Search

Highlights • The National Marrow Donor Program (NMDP) received preliminary search requests for over 3300 domestic and 3700 international allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant candidates during the initial phase of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. • Despite a decrease in preliminary search requests, the number of unrelated donor grafts infused at domestic transplant centers following the initial phase of COVID-19 was only 4% less than the same period of time 1 year earlier. • Of over 2800 transportation legs and over 1600 transports completed through the NMDP, only 1 product was delivered outside of the requested time window in the initial period after COVID-19., The impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) donor registries and transplant center (TC) practices is underreported. This article reports on the National Marrow Donor Program (NMDP) Be The Match Registry and its coordinating the provision of unrelated donor (URD) products to domestic and international TCs during the initial 3 months of the COVID-19 pandemic (March through May 2020). Specifically, NMDP data are presented for disease indications for transplant, URD search volumes and availability, graft requests and processing, courier utilization and performance, and conversion rates from formal donor search and workup to graft collection and shipment. Data following the onset of COVID-19 are compared to the immediate 3 months prior to the COVID-19 pandemic (December 2019 through February 2020) and the same quarter 1 year prior to COVID-19 (March through May 2019). During the initial onset of COVID-19 and compared to 1 year prior, TCs requested and the NMDP performed less donor searches. More multiple URD and direct to workup requests were processed by the NMDP, which likely reflected reductions in donor availability. Yet TCs continued to perform allogeneic transplants for acute disease indications like acute leukemia and myelodysplasia, using more cryopreserved grafts than before COVID-19. In comparison to prepandemic patient cycle conversion rates and durations, the NMDP was able to convert patient cycles at nearly the same or higher rates and in similar or shorter periods of time. Last, despite significant challenges caused by the pandemic, including interruptions in domestic courier services and travel restrictions, graft products were delivered to and received by TCs in similar periods of time than before COVID-19. Taken together, these data show that NMDP service line operations continued to function effectively during the early phases of the COVID-19 pandemic, ensuring requests for and delivery of URD products to domestic and international allogeneic HCT recipients.

Acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) continues to be a major cause of morbidity and mortality after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) in pediatric patients (ie, children and adolescent and young adults) and limits broader application of the therapy. Pediatric HCT patients have faced major obstacles to access clinical trials that test new agents for GVHD prevention and treatment. According to a recent search, only 6 clinical trials of interventions for prevention or treatment of acute GVHD were conducted specifically in pediatric patients in the United States over the past decade, with 8 internationally. In this review, we summarize the studies that were performed and specifically enrolled and reported on pediatric patients after allogeneic HCT and provide a listing of studies currently under way.

We compared characteristics of myeloid neoplasms (MNs) following allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) versus autologous HCT using a Japanese HCT registry database. Among 43 788 patients who underwent allogeneic (n = 18 874) or autologous HCT (n = 24 914) for non-myeloid malignancies or non-malignant diseases, 352 developed MNs. The cumulative incidence of MNs was lower after allogeneic HCT than after autologous HCT (0.3% vs. 1.8% at 10 years, respectively, p < .001). Compared with autologous HCT, MNs following allogeneic HCT developed in younger patients (median, 42 vs. 57 years old, respectively) and sooner after HCT (median, 16 vs. 33 months, respectively). Approximately half of MNs following allogeneic HCT were donor-derived and occurred later than recipient-derived MNs (median, 26 vs. 6 months, respectively, p = .003). In multivariate analysis, reduced-intensity conditioning and cord blood transplantation were associated with MN development after allogeneic HCT. Overall survival was similar in patients who developed MNs following allogeneic versus autologous HCT (18% vs. 22% at 5 years, respectively, p = .48). Patient age ≥ 55 years, the presence of previous HCT, AML subtype, and chromosome 5 or 7 abnormalities were adverse factors for overall survival after MN diagnosis. Further research is warranted to elucidate the mechanisms of MN development following allogeneic HCT.

BACKGROUND: Telehealth involves the use of telecommunication and information technology for the delivery of clinical care and may be a mechanism to alleviate the burden of visits faced by patients undergoing hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Few studies have evaluated the feasibility and acceptability of telehealth visits in the care of HCT patients. METHODS: We conducted 27 telehealth visits with 25 patients undergoing HCT using a videoconferencing system that allows for real-time, two-way interactions and administered satisfaction surveys to patients and providers. RESULTS: Of the 25 patients included in the study, 20 (80%) and five (20%) were undergoing autologous and allogeneic HCT, respectively. The telehealth visits were distributed as follows: 3 inpatient visits upon admission for HCT; 11 inpatient visits between 2–14 days post-HCT; 4 inpatient visits prior to discharge after HCT; 8 outpatient, post-HCT follow-up visits; and 1 handoff to a community oncologist. Out of a total of 54 provider assessments, 7 providers (13%) were unable to complete some part of the physical examination, but no provider reported being unable to manage patients’ symptoms through telehealth. 81% of patients were either satisfied or very satisfied with the telemedicine session. Overall satisfaction was higher among patients than providers (mean scores 4.12 vs. 2.64; scale 1–5, 1: very poor; 5: excellent). Technological barriers resulting in delays and suboptimal physical examination were largely responsible for provider dissatisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: The use of telehealth to deliver comprehensive follow-up care to HCT patients is feasible across different HCT types but is dependent upon quality of data streaming and videoconferencing technologies.

OBJECTIVE CD204+ tumor-associated macrophages are associated with adverse outcomes of various malignancies. We performed a study to elucidate the role of CD204+ macrophages in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allogeneic HCT). METHODS In a total of 81 patients who received allogeneic HCT for non-remission malignant lymphoma, immunohistochemical staining of CD204 using specimens preserved before allogeneic HCT was performed. According to the average number of CD204+ macrophages in a high-power field, patients were categorized into three groups: low (

The use of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) using Beers criteria and its impact on older allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) recipients is not known. Here the use of any PIMs and their therapeutic classes in reduced-intensity conditioning allogeneic HCT recipients were compared between older (≥65 years; n = 114) and younger (40 to 64 years; n = 240) patients during their initial HCT admission, defined as the number of days that a patient received 1 or more PIMs between day −14 and day +28. Poisson regression was used to determine rate ratios (RRs) in the 2 groups. In the ≥65 years group, we evaluated the impact of PIMs on Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade 3–4 toxicities within 100 days and on overall mortality within 1 year post-HCT. The rate of any PIM use was similar in the older and younger groups (RR, .98; 95% confidence interval [CI], .90 to 1.06; P = .65). In terms of PIM classes, the older group had a 48% higher rate of gastrointestinal (GI) medication use (RR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.32 to 1.65; P < .01) and a 25% higher rate of genitourinary (GU) medication use (RR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.02 to 1.53; P = .03). Compared with males, females had a 19% higher rate of central nervous system (CNS) medication use (RR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.03 to 1.37; P = .02) and a 30% higher rate of benzodiazepine use (RR, 1.30; 95% CI. 1.09 to 1.54; P < .01). A high-risk HCT-CI was associated with a higher rate of use of any PIMs (RR, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.01 to 1.26; P = .02), CNS medications (RR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.04 to 1.53; P = .02) and GU medications (RR, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.09 to 1.94; P = .01). Compared with matched sibling donor HCT recipients, umbilical cord blood transplantation recipients had higher rates of GI medication use (RR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.14 to 1.53; P < .01) and anticholinergic medication use (RR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.06 to 1.61; P = .01). In the ≥65 years group, increasing duration of narcotic use was associated with a 1.3-fold (95% CI, 1.0 to 1.7; P = .05) higher risk of overall mortality and a 1.6-fold (95% CI, 1.02 to 2.69) greater odds of CTCAE grade 3–4 toxicities (P = .04). Our data show that older recipients (≥65 years) were as likely as their younger counterparts to receive PIMs. Among older recipients, the use of PIMs, particularly narcotics, was associated with higher mortality and higher incidence of grade 3–4 toxicities. Identifying and reducing the use of PIMs in older HCT recipients may help decrease the burden of adverse events and associated health care costs.

Key Points Vancomycin exposure in the pre-engraftment period was associated with an increased risk for CMV reactivation after allogeneic HCT. Some gram-positive bacteria may protect against CMV reactivation.

After autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) in the first complete remission (CR1), patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) may relapse and undergo allogeneic HCT in the second complete remission (CR2). The aim of this study was to analyze the outcome of allogeneic HCT performed in CR2 comparing patients with prior consolidation by autologous HCT versus patients with chemotherapy consolidation. Included were 2619 adults with allogeneic HCT in CR2 from 2000 to 2017 with (n = 417) or without (n = 2202) prior autologous HCT. Patient groups were not entirely comparable; patients with prior autologous HCT were younger, had less often a favorable cytogenetic profile, had more commonly donors other than matched siblings, and more often received reduced-intensity conditioning. In multivariate analysis, nonrelapse mortality risks in patients with prior autologous HCT were 1.34 (1.07 to 1.67; P = .01) after adjustment for age, cytogenetic risk, transplant year, donor, conditioning intensity, sex matching, interval diagnosis-relapse, and relapse-allogeneic HCT as compared with chemotherapy consolidation. Similarly, risks of events in leukemia-free survival and graft-versus-host disease, relapse-free survival were higher with prior autologous HCT, 1.17 (1.01 to 1.35), P = .03 and 1.18 (1.03 to 1.35), P = .02, respectively. Risk of death was also higher, 1.13 (0.97 to 1.32), P = .1, but this was not significant. Postremission consolidation with autologous HCT for AML in CR1 increases toxicity of subsequent allogeneic HCT in CR2.

PD-1 blockade is an effective therapy in relapsed/refractory (R/R) classical Hodgkin Lymphoma (cHL) who have relapsed after or are ineligible for autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Although single-agent anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibodies (mAb’s) are associated with high response rates and durable remissions, available results to date suggest that a large majority of patients will eventually progress on therapy. Many of these patients are potential candidates for allogeneic HCT (allo-HCT) after receiving anti-PD-1 mAb’s, and allo-HCT remains for now the only treatment with demonstrated curative potential in this setting. However, initial reports suggested that allo-HCT in this setting may be associated with increased risk of early transplant-related toxicity, likely driven by lingering effects of PD-1 blockade. Furthermore, many patients with R/R cHL who undergo allo-HCT will relapse after transplantation, most often with limited treatment options. Here again, PD-1 blockade appears to yield high response rates, but with an increased risk of attendant immune toxicity. Many questions remain regarding the use of PD-1 blockade before or after allo-HCT, especially in relation to the feasibility, outcome, optimal timing, and method of allo-HCT after PD-1 blockade. Despite the scarcity of prospective data, these questions are unavoidable and must be tackled by clinicians in the routine care of patients with advanced cHL. We provide consensus recommendations of a working group based on available data and experience, in an effort to help guide treatment decisions until more definitive data are obtained.

To evaluate the outcomes and prognostic factors following allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) for adult acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) in second complete remission (CR2), we retrospectively analysed the Japanese registration data of 1080 adult AML patients in CR2 who had received allogeneic HCT. The probability of overall survival and the cumulative incidence of relapse at 3 years was 66% and 19%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, older age, poor cytogenetics and shorter duration of first complete remission were significantly associated with a higher overall mortality. Our data demonstrated the significant efficacy of allogeneic HCT for adult AML in CR2.

Although day +100 survival among allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) recipients has improved over time, longer-term survival remains a challenge. The aim of this study was to identify prognostic factors for survival among patients surviving longer than 100 days using baseline characteristics and factors identified within the first 100 days after transplantation. Of 413 patients undergoing a first allogeneic HCT between 2006 and 2014, 335 survived >100 days post-transplantation. The majority underwent a myeloablative transplantation (75%) with a bone marrow (BM) (52%) graft source. One-year all-cause mortality (ACM) was 29%, with 16% relapse mortality (RM) and 12% nonrelapse mortality. In multivariable analysis, high-risk disease (hazard ratio [HR], 1.55; P = .003), non-cytomegalovirus infection (HR, 1.79; P = .003), more days hospitalized (HR, 1.16; P < .001), and relapse (HR, 4.38; P < .001) within the first 100 days were associated with increased risk of ACM. Patients with higher income (HR, .89; P = .024) and those who received BM (HR, .52; P < .001) or umbilical cord blood (HR, .40; P = .002) relative to peripheral blood stem cells had lower risk of ACM. Our study identifies risk factors for adverse long-term survival in 100-day survivors, a time point when patients frequently are discharged from transplantation centers. In addition to disease- and transplantation-related factors, low socioeconomic status was associated with worse long-term survival, highlighting the need for focused efforts to improve outcomes in vulnerable patient populations.

Correspondence: Donor body mass index does not predict graft versus host disease following hematopoietic cell transplantation

We conducted a study to analyze and report on indicators of hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) physician time use and HCT center output measures. HCT centers in Australia and New Zealand (A&NZ) were invited to provide demographic and time use details for physicians participating in HCT patient care (HCT physicians). Resource details for adult and pediatric centers were included. From a total of 46 centers that were invited to participate, completed data were received from 37 centers (80%) representing 185 HCT physicians, with a median age of 48 (range, 33 to 72), of whom 31% were women. Just over half of HCT physicians cited prior work experience in large overseas HCT centers (97, 52%) and over one-third (79, 43%) possessed postgraduate qualifications other than specialist training. Total annual mean HCTs per HCT physician full-time equivalent (FTE) were 14.2 for centers performing both allogeneic and autologous HCT, 6.6 for autologous only centers, and 10.6 for all centers. For all HCT physicians surveyed the mean proportion of time spent on HCT related tasks was 31.7%. In A&NZ, for centers that perform both allografts and autografts, there was a mean of 4.0 allogeneic HCT annually per HCT bed, compared with 2.6 for the United States and 7.1 allogeneic HCT annually per HCT physician FTE (United States, 6.3). Projections of the A&NZ HCT physician workforce indicated that the numbers of HCT physicians are likely to stay within the region of 170 to 190 for the next 10 years, whereas HCT activity will likely continue to climb steadily. Healthcare and government authorities should be prepared to enable and support greater HCT activity in A&NZ in the future.

Recent studies in both mice and humans have demonstrated that the intestinal microbiota can affect hematopoiesis. Here, we performed experiments in preclinical mouse models for syngeneic and allogeneic HCT. To study the metabolic effects of intestinal flora depletion on post-transplant hematopoiesis in humans, we performed HCT experiments using a metabolic chamber and bomb calorimetry of feces. Taken together, we show that the intestinal microbiota supports post-transplant hematopoietic reconstitution in HCT recipients through its role in dietary energy uptake.

Introduction: The gut microbiome is a potentially modifiable factor in treatment related outcomes in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT). Prior studies have linked pre- or mid-treatment gut microbiome diversity with risk for treatment related morbidity and mortality. However, these studies have been limited by the inclusion of one or only a few institutions and the lack of longitudinal sampling with high quality metadata. These limitations complicate the interpretation of microbiome alterations over the course of HCT. Methods: To overcome these, we devised and implemented a large-scale biospecimen collection protocol in conjunction with BMT CTN 1703, a randomized, multicenter, Phase III trial of tacrolimus/methotrexate vs. post-transplant cyclophosphamide/tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil in reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) allogeneic HCT (NCT03959241). Patients enrolled on 1703 were optionally co-enrolled in the companion immune and microbiome profiling study, 1801 (MI-IMMUNE). This involved blood, urine and stool sampling before conditioning (PCON), then weekly starting on day 0 through day 77 (through day 84 for blood), and on days 98, 180, 270, 365 and 730. For all enrolled participants where the donor consented, residual donor cells were saved from the empty hematopoietic stem cell product bag for later analysis. Additionally, the protocol included one-time blood, urine and stool sample collection from consented matched related donors (MRDs) prior to stem cell collection. Starting with protocol version 4.0 on February 1, 2021, participation in 1801 stool collection was required for the first six out of eighteen sample collection timepoints. Participation in later stool and urine timepoint collections remained optional. Here we review the feasibility of creating a multi-institutional biobank. Additionally, we assess the success of our strategies by calculating sample collection compliance and standard deviation in compliance across centers for each timepoint. Results: On June 18, 2021, BMT CTN 1703/1801 closed to accrual with 431 patients enrolled on 1703; 323 patients from 36 centers were co-enrolled on 1801. 304 (94%) provided study samples, making this the largest prospective microbiome and immune profiling study in HCT patients to date. As of July 6, 2021, 3,683 blood, 2,668 urine, and 2,098 stool samples had been collected. Across the first 6 timepoints for all participating centers, blood, urine and stool sample collection averaged 93%, 82%, and 74% compliance, respectively. Of the 99 (30%) patients enrolled on 1801 with a MRD, 34 (34%) donors consented to sample collection. Sample collection compliance was lower for MRDs than for patients on the study with 76%, 74%, and 62% of expected blood, urine and stool samples collected, respectively, from this group. For stool collection exclusively, a median of 5 samples were collected per patient across the first 6 timepoints (median of 6 across all timepoints) with 93 (31%) of patients completing a full sample set through Day 28. 139 (46%) patients provided at least one sample after day 28; these represented 37% of the total samples collected to date. The PCON sample, which provides an important measure of pre-treatment gut microbiome diversity, had the third highest compliance with 74% of patients providing a sample. Surprisingly, Day 28 had the lowest compliance (66%) and highest standard deviation (37%) possibly because this timepoint often falls around the time of hospital discharge. Between PCON and day 28, the standard deviation between sites in the average collection compliance (24%) and number of samples collected per patient (1.1) was small indicating the successful adoption of stool collection across institutions. Table 1 summarizes sample collection statistics. Conclusion: Overall this study has resulted in a large, novel biobank of blood, urine and stool samples from patients undergoing RIC allogeneic HCT at 36 centers across the US. This will serve as a valuable resource for investigating the role of the gut microbiome in long term health outcomes following HCT. Although the results of 1801 are forthcoming given ongoing sample collection, the size and composition of the biobank to date clearly demonstrate the feasibility of implementing multi-institutional stool collection. This study represents a critical step towards the large-scale adoption of microbiome sampling as a diagnostic tool. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Chhabra: GSK: Honoraria. Clark: Kadmon: Consultancy. Horowitz: Mesoblast: Research Funding; Shire: Research Funding; Vertex: Research Funding; Stemcyte: Research Funding; Vor Biopharma: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Miltenyi Biotech: Research Funding; Kiadis: Research Funding; Sobi: Research Funding; Kite/Gilead: Research Funding; Pfizer, Inc: Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Magenta: Consultancy, Research Funding; Medac: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding; Daiicho Sankyo: Research Funding; Xenikos: Research Funding; Omeros: Research Funding; Orca Biosystems: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Regeneron: Research Funding; Tscan: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; CSL Behring: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Gamida Cell: Research Funding; Chimerix: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; bluebird bio: Research Funding; Astellas: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Allovir: Consultancy; Actinium: Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding. Jenq: Microbiome DX: Consultancy; Merck: Consultancy; Prolacta: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kaleido: Consultancy, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Seres: Consultancy, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; LisCure: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; MaaT Pharma: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Karius: Consultancy. Levine: Equillium Bio: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kamada: Research Funding; Biogen: Research Funding; Omeros: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Symbio: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Talaris Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Viracor: Patents & Royalties: GVHD biomarker patent with royalties from Viracor; Mesoblast: Consultancy, Research Funding; X4 Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Murthy: CRISPR Therapeutics: Research Funding. Riches: ATARA Biotherapeutics: Other: Payment; BioIntelect: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Other: Payment. Sung: Merck: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Enterome: Research Funding; Seres: Research Funding; AVROBIO: Consultancy; Abbott Nutrition: Honoraria; Clasado: Other: Research Product; DSM: Other: Research Product. Al Malki: Neximmune: Consultancy; Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy; Rigel Pharma: Consultancy; Hansa Biopharma: Consultancy; CareDx: Consultancy. Rezvani: Kaleido: Other: One-time scientific advisory board; Nohla Therapeutics: Other: One-time scientific advisory board; Pharmacyclics-Abbvie: Research Funding; US Department of Justice: Consultancy. Bolaños-Meade: Incyte Corp: Consultancy. Holtan: Incyte: Consultancy, Research Funding; Generon: Consultancy. Saber: Govt. COI: Other. Hamadani: Sanofi, Genzyme, AstraZeneca, BeiGene: Speakers Bureau; Janssen, Incyte, ADC Therapeutics, Omeros, Morphosys, Kite: Consultancy; Takeda, Spectrum Pharmaceuticals and Astellas Pharma: Research Funding. Kean: Bluebird Bio: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Patents & Royalties: From clinical trial data, Research Funding; Vertex: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Gilead: Research Funding; Regeneron: Research Funding; EMD Serono: Consultancy. Perales: Cidara: Honoraria; Servier: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria, Other; Equilium: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria, Other; Nektar Therapeutics: Honoraria, Other; NexImmune: Honoraria; MorphoSys: Honoraria; Omeros: Honoraria; Karyopharm: Honoraria; Sellas Life Sciences: Honoraria; Merck: Honoraria; Miltenyi Biotec: Honoraria, Other; Medigene: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Kite/Gilead: Honoraria, Other; Celgene: Honoraria.

Introduction: Randomized trials demonstrated ~95% efficacy of SARS-CoV-2 spike messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccines. Patients (pts) after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) have a variable period of immune deficiency and the impact of diagnosis, treatment regimens, GvHD, and immunosuppression on vaccine (vacc) immunogenicity is unknown. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of 149 consecutive pts (Table) who received a SARS-CoV-2 vacc between 12/17/2020, and 5/21/21, and were tested for anti-SARS-CoV-2 S1/S2 antibodies. Serology testing was performed with the Liaison® SARS-CoV-2 S1/S2 IgG assay (DiaSorin) with ≥15 AU/mL defined as a positive result. Pts with prior COVID-19 infection were excluded. Pts received mRNA-1273/Moderna (n= 46), BNT162b2/Pfizer-BioNTech (n= 100) or Jannsen vacc (n= 3). Reactogenicity was not investigated. Demographic and treatment variables were tested for prediction of vaccine response using Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test for categorical variables and two-sample t test for continuous variables. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses with backward selection using Akaike information criterion (AIC) were used to examine interdependence of those variables and odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results: Pts underwent HCT from a related HLA matched sibling (n=36), related haploidentical (n= 23), or matched/mismatched unrelated donor (n= 89). 93% received fludarabine in the HCT conditioning regimen (data not shown). All pts received a calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) and 76 pts received ATG for GvHD prophylaxis. All pts achieved at least mixed donor lymphoid engraftment (data not shown). Median time from HCT to 1st vaccination was 26 months (range, 3-258 months). Median age at time of vaccination was 61 years (range, 24-78) and 75 (50%) were female. Serology was tested at a median of 37 days (range, 6-119 days) after the second vacc dose. Serology was tested 101 pts (67%) tested positive for anti-SARS-CoV-2 S1/S2 antibodies (vacc responders). Of the responders, the median time from HCT to 1st vacc was 45.5 months (range, 3-258, SD 39.78). Among the 23 pts between 3-9 months after HCT, 26% (n=6) had a positive antibody response, but all were receiving ongoing immunosuppression at time of vaccination. 29% (n=29) vacc responders were receiving prednisone (pred) in the management of cGvHD at the time of vaccination. 48 pts did not mount an antibody response (vacc non-responders). Of the non-responders, 30 pts were receiving cGvHD treatment at the time of vacc, 31 pts were taking pred, and 20 pts were taking CNIs. In univariate analysis, we found a history of prolonged use of pred (>8 weeks) and/or CNIs, on current treatment for cGvHD at time of vacc, and receipt of rituximab in the preceding 12 months predicted for lack of response (Table). Active use of pred and treatment with pred >8 weeks in the preceding 12 months prior to vacc predicted vacc non-response [OR 0.221; 95% CI (0.106 - 0.456); p8 weeks was not [OR 2.00; 95% CI (0.55-7.298; p=0.293] in multivariable analysis. Other significant predictors for non-response in the multivariable analysis include pt use of ruxolitinib [OR, 0.233, 95% CI, (0.067-0.808); p=0.022], and rituximab within 1 year [OR, 0.026, 95% CI, (0.007-0.099); p Discussion: In this study, we found that 67% allogeneic HCT pts developed anti-SARS-CoV-2 S1/S2 antibodies after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. Predictors of non-response after adjustment for potential confounders, were factors that are expected to suppress immune response including active use of immunosuppressive medications. Consistent with prior studies, anti-CD20 therapy likely impairs humoral response to vaccination. Ruxolitinib also appears to impair response. However, a proportion of pts being actively treated for cGvHD responded to vaccination and these pts should still be encouraged to receive vaccination in consideration of the COVID-19 mortality risk. Many questions remain including the protective benefit of immune response, the duration of response, and the potential value of booster vaccinations in non-responders. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Rowley: ReAlta Life Sciences: Consultancy.

Microbial diversity is associated with improved outcome in patients receiving allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT), however, the mechanism underlying this observation is unclear. Unconventional T cells recognize specific metabolites of bacterial biosynthesis and their role in the post-HCT immunity has not yet been fully clarified. Here we have performed an observational study (n = 174 patients) using 16S rRNA sequencing of early post-HCT patient stool samples (day 7-21 after HCT) paired with multiparameter flow cytometry (performed at day 30 and day 100 after HCT) to explore the relationship between the intestinal microbiome early after HCT and the unconventional T cell populations in circulation. Our data extend findings of other groups suggesting that mucosal-associated invariant T (MAIT) cells are dependent on a diverse microbiome and are also associated with favorable allo-HCT outcome. In addition, we report for the first time that the Vδ2 subset of γδ T cells is positively correlated with MAIT cells as well as independent predictors of favorable transplant outcome. We first focused on MAIT cells as these cells respond to metabolites of the bacterial riboflavin biosynthesis pathway and should therefore be responsive to changes in the gut microbiome. MAIT cell frequency on day 30 after HCT was significantly higher in peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) graft recipients who had higher peri-engraftment stool diversity (day 7-21; p=0.014, n=118, α-diversity measured using Simpson's reciprocal index, Figure A). Patients with higher-than-median MAIT cell frequency had improved 2-year overall survival (p=0.047, n=118 PBSC recipients, Figure B) and lower non-relapse mortality (p=0.031) compared with patients with lower-than-median frequency. High dimensional flow cytometry analysis using clustering algorithms Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection (UMAP) and Self Organizing Map (FlowSOM) identified the Vδ2 subset of γδ T cells as the only differentially abundant population associated with higher MAIT cell frequency, and furthermore, frequencies of these two cell types were highly correlated (R=0.38, p=2.8e-05, Figure C). Vδ2 cells are activated by the bacterial metabolite, 4-hydroxy-3-methyl-but-2-enyl pyrophosphate (HMBPP), an intermediate of the microbial isoprenoid biosynthetic pathway. Vδ2 cell frequencies were higher in patients with higher stool α-diversity (p=0.0026, n=118 PBSC recipients, Figure D) and interestingly, appeared protective with regard to acute graft versus host disease (aGVHD), as we observed a higher frequency of Vδ2 cells among patients who had no or grade 1 disease compared with patients who experienced grade 2-4 aGVHD (p=0.013). We next used Linear Discriminant effect Size (LefSE) analysis to identify statistically significant differences between bacterial taxa in our groups of interest (threshold p>0.01 and effect size>4) and observed that higher MAIT and Vδ2 cell numbers are associated with higher abundance of bacteria belonging to the phylum Bacteroidetes and lower MAIT and Vδ2 cell numbers are associated with higher abundance of the members of the phylum Firmicutes. Furthermore, using the PICRUSt2 algorithm, which uses 16S amplicon abundance data to predict the abundance of functional pathways, we observed a significantly increased predicted abundance of HMBPP, the phosphoantigen ligand for Vδ2 cells, in the patients with higher circulating Vδ2 cell frequencies (p=0.00054). Our findings confirm our hypothesis that a diverse microbiota supports the reconstitution of protective unconventional T cell populations, namely MAIT and Vδ2 cells, which are in turn associated with a favorable HCT outcome. Although further studies are needed to dissect the functional contribution of these cells to the post-transplantation immune milieu, our work offers a valuable insight into the interplay between the intestinal microbiome and reconstitution of immune subsets after allo-HCT and may aid in the design of microbiota-targeted interventions. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Gomes: Xbiome: Current Employment. Zappasodi: iTeos Therapeutics: Consultancy; Astra Zeneca: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding. Ponce: CareDx: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Generon Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Kadmon pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria; Ceramedix: Consultancy, Honoraria; Seres Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding. Giralt: JENSENN: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; SANOFI: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AMGEN: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; PFIZER: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GSK: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; JAZZ: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; CELGENE: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Actinnum: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Peled: Seres: Other: Intellectual Property Rights, Research Funding and Travelfees; DaVolterra: Consultancy; Other: Other: Jonathan U. Peled had filed intellectual property applications related to the microbiome (referencenumbers #62/843,849, #62/977,908, and #15/756,845); MaaT Pharma: Consultancy. Perales: Cidara: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Merck: Honoraria; MorphoSys: Honoraria; Nektar Therapeutics: Honoraria, Other; Equilium: Honoraria; Karyopharm: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Kite/Gilead: Honoraria, Other; Medigene: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria, Other; Sellas Life Sciences: Honoraria; Servier: Honoraria; Miltenyi Biotec: Honoraria, Other; Omeros: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria, Other; NexImmune: Honoraria. van den Brink: Rheos: Honoraria; Merck & Co, Inc: Honoraria; Therakos: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; GlaskoSmithKline: Other: has consulted, received honorarium from or participated in advisory boards; Synthekine (Spouse): Other: has consulted, received honorarium from or participated in advisory boards; Kite Pharmaceuticals: Other; Notch Therapeutics: Honoraria; Nektar Therapeutics: Honoraria; Priothera: Research Funding; Wolters Kluwer: Patents & Royalties; Juno Therapeutics: Other; Frazier Healthcare Partners: Honoraria; DKMS (nonprofit): Other; Seres: Other: Honorarium, Intellectual Property Rights, Research Fundingand Stock Options; Forty-Seven, Inc.: Honoraria; Lygenesis: Other: has consulted, received honorarium from or participated in advisory boards ; WindMILTherapeutics: Honoraria; Pharmacyclics: Other; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria; Novartis (Spouse): Other: has consulted, received honorarium from or participated in advisory boards; Da Volterra: Other: has consulted, received honorarium from or participated in advisory boards; Ceramedix: Other: has consulted, received honorarium from or participated in advisory boards ; MagentaTherapeutics: Honoraria; Pluto Therapeutics: Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company, Other: has consulted, received honorarium from or participated in advisory boards .

This cohort study examines safety and antibody responses after 1 and 2 doses of BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine in recipients of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT).

Background The American Geriatric Society has established criteria (Beers criteria) for Potentially Inappropriate Medications (PIMs) in older (65+y) adults (J Am Geriatr Soc. 2019 Apr;67(4):674-694). The use of PIMs in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (allo-HCT) and its impact on outcomes is unknown. Methods The use of PIMs, in defined categories [anticholinergics, central nervous system (CNS), benzodiazepines, gastrointestinal (GI), genitourinary (GU), and narcotics] in older (≥ 65y) allo-HCT recipients were compared to younger recipients [(40-64y undergoing reduced intensity conditioning (RIC)] during initial HCT admission (day-14 to +28 post HCT). Use of PIMs was defined as the number of days a patient received 1 or more PIMs between d-14 to +28. Medications were retrieved from medical records and categorized by Beers criteria for 354 allo-HCT recipients ≥ 40y in 2 groups (40-64y RIC, n=240; and 65+y RIC, n=114). Poisson regression determined the log use of PIMs in the 2 groups. In 65+y group, we evaluated the impact of PIMs on the incidence of CTCAE grade 3 and 4 toxicities; and non-relapse mortality (NRM). All analyses were adjusted or length of hospital stay. Results All PIMs: The median (range) days of all PIMs in 65+y RIC recipients [94 (24-279)] was similar to 40-64y RIC recipients [101 (8-441), p=0.48, confirmed in Poisson regression (Figure 1) [65+y RIC vs 40-64y RIC log change 0.0, p=1.0). Patients with a high (vs. low) HCT-CI score received more days of all PIMs (p=0.02). PIM Categories (Figure 1) were compared and 65+y recipients received fewer days of benzodiazepines (log change -0.18, p=0.04) or narcotics (-0.21, p=0.04), but more days of anticholinergics (0.22, p=0.03) and GI PIMs (0.16, p 65+y group: In adjusted regression analysis, increasing days of narcotics was associated with a 1.6 fold (95% CI 1.1-2.6, p=0.03) higher risk of NRM. Increasing days of narcotics was also associated with a 1.66 fold (95% CI 1.02-2.69) greater odds of grade 3-4 toxicities, p=0.04 (Figure 2). More days of all PIMs was associated with a 5 times greater odds of discharge to rehab or a nursing facility (95% CI 1.43-10.0, p Conclusions Older recipients (65+y) receive PIMs as frequently as younger recipients (40-64y). Females, those with a high HCT-CI and UCB recipients receive PIMs more frequently. Amongst older recipients, use of PIMs, particularly narcotics, was associated with a higher NRM and higher risks of grade 3-4 toxicities. Identifying and reducing use of PIMs in older HCT recipients may help lower the burden of adverse events and associated health care costs.

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) results in significant morbidity and mortality following hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Establishing the cost and clinical impact is imperative to the selection of appropriate CMV preventative strategies. This is a retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients undergoing their first allogeneic HCT between January 1, 2009, and December 31, 2013. Detailed clinical and institutional cost data were obtained from the start of conditioning through 1-year post-transplantation. Baseline characteristics, resource utilization, costs, and outcomes were compared between patients with and without clinically significant CMV infection (csCMVi). One hundred seventy out of 388 patients (44%) developed csCMVi within 1 year after HCT. Within the first year post-HCT, patients with csCMVi had a significantly longer transplantation-related length of stay (mean, 91.7 days versus 78.3 days; P.0001) and more frequent and prolonged hospitalizations (mean, 2.4 versus 1.7 admissions [P.0001]; mean, 39.1 versus 31.5 inpatient days [P = .001]) without significantly more admissions to the intensive care unit (28.2% versus 21.6%; P = .408). The use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor was greater in patients with csCMVi (73.5% versus 54.1%; P = .0001), although no significant differences were demonstrated in mean platelet or red blood cell (RBC) transfusions. Total costs were also higher in patients with csCMVi (mean cost difference, $45,811; 95% CI, $26,385 to $67,544). However, the incidence of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and selected infectious complications was not significantly different between the 2 groups. There were no significant differences in 1-year and 5-year post-transplantation overall survival (OS) or nonrelapse mortality (NRM) between those with and those without csCMVi, although relapse of underlying disease was significantly lower in the csCMVi group. Overall, our data show that allogeneic HCT recipients with csCMVi had significantly greater medical resource utilization and costs than those without csCMVi. However, clinical outcomes, including GVHD, infections, and mortality, were similar in the 2 groups. Further study is needed to determine the cost-effectiveness of CMV preventive modalities.

We analyzed outcomes of 126 patients with hematologic malignancies, who relapsed after first allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) and received subsequent allografts. In 17 cases, the original donors were utilized, while in 109 cases different donors were identified. The 2-year overall survival (OS), relapse, and non-relapse mortality (NRM) rates were 33%, 42%, and 33%, respectively. Patients with early relapse after first allogeneic HCT (within 100 days vs. 100 days to 12 months vs. >12 months) had higher relapse rates (50% vs. 47% vs. 34%, respectively; p = .01) and worse OS (15% vs. 25% vs. 45%, respectively, p = .005) at 2 years after second allogeneic HCT. In conclusion, second allogeneic HCT should be considered in patients who relapse after first allografts, especially in those who relapse after more than a year. Utilizing a different donor for the second allotransplant including umbilical cord blood or HLA-haploidentical, related donors did not adversely impact outcomes.

Patients undergoing hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) experience decline in their physical activity during their transplant admission. There is limited experience with prospective monitoring of transplant recipients. We therefore measured physical activity and sleep patterns of subjects undergoing autologous and allogeneic HCT. Eighty-three patients were consented for this study. Sixty-three patients competed the study and had their physical activity prospectively assessed using the fitness-tracking device Fitbit HR. Outcomes included adherence, physical activity, readmission, hematopoietic engraftment, and 100-day survival. Sixty percent of patients (n = 37) underwent autologous HCT, and 40% (n = 26) underwent allogenic HCT. Both groups had a comparable number of steps at admission to the hospital. The number of daily steps during the study period was lower in the allogeneic group (2159 versus 3008, P = .07), as was the minimum number of steps recorded over the transplant admission (allogeneic HCT = 395 versus autologous HCT = 848, P = .01). Patients undergoing allogeneic HCT were less active on the day before discharge (1956 steps versus 3183 steps, P = .08). In multivariate analysis, physical activity was not associated with HCT-related outcomes. Patients undergoing HCT experience significant decline in their physical activity during their transplant admission that does not recover by the time of discharge. This effect can be objectively measured using fitness tracking devices.

Hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is a treatment for hematologic malignancies and disorders. Patients who receive HCT can face long-term physical and psychosocial effects. Survivorship care guides (care guides), which describe screening and preventive care practices were mailed to allogenic HCT recipients at clinically important timepoints (6, 12, and 24 months after HCT). The primary objective of this study was to evaluate how patients perceived and used the care guides. A cross-sectional, time-series survey was sent to all National Marrow Donor Program/Be The Match allogeneic HCT recipients from September 2012 to November 2016 after the care guides were sent; patients or caregivers could respond. Respondents who returned all 3 surveys were included (554 patients; 65 caregivers), for an overall response rate of 13% (maintenance rate of 45%). The majority of patients and caregivers strongly agreed or agreed that the care guides helped them understand that post-HCT care is important to staying healthy and that they were more familiar with recommended tests at check-up appointments. Most patients who did not share the care guides with their doctors at any of the timepoints believed their doctor knew which tests were needed. Results from this study can help inform and guide development of future tools and evaluations of educational resources for patients after HCT. Tools and educational resources, such as survivorship care guides, have the potential to help empower patients to be more knowledgeable and to understand and advocate for their survivorship care needs.

Background Advance directives (AD) offer the opportunity for goal-concordant care at the end of life (EOL). However, fewer than half of HCT recipients have a documented AD. We hypothesized that the use of a novel AD-the Stanford What Matters Most Letter (Letter AD)-developed to assess patients' values, goals, and EOL wishes would result in a greater proportion of AD completion among HCT recipients. We therefore conducted a prospective, randomized, controlled study of the traditional California AD vs. the Letter AD in adult allogeneic HCT recipients. Methods Patients >= 18 years old undergoing first allogeneic HCT at Stanford University were eligible. Prior to HCT conditioning, enrolled patients were randomly assigned to complete either the traditional California AD or the Letter AD, and all patients received a sociodemographic survey and a survey evaluating their opinions regarding the AD form they received. Patients were asked to return all research forms at the time of their transplant admission; a research assistant placed a reminder call to each patient prior to scheduled transplant. The primary endpoint was AD completion; secondary endpoints included EOL wishes as documented on the AD and patient preferences and opinions regarding the AD version they received. Results Between March 2017 and August 2018, 212 patients were eligible, of whom 126 (59.4%) were enrolled and randomized. Among the 84 who declined, the primary reason was already having an AD (N=34). The median age was 57 years (IQR 45-64); 54.8% were male; 58.7% were non-Hispanic White; and 72.3% had AML/MDS. There were no statistically significant differences in baseline socio-demographics between study arms. The overall AD completion rate was 71.6% and did not differ between the Traditional and Letter AD study arms (70.3% vs 72.6%, P=0.78). Preferences for EOL among responders are described in Table 1. The Letter AD uncovered that 66.7%, 42.2%, and 46.7% of patients actively wished to die gently/naturally, at home, and/or with hospice, respectively, whereas the traditional AD found that 62.2% wished to not prolong life if recovery was unlikely. Figure 1 portrays participant responses to the AD opinion survey; non-significant trends suggested that patients found the Letter AD favorable in terms of identifying what matters most to them, describing medical preferences to family, and stimulating thinking about the topic. Conclusion Completion rates of AD amongst allogeneic HCT recipients on this study were high and did not differ based upon AD version. Most patients wish to die naturally/do not wish to prolong care at EOL. Non-significant trends favored the Letter AD over the Traditional AD across several domains of patient preference.

Hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is an established procedure for acquired and congenital disorders of the hematopoietic system. In 2016, there was a tendency for continued activity in this field with 43,636 HCT in 39,313 patients [16,507 allogeneic (42%), 22,806 autologous (58%)] reported by 679 centers in 49 countries in 2016. The main indications were myeloid malignancies 9547 (24%; 96% allogeneic), lymphoid malignancies 25,618 (65%; 20% allogeneic), solid tumors 1516 (4%; 2% allogeneic), and non-malignant disorders 2459 (6%; 85% allogeneic). There was a remarkable leveling off in the use of unrelated donor HCT being replaced by haploidentical HCT. Continued growth in allogeneic HCT for marrow failure, AML, and MPN was seen, whereas MDS appears stable. Allogeneic HCT for lymphoid malignancies vary in trend with increases for NHL and decreases for Hodgkin lymphoma and myeloma. Trends in CLL are not clear, with recent increases after a decrease in activity. In autologous HCT, the use in myeloma continues to expand but is stable in Hodgkin lymphoma. There is a notable increase in autologous HCT for autoimmune disease. These data reflect the most recent advances in the field, in which some trends and changes are likely to be related to development of non-transplant technologies.

Background Hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is an intensive therapy, resulting in prolonged absence from work, with potential for unemployment, extended long-term disability, and early retirement. While published data characterize risk factors for failure to return to work following HCT, information on how centers advise and/or facilitate the return to work (RTW) transition for their post-HCT patients is lacking. We aimed to determine 1) whether transplant centers have guidelines for RTW post-HCT and the details of these guidelines and 2) whether transplant centers have RTW support programs for their patients and what these programs entail. Methods We used emailed links to an anonymous REDcap secure web application to distribute surveys with questions regarding RTW guidelines and support programs to 150 transplant center directors within and outside the United States. Centers were selected if they performed at least 50 HCTs per year. The survey contained 32 closed-ended questions as well as the opportunity to provide write-in responses. Results We received 45 completed surveys (30% response rate) from 27 transplant center directors, 6 physicians, 2 advanced practice providers, and 9 others. Thirty-six (80%) responders had been in the transplant field at least 10 years. While 39 (87%) participants endorsed that RTW is a problem for post-HCT patients, only 16 (36%) responded that they have RTW support for their patients and 3 had formal RTW support programs. Thirty-nine responders (87%) endorsed that a RTW program would be somewhat helpful (n = 16) or very helpful (n = 23) for their patients. Responders thought psychosocial counseling (n= 40), physical therapy (n = 33), vocational rehabilitation (n = 26) and interfacing with patient's employers (n = 23) would benefit their patients. Fifty-one percent thought the program should begin when the patient's condition warrants rather than at a set time-point. Twenty (44%) responders reported having RTW guidelines for their post-HCT patients. While 70% of the centers' guidelines recommended that autologous HCT recipients RTW between 1-3 months post-HCT, 85% of the centers' guidelines endorse that allogeneic HCT recipients postpone RTW until 6-12 months post HCT. Guidelines also varied depending on whether the patient was still on immune suppression and what type of work they did pre-HCT. Jobs involving children (60%), sick people (66%) and animals (47%) were considered to be the highest risk professions for RTW. Centers that did not have guidelines noted that they make RTW recommendations on a case-to-case basis. Conclusions While the majority of responders agreed that RTW is a problem for post-HCT patients, consistent guidelines and RTW support for post-HCT patients are lacking. Efforts toward creating standardized guidelines and RTW support programs are much needed and ongoing.

Hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is a complex procedure that requires availability of adequate infrastructure, personnel, and resources at transplantation centers. We conducted a national survey of transplantation centers in the United States to obtain data on their personnel, infrastructure, and care delivery models. A 42-item web-based survey was administered to medical directors of transplantation centers in the United States that reported any allogeneic HCT to the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research in 2011. The response rate for the survey was 79% for adult programs (85 of 108 centers) and 82% for pediatric programs (54 of 66 centers). For describing results, we categorized centers into groups with similar volumes based on 2010 total HCT activity (adult centers, 9 categories; pediatric centers, 6 categories). We observed considerable variation in available resources, infrastructure, personnel, and care delivery models among adult and pediatric transplantation centers. Characteristics varied substantially among centers with comparable transplantation volumes. Transplantation centers may find these data helpful in assessing their present capacity and use them to evaluate potential resource needs for personnel, infrastructure, and care delivery and in planning for growth.

The use of large databases has provided advancements in the understanding of racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic disparities in the field of adult hematopoietic cell transplants (HCT). Disparities exist on individual, institutional, and systemic levels for both allogeneic and autologous HCT. We reviewed the most recent publications that utilized large databases to elucidate disparities in HCT and placed them into historical context of the other major studies in the field. Two emerging themes were identified. These themes are persistent inequalities in both allogeneic HCT and autologous HCT for myeloma and the importance of improving homogeneity of care in HCT. Minimization of inequalities can be achieved only with an understanding of the persistent barriers that exist in the field.

The role of hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) in the therapy of Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) in pediatric and adult patients is reviewed and critically evaluated in this systematic evidence-based review. Specific criteria were used for searching the published literature and for grading the quality and strength of the evidence and the strength of the treatment recommendations. Treatment recommendations based on the evidence are included and were reached unanimously by a panel of HL experts. Both autologous and allogeneic HCT offer a survival benefit in selected patients with advanced or relapsed HL and are currently part of standard clinical care. Relapse remains a significant cause of failure after both transplant approaches, and strategies to decrease the risk of relapse remain an important area of investigation.

OBJECTIVE Second allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) may be indicated following relapse or graft failure following first HCT. Our retrospective single-center study sought to investigate parameters that influence post-second allogeneic HCT survival. METHOD We investigated 92 patients who underwent second allogeneic HCT between 1980 and 2016 for relapse or graft failure following first HCT. Median age at second HCT was 41 years (range 16-68), performed for relapse in 59 patients (64%) and for graft failure in 33 patients (36%). RESULTS On univariate analysis, 3-year OS of the entire cohort was 35% (95% CI=25-45). Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score (3-year OS 48% for ECOG 0-1, 18% for ECOG 2-3, P=.0006), second HCT indication (3-year OS 43% for relapse, 20% for graft failure, P=.02), time from first HCT to relapse/graft failure (3-year OS for

The present study aimed to investigate baseline and posttransplant prognostic factors for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) in 61 lymphoma patients. The 5-year probabilities of overall survival (OS), non-relapse mortality (NRM), progression-free survival (PFS), and event-free survival (EFS) were 31.1%, 28.8%, 38.8%, and 23.2%, respectively. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that the International Prognostic Index risk at HCT was a significantly independent prognostic factor for OS, NRM, PFS, and EFS, and chemosensitivity was a prognostic factor for OS, NRM, and EFS. The occurrence of chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) was significantly associated with higher OS, but it was not with PFS or EFS. Various parameters of immune reconstitution at 1 month after transplantation were associated with clinical outcomes in different ways. Our study results might be helpful in selecting appropriate patients or adopting effective posttransplant treatment strategies, eventually leading to an improvement in outcomes after allogeneic HCT for lymphoma.

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is the most potent therapy for preventing relapse of acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Although its efficacy is compromised by a high risk of treatment-related morbidity and mortality, an accumulating body of evidence has led to the general recommendation favoring allogeneic HCT from a matched sibling donor during first complete remission (CR1) for younger patients with cytogenetically intermediate- or high-risk AML. Over the past few decades, this field has seen a great many advancements. The indications for allogeneic HCT have been refined by taking into account the molecular profiles of leukemic cells and the degree of comorbidities. The introduction of high-resolution human leukocyte antigen-typing technology and advances in immunosuppressive therapy and supportive care measures have improved outcomes in alternative donor transplantation, while the parallel growth of unrelated donor registries and greater use of umbilical cord blood and haploidentical donors have considerably improved the chance of finding an alternative donor. The development of reduced-intensity and non-myeloablative conditioning has made it possible to receive allogeneic HCT for patients who might once have been considered ineligible due to advanced age or comorbidities. Thanks to these advances, the role of allogeneic HCT during CR1 has become progressively more important in the treatment of AML.

The original version of this article contained a mistake in fig. 1a. "Autologous HCT(n=111)" should be changed to "Allogeneic HCT (n=51)". Correct figure is presented below.

Presumably, reduced-intensity/nonmyeloablative conditioning (RIC/NMA) for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) results in reduced infections compared with myeloablative conditioning (MAC) regimens; however, published evidence is limited. In this Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research study, 1755 patients (aged ≥40 years) with acute myeloid leukemia in first complete remission were evaluated for infections occurring within 100 days after T-cell replete alloHCT. Patients receiving RIC/NMA (n = 777) compared with those receiving MAC (n = 978) were older and underwent transplantation more recently; however, the groups were similar regarding Karnofsky performance score, HCT–comorbidity index, and cytogenetic risk. One or more infections occurred in 1045 (59.5%) patients (MAC, 595 [61%]; RIC/NMA, 450 [58%]; P = .21) by day 100. The median time to initial infection after MAC conditioning occurred earlier (MAC, 15 days [range

Background Letermovir (LET) is approved for the prophylaxis of cytomegalovirus (CMV) in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) patients. LET is a weak-moderate CYP3A4 inhibitor, which may impact calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) levels. In the phase 1 trial, LET caused an increase in maximum plasma concentrations (Cmax) of CSA and tacrolimus by 37% and 70%, respectively. There are no data to correlate how the Cmax increase in the presence of LET may affect CNI trough levels. Methods A retrospective review was conducted to evaluate the effect of LET on CNI trough levels and determine if empiric dose adjustments are needed. Patients ≥ 18 years were included if they received an allo-HCT with a CNI from February to June 2018 and received LET 480 mg daily or 240mg daily for tacrolimus- or CSA-based GVHD prophylaxis, respectively. The primary endpoint was percent change in concentration to dose (C/D) ratio over the 7-day period after initiation of LET. The C/D ratio allows for an analysis of the effect on trough levels at any given dose, which we would expect to rise upon initiation of LET due to CYP inhibition. LET reaches steady state in 36-60 hours; therefore, C/D percent changes were evaluated both from baseline to 4 days post-LET and from day 4 to day 7. Results Thirty-four patients (median age 53, range 24-75) were included in the analysis, with 24 (70.6%) patients receiving a tacrolimus-based graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis and 10 (29.4%) patients receiving CSA-based GVHD prophylaxis. There were 8 (24%) umbilical cord blood transplants, 10 (29%) haploidentical HCTs, and 16 (47%) conventional HCTs, with 14 patients (41%) receiving myeloablative conditioning. LET was initiated on a median of day 7 (range 6-30) post-HCT, and 23 patients (68%) received the drug orally. In the 10 patients who received CSA, there was an average of 3.8 (range 1-6) dose changes over 7 days. From baseline to 4 days post-LET, the mean percent change in C/D ratio was +15.9%, with a subsequent -10.0% change in C/D ratio from day 4 to day 7. In the 24 patients who received tacrolimus, there was an average of 2.2 (range 0-5) dose changes over 7 days. From baseline to 4 days post-LET, the mean percent change in C/D ratio was +20.4%, with a subsequent -18.9% change in C/D ratio from day 4 to day 7. Days 0 to 7 trough levels for all patients are displayed in Figures 1 and 2. Conclusion An empiric dose reduction in CNIs upon initiation of LET does not appear to be warranted based on this pilot study. An increase in trough levels is seen within 4 days after initiation of LET; however, the increase seems marginal and is compensated for by adjusting doses based on levels, which is the standard of care. Larger studies are needed to assess additional factors that may affect this drug-drug interaction.