Search

Background: This study aimed to elucidate the short-term surgical outcomes and hemodynamics of the Intuity valve compared to the standard bioprosthesis in Japanese patients., Methods and results: Among the 307 consecutive patients who underwent aortic valve replacement (AVR) between February 2019 and March 2021, the Intuity valve was implanted in 95 patients (Intuity group) and a conventional stented bioprosthesis was implanted in 193 patients (conventional group). After propensity score matching, there was no significant difference in in-hospital mortality between the Intuity (n=2, 3%) and conventional groups (n=0, P=0.490). Operation, cardiopulmonary bypass, and aortic cross-clamping times were significantly shorter in the Intuity group. Although the effective orifice area index, trans-prosthetic mean pressure gradient, and peak velocity were similar between the 2 groups at 1 week postoperatively, the Intuity group showed a better mean pressure gradient and peak velocity at 1 year postoperatively. Complete atrioventricular block requiring permanent pacemaker implantation developed in 2 patients (3%) in the Intuity group and none in the conventional group (P=0.476). Mild or greater paravalvular leakage was present in 8 patients (13%) in the Intuity group and 2 patients (3%) in the conventional group (P=0.095)., Conclusions: AVR using the Intuity valve in Japanese patients is satisfactory, with a better valve performance and a low incidence of complete atrioventricular block at 1 year postoperatively.

Background: Transaortic transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAo-TAVR) is an alternative to peripheral or transapical TAVR. The procedural feasibility, safety, and midterm outcomes of TAo-TAVR were investigated in this study., Methods and results: Eighty-four consecutive patients underwent TAo-TAVR from 2011 to 2021. Their median age was 83 years (interquartile range, 80-87 years). The Edwards SAPIEN and Medtronic CoreValve devices were used in 45 (53.6%) and 38 (45.2%) patients, respectively. The surgical approach was a right mini-thoracotomy in 43 patients (51.2%) and partial sternotomy in 4 patients (4.8%). The remaining 37 patients (44.0%) underwent full sternotomy because of concomitant off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. VARC-3 device success was achieved in 77 patients (91.7%). Valve migration occurred in 3 patients (3.6%) using a first-generation CoreValve device, necessitating implantation of a second valve. No aortic annulus rupture, aortic dissection, or coronary orifice occlusion occurred. Conversion to surgery was required for 1 patient because of uncontrollable bleeding. Only 1 in-hospital death occurred. New pacemaker implantation was required in 6 patients (7.1%). Echocardiography at discharge showed no or trivial paravalvular leak (PVL) in 58 patients (69.0%), mild PVL in 23 (27.4%), and mild to moderate PVL in 2 (2.4%) patients. The 1- and 3-year incidence of cardiovascular death was 1.6% and 4.8%, respectively, with no structural valve deterioration., Conclusions: TAo-TAVR is feasible and safe with satisfactory midterm outcomes using both currently available devices.

Objectives: Balloon postdilation (BPD) is one strategy for decreasing paravalvular leakage, but its effect on long-term mortality remains unclear. The authors sought to clarify whether BPD influences long-term mortality of patients with transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR)., Design: Single-center retrospective study., Setting: National heart center; single institution., Participants: Participants were patients who underwent TAVR in the authors' hospital from January 2014 to December 2016. A balloon-expandable Sapien XT or Sapien3, or self-expandable CoreValve or Evolute R, was implanted according to the decision of the surgeon considering degree of calcification of the aortic valve., Interventions: No interventions., Measurements and Main Results: Multivariate Cox regression analysis and inverse probability weighted estimation were performed using a propensity score to examine whether BPD influenced six-year mortality. Ultimately, 180 patients were analyzed. During the follow-up period, with a median of 1104 (interquartile range: 730-1463) days, 41 patients died and cumulative incidence of mortality at six years was 22.8%. Society of Thoracic Surgeons score (odds ratio [OR]: 2.257, 95% CI: 1.213-4.197, p = 0.010)], BPD (OR: 0.306, 95% CI: 0.098-0.953, p = 0.041), and paravalvular regurgitation of at least moderate-to-mild severity after deploying (OR: 5.407, 95% CI: 1.626-17.978, p = 0.006) were significant factors of mortality., Conclusions: BPD is associated with reduced six-year mortality., Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: A new stented bovine pericardial valve (Avalus™) has been proven safe and effective with good hemodynamic performance in Western populations. However, its use in Japanese patients is poorly understood. We retrospectively compared the feasibility, safety, and valve haemodynamics between the Avalus™ and Magna™ valves in patients who underwent surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR)., Methods: This study included 87 patients receiving an Avalus™ valve and 387 receiving a Magna™ valve. We evaluated adverse events, outcomes, and valve haemodynamics within 1 year postoperatively. There were no significant differences in any surgical risk scores., Results: No in-hospital mortality occurred in the Avalus™ group, but two mortality events occurred in the Magna™ group. No pacemaker implantation for complete atrioventricular block was required in the Avalus™ group. There was no significant difference in in-hospital or clinical outcomes between the two groups until 1 year postoperatively. Left ventricular mass index reduction appeared to predominate in the Avalus™ over Magna™ group. There was no significant difference in the mean pressure gradient or effective orifice area of each valve size at 1 week or 1 year between the two groups, apart from the mean pressure gradient of the 23-mm valve at 1 week. Three patients (3.4%) in the Avalus™ group and 39 (10.8%) in the Magna™ group (p = 0.12) had severe patient-prosthesis mismatch at 1 week postoperatively., Conclusions: The new Avalus™ stented aortic valve bioprosthesis was associated with good in-hospital outcomes and good valve functionality post-SAVR in Japanese patients.