Search

Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) are excellent therapies for advanced heart failure patients either bridged to transplant or for lifetime use. LVADs also allow for reverse remodeling of the failing heart that is often associated with functional improvement. Indeed, growing enthusiasm exists to better understand this population of patients, whereby the LVAD is used as an adjunct to mediate myocardial recovery. When patients achieve benchmarks suggesting that they no longer need LVAD support, questions related to the discontinuation of LVAD therapy become front and center. The purpose of this review is to provide a surgical perspective on the practical and technical issues surrounding LVAD deactivation., (Copyright © 2024 International Society for the Heart and Lung Transplantation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Clinical predictors of posttransplant graft loss since the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) heart allocation system change have not been well characterized. Single organ adult heart transplants from the UNOS database were identified (n = 10,252) and divided into a test cohort (n = 6,869, 67%) and validation cohort (n = 3,383, 33%). A Cox regression analysis was performed on the test cohort to identify recipient and donor risk factors for posttransplant graft loss. Based on the risk factors, a score (max 16) was developed to classify patients in the validation cohort into risk groups of low (≤1), mid (2-3), high (≥4) risk. Recipient factors of advanced age, Black race, recipient blood group O, diabetes, etiology of heart failure, renal dysfunction, elevated bilirubin, redo-transplantation, elevated pulmonary artery pressure, transplant with a durable ventricular assist device, or transplant on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) or ventilator were associated with more posttransplant graft loss. Donor factors of ischemic time and donor age were also associated with outcomes. One year graft survival for the low-, mid-, high-risk groups was 94%, 91%, and 85%, respectively. In conclusion, easily obtainable clinical characteristics at time of heart transplant can predict posttransplant outcomes in the current era., Competing Interests: Disclosure: The authors have no conflicts of interest to report., (Copyright © ASAIO 2023.)

Background: Biventricular heart failure remains a clinically challenging condition to manage. Available literature describing the use of durable biventricular assist device (BiVAD) support has numerous limitations hindering the development of useful treatment algorithms. Analysis of BiVAD use within a large multicenter data set is needed to clarify outcomes associated with this therapy., Methods: The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Intermacs database was queried to identify adults aged ≥18 years who received durable circulatory support from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2220. The data set was divided into the following cohorts: (1) left ventricular assist device (LVAD) only (n = 27,325), (2) LVAD and concurrent right ventricular assist device (RVAD) (n = 1090), and (3) LVAD and sequential RVAD (n = 556). Propensity score matching was used to compare 1-year mortality and adverse events between concurrent (n = 565) and sequential BiVADs (n = 565)., Results: Overall survival within 1 year was significantly worse for the BiVAD cohort compared with the LVAD-only cohort (12-month survival: 50.8% vs 82.6%; log-rank P < .001). In a propensity-matched cohort, patients implanted with a BiVAD concurrently had an improved survival compared with those implanted an LVAD and an RVAD sequentially (12-month survival: 55.8% vs 41.8%; log-rank P < .001). Early (<3 months) adverse event rates were higher among patients receiving sequential BiVADs for bleeding, infection, neurologic dysfunction, and renal dysfunction (P < .01)., Conclusions: After matching for patient and disease characteristics, patients with sequential BiVAD implantation have worse outcomes than patients with concurrent BiVAD implantation., (Copyright © 2023 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Competing Interests: Disclosure: The authors have no conflicts of interest to report.

Aims: We analyzed the impact of the revised pediatric heart allocation policy on types of ventricular assist device (VAD) utilization, and waitlist (WL) and post-heart transplant (HT) survival outcomes in congenital heart disease (CHD) versus non-CHD patients before (Era-1) and after (Era-2) pediatric heart allocation policy implementation., Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the UNOS database from December 16, 2011, through March 31, 2021, for patients < 18 years old and listed for primary HT. We compared the differences observed between Era-1 and Era-2., Results: 5551 patients were listed for HT, of whom 2447(44%) were in Era-1 and 3104(56%) were in Era-2. CHD patients were listed as status 1A unchanged, but the number of patients listed as status 1B decreased in Era-2, whereas the number of non-CHD patients listed as status 1A decreased, but status 1B increased. In Era-2 compared to Era-1, both temporary (1% to 4%, p < .001) and durable VAD (13.6% to 17.8%, p < .001) utilization increased, and the transplantation rate per 100-patient years increased in both groups. The median WL period for CHD patients increased marginally from 70 to 71 days (p = .06), whereas for non-CHD patients it decreased from 61 to 54 days (p < .001). Adjusted 90-day WL survival increased from 84% to 88%, p = .016 in CHD, but there was no significant change in non-CHD patients (p = .57). There was no significant difference in 1-year post-HT survival in CHD and non-CHD patients between Era-1 and Era-2., Conclusions: In summary, after the revised heart allocation policy implementation, temporary and durable VAD support increased, HT rate increased, waitlist duration marginally increased in the CHD cohort and decreased in the non-CHD cohort, and 90-day WL survival probability improved in children with CHD without significant change in 1-year post-HT outcomes. Future studies are needed to identify changes to the policy that may further improve the listing criteria to improve WL duration and post-HT survival., (© 2022 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

This retrospective study included children aged ≤18 years who had durable ventricular assist devices (VADs) as a bridge to transplantation from the United Network Organ Sharing (UNOS) database between 2011 and 2020. We evaluated 90 day waitlist mortality and 1 year posttransplant mortality after VAD implantation in children stratified by race/ethnicity: Black, White, and Others. The VAD was used in a higher proportion of Black children listed for heart transplantation (HT) (26%) versus Other (25%) versus White (22%); p < 0.01. Black children had Medicaid health insurance coverage (67%) predominantly at the time of listing for HT. There was no significant overall difference in waitlist survival among the three groups supported with VAD at the time of listing (log-rank p = 0.4). On the other hand, the 90 day waitlist mortality after the VAD implantation at listing and while listed was the lowest among Black (6%) compared with White (13%) and Other (14%) ( p < 0.01). The multivariate regression analysis showed that Other race (hazard ratio [HR], 2.29; p < 0.01), Black race (HR, 2.13; p < 0.01), use of mechanical ventilation (HR, 1.72; p = 0.01), and Medicaid insurance (HR, 1.54; p = 0.04) were independently associated with increased 1 year posttransplant mortality. In conclusion, Black children had more access to durable VAD support than White children. The 90 day waitlist mortality was significantly lower in Black children compared with White and Other after VAD implantation. However, Black and Other racial/ethnic children with VAD at transplant had higher 1 year posttransplant mortality than White children. Future studies to elucidate the reasons for these disparities are needed., Competing Interests: Disclosure: The authors have no conflicts of interest to report., (Copyright © ASAIO 2022.)

Background: Continuous flow left ventricular assist devices have improved outcomes in patients with end-stage heart failure that require mechanical circulatory support. Current devices have an adverse event profile that has hindered widespread application. The EVAHEART®2 left ventricular assist device (EVA2) has design features such as large blood gaps, lower pump speeds and an inflow cannula that does not protrude into the left ventricle that may mitigate the adverse events currently seen with other continuous flow devices., Methods: A prospective, multi-center randomized non-inferiority study, COMPETENCE Trial, is underway to assess non-inferiority of the EVA2 to the HeartMate 3 LVAS when used for the treatment of refractory advanced heart failure. The primary end-point is a composite of the individual primary outcomes: Survival to cardiac transplant or device explant for recovery; Free from disabling stroke; Free from severe Right Heart Failure after implantation of original device. Randomization is in a 2:1 (EVA2:HM3) ratio., Results: The first patient was enrolled into the COMPETENCE Trial in December of 2020, and 25 subjects (16 EVA2 and 9 HM3) are currently enrolled. Enrollment of a safety cohort is projected to be completed by third quarter of 2022 at which time an interim analysis will be performed. Short-term cohort (92 EVA2 subjects) and long-term cohort is expected to be completed by the end of 2023 and 2024, respectively., Conclusions: The design features of the EVA2 such as a novel inflow cannula and large blood gaps may improve clinical outcomes but require further study. The ongoing COMPETENCE trial is designed to determine if the EVA2 is non-inferior to the HM3., (Copyright © 2022 International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Competing Interests: Disclosure: The authors have no conflicts of interest to report.

Many patients with end-stage heart disease die because of the scarcity of donor hearts. A total artificial heart (TAH), an implantable machine that replaces the heart, has so far been successfully used in over 1,700 patients as a temporary life-saving technology for bridging to heart transplantation. However, after more than six decades of research on TAHs, a TAH that is suitable for destination therapy is not yet available. High complication rates, bulky devices, poor durability, poor biocompatibility and low patient quality of life are some of the major drawbacks of current TAH devices that must be addressed before TAHs can be used as a destination therapy. Quickly emerging innovations in battery technology, wireless energy transmission, biocompatible materials and soft robotics are providing a promising opportunity for TAH development and might help to solve the drawbacks of current TAHs. In this Review, we describe the milestones in the history of TAH research and reflect on lessons learned during TAH development. We summarize the differences in the working mechanisms of these devices, discuss the next generation of TAHs and highlight emerging technologies that will promote TAH development in the coming decade. Finally, we present current challenges and future perspectives for the field., (© 2022. Springer Nature Limited.)

Purpose: Pediatric heart failure patients remain in critical need of a dedicated mechanical circulatory support (MCS) solution as development efforts for specific pediatric devices continue to fall behind those for the adult population. The Inspired Pediatric VAD is being developed as a pediatric specific MCS solution to provide up to 30-days of circulatory or respiratory support in a compact modular package that could allow for patient ambulation during treatment., Methods: Hydrodynamic performance (flows, pressures), impeller/rotor mechanical properties (torques, forces), and flow shear stress and residence time distributions of the latest design version, Inspired Pediatric VAD V3, were numerically predicted and investigated using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) software (SolidWorks Flow Simulator)., Results: Hydrodynamic performance was numerically predicted, indicating no change in flow and pressure head compared to the previous device design (V2), while displaying increased impeller/rotor torques and translation forces enabled by improved geometry. Shear stress and flow residence time volumetric distributions are presented over a range of pump rotational speeds and flow rates. At the lowest pump operating point (3000 RPM, 0.50 L/min, 75 mmHg), 79% of the pump volume was in the shear stress range of 0-10 Pa with < 1% of the volume in the critical range of 150-1000 Pa for blood damage. At higher speed and flow (5000 RPM, 3.50 L/min, 176 mmHg), 65% of the volume resided in the 0-10 Pa range compared to 2.3% at 150-1000 Pa., Conclusions: The initial computational characterization of the Inspired Pediatric VAD V3 is encouraging and future work will include device prototype testing in a mock circulatory loop and acute large animal model., (© 2022. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to Biomedical Engineering Society.)

The HeartWare HVAD System (Medtronic) is a durable implantable left ventricular assist device that has been implanted in approximately 20,000 patients worldwide for bridge to transplant and destination therapy indications. In December 2020, Medtronic issued an Urgent Medical Device Communication informing clinicians of a critical device malfunction in which the HVAD may experience a delay or failure to restart after elective or accidental discontinuation of pump operation. Moreover, evolving retrospective comparative effectiveness studies of patients supported with the HVAD demonstrated a significantly higher risk of stroke and all-cause mortality when compared with a newer generation of a commercially available durable left ventricular assist device. Considering the totality of this new information on HVAD performance and the availability of an alternate commercially available device, Medtronic halted the sale and distribution of the HVAD System in June 2021. The decision to remove the HVAD from commercial distribution now requires the use of the HeartMate 3 left ventricular assist system (Abbott, Inc) if a patient previously implanted with an HVAD requires a pump exchange. The goal of this document is to review important differences in the design of the HVAD and HeartMate 3 that are relevant to the medical management of patients supported with these devices, and to assess the technical aspects of an HVAD-to-HeartMate 3 exchange. This document provides the best available evidence that supports best practices. (J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2022;-:1-8)., (© 2022 Jointly between The Society of Thoracic Surgeons, The American Association for Thoracic Surgery, and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. Published by Oxford University Press the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery.)

Background Atrial and ventricular arrhythmias are commonly encountered in patients with advanced heart failure, with amiodarone being the most commonly used antiarrhythmic drug in continuous-flow left ventricular assist device (CF-LVAD) recipients. The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of amiodarone use on long-term all-cause mortality in ptients with a CF-LVAD. Methods and Results A retrospective multicenter study of CF-LVAD was conducted at 5 centers including all CF-LVAD implants from 2007 to 2015. Patients were stratified based on pre-CF-LVAD implant amiodarone use. Additional use of amiodarone after CF-LVAD implantation was also evaluated. Primary outcome was all-cause mortality during long-term follow-up. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to assess survival outcomes. Multivariable Cox regression was used to identify predictors of outcomes. Propensity matching was done to address baseline differences. A total of 480 patients with a CF-LVAD (aged 58±13 years, 81% men) were included. Of these, 170 (35.4%) were on chronic amiodarone therapy at the time of CF-LVAD implant, and 310 (64.6%) were not on amiodarone. Rate of all-cause mortality over the follow-up period was 32.9% in the amiodarone group compared with 29.6% in those not on amiodarone ( P =0.008). Similar results were noted in the propensity-matched group (log-rank, P =0.04). On multivariable Cox regression analysis, amiodarone use at baseline was independently associated with all-cause mortality (hazard ratio, 1.68 [95% CI, 1.1-2.5]; P =0.01). Conclusions Amiodarone use was associated with significantly increased rates of all-cause mortality in CF-LVAD recipients. Earlier interventions for arrhythmias to avoid long-term amiodarone exposure may improve long-term outcomes in CF-LVAD recipients and needs further study.

The new United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) policy has resulted in a significantly higher number of temporary mechanical circulatory support device usage such as extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, Impella, and intra-aortic balloon pump due to provision of higher priority with their use while on the waiting list. We aimed to identify Impella use in patients awaiting heart transplantation and temporal changes in its usage. The UNOS database was queried between years 2015 and 2019 for patients aged greater than or equal to 18 years, listed to undergo heart transplantation. A total of 378 patients had Impella support while listed for heart transplantation. Impella use skyrocketed from 2015 (1%) to 2019 (4%, p < 0.01). The most substantial increase in Impella use occurred after the UNOS policy change. The patients listed on Impella support after the policy change had significantly lower waiting time (median 12 days vs. 45 days, p < 0.01). More patients with Impella were directly transplanted (80% vs. 56%, p < 0.01) after the policy change, had significantly lower waitlist mortality (25% vs. 13%, p < 0.01) and fewer converted to a durable support (13% vs. 3%). The translatability (likelihood for receiving organs faster) was significantly improved after the policy change. A multivariable Cox regression model showed that post-transplant survival of Impella patients was not adversely affected after the policy change (hazard ratio = 0.9; p = 0.8). This increase in Impella use represents a substantial change in practice patterns of listing and managing patients on the heart transplant waiting list., Competing Interests: Disclosure: The authors have no conflicts of interest to report., (Copyright © ASAIO 2021.)

Inspired Therapeutics (Merritt Island, FL) is developing a mechanical circulatory support (MCS) system designed as a single driver with interchangeable, extracorporeal, magnetically levitated pumps. The NeoMate system design features an integrated centrifugal rotary pump, motor, and controller that will be housed in a single compact unit. Conceptually, the primary innovation of this technology will be the combination of disposable, low-cost pumps for use with a single, multi-functional, universal controller to support multiple pediatric cardiopulmonary indications. In response to the paucity of clinically available pediatric devices, Inspired Therapeutics is specifically targeting the underserved neonate and infant heart failure (HF) patient population first. In this article, we present the development of the prototype Inspired Therapeutics NeoMate System for pediatric left ventricular assist device (LVAD) support, and feasibility testing in static mock flow loops (H-Q curves), dynamic mock flow loops (hemodynamics), and in an acute healthy ovine model (hemodynamics and clinical applicability). The resultant hydrodynamic and hemodynamic data demonstrated the ability of this prototype pediatric LVAD and universal controller to function over a range of rotary pump speeds (500-6000 RPM), to provide pump flow rates of up to 2.6 L/min, and to volume unload the left ventricle in acute animals. Key engineering challenges observed and proposed solutions for the next design iteration are also presented., Competing Interests: This study was supported by a National Institutes of Health SBIR grant 1R43HL144214-01 (PI Dasse). Drs. Monreal, Koenig, and Slaughter were co-investigators on the NIH SBIR phase I grant (1R43HL144214-01) subcontract with Inspired Therapeutics. Dr. Dasse and Mr. Gellman were PI and Co-I, respectively, on the NIH SBIR phase I grant (1R43HL144214-01) and are employed by Inspired Therapeutics. Dr. Monreal is supported in part by a gift from Robert M. Prizant to the Legacy Foundation of Kentuckiana. Dr. Koenig is co-founder of Cor Habere and MAST developing medical devices supported by NIH SBIR phase I grants (R43HL142337-01, R43HL142385-01, R43HL152894-01); however, these affiliations and funded projects are unrelated to the subcontract with Inspired Therapeutics and independent of the work presented in this manuscript. Dr. Slaughter is co-founder of Cor Habere and MAST developing medical devices supported by NIH SBIR phase I grants (R43HL142337-01, R43HL142385-01, R43HL152894-01) and consultant with Magenta Medical; however, these affiliations and funded projects are unrelated to the subcontract with Inspired Therapeutics and independent of the work presented in this manuscript. Mr. Morello was a consultant on the NIH SBIR phase I grant (1R43HL144214-01) subcontract with Inspired Therapeutics and is employed by Veritium Research. Dr. Prina was a consultant on the NIH SBIR phase I grant (1R43HL144214-01) with Veritium Research LLC. Dr. Prina was also a paid consultant of VADovations Inc and Oregon Institute of Technology through his previous company Applimotion. None of these additional affiliations are related to the work presented in this manuscript. Dr. Tompkins was an engineer on the NIH SBIR phase I grant (1R43HL144214-01) as a graduate student at the University of Louisville and is a consultant for Inspired Therapeutics LLC. Additionally, Dr. Tompkins is a co-owner of MAST LLC, engineer with Cor Habere Corp., and consultant with VADovations Inc.; however, none of these additional affiliations are related to the work presented in this manuscript. Dr. Huang has a research grant from Gilead Sciences, serves as a consultant for GE Healthcare, and has ownership at Microsensor Labs and Degranin Therapeutics. Mr. Gellman is a consultant to Paragonix Technologies, Inc.; Vivante Health, Inc.; and Cardiac Assist Holdings, which are unrelated to to work presented in this manuscript. Dr. Dasse is the CEO and co-Founder of Inspired Therapeutics LLC and serves as PI on the NIH SBIR Phase I grant (1R43HL144214-01) that supported prototype development and feasibility testing presented in this manuscript. In addition, Dr. Dasse is a co-investigator on NIH SBIR phase I grant (R43HL142385-01) and consultant on NIH SBIR grant (R43HL158430), which are unrelated to this manuscript. He is also President and COO of VADovations Inc, and serves as a consultant to BiVACOR Inc, CH-Biomedical USA Inc, Jarvik Heart International, and Vortronix Medical, LLC, Teal Health Inc. CAH Holdings LLC, and “The Kidney Project” affiliated with the University of California San Francisco and Vanderbilt University, which are unrelated to this manuscript. Dr. Dasse serves on the Board of Directors for Makana Therapeutics and Artio Medical, which are unrelated to this manuscript.

Purpose: Despite the availability of first-generation extracorporeal mechanical circulatory support (MCS) systems that are widely used throughout the world, there is a need for the next generation of smaller, more portable devices (designed without cables and a minimal number of connectors) that can be used in all in-hospital and transport settings to support patients in heart failure. Moreover, a system that can be universally used for all indications for use including cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), uni- or biventricular support (VAD), extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) and respiratory assist that is suitable for use for adult, neonate, and pediatric patients is desirable. Providing a single, well designed, universal technology could reduce the incidence of human errors by limiting the need for training of hospital staff on a single system for a variety of indications throughout the hospital rather than having to train on multiple complex systems. The objective of this manuscript is to describe preliminary research to develop the first prototype pump for use as a ventricular assist device for pediatric patients with the Inspired Universal MCS technology. The Inspired VAD Universal System is an innovative extracorporeal blood pumping system utilizing novel MagLev technology in a single portable integrated motor/controller unit which can power a variety of different disposable pump modules intended for neonate, pediatric, and adult ventricular and respiratory assistance., Methods: A prototype of the Inspired Pediatric VAD was constructed to determine the hemodynamic requirements for pediatric applications. The magnitude/range of hydraulic torque of the internal impeller was quantified. The hydrodynamic performance of the prototype pump was benchmarked using a static mock flow loop model containing a heated blood analogue solution to test the pump over a range of rotational speeds (500-6000 RPM), flow rates (0-3.5 L/min), and pressures (0 to ~ 420 mmHg). The device was initially powered by a shaft-driven DC motor in lieu of a full MagLev design, which was also used to calculate the fluid torque acting on the impeller., Results: The pediatric VAD produced flows as high as 4.27 L/min against a pressure of 127 mmHg at 6000 RPM and the generated pressure and flow values fell within the desired design specifications., Conclusions: The empirically determined performance and torque values establish the requirements for the magnetically levitated motor design to be used in the Inspired Universal MagLev System. This next step in our research and development is to fabricate a fully integrated and functional magnetically levitated pump, motor and controller system that meets the product requirement specifications and achieves a state of readiness for acute ovine animal studies to verify safety and performance of the system., (© 2021. Biomedical Engineering Society.)

Objectives: This study aimed to compare the clinical characteristics, risk factors, and overall survival outcomes in adults with congenital heart disease (ACHD) bridged to transplantation with a ventricular assist device (VAD) versus no-VAD., Methods: The study included 894 ACHD patients aged ≥18 years listed for primary heart transplantation between 2010 and 2019 from the United Network for Organ Sharing database. Primary outcomes were waitlist and 1-year post-transplant mortality between VAD and no-VAD ACHD patients., Results: Of 894 ACHD patients included in the study, 91(10.1%) had VAD support at the time of listing. Patients who needed VAD support were mostly males, heavier, and had higher pulmonary artery pressure than the no-VAD group at the listing. The overall waitlist mortality was 38% in the VAD group than 17% in the no-VAD group (p < 0.01). ECMO use was associated with significantly higher mortality than either group. There was no significant difference in 1-year post-transplant mortality between VAD versus no-VAD at the time of transplant (15% vs. 17%; p = 0.66). Multivariate regression analysis found that BMI <20 kg/m 2 (hazard ratio (HR) 1.1; p = 0.01), bilirubin >2 mg/dl (HR 1.1; p = 0.03), creatinine >2 mg/dl (HR 1.3; p = 0.04) and ECMO at transplant (HR 1.4; p = 0.03) increased early post-transplant mortality., Conclusions: The one-year post-transplant mortality rate was no different for ACHD patients that received VAD versus no-VAD. These findings suggest that a VAD should be considered an option to support ACHD patients as a bridge to heart transplantation., (© 2021 International Center for Artificial Organs and Transplantation and Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Patients with left ventricular assist devices currently require long-term anticoagulation with warfarin. Warfarin requires frequent blood tests and is associated with adverse events when not in the therapeutic range. Apixaban is a possible alternative that is potentially better for compliance and requires no additional testing. The purpose of this study was to compare adverse events in patients with a HeartMate 3 LVAD receiving apixaban versus warfarin. Thirty-five patients underwent HM3 implantation between January 01, 2016 to January 31, 2021. The groups compared were apixaban (n = 15, 43%) and warfarin (n = 20, 57%). All patients received 325 mg aspirin daily. Stroke, bleeding, and death were identified as primary outcomes after LVAD implant. Univariate nonparametric statistical analysis was performed. The median duration of treatment with apixaban was 148 days (37-606 days). The groups were comparable in terms of age (56 vs. 54 years), gender (male, 85% vs. 75%), and renal function (Cr 1.5 vs. 1.4). The apixaban group had significantly higher mean pulmonary artery pressure (41 vs. 34, p = 0.03) and there were more (p < 0.05) ischemic cardiomyopathy and INTERMACS profile >3 in the warfarin group. At 6 months, thrombotic complications and death were not different between the groups. The two deaths in the apixaban group were from right heart failure. The apixaban group had clinically lower rates of bleeding complications (5% vs. 30%). The adverse events of bleeding, stroke, and death were similar in HM3 patients receiving warfarin or apixaban. Apixaban may be a safe alternative anticoagulant therapy in HM 3 LVAD patients., Competing Interests: Disclosure: The authors have no conflicts of interest to report., (Copyright © ASAIO 2022.)

Background: Use of continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) has increased over the years as a bridge to transplant. The HeartWare HVAD (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN) and HeartMate III (HM3, Abbott, Abbott Park, IL) are currently approved centrifugal-flow devices used for bridge to transplant. We sought to evaluate outcomes of the patients listed and who received a transplant after receiving these 2 devices., Methods: The United Network of Organ Sharing thoracic transplant database was queried after August 23, 2017, until December 2018 to identify patients aged older than 18 years listed for heart transplant and supported by the HVAD or HM3. Patient characteristics were evaluated at the time of listing and transplant. The primary study end point was 1-year mortality after LVAD implantation. Nonparametric tests were used to evaluate the device groups., Results: Of 569 patients listed for heart transplant during the study period, 226 had HM3 and 343 had HVAD. The HM3 group had more men (82% vs 74%, P = .02), patients with diabetes (38% vs 29%, P = .02), and the body mass index was higher (28 vs 27 kg/m 2 , P = .04) at listing. Between the HM3 and HVAD groups, the 1-year mortality was 20% vs 17%, respectively (log-rank P = .28; Figure 1), and the posttransplant survival at 1 year was 97% and 94%, respectively (P = .1)., Conclusions: In a relatively well-matched group of patients listed for heart transplant with a centrifugal-flow LVAD, the 6-month and 1-year mortality on the waiting list as well as after transplant were not statistically different. Additional real-world experience or a randomized trial would be needed to determine whether one LVAD is superior., (Copyright © 2022 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The objective of the study is to compare the clinical characteristics, risk factors, and overall survival (waitlist and posttransplant) outcomes in children with congenital heart disease (CHD) bridged to transplantation with either a ventricular assist device (VAD) versus extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) versus no mechanical circulatory support (MCS) in the recent era. The study included 2,899 primary heart transplantations in patients <18 years with CHD between 2010 and 2019 from the United Network Organ Sharing database. Patients who had ECMO or VAD at listing or while listed were included, and their waitlist and posttransplant outcomes were compared with CHD patients who did not require MCS. Of all, 464 (16%) had ECMO and 200 (7%) VAD at the time of or during the listing. The VAD utilization increased over the last decade (4% in 2010 to 10% in 2019, p < 0.01). The 90 days post-MCS survival was better with VAD than ECMO (67 vs. 49%, p < 0.01). The transplantability rate at 90 days was decreased with younger age (odds ratio [OR], 0.91; 95% CI, 0.86-0.95), lower body mass index (BMI) (OR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.89-0.98) and lower albumin <3g/dl (OR, 0.6; 95% CI, 0.53-0.7). The multivariate model predicted that lower BMI (OR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.06-1.18), pretransplant ECMO (OR, 2.19; 95% CI, 1.39-3.45), and higher bilirubin (OR, 1.15; 95% CI, 0.97-1.36) decreased 1-year posttransplant survival. Patients transplanted with VAD had better 1-year survival than ECMO (88 vs. 70%, p = 0.01). Waiting list survival of children with CHD supported by VAD is better compared to ECMO. The 1-year posttransplantation outcome of CHD patients supported by VAD is similar to the no MCS patients and better than ECMO-supported patients. There is no significant difference in post-HT survival between patients transitioned from ECMO to VAD while listed and those with VAD-first., Competing Interests: Disclosure: The authors have no conflicts of interest to report., (Copyright © ASAIO 2021.)

Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) improve quality of life (QoL) and functional capacity (FC) for patients with advanced heart failure. The association between adverse events (AEs) and changes in QoL and FC are unknown. Patients treated with the HeartWare ventricular assist device (HVAD) with paired 6-minute walk distance (6MWD, n = 263) and Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaires (KCCQ, n = 272) at baseline and 24 months in the ENDURANCE and ENDURANCE Supplemental Trial databases were included. Patients were stratified based upon occurrence of clinically significant AEs during the first 24 months of support and analyzed for the mean change in 6MWD and KCCQ. The impact of AE frequency on change in 6MWD and KCCQ from baseline to 24 months was evaluated. Of the AEs examined, only sepsis was associated with an improvement in 6MWD (109 m vs. 16 m, p = 0.002). Patients without improvement in 6MWD test from baseline to 24 months had significantly more AEs than those with FC improvement (p = 0.0002). Adverse events did not affect the KCCQ overall summary score. In this analysis, patients with fewer AEs had greater improvement in FC during the 24-month follow up. The frequency of AEs did not have a significant impact on QoL after LVAD implantation., Competing Interests: Disclosure: M.D.S. received salary supported from NIH T32 training grant (HL069749). M.S.S. received research grant funding from Heartware/Medtronic. N.M. has served as a consultant to Abbott, Medtronic, SynCardia, and Carmat. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to report., (Copyright © ASAIO 2021.)

Logfiles from the HeartWare HVAD System provide operational pump trend data to aid in patient management. Pump thrombosis is commonly associated with increases in the logfile power that may precede the clinical presentation. A Power Tracking algorithm was developed to detect significant deviations in pump power that may be associated with pump thrombus (PT). The Power Tracking algorithm was applied retrospectively to logfiles captured in the ENDURANCE, ENDURANCE Supplemental, and LATERAL clinical trials. From a combined dataset of 896 patients, available logfiles with suspected PT (n = 70 events in 60 patients) and available logfiles from patients without adverse events (AEs) (n = 106 patients, consisting of 27.4 patient-years of monitoring) were organized into two cohorts. The Power Tracking algorithm detected PT cases on or before the recorded AE date with a sensitivity of 85.7%, with detection occurring an average of 3.9 days before clinical presentation. The algorithm averaged one false alarm for every 6.85 patient-years of monitoring from logfiles without AEs. The favorable performance of the Power Tracking algorithm may enable earlier detection of pump thrombosis and allow early medical management versus surgical intervention., (Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the ASAIO.)

Pediatric heart failure (HF) patients have been a historically underserved population for mechanical circulatory support (MCS) therapy. To address this clinical need, we are developing a low cost, universal magnetically levitated extracorporeal system with interchangeable pump heads for pediatric support. Two impeller and pump designs (pump V1 and V2) for the pediatric pump were developed using dimensional analysis techniques and classic pump theory based on defined performance criteria (generated flow, pressure, and impeller diameter). The designs were virtually constructed using computer-aided design (CAD) software and 3D flow and pressure features were analyzed using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) analysis. Simulated pump designs (V1, V2) were operated at higher rotational speeds (~5,000 revolutions per minute [RPM]) than initially estimated (4,255 RPM) to achieve the desired operational point (3.5 L/min flow at 150 mm Hg). Pump V2 outperformed V1 by generating approximately 30% higher pressures at all simulated rotational speeds and at 5% lower priming volume. Simulated hydrodynamic performance (achieved flow and pressure, hydraulic efficiency) of our pediatric pump design, featuring reduced impeller size and priming volume, compares favorably to current commercially available MCS devices., Competing Interests: Disclosure: The authors have no conflicts of interest to report., (Copyright © ASAIO 2020.)

Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) have been shown to have survival advantage in advanced heart failure patients. Few studies have evaluated the role of ICDs in patients supported with continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices (CFVADs). We aimed to evaluate the impact of ICD and CFVAD on heart transplant (HTx) waiting list survival. We queried the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) thoracic transplant database between years 2007 and 2016 for patients aged ≥ 18 years listed for HTx. Patients receiving devices other than CFVAD were excluded. Patients were divided into groups-with and without CFVAD and further subdivided into groups-with and without ICD use. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to evaluate the survival outcomes. There were 34 860 patients listed for HTx during study period of which 11 481 (32%) had a CFVAD and 26 139 (75%) had an ICD. Within CFVAD group, patients with ICD were older, more likely male, with higher creatinine and listed as UNOS status 1A. In the No-CFVAD group, 1-year waitlist survival was significantly better with ICD use (81% vs. 73%, P < .0001); however, in CFVAD patients, 1-year survival with ICD use was comparable to No-ICD use (95% vs. 94%, P = .1). Use of ICD is associated with significantly better heart transplant waitlist survival in patients not supported by CFVAD. In patients supported with CFVAD, the ICD does not offer additional survival benefit., (© 2021 International Center for Artificial Organs and Transplantation and Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Aims: Continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) as destination therapy (DT) are a recommended treatment by National Institute for Health and Care Excellence England for end-stage heart failure patients ineligible for cardiac transplantation. Despite the fact that DT is frequently used as an LVAD indication across other major European countries and the United States, with consistent improvements in quality-of-life and longevity, National Health Service (NHS) England does not currently fund DT, mainly due to concerns over cost-effectiveness. On the basis of the recently published ENDURANCE Supplemental Trial studying DT patients, we assessed for the first time the cost-effectiveness of DT LVADs compared with medical management (MM) in the NHS England., Methods and Results: We developed a Markov multiple-state economic model using NHS cost data. LVAD survival and adverse event rates were derived from the ENDURANCE Supplemental Trial. MM survival was based on Seattle Heart Failure Model estimates in the absence of contemporary clinical trials for this population. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were calculated over a lifetime horizon. A discount rate of 3.5% per year was applied to costs and benefits. Deterministic ICER was £46 207 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY). Costs and utilities were £204 022 and 3.27 QALYs for the LVAD arm vs. £77 790 and 0.54 QALYs for the MM arm. Sensitivity analyses confirmed robustness of the primary analysis., Conclusions: The implantation of the HeartWare™ HVAD™ System in patients ineligible for cardiac transplantation as DT is a cost-effective therapy in the NHS England healthcare system under the end-of-life willingness-to-pay threshold of £50 000/QALY, which applies for VAD patients., (© 2021 The Authors. ESC Heart Failure published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Society of Cardiology.)

Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) can predict mortality/complications in left ventricular assist device (LVAD) patients; however, the prognostic value of longitudinal NLR measurements has not been well studied. Here, we examine the mortality/complication incidence in patients with chronically increased NLR verses patients with acutely elevated NLR as a predictor of patient outcomes. This retrospective analysis included 102 patients who underwent LVAD implantation from 2016 to 2018 at a single center. The NLR was calculated at the time of surgery, and at 30 and 90 days after surgery. The NLR values were grouped into categorical data: low, normal (put in range), and high. Patients were classified in 2 groups based on change in their NLR values from surgery to 90 days; the H90 group had sustained increase of NLR over 90-days and the N90 group had normalization of NLR at 90-days. Actuarial survival the between study groups was measured using Kaplan-Meier curves. The N90 group had 50 patients (median age 58 (48-66) years, 21% female) at the time of LVAD placement. Group H90 had 52 patients (median age 64 (52-68) years, 16% female). Median age, body mass index (BMI), bilirubin, creatinine, and BNP at time of implant as well as type of device and implant strategy were comparable between the study groups. The post implant survival for N90 group was significantly better than the H90 group at 1 year (93% vs. 80%) and 2 years (90% vs. 67%) (log-rank P = .001). Early post LVAD survival in patients with elevated NLR over 90 days postoperatively was significantly worse compared to patients who normalized the NLR at 90 days., (© 2021 International Center for Artificial Organs and Transplantation and Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Background: Left ventricular assist device (LVAD) unloading and hemodynamic support in patients with advanced chronic heart failure can result in significant improvement in cardiac function allowing LVAD removal; however, the rate of this is generally considered to be low. This prospective multicenter nonrandomized study (RESTAGE-HF [Remission from Stage D Heart Failure]) investigated whether a protocol of optimized LVAD mechanical unloading, combined with standardized specific pharmacological therapy to induce reverse remodeling and regular testing of underlying myocardial function, could produce a higher incidence of LVAD explantation., Methods: Forty patients with chronic advanced heart failure from nonischemic cardiomyopathy receiving the Heartmate II LVAD were enrolled from 6 centers. LVAD speed was optimized with an aggressive pharmacological regimen, and regular echocardiograms were performed at reduced LVAD speed (6000 rpm, no net flow) to test underlying myocardial function. The primary end point was the proportion of patients with sufficient improvement of myocardial function to reach criteria for explantation within 18 months with sustained remission from heart failure (freedom from transplant/ventricular assist device/death) at 12 months., Results: Before LVAD, age was 35.1±10.8 years, 67.5% were men, heart failure mean duration was 20.8±20.6 months, 95% required inotropic and 20% temporary mechanical support, left ventricular ejection fraction was 14.5±5.3%, end-diastolic diameter was 7.33±0.89 cm, end-systolic diameter was 6.74±0.88 cm, pulmonary artery saturations were 46.7±9.2%, and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure was 26.2±7.6 mm Hg. Four enrolled patients did not undergo the protocol because of medical complications unrelated to the study procedures. Overall, 40% of all enrolled (16/40) patients achieved the primary end point, P <0.0001, with 50% (18/36) of patients receiving the protocol being explanted within 18 months (pre-explant left ventricular ejection fraction, 57±8%; end-diastolic diameter, 4.81±0.58 cm; end-systolic diameter, 3.53±0.51 cm; pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, 8.1±3.1 mm Hg; pulmonary artery saturations 63.6±6.8% at 6000 rpm). Overall, 19 patients were explanted (19/36, 52.3% of those receiving the protocol). The 15 ongoing explanted patients are now 2.26±0.97 years after explant. After explantation survival free from LVAD or transplantation was 90% at 1-year and 77% at 2 and 3 years., Conclusions: In this multicenter prospective study, this strategy of LVAD support combined with a standardized pharmacological and cardiac function monitoring protocol resulted in a high rate of LVAD explantation and was feasible and reproducible with explants occurring in all 6 participating sites. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT01774656.

There is limited data on the cost-effectiveness of continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) in the United States particularly for the bridge-to-transplant indication. Our objective is to study the cost-effectiveness of a small intrapericardial centrifugal LVAD compared with medical management (MM) and subsequent heart transplantation using the respective clinical trial data. We developed a Markov economic framework. Clinical inputs for the LVAD arm were based on prospective trials employing the HeartWare centrifugal-flow ventricular assist device system. To better assess survival in the MM arm, and in the absence of contemporary trials randomizing patients to LVAD and MM, estimates from the Seattle Heart Failure Model were used. Costs inputs were calculated based on Medicare claim analyses and when appropriate prior published literature. Time horizon was lifetime. Costs and benefits were appropriately discounted at 3% per year. The deterministic cost-effectiveness analyses resulted in $69,768 per Quality Adjusted Life Year and $56,538 per Life Year for the bridge-to-transplant indication and $102,587 per Quality Adjusted Life Year and $87,327 per Life Year for destination therapy. These outcomes signify a substantial improvement compared with prior studies and re-open the discussion around the cost-effectiveness of LVADs.

Objectives: In patients with reduced kidney function there are no established guidelines to suggest combined heart-kidney transplant (HKTx) versus sequential kidney transplant (SKTx) using preoperative value of estimated glomerular filtration (eGFR)., Methods: The United Network for Organ Sharing database was queried from 2000 to 2015 to evaluate survival of HKTx and SKTx population stratified by preoperative eGFR rate <45 mL/min. Aim of the study was to assess the eGFR rate that is most beneficial to perform a concomitant or a SKTx at time of transplant evaluation., Results: In our analysis, patients who required SKTx are recipients that, after heart transplantation, developed or worsened kidney insufficiency due to calcineurin inhibitor nephrotoxicity. In recipients with eGFR <30 or dialysis, a total of 545 received HKTx and 80 received SKTx. The median waiting time between heart and kidney transplant in SKTx group was 6 years. The overall post-transplant survival was 81% and 80% and 75% and 59% at 5 and 1 years for the HKTx and SKTx groups, respectively (P = .04). In recipients with eGFR from 30 to 44, a total of 107 received HKTx and 112 received SKTx. The median waiting time between heart and kidney transplant in SKTx group was 4 years. Overall post-transplant survival showed no statistically significant differences in HKTx group (n=107) compared with SKTx group (n=112) and was 90% and 95% at 1 year and 74% and 52% at 5 years, respectively (P = .4) ., Conclusions: To optimize organ and patient survival, eGFR value can be utilized to discern between HKTx versus SKTx in patients with decreased renal function at the time of heart transplantation. Patients with eGFR<30 or in dialysis presented better survival with HKTx, while both SKTx and HKTx are suitable for patients with eGFR between 30 and 45., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The effect of blood group on heart transplant list mortality in the era of continuous flow left ventricular assist devices (VADs) is unknown. We sought to examine mortality from the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database, with focus on mortality among VAD versus non-VAD recipients according to blood group. The UNOS database from 2007 to 2015 was evaluated to compare the rates of waitlist mortality or delisting for clinical worsening at 1-year postlisting among various blood types based on the presence or absence of durable continuous VAD. Patients with pulsatile VAD, temporary VAD, or with incomplete data were excluded. A total of 16,803 patients met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 2,663 had a HeartMate II or HeartWare VAD implanted before listing or by 365th day of listing. The rate of adverse events on the waitlist, irrespective of VAD, was highest among group O patients (odds ratio [OR] 1.54, p < 0.001). The use of VAD was associated with significant relative risk reduction (OR 0.43, p < 0.001) in waitlist adverse events among all patients, with relative risk reduction that overall did not vary by blood group. Among VAD recipients, waitlist adverse events were similar across all blood types. Among listed patients, there is a significantly higher adverse event rate in group O patients compared with others, irrespective of VAD use. With implantation of continuous flow HeartMate II or HeartWare VAD, all blood groups experience similar relative benefit and similar rates of adverse events. All patients, but particularly those with blood group O, eligible for VAD as a bridge to transplant should be considered for VAD placement.

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) improves outcomes in heart failure patients with wide QRS complex. However, CRT management following continuous flow Left Ventricular Assist Device (LVAD) implant vary: some centers continue CRT while others turn off the left ventricular (LV) lead at LVAD implant. We sought to study the effect of continued CRT versus turning off CRT pacing following continuous flow LVAD implantation. A comprehensive retrospective multicenter cohort of 295 patients with LVAD and pre-existing CRT was studied. CRT was programmed off after LVAD implant in 44 patients. We compared their outcomes to the rest of the cohort using univariate and multivariate models. Mean age was 60 ± 12 years, 83% were males, 52% had ischemic cardiomyopathy and 54% were destination therapy. Mean follow-up was 2.4 ± 2.0 years, and mean LVAD support time was 1.7 ± 1.4 years. Patients with CRT OFF had a higher Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (INTERMACS) mean profile (3.9 vs 3.3, p = 0.01), more secondary prevention indication for a defibrillator (64.9% vs 44.5%, p = 0.023), and more pre-LVAD ventricular arrhythmias (VA) (77% vs 60%, p = 0.048). There were no differences between the CRT OFF and CRT ON groups in overall mortality (Log rank p = 0.32, adjusted HR = 1.14 [0.54-2.22], p = 0.71), heart transplantation, cardiac and noncardiac mortality, all cause hospitalizations, hospitalizations for ICD shocks, and number and frequency of ICD shocks or anti-tachycardia pacing therapy. There were no differences in post LVAD atrial arrhythmias (AA) (Adjusted OR = 0.45 [0.18-1.06], p = 0.31) and ventricular arrhythmias (OR = 0.65 [0.41-1.78], p = 0.41). There was no difference in change in LVEF, LV end diastolic and end systolic diameters between the 2 groups. Our study suggests that turning off CRT pacing after LVAD implantation in patients with previous CRT pacing did not affect mortality, heart transplantation, device therapies or arrhythmia burden. A prospective study is needed to confirm these findings.

Background: While clinical experience with left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) continues to grow and evolve, little is known regarding the ongoing use of certain medications in this population. We sought to evaluate the utility of digoxin in LVAD recipients and its association with outcomes., Methods: A total of 505 patients who underwent continuous-flow LVAD implantation at 5 centers from 2007-2015 were included. Patients were divided into 4 groups: not on digoxin at any time (ND; n = 257), received digoxin pre implant (PreD; n = 144), received digoxin pre and post implant (ContD; n = 55), and received digoxin only post implant (PostD; n = 49). Survival and all-cause readmission were compared between the 4 groups., Results: There was no difference in survival at 1 year nor at 3 years between groups (ND = 88%, 66%, respectively; PreD = 85%, 66%; ContD = 86%, 57%; PostD = 90%, 51%; p = 0.7). Readmission per 100 days also was not different between groups (ND = 0.5, PreD = 0.6, ContD = 0.5, PostD = 0.7; p = 0.1)., Conclusions: In this large, multicenter cohort, use of digoxin was not associated with any significant benefit in regard to mortality or hospitalization in patients supported with a continuous-flow LVAD. Importantly, its discontinuation post implant did not worsen all-cause hospitalization or survival., Competing Interests: Henri Roukoz is a consultant for Boston Scientific. Jennifer Cowger serves on a steering committee for Medtronic, receives research-related travel support from Abbott, and receives institutional clinical trial research support from Medtronic and Abbott. Mark S. Slaughter has a research grant from Heartware Inc., and serves on an advisory board for Oregon Heart (no compensation). Rakesh Gopinathannair is a consultant and serves on speakers’ bureaus for Abbott Medical, American Heart Association, Pfizer, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Zoll Medical, and serves on an advisory board for HealthTrust PG. Ashwin Ravichandran serves on speakers’ bureaus and receives institutional clinical trial research support and research-related travel support from Abbott and Medtronic. All other authors report that they have nothing to disclose. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.

Hemorrhagic or thrombotic events are common complications in heart failure patients with continuous-flow left ventricular assist device (CF-LVAD) support. Aim of this study is to investigate the effect of change in antiplatelet therapy after thrombotic or hemorrhagic events in patients with CF-LVAD support. A total of 231 CF-LVAD patients were included in this study. Patients with CF-LVAD were categorized into three groups: (1) high antiplatelet regimen as control group (aspirin [ASA] 325 mg; n = 115), (2) low antiplatelet regimen (ASA 81 mg; n = 82), started after hemorrhagic complications, and (3) double antiplatelet therapy (ASA/clopidogrel; n = 34) started after thrombotic complications. In our analysis, indications for low antiplatelet therapy were gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding (36%), hemorrhagic stroke (8%), and epistaxis (9%). Freedom from major bleeding events after changing therapy was comparable at 1 year for all three groups respectively 96%, 97%, and 91% (log rank = 0.421). Major indications for double antiplatelet therapy were pump thrombosis (15%) and coronary artery stent placement (2.5%). Freedom from thrombotic events after changing therapy was comparable at 1 year for groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively, 97%, 98%, and 91% (log rank = 0.317). Logistic regression shows that Heartmate II patients required more antiplatelet therapy changes compared with HeartWare (odds ratio [OR]: 3.611, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.8-6.9; p = 0.0001). HeartMate II required more adjustment of antiplatelet therapy during follow-up. Reducing or increasing antithrombotic therapies in response to major thrombotic hemorrhagic events in CF-LVAD patients is a safe strategy to avoid recurrences.

Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) are an increasingly used strategy for the management of patients with advanced heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. Although these devices effectively improve survival, atrial and ventricular arrhythmias are common, predispose these patients to additional risk, and complicate patient management. However, there is no consensus on best practices for the medical management of these arrhythmias or on the optimal timing for procedural interventions in patients with refractory arrhythmias. Although the vast majority of these patients have preexisting cardiovascular implantable electronic devices or cardiac resynchronization therapy, given the natural history of heart failure, it is common practice to maintain cardiovascular implantable electronic device detection and therapies after LVAD implantation. Available data, however, are conflicting on the efficacy of and optimal device programming after LVAD implantation. Therefore, the primary objective of this scientific statement is to review the available evidence and to provide guidance on the management of atrial and ventricular arrhythmias in this unique patient population, as well as procedural interventions and cardiovascular implantable electronic device and cardiac resynchronization therapy programming strategies, on the basis of a comprehensive literature review by electrophysiologists, heart failure cardiologists, cardiac surgeons, and cardiovascular nurse specialists with expertise in managing these patients. The structure and design of commercially available LVADs are briefly reviewed, as well as clinical indications for device implantation. The relevant physiological effects of long-term exposure to continuous-flow circulatory support are highlighted, as well as the mechanisms and clinical significance of arrhythmias in the setting of LVAD support.

Objectives: Wide QRS duration and ventricular pacing are common in recipients of continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices (CF-LVADs) but their impact on outcomes remains unclear. We assessed the clinical and arrhythmic outcomes of CF-LVAD patients with wide QRS or right ventricular (RV) pacing at baseline, compared with those with narrow QRS and those with continued cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT)., Methods and Results: A total of 520 patients (57 ± 13 years) with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) (n = 240) or CRT-defibrillator (n = 280) who underwent CF-LVAD implantation at 5 centers in 2007-2015 were studied. Patients were divided into 3 groups: ICD-N (QRS ≤120 ms; n = 134), ICD-W (QRS >120 ms; n = 106), and CRT (n = 280). Mortality, hospitalization, and ventricular arrhythmia (VA) incidence were compared among the groups. Baseline QRS duration was different among the groups (100 ± 13 [ICD-N] vs 155 ± 26 [ICD-W] vs 159 ± 29 ms [CRT]; P < .0001). In the ICD-W group, 37 (35%) had >80% RV pacing at baseline. Median biventricular pacing in the CRT group was 96%. Over 523 days of CF-LVAD support, Kaplan-Meier analysis showed no difference in survival among groups (log rank P = .9). According to multivariate Cox regression, wide QRS duration and RV pacing were not associated with survival. QRS narrowed during CF-LVAD support in the ICD-W and CRT groups but was not associated with improved survival (P = .9). No differences were noted among the groups in hospitalizations (P = .9), VA (P = .2), or ICD shocks (P = .06)., Conclusions: In this large CF-LVAD cohort, a wide QRS duration, high percentage of RV pacing at baseline, and changes in QRS duration after LVAD implantation were not associated with survival. Continued CRT after CF-LVAD implantation also was not associated with improved survival or HF hospitalizations., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: The aim of this study was to prospectively evaluate the impact of blood pressure management on stroke rates in patients receiving the HeartWare HVAD System., Background: The ENDURANCE trial demonstrated noninferiority of the HeartWare HVAD System versus control (HeartMate II) in patients with advanced heart failure ineligible for heart transplantation. However, stroke was more common in HVAD subjects. Post hoc analyses demonstrated increased mean arterial blood pressure as a significant independent risk factor for stroke., Methods: The ENDURANCE Supplemental Trial was a prospective, multicenter evaluation of 465 patients with advanced heart failure ineligible for transplantation, randomized 2:1 to HVAD (n = 308) or control (n = 157). The primary endpoint was the 12-month incidence of transient ischemic attack or stroke with residual deficit 24 weeks post-event. Secondary endpoints included the composite of freedom from death, disabling stroke, and need for device replacement or urgent transplantation, as well as comparisons of stroke or transient ischemic attack rates in HVAD cohorts in ENDURANCE Supplemental and ENDURANCE., Results: The enhanced blood pressure protocol significantly reduced mean arterial blood pressure. The primary endpoint was not achieved (14.7% with HVAD vs. 12.1% with control, noninferiority [margin 6%] p = 0.14). However, the secondary composite endpoint demonstrated superiority of HVAD (76.1%) versus control (66.9%) (p = 0.04). The incidence of stroke in HVAD subjects was reduced 24.2% in ENDURANCE Supplemental compared with ENDURANCE (p = 0.10), and hemorrhagic cerebrovascular accident was reduced by 50.5% (p = 0.02)., Conclusions: The ENDURANCE Supplemental Trial failed to demonstrate noninferiority of HVAD versus control regarding the pre-specified primary endpoint. However, the trial confirmed that BP management is associated with reduced stroke rates in HVAD subjects. HVAD subjects, relative to control subjects, more commonly achieved the composite endpoint (freedom from death, disabling stroke, and device replacement or urgent transplantation). (A Clinical Trial to Evaluate the HeartWare™ Ventricular Assist System [ENDURANCE SUPPLEMENTAL TRIAL] [DT2]; NCT01966458)., (Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Nonsurgical bleeding (NSB) in heart failure (HF) patients with continuous-flow left ventricular assist device (CF-LVAD) support is the most common clinical complication. The aim of this study was to investigate the association between oxidative stress and platelet glycoproteins GPIbα and GPVI shedding on the incidence of NSB in CF-LVAD patients. Fifty-one HF patients undergoing CF-LVAD implantation and 11 healthy volunteers were recruited. Fourteen patients developed NSB (bleeder group) during 1 month follow-up duration, while others were considered nonbleeder group (n = 37). Several biomarkers of oxidative stress were quantified at baseline and weekly intervals in all patients. Surface expression and plasma elements of platelet receptor glycoproteins GPIbα and GPVI were measured. Oxidative stress biomarkers and platelet GPIbα and GPVI receptor-shedding (decreased surface expression and higher plasma levels) were found to be preexisting conditions in baseline samples of both groups of HF patients when compared with healthy volunteers. Significantly elevated oxidative stress biomarkers and platelet glycoprotein receptor shedding were observed in postimplant bleeder group temporarily when compared with nonbleeder group. Strong significant associations between biomarkers of oxidative stress and platelet glycoprotein receptor shedding were observed, suggesting a possible role of oxidative stress in platelet integrin shedding leading to NSB in CF-LVAD patients. Receiver operating characteristic analyses of GPIbα and GPVI indicated that the likelihood of NSB had a predictive power of bleeding complication in CF-LVAD patients. In conclusion, elevated oxidative stress may play a role in GPIbα and GPVI shedding in the event of NSB. Thus, oxidative stress and GPIbα and GPVI shedding may be used as potential biomarkers for bleeding risk stratification in those patients.

The effects of pulmonary hypertension (PAH) on survival after heart transplantation are debated, especially for patients with left ventricular assist devices (LVAD). The United Network of Organ Sharing database was retrospectively queried from January 2005 to June 2015 to identify adult patients who underwent heart transplantation. Four groups were defined: patients without PAH, persistent PAH, resolved PAH, and developed PAH between listing and transplant. A total of 15,914 patients underwent heart transplant of which 4,662 (29%) were implanted with an LVAD. Of the total population, 10,872 (68%) had PAH at time of listing and 9,661 (61%) had PAH at time of transplant. Long-term survival was significantly worse for patients with an LVAD than for those without who had PAH at time of transplant (p = 0.010). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed a trend of worse long-term survival for patients with an LVAD who developed PAH by the time of transplant but improved survival for patients with resolved PAH while on LVAD therapy (p = 0.052). PAH at time of transplant results in worse long-term survival for patients with an LVAD. Furthermore, the development of PAH while on LVAD therapy may negatively impact long-term post-transplant survival, while resolution of PAH improves long-term survival.

Background: Many patients with heart failure continue cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) after continuous flow left ventricular assist device (CF-LVAD) implant. We report the first multicenter study to assess the impact of CRT on clinical outcomes in CF-LVAD patients., Methods and Results: Analysis was performed on 488 patients (58±13 years, 81% male) with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) (n=223) or CRT-D (n=265) who underwent CF-LVAD implantation at 5 centers from 2007 to 2015. Effects of CRT on mortality, hospitalizations, and ventricular arrhythmia incidence were compared against CF-LVAD patients with an ICD alone. Baseline differences were noted between the 2 groups in age (60±12 versus 55±14, P <0.001) and QRS duration (159±29 versus 126±34, P =0.001). Median biventricular pacing in the CRT group was 96%. During a median follow-up of 478 days, Kaplan-Meier analysis showed no difference in survival between groups (log rank P =0.28). Multivariate Cox regression demonstrated no survival benefit with type of device (ICD versus CRT-D; P =0.16), whereas use of amiodarone was associated with increased mortality (hazard ratio 1.77, 95% confidence interval 1.1-2.8, P =0.01). No differences were noted between CRT and ICD groups in all-cause ( P =0.06) and heart failure ( P =0.9) hospitalizations, ventricular arrhythmia incidence (43% versus 39%, P =0.3), or ICD shocks (35% versus 29%, P =0.2). During follow-up, 69 (26%) patients underwent pulse generator replacement in the CRT-D group compared with 36 (15.5%) in the ICD group ( P =0.003)., Conclusions: In this large, multicenter CF-LVAD cohort, continued CRT was not associated with improved survival, hospitalizations, incidence of ventricular arrhythmia and ICD therapies, and was related to a significantly higher number of pulse generator changes., (© 2018 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley.)

Introduction: Oxidative stress and platelet integrin α2bβ3 plays important role in the process of hemostasis and thrombosis. We hypothesized that device-induced patient specific oxidative stress and integrin α2bβ3 shedding may be linked to major bleeding complication (MBC) in heart failure (HF) patients supported by continuous flow left ventricular assist devices (CF-LVADs)., Materials and Methods: We recruited 47patients implanted with CF-LVADs and 15 healthy volunteers. Fourteen patients developed MBC (bleeder group) within one month after implantation while others were considered non-bleeder group (n=33). Oxidative stresses were evaluated by measuring reactive oxygen species (ROS) in platelets, superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity, total antioxidant capacity (TAC) and oxidized low density lipoprotein (oxLDL). Assessments of α2bβ3 were carried out using flow cytometry and ELISA., Results: Biomarkers of oxidative stress and α2bβ3 shedding (decreased surface expression and higher plasma levels) were found to be preexisting condition in all HF patients prior to CF-LVAD implantation compared to the healthy volunteers. Significantly elevated levels of ROS and oxLDL; concomitant depletion of SOD and TAC; and α2bβ3 shedding were observed in the bleeder group temporarily in comparison to the non-bleeder group after CF-LVAD implantation. A significantly strong association between α2bβ3 shedding and biomarkers of oxidative stress was observed; suggesting a potential role of oxidative stress in platelet integrin shedding leading to MBC after CF-LVAD implantation. Moreover, a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis indicated that the likelihood of MBC data from Integrin α2bβ3 shedding had a predictive power of MBC in CF-LVAD patients., Conclusions: Oxidative stress might play a potential role in accelerating α2bβ3 shedding and platelet dysfunction, resulting in MBC in CF-LVAD patients. Integrin α2bβ3 shedding may be used to refine bleeding risk stratification in CF-LVAD patients., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Non-surgical bleeding (NSB) is the most common clinical complication in heart failure (HF) patients supported by continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices (CF-LVADs). In this study, oxidative stress and alteration of signal pathways leading to platelet apoptosis were investigated. Thirty-one HF patients supported by CF-LVADs were divided into bleeder (n = 12) and non-bleeder (n = 19) groups. Multiple blood samples were collected at pre-implant (baseline) and weekly up to 1-month post-implant. A single blood sample was collected from healthy subjects (reference). Production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in platelets, total antioxidant capacity (TAC), oxidized low-density lipoproteins (oxLDL), expression of Bcl-2 and Bcl-xL, Bax and release of cytochrome c (Cyt.c), platelet mitochondrial membrane potential (Δψ m ), activation of caspases, gelsolin cleavage and platelet apoptosis were examined. Significantly elevated ROS, oxLDL and depleted TAC were evident in the bleeder group compared to non-bleeder group (p < 0.05). Platelet pro-survival proteins (Bcl-2, Bcl-xL) were significantly reduced in the bleeder group in comparison to the non-bleeder group (p < 0.05). Translocation of Bax into platelet mitochondria membrane and subsequent release of Cyt.c were more prevalent in the bleeder group. Platelet mitochondrial damage, activation of caspases, gelsolin cleavage, and ultimate platelet apoptosis in the bleeder group were observed. Oxidative stress and activation of both intrinsic and extrinsic pathways of platelet apoptosis may be linked to NSB in CF-LVAD patients. Additionally, biomarkers of oxidative stress, examination of pro-survivals and pro-apoptotic proteins in platelets, mitochondrial damage, caspase activation, and platelet apoptosis may be used to help identify HF patients at high risk of NSB post-implant.

Continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices (CF LVADs) are rotary blood pumps that improve mean blood flow, but with potential limitations of non-physiological ventricular volume unloading and diminished vascular pulsatility. In this study, we tested the hypothesis that left ventricular unloading with increasing CF LVAD flow increases myocardial flow normalized to left ventricular work. Healthy (n = 8) and chronic ischemic heart failure (IHF, n = 7) calves were implanted with CF LVADs. Acute hemodynamics and regional myocardial blood flow were measured during baseline (LVAD off, clamped), partial (2-4 L/min) and full (>4 L/min) LVAD support. IHF calves demonstrated greater reduction of cardiac energy demand with increasing LVAD support compared to healthy calves, as calculated by rate-pressure product. Coronary artery flows (p < 0.05) and myocardial blood flow (left ventricle (LV) epicardium and myocardium, p < 0.05) decreased with increasing LVAD support in normal calves. In the IHF model, blood flow to the septum, LV, LV epicardium, and LV myocardium increased significantly with increasing LVAD support when normalized to cardiac energy demand (p < 0.05). In conclusion, myocardial blood flow relative to cardiac demand significantly increased in IHF calves, thereby demonstrating that CF LVAD unloading effectively improves cardiac supply and demand ratio in the setting of ischemic heart failure.

Implantable continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) have improved the survival of end-stage heart failure patients. Recent studies have shown an increased occurrence of device replacement in the axial flow pumps particularly for thrombosis. In some patients, to try and avoid recurrent pump thrombosis, it might be advantageous to switch from the axial flow LVAD to a newer generation centrifugal flow LVAD. Technically, this requires some adaption of the LVAD inflow and outflow connections. We describe our technique and outcomes in patients who underwent the conversion from an axial flow LVAD to a centrifugal flow LVAD.

The objective of this study was to investigate the changes in oxidative stress (OS) and circulating regulatory T cells (Tregs) of the immune system in patients supported by continuous-flow ventricular assist device (CF-VAD) with or without infection. We recruited 16 CF-VAD patients (5 with infection and 11 without infection) and 7 healthy volunteers. Generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) from lymphocytes, superoxide dismutase (SOD) in erythrocyte, total antioxidant capacity (TAC), and oxidized low-density lipoprotein (oxLDL) in plasma were measured. Circulating Tregs were evaluated by flow cytometry. Heart failure (HF) patients had elevated OS than healthy volunteers as evident from higher lymphocyte ROS, elevated oxLDL, as well as depleted SOD and TAC levels. At baseline, HF patients had decreased percentage of Tregs (5.12 ± 1.5% vs. 8.14 ± 3.01%, p < 0.01) when compared with healthy volunteers. Postimplant patients with infection illustrated 35% and 44% rise in ROS and oxLDL, respectively, 31% decrease in TAC, and marked rise in percentage of Tregs (14.27 ± 3.17% vs. 9.38 ± 3.41%, p < 0.01) when compared with the patients without infection. Elevated OS and rise in Tregs were more prominent in CF-VAD patients with infection. In conclusion, OS and compromised immune system may be important indicators of systemic response of the body to CF-VAD among HF patients with infection.

Counterpulsation devices (CPDs) require an accurate, reliable electrocardiogram (ECG) waveform for triggering inflation and deflation. Surface electrodes are for short-term use, and transvenous/epicardial leads require invasive implant procedure. A subcutaneous ECG lead configuration was developed as an alternative approach for long-term use with timing mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices. In this study, efficacy testing was completed by simultaneously recording ECG waveforms from clinical-grade epicardial (control) and subcutaneous (test) leads in chronic ischemic heart failure calves implanted with CPD for up to 30 days. Sensitivity and specificity of CPD triggering by R-wave detection was quantified for each lead configuration. The subcutaneous leads provided 98.9% positive predictive value and 98.9% sensitivity compared to the epicardial ECG leads. Lead migration (n = 1) and fracture (n = 1) were observed in only 2 of 40 implanted leads, without adversely impacting triggering efficacy due to lead redundancy. These findings demonstrate the efficacy of subcutaneous ECG leads for long-term CPD timing and potential use as an alternative method for MCS device timing.