Search

Purpose: Cefiderocol is a novel siderophore cephalosporin with potent activity against gram-negative bacteria, including multidrug-resistant strains. This Phase I study was conducted to assess the tolerability of single-ascending doses of cefiderocol (part 1) and the effect of cefiderocol on cardiac repolarization, assessed using the electrocardiographic corrected QT interval (QTcF) and other ECG parameters (part 2), in healthy adult subjects., Methods: Part 1 was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single-ascending dose study in healthy adult male and female subjects. Part 2 was a 4-period crossover study in which subjects received a single 2-g dose of cefiderocol (therapeutic dose), a single 4-g dose of cefiderocol (supratherapeutic dose), or saline (placebo), each infused over 3 hours, and a single oral 400-mg dose of moxifloxacin. In each treatment period, continuous cardiac monitoring was used to assess the effects of cefiderocol on ECG parameters. The QT interval corrected using the Fridericia formula (QTcF) was the primary ECG parameter; the time-matched placebo- and baseline-adjusted (dd)-QTcF interval was the primary end point. The plasma pharmacokinetic properties of cefiderocol were calculated on the basis of concentration-time profiles in all evaluable subjects., Findings: All point estimates for the ddQTcF interval were <5 ms and the upper bound of the 90% CIs were <10 ms at each timepoint after the initiation of the cefiderocol 3-hour infusion. Concentration-effect modeling showed a slightly negative slope and predicted modestly negative values of the ddQTcF interval at the C max of cefiderocol. Both doses of cefiderocol were well tolerated. All adverse events were mild in severity, with no deaths or serious adverse events reported., Implications: Overall, therapeutic and supratherapeutic doses of cefiderocol had no apparent clinically significant effect on the QTcF., (Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To determine the clinical value of correcting the QRS duration for heart rate., Background: We recently observed [1] that the QRS duration shortens during spontaneous increases in heart rate. In the current study, we analyzed ECG and pharmacokinetic data of 21 subjects who received quinidine in a recent study [2]. They experienced the expected post-quinidine increase in heart rate, allowing us to determine if quinidine's well-known QRS prolongation might be attenuated due to the concomitant rate increase., Methods: In a crossover-designed study, after baseline ECG recording, the subjects received quinidine 400 mg orally or placebo, and ECGs and quinidine plasma concentrations were then obtained at 15 prespecified timepoints over 24 h. The previously determined QRS-RR regression slope (0.0125) [1] was used to rate-correct QRS. Change in QRS from baseline (dQRS) and rate-corrected change in QRS from baseline (dQRSc) over time were plotted with the mean quinidine concentration and the correlation of plasma concentration with dQRS and dQRSc was assessed by pairwise correlation and linear regression., Results: There was a statistically significantly greater increase in heart rate at all timepoints combined in the quinidine arm compared with the placebo arm (9.9 ± 6.80 vs. 5.2 ± 7.42, respectively, p < 0.0001). dQRSc was significantly greater at all timepoints combined compared with dQRS (1.99 ± 4.824 vs -0.68 ± 4.640 msec, respectively, p < 0.0001). dQRS correlated poorly with quinidine plasma concentration (p = 0.127), with no clear change in QRS observed. On the other hand, dQRSc correlated well with quinidine concentration (p = 0.010), with a clear rise and fall in dQRSc that mirrored the rise and fall of quinidine concentration., Conclusion: Rate correction of the QRS duration improves detection of QRS prolongation in the presence of heart rate change., Condensed Abstract: Using the mean QRS - RR slope determined previously in normal volunteers [1], we corrected the QRS duration for its known dependency on heart rate in 21 subjects who received quinidine and experienced the expected post-quinidine increase in heart rate in a recent clinical trial [2]. We found that uncorrected QRS did not correlate with quinidine concentration (p = 0.127), while rate-corrected QRS correlated well (p = 0.010) and mirrored the rise and fall of quinidine concentration. Rate correction of the QRS duration improves detection of QRS prolongation in the presence of heart rate change., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The purpose of this study was to measure the electrocardiographic (ECG) effects of WCK 2349 (the L-alanine ester prodrug of levonadifloxacin) at a supratherapeutic oral dose of 2,600 mg. A total of 48 healthy volunteers were randomized to treatment with placebo, WCK 2349, or oral moxifloxacin, 400 mg, in a crossover-designed thorough QT study. A supratherapeutic mean maximum levonadifloxacin concentration (C max ) of 43.3 μg/mL was achieved at 3.1 hours. A therapeutic dose of 1,000 mg b.i.d. in a previous study in patients resulted in a C max of 17.8 μg/mL. WCK 2349 exerted no significant effect on baseline- and placebo-corrected QTcF (QT interval corrected for heart rate (HR) by the Fridericia formula), QRS, or PR interval. HR was transiently accelerated by a maximum of 14.4 (95% confidence interval, 11.80-16.92) beats per minute (bpm) at 3 hours. Concentration-effect modeling predicted a mean increase of 8.0 bpm at C max at the standard therapeutic dose. A therapeutic dose of 1,000 mg b.i.d. of WCK 2349 is not expected to cause clinically significant ECG effects, except for a possible transient increase in HR, which seems to be clinically insignificant., (© 2018 The Authors. Clinical and Translational Science published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of the American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics.)

US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) investigators recently demonstrated in a crossover study that early (J-T peak c) and late (T peak -T end ) repolarization duration can differentiate selective potassium block with a high arrhythmia risk from multichannel block with lower risk in subjects receiving dofetilide, verapamil, quinidine, or ranolazine. The purpose of this study was to determine if the findings by the FDA using their published software algorithm could be corroborated using an alternative software algorithm for the same metrics and to determine if methodological differences resulted in clinically meaningful differences in interpretation. Exposure-response relationships computed with linear mixed effects models and mean maximal effects on ECG intervals measured by the two algorithms were similar, corroborating the FDA findings, but with some differences in the modeled slopes and magnitude of changes. The alternative software resulted in an average 25% reduction in the 95% confidence intervals of the mixed effects models with generally lower Akaike Information Criterion values., (© 2017 The Authors. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics.)

Background: Existence of a relationship between the electrocardiographic QRS interval duration and the diurnally varying heart rate, of consistent sign and magnitude, is controversial and the relationship has not been fully characterized in normal populations., Methods and Results: We analyzed the QRS-RR interval relationship in 884 Holter recordings in 410 normal subjects participating in 5 clinical trials. The slope of the linear regression of QRS on RR was positive in 93% of subjects with an average slope of 0.0125, which indicates an increase in QRS duration of 1.25msec for an increase in RR interval of 100msec. The increase was 15% larger in women than in men. Age had no significant effect on the slope., Conclusions: In two populations of normal subjects we observed a robust, direct relationship between the spontaneously changing RR interval and intraventricular conduction time represented by the duration of the QRS interval. As heart rate increases, QRS duration decreases. The change is larger in women. These observations have important physiological and clinical implications., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Subject-specific electrocardiographic QT interval correction for heart rate is often used in clinical trials with frequent electrocardiographic recordings. However, in these studies relatively few 10-s, 12-lead electrocardiograms may be available for calculating the individual correction. Highly automated QT and RR measurement tools have made it practical to measure electrocardiographic intervals on large volumes of continuous electrocardiogram data. The purpose of this study was to determine whether an automated method can be used in lieu of a manual method., Methods: In 49 subjects who completed all treatments in a four-armed crossover study we compared two methods for derivation of individualized rate-correction coefficients: manual measurement on 10-s electrocardiograms and automated measurement of QT and RR during continuous 24-h electrocardiogram recordings. The four treatments, received by each subject in a latin-square randomization sequence were placebo, moxifloxacin, and two doses of an investigational drug., Results: Analysis of continuous electrocardiogram data yielded a lower standard deviation of QT:RR regression values than the manual method, though the differences were not statistically significant. The within-subject and within-treatment coefficients of variation between the manual and automated methods were not significantly different. Corrected QT values from the two methods had similar rates of true and false positive identification of moxifloxacin's QT prolonging effect., Conclusion: An automated method for individualized rate correction applied to continuous electrocardiogram data could be advantageous in clinical trials, as the automated method is simpler, is based upon a much larger volume of data, yields similar results, and requires no human over-reading of the measurements., (© The Author(s) 2015.)

Background: Existing formulas for rate-corrected QT (QTc) commonly fail to properly adjust the upper normal limits which are more critical than the mean QTc for evaluation of prolonged QT. Age- and sex-related differences in QTc are also often overlooked. Our goal was to establish criteria for prolonged QTc using formulas that minimize QTc bias at the upper normal limits., Methods and Results: Strict criteria were used in selecting a study group of 57,595 persons aged 5 to 89 years (54% women) and to exclude electrocardiograms (ECG) with possible disease-associated changes. Two QT rate adjustment formulas were identified which both minimized rate-dependency in the 98 th percentile limits: QTcmod, based on an electrophysiological model (QTcMod = QTx(120 + HR)/180)), and QTcLogLin, a power function of the RR interval with exponents 0.37 for men and 0.38 for women. QTc shortened in men during adolescence and QTcMod became 13 ms shorter than in women at age 20-29 years. The sex difference was maintained through adulthood although decreasing with age. The criteria established for prolonged QTc were: Age < 40 years, men 430 ms, women 440 ms; Age 40 to 69, men 440 ms, women 450 ms; Age ≥ 70 years, men 455 ms, and women 460 ms., Conclusions: Sex difference in QTc originates from shortened QT in adolescent males. Upper normal limits for QTc vary substantially by age and sex, and it is essential to use age- and sex-specific criteria for evaluation of QT prolongation., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Reference ranges for electrocardiogram (ECG) intervals, heart rate, and QRS axis in general use by medical personnel and ECG readers are unrepresentative of true age- and sex-related values in large populations and are not based on modern electrocardiographic and ECG reading technology., Methods and Results: The results of ECG interpretation by cardiologists using digital technology for viewing and interpreting ECGs were compiled from single, baseline ECGs of 79,743 individuals included in pharmaceutical company-sponsored clinical trials. Women comprised 48% of the total population. Ages ranged from 3 months to 99 years, and the bulk of the population (56%) was aged 40 to 70 years. Striking differences in numerical ECG values based on age and sex were observed. A subgroup of 46,129 individuals with a very low probability of cardiovascular disease was identified. The following were the reference ranges for this subgroup, determined using the 2nd and 98th percentiles: heart rate, 48 to 98 beats/min; PR interval, 113 to 212 milliseconds; QRS interval, 69 to 109 milliseconds; frontal plane QRS axis, -40 degrees to 91 degrees ; QT interval, 325 to 452 milliseconds; QTc-Bazett, 361 to 457 milliseconds; and QTc-Fridericia, 359 to 445 milliseconds. There were marked age- and sex-related variations in the reference ranges of this subgroup, and they differ substantially from previously reported norms. Small differences were observed in ECG values obtained using our digital methods as compared with readings done using paper tracings and values computed by 2 commercial computer algorithms., Conclusions: We observed large differences in electrocardiographic heart rate, interval, and axis reference ranges in this study compared with those reported previously and with reference ranges in general use. We also observed a large influence of age and sex upon normal values. Very large cohorts are required to fully assess age- and sex-related variation of reference ranges. Electrocardiographic reference ranges should be modernized.

(1) Background: We assessed the effect of moxifloxacin on heart rate, and reviewed the heart rate effects of other antibiotics; (2) Methods: A total of 335 normal volunteers had 12-lead electrocardiograms recorded at multiple time points before and during treatment with moxifloxacin andwith placebo in seven consecutive, thoroughQT studies of crossover design; (3) Results: The average baseline heart rate across the seven studies was 61.5 bpm. The heart rate after moxifloxacin dosing was analyzed at five time points shared by all seven studies (hours 1, 2, 3, 12 and 24). The maximum mean heart rate (HR) increase for the seven studies combined was 2.4 bpm (95% CI 1.6, 3.3) at hour 2. The range of mean maximum increases among the seven studies was 2.1 to 4.3 bpm. For the seven studies combined, the increase was statistically significant at all but the 24 h time point. The maximum observed individual increase in HR was 36 bpm and the mean maximum increase was 30 ± 4.1 bpm by time point and 8 ± 6.9 bpm by subject. Many antibiotics increase HR, some several-fold more than moxifloxacin. However, clinicians and clinical investigators give little attention to this potential adverse effect in the medical literature; (4) Conclusions: The observed moxifloxacin-induced increase in HR is large enough to be clinically relevant, and it is a potentially important confounder in thorough QT studies using moxifloxacin as an active control. More attention to heart rate effects of antibiotics is warranted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Drugs that prolong the heart rate corrected QT interval (QTc) on the electrocardiogram (ECG) by blocking the hERG potassium channel and also block inward currents (late sodium or L-type calcium) are not associated with torsade de pointes (e.g. ranolazine and verapamil). Thus, identifying ECG signs of late sodium current block could aid in the determination of proarrhythmic risk for new drugs. A new cardiac safety paradigm for drug development (the “CiPA” initiative) will involve the preclinical assessment of multiple human cardiac ion channels and ECG biomarkers are needed to determine if there are unexpected ion channel effects in humans. Methods and Results: In this study we assess the ability of eight ECG morphology biomarkers to detect late sodium current block in the presence of QTc prolongation by analyzing a clinical trial where a selective hERG potassium channel blocker (dofetilide) was administered alone and then in combination with two late sodium current blockers (lidocaine and mexiletine). We demonstrate that late sodium current block has the greatest effect on the heart-rate corrected J-Tpeak interval (J-Tpeakc), followed by QTc and then T-wave flatness. Furthermore, J-Tpeakc is the only biomarker that improves detection of the presence of late sodium current block compared to using QTc alone (AUC: 0.83 vs. 0.72 respectively, p<0.001). Conclusions: Analysis of the J-Tpeakc interval can differentiate drug-induced multichannel block involving the late sodium current from selective hERG potassium channel block. Future methodologies assessing drug effects on cardiac ion channel currents on the ECG should use J-Tpeakc to detect the presence of late sodium current block. Trial Registration: and [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]