Search

Aims: To compare the cost‐effectiveness of immediate and 12‐month delayed initiation of dapagliflozin treatment in patients with a history of hospitalization for heart failure (HHF) from the UK, Canadian, German, and Spanish healthcare perspectives. Methods and results: A cost‐utility analysis was conducted using a decision‐analytic Markov model with health states defined by Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire scores, type 2 diabetes mellitus status and incidence of heart failure (HF) events. Patient‐level data for patients with prior HHF from the Dapagliflozin And Prevention of Adverse‐outcomes in Heart Failure (DAPA‐HF) trial were used to inform the model inputs on clinical events and utility values. Healthcare costs were sourced from the relevant national reference databases and the published literature. Compared to standard therapy, immediate initiation of dapagliflozin decreased HHF (187 events), urgent HF visits (32 events) and cardiovascular mortality (18 events). Standard therapy was associated with lifetime costs of £13 224 and 4.02 quality‐adjusted life years (QALYs). Twelve‐month delayed initiation of dapagliflozin was associated with total discounted lifetime costs and QALYs of £16 660 and 4.61, respectively, compared to £16 912 and 4.66, respectively, for immediate initiation. Compared to standard therapy, immediate and 12‐month delayed initiation of dapagliflozin yielded an incremental cost‐effectiveness ratio (ICER) of £5779 and £5821, respectively. Compared to 12‐month delayed initiation, immediate initiation of dapagliflozin had an ICER of £5263. Results were similar from the Canadian, German, and Spanish healthcare perspectives. Conclusion: Both immediate and 12‐month delayed initiation of dapagliflozin are cost‐effective. However, immediate initiation provides greater clinical benefits, with almost 10% additional QALYs gain, compared to 12‐month delayed initiation of dapagliflozin and should be considered standard of care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim Patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and low systolic blood pressure (SBP) have high mortality, hospitalizations, and poorly tolerate evidence-based medical treatment. Omecamtiv mecarbil may be particularly helpful in such patients. This study examined its efficacy and tolerability in patients with SBP ≤100 mmHg enrolled in the Global Approach to Lowering Adverse Cardiac outcomes Through Improving Contractility in Heart Failure (GALACTIC-HF). Methods and results The GALACTIC-HF enrolled patients with baseline SBP ≥85 mmHg with a primary outcome of time to cardiovascular death or first heart failure event. In this analysis, patients were divided according to their baseline SBP (≤100 vs. >100 mmHg). Among the 8232 analysed patients, 1473 (17.9%) had baseline SBP ≤100 mmHg and 6759 (82.1%) had SBP >100 mmHg. The primary outcome occurred in 715 (48.5%) and 2415 (35.7%) patients with SBP ≤100 and >100 mmHg, respectively. Patients with lower SBP were at higher risk of adverse outcomes. Omecamtiv mecarbil, compared with placebo, appeared to be more effective in reducing the primary composite endpoint in patients with SBP ≤100 mmHg [hazard ratio (HR), 0.81; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.70–0.94] compared with those with SBP >100 mmHg (HR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.88–1.03; P -value for interaction = 0.051). In both groups, omecamtiv mecarbil did not change SBP values over time and did not increase the risk of adverse events, when compared with placebo. Conclusion In GALACTIC-HF, risk reduction of heart failure outcomes with omecamtiv mecarbil compared with placebo was large and significant in patients with low SBP. Omecamtiv mecarbil did not affect SBP and was well tolerated independent of SBP values. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: Surveillance imaging is often used to detect remodelling, a change in cardiac geometry, and/or function; however, there are limited data in patients with chronic heart failure (HF). We sought to characterize cardiac remodelling in patients with chronic HF and evaluate its association with outcome. Methods and results: A prospective cohort of patients at risk for HF or with chronic HF underwent cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) at baseline and 1 year. Ventricular function, volumes, mass, left atrial volume, global longitudinal strain, and myocardial scar were measured. The primary outcome was a composite of death or cardiovascular hospitalization up to 5 years from the 1 year scan. Cox regression was used to identify 1 year CMR predictors of outcome after adjusting for baseline risk. A total of 262 patients (median age 68 years, 57% males) including 96 at risk for HF, 97 with HF and preserved ejection fraction, and 69 with HF and reduced ejection fraction were included. In the patients with HF, 55 events were identified during follow‐up. After adjustment for baseline clinical risk, Cox proportion hazard regressions only identified 1 year change in left ventricular (LV) mass index as a CMR predictor of outcome, adjusted hazard ratio 1.21 (1.02, 1.44) per 10% increase, P = 0.031. Cardiac remodelling defined as a 1 year change in LV mass index ≥15% was observed in 35% of patients with HF. Patients with adverse remodelling of LV mass index had more events on Kaplan–Meier analyses compared to those with no remodelling, log‐rank P = 0.004 for overall cohort, P = 0.035 for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and P = 0.035 for heart failure and reduced ejection fraction. Conclusions: Cardiac remodelling is common during serial CMR assessment of patients with chronic HF. Change in LV mass predicted long‐term outcomes whereas change in left ventricular ejection fraction did not. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: The aim of this study is to determine factors associated with long‐term recovery of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in patients with heart failure with reduced EF (HFrEF) and if further recovery also occurs in this group. Methods and results: Among 621 participants enrolled in the Alberta Heart Failure Etiology and Analysis Team (HEART) Study, 316 with Stage C HF underwent comprehensive imaging and biomarker testing at enrolment and at 1‐year follow up. Using pre‐enrolment data, HF with recovered EF (HFrecEF) was defined as an absolute improvement ≥5% in LVEF from the prior lowest LVEF value, with a final LVEF value > 35% at or prior to study baseline. Participants with all LVEF > 40% were included for comparison. Hospitalization‐free survival to 5 years was performed. The median cohort age was 66 years, and time from diagnosis was 4 years; 82% were male patients. Of the 316 patients, 95 (30%) patients had HFrecEF and 56 (18%) patients pHFrEF. On multivariate analysis, only shorter duration of HF was predictive of HFrecEF status. Over 1 year, LVEF increased in the HFrecEF group 4.0% (0.15–7.90, P = 0.042) as compared with persistent HFrEF, who in turn demonstrated higher baseline serum high sensitivity Troponin‐T with further increase at follow up 0.55(0.33–0.86, P = 0.011). No change in any parameter in the HFpEF/HFmrEF group at follow up was observed. Conclusions: Patients with HFrecEF demonstrate evidence of additional late improvement in LVEF and unchanged troponin levels, in contrast to those with persistent HFrEF, where LVEF does not improve and serum troponin rises over time. These data help to inform mechanisms relating to late LV remodelling. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

B This article refers to 'Dosing of losartan in men versus women with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: the HEAAL trial' by J.P. Ferreira I et al i ., published in this issue on pages 1477-1484. b It is well known that women have been under-represented in early clinical trials of heart failure (HF). The authors noted that clinical factors associated with female sex may have suggested more frail patients, who were possibly less able to tolerate high-dose medical therapy - a plausible underlying reason for the difference in dose-response relationship. [Extracted from the article]

The article reports on the results of research which was conducted in an effort to test the effects of exercise training on health status among patients with heart failure. researchers conducted a multicenter, randomized controlled trial among 2,331 medical stable outpatients with heart failure with left ventricular ejection fraction of 35% or less. Researchers found that exercise training conferred modest but statistically significant improvements in self-reported health status compared with usual care without training.

Background: Ivabradine, a selective sinus node inhibitor, is indicated for patients with chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Use in cardiogenic shock is currently contraindicated. However, studies have suggested increasing heart rate may be deleterious for patients with HFrEF due to an inverted Bowditch-Treppe response. Limited case series have suggested use of Ivabradine in decompensated HFrEF may be beneficial. We present a case series of patients who presented with severely decompensated HFrEF and received inotropic support and concomitant ivabradine. Methods: We selected four patients with HFrEF presenting with elevated sinus heart rate and cardiogenic shock (cardiac index <2.0L/min*m2with pulmonary artery wedge pressure > 20 mmHg by invasive hemodynamic monitoring) while on inotropic therapy and were intolerant of beta blockade due to hypotension. Ivabradine 2.5 mg 12 h was initiated and subsequently titrated with continued monitoring with baseline, 24 h and latest obtained parameters recorded. Other treatments occurred at the discretion of the attending physician. Results: Four male patients (mean age 44 years) with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (mean EF 17%, mean NT-pro-BNP 5104 pg/ml) were included. Ivabradine was tolerated in all cases, with a mean dose of 6 mg q12h. Mean heart rate and pulmonary wedge pressure fell 20% and 32% respectively from baseline to last measurement, while stroke volume increased with an overall improvement in cardiac index. (Table 1) There were no changes noted in mean arterial blood pressure. All patients underwent successful wean of inotropic support within 48 hours and were discharged alive on beta blocker and ACE inhibitor therapy. No adverse events attributed to use of Ivabradine were observed. Conclusion: In our small series of patients with cardiogenic shock, beta blocker intolerance and elevated sinus heart rate, Ivabradine was added without any deleterious hemodynamic effect and associated with early clinical improvement. Further studies are needed to better assess its potential use in this population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: In the DAPA-HF trial (Dapagliflozin and Prevention of Adverse-Outcomes in Heart Failure), the sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor dapagliflozin reduced the risk of worsening heart failure and death in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction. We examined the efficacy and tolerability of dapagliflozin in relation to background diuretic treatment and change in diuretic therapy after randomization to dapagliflozin or placebo.Methods: We examined the effects of study treatment in the following subgroups: no diuretic and diuretic dose equivalent to furosemide <40, 40, and >40 mg daily at baseline. We examined the primary composite end point of cardiovascular death or a worsening heart failure event and its components, all-cause death and symptoms.Results: Of 4616 analyzable patients, 736 (15.9%) were on no diuretic, 1311 (28.4%) were on <40 mg, 1365 (29.6%) were on 40 mg, and 1204 (26.1%) were taking >40 mg. Compared with placebo, dapagliflozin reduced the risk of the primary end point across each of these subgroups: hazard ratios were 0.57 (95% CI, 0.36-0.92), 0.83 (95% CI, 0.63-1.10), 0.77 (95% CI, 0.60-0.99), and 0.78 (95% CI, 0.63-0.97), respectively (P for interaction=0.61). The hazard ratio in patients taking any diuretic was 0.78 (95% CI, 0.68-0.90). Improvements in symptoms and treatment toleration were consistent across the diuretic subgroups. Diuretic dose did not change in most patients during follow-up, and mean diuretic dose did not differ between the dapagliflozin and placebo groups after randomization.Conclusions: The efficacy and safety of dapagliflozin were consistent across the diuretic subgroups examined in DAPA-HF. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03036124. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]