Search

Objectives: We aimed to explore imaging features including tissue characterization and myocardial deformation in diabetic heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) patients by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and investigate its prognostic value for adverse outcomes., Materials and Methods: Patients with HFpEF who underwent cardiac MRI between January 2010 and December 2016 were enrolled. Feature-tracking (FT) analysis and myocardial fibrosis were assessed by cardiac MRI. Cox proportional regression analysis was performed to determine the association between MRI variables and primary outcomes. Primary outcomes were all-cause death or heart failure hospitalization during the follow-up period., Results: Of the 335 enrolled patients with HFpEF, 191 had diabetes mellitus (DM) (mean age: 58.7 years ± 10.8; 137 men). During a median follow-up of 10.2 years, 91 diabetic HFpEF and 56 non-diabetic HFpEF patients experienced primary outcomes. DM was a significant predictor of worse prognosis in HFpEF. In diabetic HFpEF, the addition of conventional imaging variables (left ventricular ejection fraction, left atrial volume index, extent of late gadolinium enhancement (LGE)) and global longitudinal strain (GLS) resulted in a significant increase in the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (from 0.693 to 0.760, p < 0.05). After adjustment for multiple clinical and imaging variables, each 1% worsening in GLS was associated with a 9.8% increased risk of adverse events (p = 0.004)., Conclusions: Diabetic HFpEF is characterized by more severely impaired strains and myocardial fibrosis, which is identified as a high-risk HFpEF phenotype. In diabetic HFpEF, comprehensive cardiac MRI provides incremental value in predicting prognosis. Particularly, MRI-FT measurement of GLS is an independent predictor of adverse outcome in diabetic HFpEF., Clinical Relevance Statement: Our findings suggested that MRI-derived variables, especially global longitudinal strain, played a crucial role in risk stratification and predicting worse prognosis in diabetic heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, which could assist in identifying high-risk patients and guiding therapeutic decision-making., Key Points: • Limited data are available on the cardiac MRI features of diabetic heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, including myocardial deformation and tissue characterization, as well as their incremental prognostic value. • Diabetic heart failure with preserved ejection fraction patients was characterized by more impaired strains and myocardial fibrosis. Comprehensive MRI, including tissue characterization and global longitudinal strain, provided incremental value for risk prediction. • MRI served as a valuable tool for identifying high-risk patients and guiding clinical management in diabetic heart failure with preserved ejection fraction., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to European Society of Radiology.)

Purpose To describe the clinical presentation, comprehensive cardiac MRI characteristics, and prognosis of individuals with predisposed heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Materials and Methods This prospective cohort study (part of MISSION-HFpEF [Multimodality Imaging in the Screening, Diagnosis, and Risk Stratification of HFpEF]; NCT04603404) was conducted from January 1, 2019, to September 30, 2021, and included individuals with suspected HFpEF who underwent cardiac MRI. Participants who had primary cardiomyopathy and primary valvular heart disease were excluded. Participants were split into a predisposed HFpEF group, defined as HFpEF with normal natriuretic peptide levels based on an HFA-PEFF (Heart Failure Association Pretest Assessment, Echocardiography and Natriuretic Peptide, Functional Testing, and Final Etiology) score of 4 from the latest European Society of Cardiology guidelines, and an HFpEF group (HFA-PEFF score of ≥ 5). An asymptomatic control group without heart failure was also included. Clinical and cardiac MRI-based characteristics and outcomes were compared between groups. The primary end points were death, heart failure hospitalization, or stroke. Results A total of 213 participants with HFpEF, 151 participants with predisposed HFpEF, and 100 participants in the control group were analyzed. Compared with the control group, participants with predisposed HFpEF had worse left ventricular remodeling and function and higher systemic inflammation. Compared with participants with HFpEF, those with predisposed HFpEF, whether obese or not, were younger and had higher plasma volume, lower prevalence of atrial fibrillation, lower left atrial volume index, and less impaired left ventricular global longitudinal strain (-12.2% ± 2.8 vs -13.9% ± 3.1; P < .001) and early-diastolic global longitudinal strain rate (eGLSR, 0.52/sec ± 0.20 vs 0.57/sec ± 0.15; P = .03) but similar prognosis. Atrial fibrillation occurrence (hazard ratio [HR] = 3.90; P = .009), hemoglobin level (HR = 0.94; P = .001), and eGLSR (per 0.2-per-second increase, HR = 0.28; P = .002) were independently associated with occurrence of primary end points in participants with predisposed HFpEF. Conclusion Participants with predisposed HFpEF showed relatively unique clinical and cardiac MRI features, warranting greater clinical attention. eGLSR should be considered as a prognostic factor in participants with predisposed HFpEF. Keywords: Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction, Normal Natriuretic Peptide Levels, Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, Myocardial Strain, Prognosis Clinical trial registration no. NCT04603404 Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2024.

Objectives: To explore individual weight of cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) metrics to predict mid-term outcomes in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM), and develop a risk algorithm for mid-term outcome based on CMR biomarkers. Materials and methods: Patients with DCM who underwent CMR imaging were prospectively enrolled in this study. The primary endpoint was a composite of heart failure (HF) death, sudden cardiac death (SCD), aborted SCD, and heart transplantation. Results: A total of 407 patients (age 48.1 ± 13.8 years, 331 men) were included in the final analysis. During a median follow-up of 21.7 months, 63 patients reached the primary endpoint. NYHA class III/IV (HR = 2.347 [1.073–5.133], p = 0.033), left ventricular ejection fraction (HR = 0.940 [0.909–0.973], p < 0.001), late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) > 0.9% and ≤ 6.6% (HR = 3.559 [1.020–12.412], p = 0.046), LGE > 6.6% (HR = 6.028 [1.814–20.038], p = 0.003), and mean extracellular volume (ECV) fraction ≥ 32.8% (HR = 5.922 [2.566–13.665], p < 0.001) had a significant prognostic association with the primary endpoints (C-statistic: 0.853 [0.810–0.896]). Competing risk regression analyses showed that patients with mean ECV fraction ≥ 32.8%, LGE ≥ 5.9%, global circumferential strain ≥ − 5.6%, or global longitudinal strain ≥ − 7.3% had significantly shorter event-free survival due to HF death and heart transplantation. Patients with mean ECV fraction ≥ 32.8% and LGE ≥ 5.9% had significantly shorter event-free survival due to SCD or aborted SCD. Conclusion: ECV fraction may be the best independently risk factor for the mid-term outcomes in patients with DCM, surpassing LVEF and LGE. LGE has a better prognostic value than other CMR metrics for SCD and aborted SCD. The risk stratification model we developed may be a promising non-invasive tool for decision-making and prognosis. Clinical relevance statement: "One-stop" assessment of cardiac function and myocardial characterization using cardiac magnetic resonance might improve risk stratification of patients with DCM. In this prospective study, we propose a novel risk algorithm in DCM including NYHA functional class, LVEF, LGE, and ECV. Key Points: • The present study explores individual weight of CMR metrics for predicting mid-term outcomes in dilated cardiomyopathy. • We have developed a novel risk algorithm for dilated cardiomyopathy that includes cardiac functional class, ejection fraction, late gadolinium enhancement, and extracellular volume fraction. • Personalized risk model derived by CMR contributes to clinical assessment and individual decision-making. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]