Search

Background and purpose: Significant improvements in the treatment of anal cancer have produced a growing population of anal cancer survivors. These patients often experience late adverse effects related to their treatment. Research has revealed substantial unmet needs because of long-term symptoms and functional impairments after treatment that may negatively affect health-related quality of life. The purpose of the present guidelines is to review the scientific evidence for the management of late adverse effects after (chemo)radiotherapy ([C]RT) for anal cancer and to extrapolate knowledge from other pelvic malignancies treated with pelvic (C)RT so that they may guide the clinical management of late adverse effects. Materials and methods: Relevant studies were systematically searched in four databases from their inception to June 2020 (no language limitation) and guidelines were searched in 16 databases, focussing on bowel dysfunction, psychosocial aspects, pain, and sexual and urinary dysfunction. The guidelines were developed by a panel of experts using the Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine, levels of evidence, and grades of recommendations. Scientific evidence: Late adverse effects after (C)RT for anal cancer are associated with a low overall quality of life among survivors. The most pronounced late adverse effects are bowel dysfunction (present in up to 78%), urinary dysfunction (present in up to 45%), and sexual dysfunction (present in up to 90% of men and up to 100% of women). Only indirect data on adequate treatment options of these late adverse effects for anal cancer are available. Conclusion: Quality of life and late adverse effects should be monitored systematically following treatment for anal cancer to identify patients who require further specialist evaluation or support. Increased awareness of the extent of the problem may serve to stimulate and facilitate multidisciplinary collaboration, which is often required.

Background The Danish Breast Cancer Group (DBCG) Proton Trial randomizes breast cancer patients selected on high mean heart dose (MHD) or high lung dose (V20Gy/V17Gy) in the photon plan between photon and proton therapy. This study presents the proton plans and adaptation strategy for the first 43 breast cancer patients treated with protons in Denmark. Material and methods Forty-four proton plans (one patient with bilateral cancer) were included; 2 local and 42 loco-regional including internal mammary nodes (IMN). Nineteen patients had a mastectomy and 25 a lumpectomy. The prescribed dose was either 50 Gy in 25 fractions (n = 30) or 40 Gy in 15 fractions (n = 14) wherefrom five received simultaneous integrated boost to the tumor bed. Using 2-3 en face proton fields, single-field optimization, robust optimization and a 5 cm range shifter ensured robustness towards breathing motion, setup- and range uncertainties. An anatomical evaluation was performed by evaluating the dose after adding/removing 3 mm and 5 mm tissue to/from the body-outline and used to define treatment tolerances for anatomical changes. Results The nominal and robust criteria were met for all patients except two. The median MHD was 1.5 Gy (0.5-3.4 Gy, 50 Gy) and 1.1 Gy (0.0-1.5 Gy, 40 Gy). The anatomical evaluations showed how 5 mm shrinkage approximately doubled the MHD while 5 mm swelling reduced target coverage of the IMN below constraints. Ensuring 3-5 mm robustness toward swelling was prioritized but not always achieved by robust optimization alone emphasizing the need for a distal margin. Twenty-eight patients received plan adaptation, eight patients received two, and one received five. Conclusion This proton planning strategy ensured robust treatment plans within a pre-defined level of acceptable anatomical changes that fulfilled the planning criteria for most of the patients and ensured low MHD.

Background and purpose Chemoradiotherapy is the primary treatment for localized anal cancer (AC). This treatment offers high rates of cure and organ preservation. Radiotherapy can however, result in late persisting anorectal dysfunction, with anal incontinence, urge and clustering. Correlation of radiation doses to pelvic substructures and functional outcome is not well described in AC. We correlated patient reported anorectal function to radiation doses to sphincters and pelvic floor muscles. Materials and methods Patients treated with (chemo)radiotherapy for AC were asked to fill out LARS (lower anterior resection syndrome) questionnaires at follow-up. We compared patients with no LARS (score 0–19) and patients with major LARS (30–42) as well as individual LARS questions to specific radiation doses to sphincters, levators and puborectal muscles. Results Thirty-six patients were included, 18 with no LARS and 18 with major LARS. Gender, age, TNM stage, PTV, chemotherapy, time to LARS score (mean 660 and 749 days) were comparable between the two groups. LARS symptoms, occurring at least once per week, were reported between 25–55.7%, and poorer LARS outcome was associated to worse quality of life. Dose to sphincter complex (Dmean, V50Gy and D90%) differed significantly between patients with no and major LARS (p = 0.048, 0.035 and 0.02 respectively). Further, D90% to the sphincter complex was significantly higher in patients who had accidental leakage of stool, (p = 0.044). Conclusion: Patients treated with (chemo)radiotherapy for AC show high frequency of patient reported anorectal dysfunction. Specific doses to the sphincters could become a useful predictor of anal incontinence and major LARS and incorporated into future radiotherapy planning studies.

Background: Measuring circulating-free-deoxyribonucleic-acid (cfDNA) has created a new framework for personalized treatment in oncology. The aim of this study was to analyze the relation between cfDNA and risk factors and outcome in squamous cell carcinoma of the anus (SCCA). Methods: Patients treated with radiotherapy for localized SCCA were included in Aarhus, Denmark from 2016 to 2019. Serum samples from baseline, during and after therapy, were measured for the level of cfDNA in copies per mL by a direct fluorescent assay. Results: Eighty patients were included. Samples were available at baseline (n = 73) mid-therapy (n = 74), end-therapy (n = 67) and one-year follow-up (1Y) (n = 29). P16-positivity was found in 89% (n = 55). The median level of cfDNA was higher for P16 negative tumors (1.48) compared with the P16 positive tumors (0.90, P = 0.04). Data showed a correlation between baseline cfDNA levels and Gross Tumor Volume (R2 = 0.13, P < 0.01), and increasing levels with increasing T-stage (T1 = 0.80, T2 = 0.94, T3 = 1.11, T4 = 1.3). Higher cfDNA levels were observed in patients with poor performance status (P < 0.01). The cfDNA level decreased from baseline to mid-therapy (0.92–0.78, P < 0.01) and from baseline to 1Y (0.92–0.71, P < 0.01). Baseline levels for patients with treatment failure (n = 8) were above the 25th percentile (p = 0.05) which translates into difference in disease free survival. Conclusion: Results indicate an association between baseline cfDNA levels and risk factors in SCCA and a low baseline level correlates to lower risk of treatment failure. Findings contribute with new knowledge of the biological role of cfDNA in SCCA and holds potential knowledge for personalized treatment of SCCA.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is the standard therapy for localized anal cancer (AC), but this treatment is associated with substantial toxicity. However, there is a lack of prospectively collected toxicity and patient reported outcome (PRO) data from larger cohorts. The purpose was to prospectively collect and determine agreement between physician assessed toxicity (CTCAE) and PRO during and after CRT and to compare IMRT, VMAT and proton-based planning in a subgroup of patients.MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients, treated with CRT for AC, were included between 2015 and 2017. NCI-CTCAE v.4.0, EORTC QLQ-C30 and CR29 data were collected baseline, mid-therapy, end-of therapy and 2-4 weeks posttherapy. Treatment planning with 5- or 6-fixed field IMRT, 2 and 3 arc VMAT, and 3- and 4-field proton plans were compared.RESULTS: One-hundred patients were included. Both CTCAE and PROs related to acute toxicity reached a maximum at end of therapy. Incidences of PROs were markedly higher with only slight to fair agreement to CTCAE, (κ 13-37). Comparative planning revealed dosimetric equality of IMRT and VMAT plans, but superiority of proton plans.CONCLUSIONS: The high incidence of PRO scores and weak agreement to CTCAE suggest that PROs are important tools complementary to CTCAE in evaluating patient symptoms during and after CRT. Proton therapy has the potential to lower radiation doses to most organs at risk.

Endothelial-cell dysfunction is central in the preeclamptic pathogenesis. Several components present in the blood of the preeclamptic mother are capable of mediating this dysfunction. We analyzed the regulation of the ISG12A gene by serum from the third trimester, to elucidate the role of type 1 interferon ISGs late in both healthy and preeclamptic pregnancies. The ISG12A transcription was up-regulated by serum from healthy pregnant women, but not by preeclamptic serum in HeLa and human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC). However, the ISG12A up-regulation by healthy pregnancy serum was not due to a general type 1 interferon response, since 6-16 and OAS1 were not up-regulated similarly. Also, the up-regulation of ISG12A was independent of the interferon-alpha receptor 2, but dependent on STAT1. Stimulation with folic acid alone or in combination with preeclamptic serum up-regulated ISG12A and 6-16. We conclude that type 1 interferon is not increased in third trimester serum, neither from healthy nor preeclamptic pregnancies. However, since ISG12A mRNA is up-regulated in healthy pregnancies, the ISG12A protein might take part in maintaining endothelial stability, as this function is lacking in preeclamptic pregnancies. Folic acid may ameliorate endothelial cell stability in preeclampsia by up-regulating ISG12A.