Search

Background: Heart failure with mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction (hereafter referred to as HFpEF) is the most common type of heart failure and is associated with a high risk of hospitalisation and death, especially in patients with overweight, obesity, or type 2 diabetes. In the STEP-HFpEF and STEP-HFpEF DM trials, semaglutide improved heart failure-related symptoms and physical limitations in participants with HFpEF. Whether semaglutide also reduces clinical heart failure events in this group remains to be established., Methods: We conducted a post-hoc pooled, participant-level analysis of four randomised, placebo-controlled trials (SELECT, FLOW, STEP-HFpEF, and STEP-HFpEF DM) to examine the effects of once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide (2·4 mg in SELECT, STEP-HFpEF, and STEP-HFpEF DM; 1·0 mg in FLOW) on heart failure events. The STEP-HFpEF and STEP-HFpF DM trials enrolled participants with obesity-related HFpEF, the SELECT trial enrolled participants with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and overweight or obesity, and the FLOW trial enrolled participants with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease. Hence, for this analysis, we include all participants from the STEP-HFpEF trials and those with an investigator-reported history of HFpEF from SELECT and FLOW. The main outcomes for this analysis were the composite endpoint of time to cardiovascular death or first worsening heart failure event (defined as hospitalisation or urgent visit due to heart failure), time to first worsening heart failure event, and time to cardiovascular death. Efficacy and safety endpoints were analysed with the full analysis set (ie, all participants randomly assigned to treatment, according to the intention-to-treat principle). The SELECT, FLOW, STEP-HFpEF, and STEP-HFpEF DM trials are registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03574597, NCT03819153, NCT04788511, and NCT04916470, respectively, and all are complete., Findings: Across the four trials, 3743 (16·8%) of 22 282 participants had a history of HFpEF (1914 assigned to semaglutide and 1829 assigned to placebo). In this group of participants with HFpEF, semaglutide reduced the risk of the combined endpoint of cardiovascular death or heart failure events (103 [5·4%] of 1914 in the semaglutide group had events vs 138 [7·5%] of 1829 in the placebo group; hazard ratio [HR] 0·69 [95% CI 0·53-0·89]; p=0·0045). Semaglutide also reduced the risk of worsening heart failure events (54 [2·8%] vs 86 [4·7%]; HR 0·59 [0·41-0·82]; p=0·0019). No significant effect on cardiovascular death alone was seen (59 [3·1%] vs 67 [3·7%]; HR 0·82 [0·57-1·16]; p=0·25). A lower proportion of patients treated with semaglutide had serious adverse events than did those who were treated with placebo (572 [29·9%] vs 708 [38·7%])., Interpretation: In patients with HFpEF, semaglutide reduced the risk of the combined endpoint of cardiovascular death or worsening heart failure events, and worsening heart failure events alone, whereas its effect on cardiovascular death alone was not significant. These data support the use of semaglutide as an efficacious therapy to reduce the risk of clinical heart failure events in patients with HFpEF, for whom few treatment options are currently available., Funding: Novo Nordisk., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests MNK has served as a consultant for 35Pharma, Alnylam, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Cytokinetics, Corcept Therapeutics, Dexcom, Eli Lilly, Esperion Therapeutics, Imbria Pharmaceuticals, Janssen, Lexicon Pharmaceuticals, Merck (Diabetes and Cardiovascular), Novo Nordisk, Pharmacosmos, Pfizer, Regeneron, scPharmaceuticals, Structure Therapeutics, Vifor Pharma, and Youngene Therapeutics; has served on a data monitoring board for Applied Therapeutics; has served on an advisory board for Alnylam, Amgen, Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Corcept Therapeutics, Eli Lilly, Esperion Therapeutics, Merck (Diabetes and Cardiovascular), Novo Nordisk, and Sanofi; has received research grants from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Pfizer; holds stocks in Artera Health and Saghmos Therapeutics; has received honoraria from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Novo Nordisk; and has received support for data analyses from AstraZeneca and Vifor. JD has received consulting honoraria from Aegerion, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Merck, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Sanofi, and Takeda and research grants from Aegerion, British Heart Foundation, Colgate, UK Medical Research Council, MSD, National Institute for Health and Care Research, Pfizer, Public Health England, and Roche. RP reports speaker fees from Eli Lilly, Lilly USA, and Novo Nordisk; consulting fees from AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Corcept Therapeutics, Dexcom, Endogenex, Gasherbrum Bio, Genprex, Getz Pharma, Hanmi Pharmaceutical, Hengrui (USA), Intas Pharmaceuticals, Eli Lilly, Lilly USA, Merck, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Rivus Pharmaceuticals, Scholar Rock, and Sun Pharmaceutical Industries; and grants from Biomea Fusion, Carmot Therapeutics, Dompe, Endogenex, Fractyl, Eli Lilly, Novo Nordisk, and Sanofi. All grants are directed to RP's institution. Up to Dec 31, 2023, payment for RP's consultant and speaker services was made directly to his employer, AdventHealth, a nonprofit entity; as of Jan 1, 2024, payment was directed to RP personally. BAB receives research support from the US National Institutes of Health and the US Department of Defense, as well as research grant funding from AstraZeneca, Axon Therapies, GlaxoSmithKline, Medtronic, Mesoblast, Novo Nordisk, Rivus, and Tenax Therapeutics; he has served as a consultant for Actelion, Amgen, Aria, Axon Therapies, BD, Boehringer Ingelheim, Cytokinetics, Edwards Lifesciences, Eli Lilly, Imbria, Janssen, Merck, NGM, Novo Nordisk, NXT, and VADovations; and is named inventor (US patent number 10,307,179) for the tools and approach for a minimally invasive pericardial modification procedure to treat heart failure. JB is a consultant to Abbott, American Regent, Amgen, Applied Therapeutics, AskBio, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Boston Scientific, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cardiac Dimension, CardioCell, Cardior, CSL Behring, CVRx, Cytokinetics, Daxor, Edwards Lifesciences, Element Science, Faraday, Foundry, G3P, Imbria, Impulse Dynamics, Innolife, Inventiva, Ionis, Levator, Lexicon, Lilly, LivaNova, Janssen, Medtronics, Merck, Occlutech, Owkin, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Pharmacosmos, PharmaIN, Prolaio, Pulnovo, Regeneron, Renibus, Roche, Salamandra, Salubris, Sanofi, scPharmaceuticals, Secretome, Sequana, SQ Innovation, Tenex, Tricog, Ultromics, Vifor, and Zoll. MJD has acted as a consultant, advisory board member, and speaker for Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Novo Nordisk, and Sanofi; an advisory board member for AstraZeneca, Carmot/Roche, Medtronic, Pfizer, and Zealand Pharma; and a speaker for Amgen and AstraZeneca; and has received grants from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novo Nordisk, and Sanofi-Aventis. SSE has received consulting fees from Amylyx, AstraZeneca, Avillion, Ayala, Bayer, BeiGene, Boehringer Ingelheim, 89 Bio, BioAge, BioAtla, Bristol Meyer Squibb, BridgeBio, Daiichi Sankyo, Denovo, Fore Therapeutics, GlaxoSmithKline, Inovio, Insmed, Ipsen, Karuna, Lilly, Lundbeck, Mirati, Moderna, Novartis, Novavax, Novo Nordisk, National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project, Pfizer, Principia, Reata, Rebiotx, Roche, Sanofi, solvd, Sutro Biopharma, and TG Therapeutics. SEK received consulting fees from Casma Therapeutics, Oramed, and Third Rock Ventures; and served on an advisory board for AltPep, Anji Pharmaceuticals, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Intarcia, Merck, and Novo Nordisk. He has received stock options from AltPep. DK was supported in part by the Kermit Glenn Phillips II Chair in Cardiovascular Medicine and US National Institutes of Health grants U01AG076928, R01AG078153, R01AG045551, R01AG18915, P30AG021332, U24AG059624, and U01HL160272; and received honoraria as a consultant for AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Corvia Medical, Ketyo, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, and Rivus; grant funding from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, and Rivus; and has stock ownership in Gilead Sciences. IL has received research grants from Boehringer Ingelheim, Merck, Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, and Sanofi; served as a consultant for AstraZeneca, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Biomea, Boehringer Ingelheim, Carmot, Eli Lilly, Intarcia, Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Janssen Global Services, Johnson & Johnson Medical Devices & Diagnostics Group—Latin America, MannKind, Merck, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Sanofi, Shionogi, Structure Therapeutics, Target Pharma, Valeritas, and Zealand Pharma; and received travel expenses from Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Johnson & Johnson Medical Devices & Diagnostics Group—Latin America, Novo Nordisk, Sanofi, and Zealand Pharma. KWM has received grants from AHA, Apple, Bayer, California Institute for Regenerative Medicine, CSL Behring, Eidos, Ferring, Gilead, Google, Idorsia, Johnson & Johnson, Luitpold, Novartis, PAC-12, Precordior, and Sanifit; and consulting fees from Applied Therapeutics, Bayer, BMS, BridgeBio, CSL Behring, Elsevier, Fosun Pharma, Human, Johnson & Johnson, Moderna, Myokardia, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Otsuka, Phasebio, Portola, Quidel, and Theravance; and holds stock options for Human, Medeloop, Precordior, and Regencor. MCP was supported by the British Heart Foundation Centre of Research Excellence Grant RE/18/6/34217; has received research funding from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Boston Scientific, Medtronic, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Pharmacosmos, Roche, and SQ Innovations; and served on committees or consulted for AbbVie, Akero, AnaCardio, Applied Therapeutics, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Biosensors, Boehringer Ingelheim, Cardiorentis, Corvia, Eli Lilly, Horizon Therapeutics, LIB Therapeutics, Moderna, New Amsterdam, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Pharmacosmos, Siemens, SQ Innovations, Takeda, Teikoku, and Vifor. JP has received consulting fees from Altimmune, Amgen, Esperion Therapeutics, Merck, MJH Life Sciences, Novartis, and Novo Nordisk and received a grant, paid to his institution, from Boehringer Ingelheim. CR, SR, and PEW are employees and SR and PEW are shareholders of Novo Nordisk. SJS has received research grants from AstraZeneca, Corvia, and Pfizer; and consulting fees from Abbott, Alleviant, Amgen, Aria CV, AstraZeneca, Axon Therapies, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Boston Scientific, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cyclerion, Cytokinetics, Edwards Lifesciences, Eidos, Imara, Impulse Dynamics, Intellia, Ionis, Lilly, Merck, MyoKardia, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Prothena, ReCor, Regeneron, Rivus, Sardocor, Shifamed, Tenax, Tenaya, and Ultromics. SV reports speaking honoraria or consulting fees from Abbott, Amarin, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Canadian Medical and Surgical Knowledge Translation Research Group, Eli Lilly, HLS Therapeutics, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, PhaseBio, and TIMI. AML has received research grants from AbbVie, AstraZeneca, CSL Behring, Eli Lilly, Esperion Therapeutics, and Novartis, paid to his institution; and consulting fees from Akebia Therapeutics, Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Ardelyx, Eli Lilly, FibroGen, GlaxoSmithKline, Intarcia, Medtronic Vascular, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Provention Bio, Amgen, and ReCor Medical. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.)

Background: Semaglutide, a GLP-1 receptor agonist, reduces the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in people with overweight or obesity, but the effects of this drug on outcomes in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and heart failure are unknown. We report a prespecified analysis of the effect of once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide 2·4 mg on ischaemic and heart failure cardiovascular outcomes. We aimed to investigate if semaglutide was beneficial in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease with a history of heart failure compared with placebo; if there was a difference in outcome in patients designated as having heart failure with preserved ejection fraction compared with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction; and if the efficacy and safety of semaglutide in patients with heart failure was related to baseline characteristics or subtype of heart failure., Methods: The SELECT trial was a randomised, double-blind, multicentre, placebo-controlled, event-driven phase 3 trial in 41 countries. Adults aged 45 years and older, with a BMI of 27 kg/m 2 or greater and established cardiovascular disease were eligible for the study. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) with a block size of four using an interactive web response system in a double-blind manner to escalating doses of once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide over 16 weeks to a target dose of 2·4 mg, or placebo. In a prespecified analysis, we examined the effect of semaglutide compared with placebo in patients with and without a history of heart failure at enrolment, subclassified as heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, or unclassified heart failure. Endpoints comprised MACE (a composite of non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke, and cardiovascular death); a composite heart failure outcome (cardiovascular death or hospitalisation or urgent hospital visit for heart failure); cardiovascular death; and all-cause death. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03574597., Findings: Between Oct 31, 2018, and March 31, 2021, 17 604 patients with a mean age of 61·6 years (SD 8·9) and a mean BMI of 33·4 kg/m 2 (5·0) were randomly assigned to receive semaglutide (8803 [50·0%] patients) or placebo (8801 [50·0%] patients). 4286 (24·3%) of 17 604 patients had a history of investigator-defined heart failure at enrolment: 2273 (53·0%) of 4286 patients had heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, 1347 (31·4%) had heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, and 666 (15·5%) had unclassified heart failure. Baseline characteristics were similar between patients with and without heart failure. Patients with heart failure had a higher incidence of clinical events. Semaglutide improved all outcome measures in patients with heart failure at random assignment compared with those without heart failure (hazard ratio [HR] 0·72, 95% CI 0·60-0·87 for MACE; 0·79, 0·64-0·98 for the heart failure composite endpoint; 0·76, 0·59-0·97 for cardiovascular death; and 0·81, 0·66-1·00 for all-cause death; all p interaction >0·19). Treatment with semaglutide resulted in improved outcomes in both the heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HR 0·65, 95% CI 0·49-0·87 for MACE; 0·79, 0·58-1·08 for the composite heart failure endpoint) and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction groups (0·69, 0·51-0·91 for MACE; 0·75, 0·52-1·07 for the composite heart failure endpoint), although patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction had higher absolute event rates than those with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. For MACE and the heart failure composite, there were no significant differences in benefits across baseline age, sex, BMI, New York Heart Association status, and diuretic use. Serious adverse events were less frequent with semaglutide versus placebo, regardless of heart failure subtype., Interpretation: In patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular diease and overweight or obesity, treatment with semaglutide 2·4 mg reduced MACE and composite heart failure endpoints compared with placebo in those with and without clinical heart failure, regardless of heart failure subtype. Our findings could facilitate prescribing and result in improved clinical outcomes for this patient group., Funding: Novo Nordisk., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests JD declares having received consulting honoraria from Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Merck, Pfizer, Aegerion, Novartis, Sanofi, Takeda, Novo Nordisk, and Bayer, and research grants from British Heart Foundation, Medical Research Council (UK), National Institute for Health and Care Research, Public Health England, MSD, Pfizer, Aegerion, Colgate, and Roche. BMS declares having received institutional research grants to Brigham and Women's Hospital from Better Therapeutics, Merck, Novo Nordisk, and Pfizer, and consulting fees from Allergan, Boehringer Ingelheim, Better Therapeutics, Elsevier PracticeUpdate Cardiology, Esperion, Hanmi, Lexicon, Novo Nordisk, and equity in health at Scale and Doximity. SV reports speaking honoraria or consulting fees from Abbott, Amarin, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Canadian Medical and Surgical Knowledge Translation Research Group, Eli Lilly, HLS Therapeutics, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, PhaseBio, and TIMI. DR declares having received consulting honoraria from Altimmune, Amgen, Biohaven, Boehringer Ingelheim, Calibrate, Carmot Therapeutics, CinRx, Eli Lilly, Epitomee, Gila Therapeutics, Ifa Celtic, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Rhythm, Scientific Intake, Wondr Health, and Zealand. DR also declares having received stock options from Calibrate, Epitomee, Scientific Intake, and Xeno Bioscience. IL declares having received research funding (paid to institution) from Novo Nordisk, Sanofi, Mylan, and Boehringer Ingelheim. IL received advisory or consulting fees or other support from Altimmune, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Biomea, Boehringer Ingelheim, Carmot, Cytoki Pharma, Eli Lilly, Intercept, Janssen/Johnson & Johnson, Mannkind, Mediflix, Merck, Metsera, Novo Nordisk, Pharmaventures, Pfizer, Regeneron, Sanofi, Shionogi, Structure Therapeutics, Target RWE, Terns Pharma, The Comm Group, Valeritas, WebMD, and Zealand Pharma. HMC declares being a stockholder and serving on an advisory panel for Bayer; receiving research grants from Chief Scientist Office, Diabetes UK, European Commission, IQVIA, Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation, and Medical Research Council; serving on an advisory board and speakers bureau for Novo Nordisk; and holding stock in Roche Pharmaceuticals. SEK declares having received consulting honoraria from Anii Pharmaceuticals, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Merck, Novo Nordisk, and Oramed and stock options from Altpep. JP declares having received consulting honoraria from Altimmune, Amgen, Esperion Therapeutics, Merck, MJH Life Sciences, Novartis, and Novo Nordisk; he has received a grant, paid to his institution, from Boehringer Ingelheim, and holds the position of Director, Preventive Cardiology, at Brigham and Women's Hospital. MNK declares having served as a consultant or on an advisory board for 35Pharma, Alnylam, Amgen, Applied Therapeutics, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Cytokinetics, Dexcom, Eli Lilly, Esperion Therapeutics, Imbria Pharmaceuticals, Janssen, Lexicon Pharmaceuticals, Merck (Diabetes and Cardiovascular), Novo Nordisk, Pharmacosmos, Pfizer, Sanofi, scPharmaceuticals, Structure Therapeutics, Vifor Pharma, and Youngene Therapeutics; has received research grants from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Pfizer; holds stocks in Artera Health and Saghmos Therapeutics; and has received honoraria from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Novo Nordisk. MNK has also received other research support from AstraZeneca. SSE declares having received consulting honoraria from Amylyx, AstraZeneca, Avillion, Ayala, Bayer, BeiGene, Boehringer Ingelheim, 89 Bio, BioAge, BioAtla, Bristol Myers Squibb, BridgeBio, Daiichi Sankyo, Denovo, Fore Therapeutics, GlaxoSmithKline, Inovio, Insmed, Ipsen, Karuna, Lilly, Lundbeck, Mirati, Moderna, Novartis, Novavax, Novo Nordisk, National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project, Pfizer, Principia, Reata, Rebiotx, Roche, Sanofi, Solvd, Sutro Biopharma, and TG Therapeutics. AG declares having received honoraria from Novo Nordisk, AstraZeneca, Novartis, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Bayer. CCL declares having received consulting and research honoraria from Amarin, Applied Therapeutics, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Moderna, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, and Roche Diagnostics. MU-T declares having received consulting and research honoraria from Abbott, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Frosst Laboratories, Johnson and Johnson, Menarini, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Procaps, Sanofi-Aventis, Servier, and Tecnofarma. MP declares having received honoraria from Novo Nordisk. AML declares having received honoraria from Novo Nordisk, Eli Lilly, Akebia, Amgen, Ardelyx, Becton Dickson, Endologix, Fibrogen, GlaxoSmithkline, Medtronic, Neovasc, Provention Bio, ReCor, Brainstorm Cell, Alnylam, and Intarcia for consulting activities and research funding to his institution from AbbVie, Esperion, AstraZeneca, CSL Behring, Novartis, and Eli Lilly. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Aims: To date, potential differences in outcomes for immigrants and non-immigrants with a cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), in a European setting, remain underutilized and unknown. Hence, we examined the efficacy of CRT measured by heart failure (HF)-related hospitalizations and all-cause mortality among immigrants and non-immigrants., Methods and Results: All immigrants and non-immigrants who underwent first-time CRT implantation in Denmark (2000-2017) were identified from nationwide registries and followed for up to 5 years. Differences in HF related hospitalizations and all-cause mortality were evaluated by Cox regression analyses. From 2000 to 2017, 369 of 10 741 (3.4%) immigrants compared with 7855 of 223 509 (3.5%) non-immigrants with a HF diagnosis underwent CRT implantation. The origins of the immigrants were Europe (61.2%), Middle East (20.1%), Asia-Pacific (11.9%), Africa (3.5%), and America (3.3%). We found similar high uptake of HF guideline-directed pharmacotherapy before and after CRT and a consistent reduction in HF-related hospitalizations the year before vs. the year after CRT (61% vs. 39% for immigrants and 57% vs. 35% for non-immigrants). No overall difference in 5-year mortality among immigrants and non-immigrants was seen after CRT [24.1% and 25.8%, respectively, P-value = 0.50, hazard ratio (HR) = 1.2, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.8-1.7]. However, immigrants of Middle Eastern origin had a higher mortality rate (HR = 2.2, 95% CI: 1.2-4.1) compared with non-immigrants. Cardiovascular causes were responsible for the majority of deaths irrespective of immigration status (56.7% and 63.9%, respectively)., Conclusion: No overall differences in efficacy of CRT in improving outcomes between immigrants and non-immigrants were identified. Although numbers were low, a higher mortality rate among immigrants of Middle Eastern origin was identified compared with non-immigrants., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.)

Aims: While clinical trials have suggested that a high ventricular rate is associated with increased risk of heart failure (HF) and mortality, all-comers studies are warranted., Objective: To assess 1-year risk of new-onset diagnosed HF and all-cause mortality among rate-control treated patients presenting with atrial fibrillation (AF) on an electrocardiogram (ECG) according to ventricular rate., Methods and Results: ECGs recorded at the Copenhagen General Practitioners Laboratory (2001-15) were used to identify patients with AF. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to compare risk of new-onset HF and all-cause mortality after first ECG presenting with AF according to ventricular rate on ECG [<60, 60-79, 80-99, and 100-110, > 110 beats per minute (bpm)]. We identified 7408 patients in treatment with rate control drugs at time of first ECG presenting with AF [median age 78 years (Q1,Q3 = 70-85 years)], 45.8% male, median ventricular rate 83 bpm, (Q1,Q3 = 71-101 bpm)]. During 1-year follow-up, 666 (9.0%) of all patients with AF developed HF and 858 (11.6%) died. Patients with AF ventricular rates 100-110 bpm and >110 bpm had a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.46 (CI: 1.10-1.95) and 2.41 (CI: 1.94-3.00) respectively for new-onset HF, compared with 60-79 bpm. Similarly, patients with AF ventricular rates 100-110 bpm and >110 bpm had a HR of 1.44 (CI: 1.13-1.82) and 1.34 (CI: 1.08-1.65) respectively for all-cause mortality, compared with 60-79 bpm., Conclusions: Ventricular rates ≥100 bpm among patients presenting with AF on ECG in treatment with rate control drugs were associated with greater risk of both new-onset HF and all-cause mortality., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: Lucas Malta Westergaard: none, Amna Alhakak: none, Rasmus Rørth: none, Emil L. Fosbøl: none, and Søren L. Kristensen: speaker fee from Astra Zeneca. Advisory board at Bayer, Jesper H. Svendsen: research grant, payment to institution, and speaker fee from Medtronic. Advisory board at Medtronic, Claus Graff: none, Jonas B. Nielsen: is employed by Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc., New York, unrelated to this work; Gunnar H. Gislason: research grants from Boerhinger Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Pfizer; Lars Køber: serves as a consultant for Boehringer Ingelheim and has received other support from AstraZeneca, Novartis, and Novo Nordisk; and Christian Torp-Pedersen: grant for randomized study from Bayer. Grant for epidemiological study from Novo Nordisk; Christina J-Y Lee: none; and Peter E. Weeke: none., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.)

Aims: Thyroid dysfunction is considered the most frequent complication to amiodarone treatment, but data on its occurrence outside clinical trials are sparse. The present study aimed to examine the incidence of thyroid dysfunction following initiation of amiodarone treatment in a nationwide cohort of patients with and without heart failure (HF)., Methods and Results: In Danish registries, we identified all patients with first-time amiodarone treatment during the period 2000-18, without prior thyroid disease or medication. The primary outcome was a composite of thyroid diagnoses and initiation of thyroid drugs. Outcomes were assessed at 1-year follow-up, and for patients free of events in the first year, in a landmark analysis for the subsequent 5 years. We included 43 724 patients with first-time amiodarone treatment, of whom 16 939 (38%) had HF. At 1-year follow-up, the cumulative incidence and adjusted hazard ratio (HR) of the primary outcome were 5.3% and 1.37 (95% confidence interval 1.25-1.50) in patients with a history of HF and 4.2% in those without HF (reference). In the 1-year landmark analysis, the subsequent 5-year cumulative incidences and adjusted HRs of the primary outcome were 5.3% (reference) in patients with 1-year accumulated dose <27.38 g [corresponding to average daily dose (ADD <75 mg)], 14.0% and HR 2.74 (2.46-3.05) for 27.38-45.63 g (ADD 75-125 mg), 20.0% and HR 4.16 (3.77-4.59) for 45.64-63.88 g (ADD 126-175 mg), and 24.5% and HR 5.30 (4.82-5.90) for >63.88 g (ADD >175 mg)., Conclusion: Among patients who initiated amiodarone treatment, around 5% had thyroid dysfunction at 1-year follow-up, with a slightly higher incidence in those with HF. A dose-response relationship was observed between the 1-year accumulated amiodarone dose and the subsequent 5-year cumulative incidence of thyroid dysfunction., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: J.H.B. received advisory board honoraria from Bayer, unrelated to the submitted work. E.F. received an independent research grant from Novo Nordisk Foundation, unrelated to the submitted work. L.K. received speaker’s honoraria from Novo, Novartis, AstraZeneca, and Boehringer, unrelated to the submitted work. S.L.K. received a speaker’s honoraria from Astra Zeneca outside of the submitted work. All remaining authors have declared no conflicts of interest., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.)

Objective: To examine the long-term rates of heart failure (HF) and other adverse cardiovascular (CV) outcomes in a nationwide cohort of patients diagnosed with granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA) compared with the general population., Methods: Using Danish nationwide registries, patients with newly diagnosed GPA were identified and matched 1:4 by age, sex, and comorbidities with subjects from the general population. Outcomes were compared using Cox regression. Due to violation of the proportional hazard assumption, landmark analyses for the first year and from 1 year were performed., Results: Of the 1923 patients with GPA, 1781 patients (median age 59 yrs, 47.9% men) were matched with 7124 subjects from the general population. The median follow-up was 6.4 years. The absolute 10-year risk of HF was 6.8% (95% CI 5.5-8.2%) for patients with GPA and 5.9% (5.3-6.6%) for the general population. During the first year after diagnosis, GPA was associated with a significantly higher rate of HF (hazard ratio [HR] 3.60, 95% CI, 2.28-5.67) and other adverse outcomes, including atrial fibrillation/flutter (HR 6.50, 95% CI 4.43-9.55) and ischemic stroke (HR 3.24, 95% CI 1.92-5.48), compared with the general population. After the first year, GPA was not associated with higher rates of HF or other CV outcomes compared with the general population, except atrial fibrillation/flutter (HR 1.38, 95% CI 1.12-1.70)., Conclusion: During the first year after diagnosis, the rates of HF and other CV outcomes were higher in patients with GPA compared with the general population. However, after the first year, the rates of HF and other CV outcomes, except atrial fibrillation/flutter, were similar to those in the general population., (Copyright © 2022 by the Journal of Rheumatology.)

Aims: The HERMES (HEart failure Molecular Epidemiology for Therapeutic targetS) consortium aims to identify the genomic and molecular basis of heart failure., Methods and Results: The consortium currently includes 51 studies from 11 countries, including 68 157 heart failure cases and 949 888 controls, with data on heart failure events and prognosis. All studies collected biological samples and performed genome-wide genotyping of common genetic variants. The enrolment of subjects into participating studies ranged from 1948 to the present day, and the median follow-up following heart failure diagnosis ranged from 2 to 116 months. Forty-nine of 51 individual studies enrolled participants of both sexes; in these studies, participants with heart failure were predominantly male (34-90%). The mean age at diagnosis or ascertainment across all studies ranged from 54 to 84 years. Based on the aggregate sample, we estimated 80% power to genetic variant associations with risk of heart failure with an odds ratio of ≥1.10 for common variants (allele frequency ≥ 0.05) and ≥1.20 for low-frequency variants (allele frequency 0.01-0.05) at P < 5 × 10 -8 under an additive genetic model., Conclusions: HERMES is a global collaboration aiming to (i) identify the genetic determinants of heart failure; (ii) generate insights into the causal pathways leading to heart failure and enable genetic approaches to target prioritization; and (iii) develop genomic tools for disease stratification and risk prediction., (© 2021 The Authors. ESC Heart Failure published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Society of Cardiology.)

Heart failure (HF) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. A small proportion of HF cases are attributable to monogenic cardiomyopathies and existing genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have yielded only limited insights, leaving the observed heritability of HF largely unexplained. We report results from a GWAS meta-analysis of HF comprising 47,309 cases and 930,014 controls. Twelve independent variants at 11 genomic loci are associated with HF, all of which demonstrate one or more associations with coronary artery disease (CAD), atrial fibrillation, or reduced left ventricular function, suggesting shared genetic aetiology. Functional analysis of non-CAD-associated loci implicate genes involved in cardiac development (MYOZ1, SYNPO2L), protein homoeostasis (BAG3), and cellular senescence (CDKN1A). Mendelian randomisation analysis supports causal roles for several HF risk factors, and demonstrates CAD-independent effects for atrial fibrillation, body mass index, and hypertension. These findings extend our knowledge of the pathways underlying HF and may inform new therapeutic strategies.

Background: The optimal medical treatment in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and right-sided heart failure (RHF) is unknown. We aimed to estimate the risks of all-cause mortality associated with the current clinical use of various cardiovascular drugs in this patient-group., Methods: We followed all patients with registered COPD and RHF (defined as a diagnosis of pulmonary hypertension plus use of loop-diuretics) for the risk of all-cause mortality (Jan 1, 1995 to Dec 31, 2015) using the Danish nationwide administrative registries. The association between mortality and claimed prescriptions for cardiovascular drugs was assessed by multivariable Cox regression models., Results: 5991 patients (mean age 74 ± standard deviation 10 years, 51% women) were included. Of these, 1440 (24%) used beta-blockers, 2149 (36%) renin-angiotensin system inhibitors [RASi], 1340 (22%) oral anticoagulants, 1376 (23%) calcium channel blockers, 1194 (20%) statins, 1824 (30%) spironolactone, and 2099 (35%) low-dose aspirin. During an average follow-up of 2.2 years (±standard deviation 2.8, min-max 0-19.6 years), 5071 (85%) died, corresponding to a mortality rate of 38 per 100 person-years (95% confidence interval 37-39). Compared to no use, beta-blockers were associated with adjusted hazards ratio 0.90 (95% confidence interval 0.84-0.98), RASi 0.92 (0.86-0.98), calcium channel blockers 0.86 (0.80-0.92), spironolactone 1.17 (1.10-1.24), statins 0.85 (0.78-0.92), oral anticoagulants 0.87 (0.79-0.95), and aspirin 0.99 (0.93-1.05). Propensity-score matched analyses and inverse-probability-weighted models yielded similar results., Conclusion: Several cardiovascular drugs may be associated with lowered mortality in COPD and RHF. Given the grave prognosis, randomized clinical trials are warranted to test this hypothesis., (Copyright © 2019 European Federation of Internal Medicine. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Aims To date, potential differences in outcomes for immigrants and non-immigrants with a cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), in a European setting, remain underutilized and unknown. Hence, we examined the efficacy of CRT measured by heart failure (HF)-related hospitalizations and all-cause mortality among immigrants and non-immigrants. Methods and results All immigrants and non-immigrants who underwent first-time CRT implantation in Denmark (2000–2017) were identified from nationwide registries and followed for up to 5 years. Differences in HF related hospitalizations and all-cause mortality were evaluated by Cox regression analyses. From 2000 to 2017, 369 of 10 741 (3.4%) immigrants compared with 7855 of 223 509 (3.5%) non-immigrants with a HF diagnosis underwent CRT implantation. The origins of the immigrants were Europe (61.2%), Middle East (20.1%), Asia-Pacific (11.9%), Africa (3.5%), and America (3.3%). We found similar high uptake of HF guideline-directed pharmacotherapy before and after CRT and a consistent reduction in HF-related hospitalizations the year before vs. the year after CRT (61% vs. 39% for immigrants and 57% vs. 35% for non-immigrants). No overall difference in 5-year mortality among immigrants and non-immigrants was seen after CRT [24.1% and 25.8%, respectively, P -value = 0.50, hazard ratio (HR) = 1.2, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.8–1.7]. However, immigrants of Middle Eastern origin had a higher mortality rate (HR = 2.2, 95% CI: 1.2–4.1) compared with non-immigrants. Cardiovascular causes were responsible for the majority of deaths irrespective of immigration status (56.7% and 63.9%, respectively). Conclusion No overall differences in efficacy of CRT in improving outcomes between immigrants and non-immigrants were identified. Although numbers were low, a higher mortality rate among immigrants of Middle Eastern origin was identified compared with non-immigrants. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims While clinical trials have suggested that a high ventricular rate is associated with increased risk of heart failure (HF) and mortality, all-comers studies are warranted. Objective To assess 1-year risk of new-onset diagnosed HF and all-cause mortality among rate-control treated patients presenting with atrial fibrillation (AF) on an electrocardiogram (ECG) according to ventricular rate. Methods and results ECGs recorded at the Copenhagen General Practitioners Laboratory (2001–15) were used to identify patients with AF. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to compare risk of new-onset HF and all-cause mortality after first ECG presenting with AF according to ventricular rate on ECG [<60, 60–79, 80–99, and 100–110, > 110 beats per minute (bpm)]. We identified 7408 patients in treatment with rate control drugs at time of first ECG presenting with AF [median age 78 years (Q1,Q3 = 70–85 years)], 45.8% male, median ventricular rate 83 bpm, (Q1,Q3 = 71–101 bpm)]. During 1-year follow-up, 666 (9.0%) of all patients with AF developed HF and 858 (11.6%) died. Patients with AF ventricular rates 100–110 bpm and >110 bpm had a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.46 (CI: 1.10–1.95) and 2.41 (CI: 1.94–3.00) respectively for new-onset HF, compared with 60–79 bpm. Similarly, patients with AF ventricular rates 100–110 bpm and >110 bpm had a HR of 1.44 (CI: 1.13–1.82) and 1.34 (CI: 1.08–1.65) respectively for all-cause mortality, compared with 60–79 bpm. Conclusions Ventricular rates ≥100 bpm among patients presenting with AF on ECG in treatment with rate control drugs were associated with greater risk of both new-onset HF and all-cause mortality. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims Thyroid dysfunction is considered the most frequent complication to amiodarone treatment, but data on its occurrence outside clinical trials are sparse. The present study aimed to examine the incidence of thyroid dysfunction following initiation of amiodarone treatment in a nationwide cohort of patients with and without heart failure (HF). Methods and results In Danish registries, we identified all patients with first-time amiodarone treatment during the period 2000–18, without prior thyroid disease or medication. The primary outcome was a composite of thyroid diagnoses and initiation of thyroid drugs. Outcomes were assessed at 1-year follow-up, and for patients free of events in the first year, in a landmark analysis for the subsequent 5 years. We included 43 724 patients with first-time amiodarone treatment, of whom 16 939 (38%) had HF. At 1-year follow-up, the cumulative incidence and adjusted hazard ratio (HR) of the primary outcome were 5.3% and 1.37 (95% confidence interval 1.25–1.50) in patients with a history of HF and 4.2% in those without HF (reference). In the 1-year landmark analysis, the subsequent 5-year cumulative incidences and adjusted HRs of the primary outcome were 5.3% (reference) in patients with 1-year accumulated dose <27.38 g [corresponding to average daily dose (ADD <75 mg)], 14.0% and HR 2.74 (2.46–3.05) for 27.38–45.63 g (ADD 75–125 mg), 20.0% and HR 4.16 (3.77–4.59) for 45.64–63.88 g (ADD 126–175 mg), and 24.5% and HR 5.30 (4.82–5.90) for >63.88 g (ADD >175 mg). Conclusion Among patients who initiated amiodarone treatment, around 5% had thyroid dysfunction at 1-year follow-up, with a slightly higher incidence in those with HF. A dose–response relationship was observed between the 1-year accumulated amiodarone dose and the subsequent 5-year cumulative incidence of thyroid dysfunction. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Whether the increased risk of coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients with breast cancer may be linked to shared genetics is unknown. Our objective was to investigate the association of genetic predisposition to breast cancer with CAD risk via 1) a polygenic risk score 2) a nationwide case-control study. We studied the associations of a polygenic risk score based on 91 single nucleotide polymorphisms previously associated with breast cancer in genome-wide association studies with the risk of CAD in a sample of patients undergoing coronary angiography. Secondary outcomes were prevalent atrial fibrillation, heart failure and breast cancer. Logistic regression models were used to analyze the associations. The risk of CAD associated with having a mother with breast cancer was analyzed with conditional logistic regression in the case-control study. Among 4985 patients undergoing coronary angiography (median age 66 years (Quartile (Q) 1-Q3 57–73), 65% male) 3724 (75%) had CAD. Increasing polygenic risk score was not associated with risks of CAD (odds ratio (OR) 1.01, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.94–1.08), atrial fibrillation (OR 1.03, CI 0.94–1.12), or heart failure (OR 0.97, CI 0.90–1.05). In women, increasing polygenic risk score was associated with the risk of breast cancer (OR 1.40, CI 1.14–1.73). The risk of CAD was not significantly increased in children with vs. without mothers with breast cancer (Hazard ratio 0.89 95% CI 0.83–0.96, p = 0.002). Our study found no evidence of a shared genetic predisposition of breast cancer with CAD, atrial fibrillation, or heart failure. Unlabelled Image • Polygenic predisposition to breast cancer was not associated with coronary artery disease. • No familial clustering of breast cancer and coronary artery disease • Coronary artery disease in patients with breast cancer is not due to shared genetics. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]