Search

The management of hematological malignancies (HM) in renally impaired patients may be a difficult task. Indeed, the kidney represents a major elimination pathway for many chemotherapeutic agents and their metabolites, whose serum levels are not usually measured in daily clinical practice. In addition, many antineoplastic drugs have a narrow therapeutic index for which they require dose adjustment when administered to patients with renal failure. Only limited data regarding the use of chemotherapy in patients with renal impairment and in those on dialysis are available. Indeed, renal patients with HM are often excluded from most clinical trials. Thus far, in order to provide recommendations, we have reviewed the pertinent literature, gathering information from published guidelines regarding chemotherapy in patients with kidney dysfunction and from articles describing the use of individual agents in renal patients with HM.

Pain is frequently experienced by patients with hematological malignancies, although it often receives little attention. Different underlying causes and mechanisms may sustain several pain syndromes in hematological malignant patients. Pain may be due to disease itself, to disease-related complications, to iatrogenic causes or may be associated with unrelated medical conditions. The management of pain in this setting requires a multidisciplinary approach, integrating analgesics and causal interventions. An accurate diagnostic assessment and the identification of the underlying causes and pathogenetic mechanisms may dictate the treatment approach. For most pain patients, the WHO's three-step analgesic scale for cancer pain relief can provide adequate relief with oral options, although difficult-to-treat pain syndromes, requiring a more complex treatment approach, may also be observed.

Background: In the management of hematological malignancies, chemotherapy-induced mucositis is an increasingly recognized problem, leading to potentially severe clinical complications, treatment delays, increased costs and impairment of patient's quality of life. Many forms of cytotoxic treatments given in this setting may induce several degrees of mucositis. In particular, conditioning therapy with hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) induces a disruption of the mucosal barrier function throughout the entire gastrointestinal tract facilitating the spreading of bacteria and endotoxin with subsequent increased risk of septicemia and, in the allogeneic setting, a worsening of Graft Versus Host Disease (GVHD)., Objectives: To review the role of palifermin and of other existing and potential treatments for chemotherapy-induced mucositis in the context of current knowledge of pathobiology in the setting of hematological malignancies., Methods: We searched for palifermin and mucositis of any region of the gastrointestinal tract using Medline; the abstract books of the most important hematological and oncological meetings were also reviewed., Results/conclusions: The pathobiology of mucositis is complex, and agents that target mechanisms to prevent mucositis or accelerate healing are highly required. In this regard, palifermin (recombinant human keratinocyte growth factor) has been demonstrated to reduce the severity and the duration of oral mucositis and to significantly improve several treatment outcomes in patients submitted to autologous HSCT; data are insufficient to recommend its use in the non-autologous HSCT settings, although interesting properties of this agent deserves other investigations in order to explore other possible indications.

Patients with advanced hematological malignancies may experience many troublesome hemorrhagic complications requiring hospitalisation during a palliative home care (HC) program. We report on the feasibility of the management of bleeding at home in patients with haematological malignancies admitted in a domiciliary HC program. The occurrence of a major hemorrhage episode (>1 WHO grade) was registered among 469 patients with hematological malignancies in the terminal phase of their disease followed at home. Number, sites, domiciliary treatment (local hemostatic measures, platelet units, hemostatic drugs, packed red blood cells) and outcome of hemorrhagic complications were evaluated. Out of 469 patients, 123 (26%) experienced a bleeding complication; the overall number of hemorrhagic episodes was 232 (49%) with a median number of 2 episodes per patient. Patients with a platelet count lower than 20 x 10(9)/L (P < 0.00005) or with a diagnosis of acute leukemia or in blast crisis of myeloprolypherative disorders (P < 0.00005) showed a significant higher incidence of hemorrhages than other patients. Resolution of bleeding at home was obtained in 206 (88%) of the 232 episodes; platelet units were transfused at home in 188 (81%) cases. Bleeding was the cause of hospitalisation in four cases. Death occurred in 447 of 469 patients: in 26 of them (6%), it was caused by bleeding complications (11 brain hemorrhage, 2 hematemesis, 3 hemoptysis and 10 melena). In this group of patients, bleeding was a relevant clinical problem However, by implementing a domiciliary palliative care program, home management of hemorrhages proved to be a safe and effective choice.

Severe pain syndromes may be recorded during all phases of haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) for haematological malignancies: from stem cell mobilization to the long-term post transplant period. Although the major cause of pain in the setting of HSCT is injury to mucosal tissues induced by the conditioning regimen, pain from several other causes has been reported. In this paper, we review pain and its management in the setting of HSCT.

Varicella zoster virus (VZV) outbreak is a significant cause of morbidity in patients suffering from blood-related malignancies, occurring mostly among those affected by lymphoproliferative disorders and in those receiving haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation. The elucidated pathological mechanisms of VZV-related painful complications have provided the rationale for acute zoster pain (AZP) and post-herpetic neuralgia (PHN) treatment with antiviral therapy combined with neuroactive agents, such as tricyclic or anticonvulsant agents. The role of opioids in this setting is less clearly established. We successfully treated (with oxycodone) 12 consecutive patients suffering from AZP and long-lasting PHN resistant to several agents, including anticonvulsants and analgesics. Our experience is reported together with a brief overview of the management of these often distressing and intractable complications.

We report on epidemiology, features, outcome, and domiciliary management of pain in patients with advanced hematological malignancies followed by an experienced hospital-based home care (HC) team. Out of 469 patients, 244 (52%) experienced a total of 284 pain syndromes. Pain intensity was rated from mild to moderate in 31% and from moderate to severe in 69% of them. The diagnosed pain mechanisms were deep somatic in 56%, superficial somatic in 15%, visceral 14%, mixed 8%, and neuropathic in 7% of pain syndromes, respectively. Incident pain was observed in 38% of all pain syndromes. In every diagnostic group, deep somatic pain was prevalent. Moreover, 85% of visceral pain syndromes were observed in patients affected by non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). In addition, out of 284 pain syndromes, 150 (51%) were caused by bone involvement. The most frequent recognized pain provocative mechanisms were bone marrow expansions, osteolysis, lymph node enlargement, and mucositis. In our experience, an approach based on the association of causal therapies and analgesics allows optimal control of most pain syndromes. Therefore, pain is a major problem in patients affected by advanced hematological malignancies, and its management can be effective and feasible when carried out by a skilled HC team.

Mucosal barrier injury (mucositis) is a common complication of many treatments used in hematologic malignancies, affecting most patients whose neoplasms are treated with intensive chemotherapy, and virtually all those receiving myeloablative conditioning regimens prior to hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Mucositis has been identified as a critical risk factor for infections and is a major driver of analgesic and total parenteral nutrition use. Patients with this complication require careful analgesic therapy, additional nursing care and longer hospitalization. To date, the measures to prevent and treat this potentially devastating complication are inadequate and limited to the control of pain, infections, bleeding and nutrition. Nevertheless, in the last decade, a better insight into the pathogenesis of the mucosal damage has led to the development of novel therapeutic options which potentially could allow a targeted approach to mucositis.

Home care (HC) has an increasingly expanding role in the global management of patients affected by hematologic malignancies. Integrated strategies, including causal-targeted and supportive treatments according to hematologic expertise and a holistic approach inspired by the philosophy and practice of palliative medicine, may allow suitable management and the possibility for most patients to stay at home. Physical, social and psychological needs of patients are likely to vary according to the course of their disease and the treatments they are receiving. Therefore, consideration should be given to different models of care and how to tackle patients' diverse needs, as outlined by reported experiences which claimed that HC can provide appropriate solutions not only for terminally and chronically ill patients but also for those in other phases of disease. According to these studies and to our own experience, when appropriate measures and structured operating models are adopted, HC results in a safe, effective and economically realistic alternative to traditional in-hospital treatment. Therefore, all efforts should be made to overcome budget and administrative barriers and to ensure a more widespread use of this model of care.

Opioids are basic analgesics used in the treatment of moderate to severe pain in patients affected by blood-related malignancies. They should be sequentially administered according to the World Health Organisation scale for cancer pain. Initial treatment and titration with opioids should be based on immediate-release preparations, to be administered at appropriate intervals in order to relieve pain and to satisfy the individual opioid requirement. Once a relatively good pain control has been achieved, a slow release formulation at equivalent doses can be given. Most patients can be adequately managed using oral formulation opioids. However, a small group, such as those presenting severe mucositis or requiring a rapid pain relief, should be managed by intravenous continuous infusion and/or by a patient-controlled analgesia system; while for patients in the community, there are distinct advantages to using the subcutaneous route. Other available routes of administration for opioids, can be used in selected circumstances, including rectal, transdermal, epidural, intrathecal and intramuscular. The invasive neuraxial route has a very limited role in patients with haematological malignancies, given the high risk of infection and bleeding. Through a close observation and a careful management, opioid-related side effects can be effectively prevented and treated. This article reviews the principles of opioid therapy and how opioids can be adapted for patients with pain due to haematological malignancies.

Several pain syndromes, which may be related to the diagnostic procedures, to the treatments, or to disease itself, may be recorded during the disease course of most haematological malignancies. So far, the painful complication occurring in this setting has been poorly investigated. Pain arising from skeletal and bone marrow (BM) involvement represents the most frequent disease-related painful states observed in this setting, while patients undergoing treatments with curative intent, such as BM transplantation, usually experienced painful stomatitis. Additionally, more than one pathologic process may coexist simultaneously in one patient and the pathophysiology of pain and hypersensitivity may change over time. An accurate diagnostic assessment and the identification of the underlying pathogenetic mechanism may dictate the treatment approach. For most patients in pain, the World Health Organisation's three-step analgesic scale provides adequate relief with oral options. Pain left unrelieved may induce an aberrant peripheral activity and central functional alterations, generating chronic neuropathic pain. In the aim to summarize the current knowledge on this topic, the pertinent literature and the current guidelines for the pain management were reviewed by a group of haematologists, experienced in palliative care and by a skilled algologist, involved as consultant in this clinical setting.

A home care service has been implemented at our center with the aim of offering domiciliary assistance to patients with hematologic malignancies in advanced phase. We report our experience concerning the home management of these patients in the setting of infective complications. Of 151 patients in home care, 70 (46%) developed a total of 109 febrile episodes, performance status and neutrophil count significantly affecting the incidence of infections. Fever was of unknown origin in 51% of cases and microbiologically and clinically documented infections accounted for 26 and 23% of the cases, respectively. Oral ciprofloxacin in patients not neutropenic and intravenous ceftriaxone plus amikacin in neutropenic patients was shown to be effective and suitable for empiric home antibacterial treatment; in fact, 65% of febrile episodes responded to the initial antibacterial therapy with a further 16% after modification. Overall, 19.3% of the infective episodes were fatal, the prognosis appearing to be similar to that usually observed in the same category of patients in an inpatient setting. Our experience appears to show that a home care program could be the option of choice for patients with advanced cancer even in the setting of infective complications. It could improve the quality of life of patients and of their families, and it could save these subjects the risk of developing infections by resistant nosocomial isolates.