Search

Background: To report the safety and effectiveness of laparoscopic intratumoral resection facilitated by coagulation (LIRC) compared with laparoscopic hepatectomy (LH) in treating giant hepatic hemangioma., Methods: From 2017 to 2020, 19 consecutive patients with giant hepatic hemangioma (≥ 10 cm) received LIRC in one center. We selected a subgroup of 103 patients treated by LH in other four centers who well matched the 19 consecutive patients treated with LIRC, in a 1:1 fashion based on the tumor location, tumor size, and body mass index. Furthermore, the differences in technical success, operative time, operative blood loss, change of laboratory indexes, hospital stays, complication and clinical responds are compared between the two groups., Results: Technical success was achieved in all 38 patients. Patients in the LIRC group had a relative shorter operative time (P < 0.001) and less operative blood loss (P = 0.003). The serum levels of C-reactive protein (CRP), total bilirubin (TBil), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), and aspartate transaminase (AST) were elevated significantly (P < 0.05) 1 day after the resection and returned to normal within 7 days in both groups; however, relatively lower serum levels of those indexes were observed in the LIRC group (P < 0.05). The total complication rate was relatively lower in the LIRC group compared with the LH group (P = 0.029). Patients in the LIRC group had shorter hospital stays than those in the LH group (P = 0.010). The clinical response was similar in the two groups., Conclusions: LIRC is safe and effective for treating giant hepatic hemangioma., (© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Background: Surgical treatment of giant hepatic hemangioma larger than 10 cm in diameter often requires major laparoscopic liver resection (LLR), which is very difficult and has a high risk of bleeding. There is no consensus as to whether giant hepatic hemangioma is an indication or a contraindication for laparoscopic surgery., Methods: From 2011/09 to 2018/05, 58 patients with giant hepatic hemangioma larger than 10 cm underwent laparoscopic surgery. They were divided into high-difficulty (HD) group and low-difficulty (LD) group according to the operation difficulty score. The perioperative data of the two groups were analyzed and compared., Results: There were 30 patients in the LD group and 28 in the HD group. No differences were showed in sex, age, ASA grade, tumor size, operation time, conversion rate, intraoperative and post-operative blood transfusion rate, and post-operative complications between the two groups. The amount of bleeding in the HD group was significantly higher than that in the LD group (285.7 ± 224.0 vs 189.6 ± 157.6 ml, p = 0.007). The time of hepatic hilar occlusion in the HD group was longer than that in the LD group (25.4 ± 8.8 vs 20.6 ± 7.3 min, p = 0.001), and the rate of hepatic hilar occlusion in the HD group was also higher than that in the LD group (71.4% vs 33.3%, p = 0.004). The incidence of hospitalization days and discharge time in the LD group were shorter than those in the HD group (6.3 ± 1.6 vs 8.2 ± 1.4 days, p = 0.000; 16.4 ± 5.5 vs 21.9 ± 4.6 h, p = 0.019). There was no significant difference in enzymatic parameters between the two groups after operation., Conclusions: Although there are great difficulties and risks objectively, laparoscopic treatment of giant hepatic hemangioma is safe and feasible.

Background: Hepatic hemangioma is a common benign liver tumor. The majority of cases are asymptomatic and require no specific treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility, safety and efficacy of microwave ablation (MWA) for symptomatic or enlarging giant hepatic hemangioma (≥10 cm)., Methods: From December 2013 to June 2016, 12 patients with giant hepatic hemangioma (≥10 cm) underwent ultrasound-guided percutaneous MWA, and ablation-related complications were observed. All patients were followed up with magnetic resonance or enhanced CT imaging at one month postoperatively to evaluate efficacy., Results: This study included a total of 13 giant hepatic hemangiomas (mean: 11.7 ± 1.6 cm) in 12 patients who initially underwent 16 sessions of MWA; three lesions were treated with two sessions of planned ablation. The average ablation time for a single hepatic hemangioma was 39.0 ± 14.4 minutes. Two patients had acute postoperative non-oliguric renal insufficiency without intra-abdominal hemorrhage, liver failure or other complications. Initially, complete ablation was achieved in ten lesions in nine patients (76.9%, 10/13). One patient underwent a second session of MWA at 5 months postoperatively due to fast growing residual tissue; complete necrosis was achieved after treatment. The remaining two cases did not receive any invasive treatment due to small residual volumes. The total complete ablation rate was 84.6% (11/13)., Conclusion: Image-guided MWA is a safe, feasible, effective treatment for giant hepatic hemangioma; these findings may open a new avenue for treatment.