Search

Heat shock proteins (HSPs) play critical roles in regulating different mechanisms under high-temperature conditions. HSPs have been identified and well-studied in different plants. However, there is a lack of information about their genomic organization and roles in medicinal plants and fungi, especially in Wolfi-poria cocos (W. cocos). We identified sixteen heat shock proteins (HSPs) in W. cocos and analyzed in terms of phylogenetic analysis, gene structure, motif distribution patterns, physiochemical properties, and expression comparison in different strains. Based on phylogenetic analysis, HSPs were divided into five subgroups (WcHSP100, WcHSP90, WcHSP70, WcHSP60, and WcsHSP). Subgroups WcHSP100s, WcHSP90s, WcHSP70s, WcHSP60, and WcsHSPs were further divided into 3, 2, 3, 1, and 6 subfamilies, respectively. Moreover, the expression profiling of all HSP genes in five strains of W. cocos under different temperature extremes revealed that expression of most HSPs were induced by high temperature. However, every subfamily showed different expression suggesting distinctive role in heat stress tolerance. WcHSP70-4, WcHSP90-1, and WcHSP100-1 showed the highest response to high temperature stress. Heterologous expression of WcHSP70-4, WcHSP90-1, and WcHSP100-1 genes in Escherichia coli enhanced survival rate of E. coli during heat stress. These findings suggest the role of W. cocos heat shock genes in the high temperature stress tolerance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The heat shock response (HSR) is an ancient and highly conserved program of stress-induced gene expression, aimed at reestablishing protein homeostasis to preserve cellular fitness. Cells that fail to activate or maintain this protective response are hypersensitive to proteotoxic stress. The HSR is mediated by the heat shock transcription factor 1 (HSF1), which binds to conserved heat shock elements (HSE) in the promoter region of heat shock genes, resulting in the expression of heat shock proteins (HSP). Recently, we observed that hyperactivation of RhoA conditions cardiomyocytes for the cardiac arrhythmia atrial fibrillation. Also, the HSR is annihilated in atrial fibrillation, and induction of HSR mitigates sensitization of cells to this disease. Therefore, we hypothesized active RhoA to suppress the HSR resulting in sensitization of cells for proteotoxic stimuli. Methods and Results: Stimulation of RhoA activity significantly suppressed the proteotoxic stress-induced HSR in HL-1 atrial cardiomyocytes as determined with a luciferase reporter construct driven by the HSF1 regulated human HSP70 (HSPA1A) promoter and HSP protein expression by Western Blot analysis. Inversely, RhoA inhibition boosted the proteotoxic stress-induced HSR. While active RhoA did not preclude HSF1 nuclear accumulation, phosphorylation, acetylation, or sumoylation, it did impair binding of HSF1 to the hsp genes promoter element HSE. Impaired binding results in suppression of HSP expression and sensitized cells to proteotoxic stress. Conclusion: These results reveal that active RhoA negatively regulates the HSR via attenuation of the HSF1-HSE binding and thus may play a role in sensitizing cells to proteotoxic stimuli. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: The most common clinical tachycardia, Atrial Fibrillation (AF), is a progressive disease, caused by cardiomyocyte remodeling, which finally results in contractile dysfunction and AF persistence. Recently, we identified a protective role of heat shock proteins (HSPs), especially the small HSPB1 member, against tachycardia remodeling in experimental AF models. Our understanding of tachycardia remodeling and anti-remodeling drugs is currently hampered by the lack of suitable (genetic) manipulatable in vivo models for rapid screening of key targets in remodeling. We hypothesized that Drosophila melanogaster can be exploited to study tachycardia remodeling and protective effects of HSPs by drug treatments or by utilizing genetically manipulated small HSP-overexpressing strains. Tachypacing of Drosophila pupae resulted in gradual and significant cardiomyocyte remodeling, demonstrated by reduced contraction rate, increase in arrhythmic episodes and reduction in heart wall shortening, compared to normal paced pupae. Heat shock, or pre-treatment with HSP-inducers GGA and BGP-15, resulted in endogenous HSP overexpression and protection against tachycardia remodeling. DmHSP23 overexpressing Drosophilas were protected against tachycardia remodeling, in contrast to overexpression of other small HSPs (DmHSP27, DmHSP67Bc, DmCG4461, DmCG7409, and DmCG14207). (Ultra)structural evaluation of the tachypaced heart wall revealed loss of sarcomeres and mitochondrial damage which were absent in tachypaced DmHSP23 overexpressing Drosophila. In addition, tachypacing induced a significant increase in calpain activity, which was prevented in tachypaced Drosophila overexpressing DmHSP23. Tachypacing of Drosophila resulted in cardiomyocyte remodeling, which was prevented by general HSP-inducing treatments and overexpression of a single small HSP, DmHSP23. Thus, tachypaced D. melanogaster can be used as an in vivo model system for rapid identification of novel targets to combat AF associated cardiomyocyte remodeling. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common clinical tachyarrhythmia associated with significant morbidity and mortality and is expected to affect approximately 30 million North Americans and Europeans by 2050. AF is a persistent disease, caused by progressive, often age-related, derailment of proteostasis resulting in structural remodeling of the atrial cardiomyocytes. It has been widely acknowledged that the progressive nature of the disease hampers the effective functional conversion to sinus rhythm in patients and explains the limited effect of current drug therapies. Therefore, research is directed at preventing new-onset AF by limiting the development of substrates underlying AF promotion. Upstream therapy refers to the use of drugs that modify the atrial substrate- or target-specific mechanisms of AF, with the ultimate aim to prevent the occurrence (primary prevention) and recurrence of the arrhythmia following (spontaneous) conversion and to prevent the progression of AF (secondary prevention). Recently, we observed that heat shock protein (HSP)–inducing drugs, such as geranylgeranylacetone, prevent derailment of proteostasis and remodeling of cardiomyocytes and thereby attenuate the AF substrate in cellular, Drosophila melanogaster, and animal experimental models. Also, correlative data from human studies were consistent with a protective role of HSPs in preventing the progression from paroxysmal AF to permanent AF and in the recurrence of AF. In this review, we discuss novel HSP-inducing compounds as emerging therapeutics for the primary and secondary prevention of AF. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Atrial Fibrillation (AF) is the most common progressive tachyarrhythmia. AF progression is driven by abnormalities in electrical impulse formation and contractile function due to structural remodeling of cardiac tissue. Previous reports indicate that structural remodeling is rooted in derailment of protein homeostasis (proteostasis). Heat shock proteins (HSPs) play a critical role in facilitating proteostasis. Hence, the HSP-inducing compound geranylgeranylacetone (GGA) and its derivatives protect against proteostasis derailment in experimental models for AF. Whether these compounds also accelerate reversibility from structural remodeling in tachypaced cardiomyocytes is unknown. To investigate whether the potent HSP inducer GGA*-59 restores structural remodeling and contractile dysfunction in tachypaced cardiomyocytes and explore the underlying mechanisms. HL-1 cardiomyocytes post-treated with GGA*-59 or recombinant HSPB1 (rcHSPB1) revealed increased levels of HSPB1 expression and accelerated recovery from tachypacing (TP)-induced calcium transient (CaT) loss compared to non-treated cardiomyocytes. In addition, protein levels of the microtubule protein (acetylated) α-tubulin, and contractile proteins cardiac troponin I (cTnI) and troponin T (cTnT) were reduced after TP and significantly recovered by GGA*-59 or rcHSPB1 post-treatment. The mRNA levels of α-tubulin encoding genes, but not cardiac troponin genes, were reduced upon TP and during recovery, but significantly enhanced by GGA*-59 and rcHSPB1 post-treatment. In addition, TP increased calpain activity, which remained increased during recovery and GGA*-59 post-treatment. However, HDAC6 activity, which deacetylates α-tubulin resulting in microtubule disruption, was significantly increased after TP and during recovery, but normalized to control levels by GGA*-59 or rcHSPB1 post-treatment in HL-1 cardiomyocytes. Our results imply that the HSP inducer GGA*-59 and recombinant HSPB1 accelerate recovery from TP-induced structural remodeling and contractile dysfunction in HL-1 cardiomyocytes. GGA*-59 increases HSPB1 levels, represses HDAC6 activity and restores contractile protein and microtubule levels after TP, indicating that HSP-induction is an interesting target to accelerate recovery from AF-induced remodeling. • Tachypacing-induced remodeling of HL-1 atrial cardiomyocytes is persistent. • GGA*-59 and HSPB1 post-treatment enhances recovery from remodeling. • GGA*-59/HSPB1 repair the microtubule network resulting in improved contractile function. • Repair is partly via suppression of HDAC6 activity. • HSP-induction is an important target to enhance recovery from AF-induced remodeling. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]