1. Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Complex Coronary Artery Disease.
- Author
-
Alperi A, Mohammadi S, Campelo-Parada F, Munoz-Garcia E, Nombela-Franco L, Faroux L, Veiga G, Serra V, Fischer Q, Pascual I, Asmarats L, Gutiérrez E, Regueiro A, Vilalta V, Ribeiro HB, Matta A, Munoz-Garcia A, Armijo G, Metz D, De la Torre Hernandez JM, Rodenas-Alesina E, Urena M, Moris C, Arzamendi D, Perez-Fuentes P, Fernandez-Nofrerias E, Campanha-Borges DC, Mesnier J, Voisine P, Dumont E, Kalavrouziotis D, and Rodés-Cabau J
- Subjects
- Aortic Valve diagnostic imaging, Aortic Valve surgery, Humans, Risk Factors, Treatment Outcome, Aortic Valve Stenosis complications, Aortic Valve Stenosis diagnostic imaging, Aortic Valve Stenosis surgery, Coronary Artery Disease diagnostic imaging, Coronary Artery Disease surgery, Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation adverse effects, Percutaneous Coronary Intervention adverse effects, Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement adverse effects
- Abstract
Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare, in a cohort of patients with complex coronary artery disease (CAD) and severe aortic stenosis (AS), the clinical outcomes associated with transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) (plus percutaneous coronary intervention [PCI]) versus surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) (plus coronary artery bypass grafting [CABG])., Background: Patients with complex CAD were excluded from the main randomized trials comparing TAVR with SAVR, and no data exist comparing TAVR + PCI vs SAVR + CABG in such patients., Methods: A multicenter study was conducted including consecutive patients with severe AS and complex CAD (SYNTAX [Synergy Between PCI with Taxus and Cardiac Surgery] score >22 or unprotected left main disease). A 1:1 propensity-matched analysis was performed to account for unbalanced covariates. The rates of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), including all-cause mortality, nonprocedural myocardial infarction, need for new coronary revascularization, and stroke, were evaluated., Results: A total of 800 patients (598 undergoing SAVR + CABG and 202 undergoing transfemoral TAVR + PCI) were included, and after propensity matching, a total of 156 pairs of patients were generated. After a median follow-up period of 3 years (interquartile range: 1-6 years), there were no significant differences between groups for MACCE (HR for transfemoral TAVR vs SAVR: 1.33; 95% CI: 0.89-1.98), all-cause mortality (HR: 1.25; 95% CI: 0.81-1.94), myocardial infarction (HR: 1.16; 95% CI: 0.41-3.27), and stroke (HR: 0.42; 95% CI: 0.13-1.32), but there was a higher rate of new coronary revascularization in the TAVR + PCI group (HR: 5.38; 95% CI: 1.73-16.7)., Conclusions: In patients with severe AS and complex CAD, TAVR + PCI and SAVR + CABG were associated with similar rates of MACCE after a median follow-up period of 3 years, but TAVR + PCI recipients exhibited a higher risk for repeat coronary revascularization. Future trials are warranted., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures Dr Alperi was supported by a research grant from the Martín Escudero Foundation. Dr Rodés-Cabau holds the Research Chair “Fondation Famille Jacques Larivière” for the Development of Structural Heart Disease Interventions; and has received institutional research grants from Edwards Lifesciences and Medtronic. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2021 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF