1.2 or was less than 0.8, the second dose of Bu (Bu 2) was changed by no more than ± 20%, repeat PK samples were drawn, and the process was repeated for TDM for the third dose of Bu. Recipients of Bu TDM were younger than those receiving WBD (median 45 vs. 58 years, p=0.008). No other baseline differences were observed. There was no difference in hepatotoxicity between TDM and WBD (median 1 vs. 0 days, p=0.40), time to neutrophil (median 17 vs. 17 days, P=0.18) or platelet engraftment (median 29 vs. 25 days, p=0.75), IV opioid administration (median 4 vs. 4 days, p=0.83), breakthrough antiemetic use (median 59 vs. 58 doses, p=0.99), SOS (4.5 vs. 7.1%, p=1.0), or LOS (median 28 vs. 27 days, p=0.95). In the TDM group, 45% of patients had increases and 41% had decreases in Bu dose after Bu 1. 32% of patients required repeat PK after Bu 2. A PK dose monitoring program for MAC IV Bu regimens may be considered a safe practice in allo-HSCT recipients. The majority of patients receiving PK-guided TDM required dose changes, and TDM patients had no significant difference in toxicity compared to those receiving WBD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Pharmacists are increasingly identified as vital members of the HSCT multidisciplinary team. At our institution, pharmacists recently established roles providing clinical pharmacy services in the outpatient setting focused on performing interventions during the pre-HSCT clinic visit. The primary objective was to evaluate the number of medication discrepancies identified during pre-HSCT clinic visits performed by pharmacists, defined as addition, removal, or dose adjustment of current medications. Secondary objectives were to evaluate the number of interventions made by pharmacists for drug interactions, chemotherapy dose adjustments, and other medication recommendations for all patients prior to HSCT. A retrospective review of all patients admitted for HSCT from August 2018 to 2019 was performed. Patients are seen by their HSCT provider about 1 week prior to HSCT. At this visit, oncology trained pharmacists specializing in HSCT meet with the patient and provide services such as medication reconciliation, screening for drug interactions, screening for pertinent medication allergies/ intolerances and identifying alternatives, assessing medication adherence, evaluating need for chemotherapy dose adjustments, and identifying barriers to medication access. Patients that are unable to be seen by the pharmacist receive extensive chart review prior to admission to identify medication interventions. HSCT pharmacists performed 150 pre-HSCT clinic visits for 88 (59%) autologous, 46 (31%) allogeneic, and 16 (11%) Chimeric Antigen Receptor Therapy (CAR- T) recipients. A total of 511 medication discrepancies were identified in 128 (85%) patients seen (Figure 1). In addition to the 150 patients seen, 88 patient charts were reviewed by a pharmacist. A total of 66 significant drug interactions requiring intervention were identified in 52 (22%) patients and 30 chemotherapy dose adjustments were implemented in 29 (12%) patients. Other medication recommendations were made to the provider for 109 (46%) patients. Examples of these interventions include stopping oral chemotherapy prior to HSCT, modifying supportive care medications to reflect patient preference and prior response, modifying hydration due to cardiac history, coordinating steroid tapers before haploidentical HSCT or CAR-T, adjusting prophylactic antimicrobials due to allergies or to meet institutional standards, coordinating refills, and developing a plan for non-formulary medications. Pharmacists play a crucial role in providing safe and effective care to HSCT patients, and their involvement in the multidisciplinary team can lead to significant clinical interventions. Future directions include expansion of the role of HSCT pharmacists through Pharmacy Consult Agreements, focusing on HSCT patients post-transplant and within a Survivorship Clinic. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]