Search

Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) serves as a conventional short-term mechanical circulatory assist to support heart and lung functions. The short-term ventricular assist devices (ST-VAD) can, on the contrary, offer only circulatory support. A combination of VAD and oxygenator (Oxy-VAD) could help overcome this potential disadvantage. This is a retrospective case note study of patients supported on ST-VAD which required adding an oxygenator for extra respiratory support. The oxygenator was introduced in the ST-VAD circuit, either on the left or the right side. Twenty-two patients with the etiology of refractory cardiogenic shock in decompensation were supported on Oxy-VAD between years 2009 and 2019 at tertiary care . All patients were classified into class-I INTERMACS with a mean SOFA Score of 14 ± 2.58. 86.4% of patients were already on mechanical support pre-ST-VAD implant, 80% on VA-ECMO. The BiVAD implant accounted for 63.6%, followed by LVAD and RVAD with 27.3% and 9.1%. Mean duration of the ST-VAD was 8.5 days. The oxygenator was introduced in 14 RVAD and 8 LVAD circuits. The oxygenator was successfully weaned in 54.5% while ST-VAD was explanted in 31.8%. Discharge to home survival was 22.7%. Oxy-VAD proves a viable, and probably, a better option to VA-ECMO in acute cardiorespiratory decompensation. It offers organ-specific tailor-made support to the right and/or left heart and/or lungs. While on Oxy-VAD support, each organ performance can be assessed independently, and the assistance of the specifically improved organ can be weaned off without discontinuing the support for the rest., (© 2020 International Center for Artificial Organ and Transplantation (ICAOT) and Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Objectives: Due to organ shortage in lung transplantation (LTx), donation after circulatory death (DCD) has been implemented in several countries, contributing to an increasing number of organs transplanted. We sought to assess long-term outcomes after LTx with organs procured following circulatory death in comparison with those obtained from donors after brain death (DBD)., Methods: Between January 2007 and November 2013, 302 LTxs were performed in our institution, whereby 60 (19.9%) organs were retrieved from DCD donors. We performed propensity score matching (DCD:DBD = 1:2) based on preoperative donor and recipient factors that were significantly different in univariate analysis., Results: After propensity matching, there were no statistically significant differences between the groups in terms of demographics and preoperative donor and recipient characteristics. There were no significant differences regarding intraoperative variables and total ischaemic time. Patients from the DCD group had significantly higher incidence of primary graft dysfunction grade 3 at the end of the procedure (P = 0.014), and significantly lower pO2/FiO2 ratio during the first 24 h after the procedure (P = 0.018). There was a trend towards higher incidence of the need for postoperative extracorporeal life support in the DCD group. Other postoperative characteristics were comparable. While the overall cumulative survival was not significantly different, the DCD group had significantly poorer results in terms of bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS)-free survival in the long-term follow-up., Conclusions: Long-term results after LTx with organs procured following DCD are in general comparable with those obtained after DBD LTx. However, patients transplanted using organs from DCD donors have a predisposition for development of BOS in the longer follow-up., (© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.)

The Synergy Micro-pump is the smallest implantable left ventricular assist device (LVAD) and provides partial flow support up to 4.25 L/min. It was shown that early intervention with this device can provide substantial benefits to patients with severe heart failure not yet sick enough for a full-support LVAD. However, as it can be inserted via small incisions with no need for sternotomy or cardiopulmonary bypass, it might be beneficial for selected high-risk patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of the Synergy Micro-pump in patients in INTERMACS class 1-2. From February 2012 to August 2013, 13 patients with severe heart failure were supported with the Synergy Pocket Micro-pump. Patients were divided into two groups according to INTERMACS class: the high-risk group (INTERMACS class 1-2) and the low-risk group (INTERMACS class 3-4). There were seven patients in INTERMACS class 1-2 and six in INTERMACS class 3-4. Patient demographics, perioperative characteristics, and postoperative outcomes were compared. There were no statistically significant differences in patient demographics, and mean support time was 108 ± 114 days in the high-risk group and 238 ± 198 days in the low-risk group. Also, there were no significant differences in perioperative characteristics or in the rate of postoperative adverse events. The overall survival was comparable between the two groups (one late death in each group, log-rank P = 0.608). Two patients from the high-risk group were upgraded to a full-support LVAD (P = 0.462) after 65 ± 84.9 days of mean support. One patient from the high-risk group and two patients from the low-risk group were successfully transplanted (P = 0.559). The use of the Synergy Micro-pump in INTERMACS 1-2 patients is feasible and is associated with similar postoperative outcome as in patients in INTERMACS 3-4. Carefully selected patients with severe heart failure could benefit due to the small size of the pump; however, further studies and medium-term follow-up are required., (Copyright © 2014 International Center for Artificial Organs and Transplantation and Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Ventricular assist devices are fast becoming an accepted alternative to treat end-stage heart failure, and are being implemented as a bridge to myocardial recovery, a bridge to heart transplantation, or as destination therapy. Positioning of the inflow cannula into the apex of the ventricle is a crucial step due to the risk of sucking in air. We describe an improved method of preparing the insertion site for the ventricular assist device inflow cannula, to minimize the chances of air embolism and blood spillage, which we applied in a 34-year-old man, as a bridge to transplantation., (© The Author(s) 2013 Reprints and permissions: sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav.)

Post-cardiotomy cardiogenic shock (PCCS) results in substantial morbidity and mortality, whereas refractory cases require mechanical circulatory support. The aim of this study was to evaluate factors influencing survival during short-term ventricular assist support in PCCS. In total, 154 CentriMag(®) (Thoratec; CA, USA) devices were implanted for cardiogenic shock between 2004 and 2011 out of which 31 were for PCCS. A retrospective review was performed in 31 PCCS patients who required the CentriMag short-term VAD as a bridge to decision. Survivors and non-survivors were compared with respect to pre- and intra-operative characteristics as well as duration of short-term VAD support. Mean duration of support was 11.7 ± 15.4 days (range 1-65 days). Seventeen (54.83 %) patients died on support, 14 (45.16 %) were weaned off or upgraded to long-term device, while 11 (35.5 %) were discharged home. The overall survival to myocardial recovery and device explantation, or upgrade to a long-term VAD, was 41.9 % (n = 13) at the study cutoff. EuroSCORE II was significantly higher in non-survivors as compared to survivors (p = 0.047). The duration of short-term VAD support was significantly longer in survivors (p < 0.001). The CentriMag is a versatile, safe and effective short-term circulatory support for patients with PCCS as a bridge to decision which enables longer support and better recovery of both heart and end-organ function and thus may improve the survival of PCCS patients. Lower EuroSCORE may be essential for myocardial recovery in PCCS.

Chronic heart failure is a progressive and eventually fatal illness. Although the disease cannot be cured and treatment is symptom oriented, most of the patients benefit from optimum medical treatment. Patients with rapid deterioration in chronic advanced heart failure refractory to medical treatment need inotropic support and may need intra-aortic balloon pump to maintain circulatory support, which of course cannot be prolonged beyond a certain limit. The outcome of heart transplant and long-term ventricular assist device (VAD) in such patients is poor. The short-term mechanical circulatory support (MCS) offered to such patients not only provides effective circulatory support and stabilizes them hemodynamically, but also halts the ensuing or reverts the established end-organ failure. As the name suggests, the short-term MCS offers support for the short term, usually less than a month. Although some patients with acute heart failure experience recovery of myocardial function with short-term MCS support, others become dependent. These patients, stabilized and "stuck" with short-term MCS, can be "rescued" with long-term VAD or heart transplantation. Both the procedures, when done in this special situation, have their inherent advantages, disadvantages, and complications and hence need the careful consideration about the choice of the procedure. We have tried to elucidate this situation by considering the advantages and disadvantages of both options., (© 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. and International Center for Artificial Organs and Transplantation.)

Objectives: Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) offer very valuable therapeutic options for patients with advanced heart failure. CentriMag (Thoratec, Pleasanton, CA, USA) is an extracorporeal short-term circulatory assist device Conformité Européenne-marked in Europe for use up to 30 days., Methods: Retrospective analysis of 41 patients with advanced heart failure who, from 2003 to 2011, were supported with CentriMag for >30 days as a bridge to recovery, long-term VAD or transplantation., Results: Forty-one adult patients were supported with 46 CentriMag devices for a total of 2695 days with a mean support time of 59 (range: 31-167) days. Indications were post-cardiotomy cardiogenic shock (PC = 4), primary graft failure (PGF = 7) and refractory heart failure (RHF = 35). Six devices were used to support the left ventricle, 19 to support the right ventricle and 21 to support both the ventricles (biventricular support considered as single device unit). In the PC cohort, 3 (75%) patients were weaned from support, while 4 (57%) were weaned from support in the PGF cohort. In the RHF cohort, 8 patients were bridged to long-term VAD and 5 were bridged to transplantation; heart function recovered and device explanted in 14, while 8 patients died on support. There were no device failures. Overall, 34 (74%) patients were recovered or bridged, with a 1-year survival of 54%., Conclusions: CentriMag proved to be a versatile, safe and effective short-term circulatory support for patients with advanced heart failure as a bridge to solution. Its use over 30 days is associated with acceptable survival and does not increase device-related complications.

The implantation of a left ventricular assist device as a bridge to transplantation is a well-established treatment of end-stage heart failure in selected patients. Device-related infection is a well-known complication that may require the removal of the device. We describe a minimally invasive explantation approach with complete removal of all components of a HeartWare left ventricular assist device in a patient with persistent infection related to the device.

Diseased, replaced or repaired mitral valve can lead to restricted blood flow to left ventricle and inadequate flow in left ventricular assist device (LVAD). A middle age woman with 'burnt out' hypertrophic cardiomyopathy had mitral valve repair for mitral regurgitation. She needed LVAD to support severe decompensating heart failure. Repaired mitral valve posed a risk of restricted flow through the device. Mitral commissurotomy was performed on beating heart through the left ventricular apical hole created for insertion of inflow cannula of LVAD.

Background: The gold standard treatment for end-stage heart failure is cardiac transplantation. Because of the increasing number of heart failure patients and the limited supply of donor hearts, a ventricular assist device (VAD) is used as a bridge to transplantation, recovery, or decision. Newer generation VADs have lower risk of fatal adverse events and are also smaller in size. We present our experience with the intrapericardial HeartWare VAD (HeartWare, Framingham, MA) and its clinical outcome., Methods: The clinical outcome of HeartWare VAD implantations for end-stage heart failure patients performed at Harefield Hospital from March 2007 to June 2011 was studied. The study design was a retrospective review of the prospectively collected data., Results: Thirty-four patients with a mean age of 51±10 years were included in this study. Twenty-nine patients were male (85%). The mean duration of mechanical support was 261±64 days. Five patients (15%) were successfully bridged to heart transplantation. The overall mortality was 24% (8 patients). There were 1 case of mechanical device failure (2%) and 3 cases of device failure due to thrombus formation (8%). Postoperative complications included 5 reoperations for bleeding (15%), 12 acute renal failures (36%), 7 respiratory failures (21%), 2 hepatic dysfunctions (6%), 3 neurologic dysfunctions (9%), 7 right-side heart failures (21%), and 5 driveline infections (15%)., Conclusions: Although cardiac transplantation remains the gold standard for treatment of end-stage heart failure patients, the HeartWare VAD can be used as a safe alternative with a satisfactory clinical outcome., (Copyright © 2012 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

OBJECTIVES Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) are a routine treatment for patients with advanced heart failure as a bridge to transplantation. The aim of this study was to present our institutional experience and mid-term outcomes after implantation of 139 continuous-flow (cf) LVADs as a bridge to transplantation. METHODS One hundred and thirty-nine consecutive LVAD implantations were performed in our institution between July 2007 and August 2013. The mean age of the population was 44.0 ± 13.7 years and 24 (17%) of the patients were female. A substantial number of the patients were on preoperative mechanical support: 35 (25%) with an intra-aortic balloon pump, 9 (6.5%) with an extracorporeal membrane oxygenator and 25 (18%) with previous LVAD, for LVAD exchange. RESULTS The mean support duration was 514 ± 481 days, whereas the longest support duration was 2493 days (>6 years). The overall cumulative survival rate following cfLVAD implantation was 89% at 30 days, 76% at 1 year and 66% at 2 years (Fig. 1). There was a statistically significant difference in survival in favour of first LVAD implantation compared with VAD exchange: 91 vs 80% at 30 days, 79 vs 57% at 1 year and 70 vs 43% at 2 years (log-rank P = 0.010). Postoperatively, patients had a significant improvement in end-organ function 1 month after LVAD implantation. In addition, comparison of two different devices [HeartMate II (HM II) and HeartWare] using propensity score matching showed no significant differences in survival and most postoperative adverse events. However, patients supported with HM II required significantly more units of fresh frozen plasma (P = 0.020) with a trend towards a higher use of red blood cells (P = 0.094), and were also more likely to develop percutaneous site infections (P = 0.022). CONCLUSIONS HM II and HeartWare cfLVADs have excellent early postoperative outcomes and good mid-term survival, despite a considerable number of patients needing VAD exchange. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]