Search

Background: Frailty and heart failure share pathophysiology and clinical characteristics., Objectives: The aim of this study was to analyze the contribution of heart failure to the physical frailty phenotype by examining patients with heart failure before and after percutaneous mitral valve repair (PMVR)., Methods: Frailty according to the Fried criteria (weight loss, weakness, exhaustion, slowness, and low activity) was assessed in consecutive patients before and 6 weeks after PMVR., Results: A total of 118 of 258 patients (45.7%) (mean age: 78 ± 9 years, 42% female, 55% with secondary mitral regurgitation) were frail at baseline, which significantly decreased to 74 patients (28.7 %) at follow-up (P < 0.001). The frequency of frailty domains slowness, exhaustion, and inactivity significantly decreased, whereas weakness remained unchanged. Baseline frailty was significantly associated with comorbidities, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels, and functional capacity, whereas frailty after PMVR was not associated with NT-proBNP levels. Predictors of postprocedural reversibility of frailty were NYHA functional class 

Purpose: Baroreflex activation therapy has favorable effects in heart failure patients. We report the results of a single-center study of baroreflex activation therapy in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction including cardiopulmonary exercise testing for the first time to show the effect on exercise capacity., Methods: A total of 17 patients were treated with baroreflex activation therapy. Eligibility criteria were the New York Heart Association class ⩾III and ejection fraction ⩽35% on guideline-directed medical and device therapy. The New York Heart Association class, quality of life, and 6-min hall walk distance were assessed in all patients. Twelve patients underwent cardiopulmonary exercise testing before and 8.9 ± 6.4 months after initiation of baroreflex activation therapy., Results: The New York Heart Association class and 6-min hall walk distance improved after baroreflex activation therapy, while quality of life remained stable. Weight-adapted peak oxygen uptake increased significantly from 10.1 (8.2-12.9) ml/min/kg to 12.1 (10.4-14.6) ml/min/kg ( p = 0.041). Maximal heart rate was stable. Maximal oxygen pulse increased from 9.7 (5.5-11.3) to 9.9 (7.1-12.1) ml/heartbeat ( p = 0.047) in 10 patients with low maximal oxygen pulse at baseline (<16.5 ml/heartbeat). There was no significant change in maximal oxygen pulse in the whole cohort. Ventilatory efficiency remained stable., Conclusion: Weight-adapted peak oxygen uptake improved after baroreflex activation therapy, pointing to an enhanced exercise capacity. Ventilatory efficiency and heart rate did not change, while oxygen pulse increased in patients with low oxygen pulse at baseline, indicating an improvement in circulatory efficiency, that is, a beneficial effect on stroke volume and peripheral oxygen extraction.

Background: In a randomized trial, baroreflex activation therapy (BAT) improved exercise capacity, quality of life and NT-proBNP in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). In view of different mechanisms underlying HFrEF, we performed a post-hoc subgroup analysis of efficacy and safety of BAT in patients with and without coronary artery disease (CAD)., Methods and Results: Patients with left ventricular ejection fraction <35% and NYHA Class III were randomized 1:1 to guideline-directed medical and device therapy alone or plus BAT. Patients with a history of CAD, prior myocardial infarction or coronary artery bypass graft were assigned to the CAD group with all others assigned to the no-CAD group. Of 71 BAT treated patients, 52 had CAD and 19 had no CAD. In the control group, 49 of 69 patients had CAD and 20 had no CAD. The system- or procedure-related major adverse neurological or cardiovascular event rate was 3.8% in the CAD group vs. 0% in the no-CAD group (p = 1.0). In the whole cohort, NYHA Class, Minnesota Living with Heart Failure score, 6-minute hall walk distance and NTproBNP were improved in BAT treated patients compared with controls. Statistical analyses revealed no interaction between the presence of CAD and effect of BAT (all p > 0.05)., Conclusion: No major differences were found in BAT efficacy or safety between patients with and without CAD, indicating that BAT improves exercise capacity, quality of life and NTproBNP in patients with ischemic and non-ischemic cardiomyopathy. CLINICALTRIALS., Gov Identifier: NCT01471860 and NCT01720160., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

The purpose of this publication is to describe the intraoperative experience along with long-term safety and efficacy of the second-generation baroreflex activation therapy (BAT) system in patients with heart failure (HF) and reduced ejection fraction HF (HFrEF). In a randomized trial of New York Heart Association Class III HFrEF, 140 patients were assigned 1:1 to receive BAT plus medical therapy or medical therapy alone. Procedural information along with safety and efficacy data were collected and analyzed over 12 months. Within the cohort of 71 patients randomized to BAT, implant procedure time decreased with experience, from 106 ± 37 minutes on the first case to 83 ± 32 minutes on the third case. The rate of freedom from system- and procedure-related complications was 86% through 12 months, with the percentage of days alive without a complication related to system, procedure, or underlying cardiovascular condition identical to the control group. The complications that did occur were generally mild and short-lived. Overall, 12 months therapeutic benefit from BAT was consistent with previously reported efficacy through 6 months: there was a significant and sustained beneficial treatment effect on New York Heart Association functional Class, quality of life, 6-minute hall walk distance, plasma N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide, and systolic blood pressure. This was true for the full trial cohort and a predefined subset not receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy. There is a rapid learning curve for the specialized procedures entailed in a BAT system implant. BAT system implantation is safe with the therapeutic benefits of BAT in patients with HFrEF being substantial and maintained for at least 1 year., (Copyright © 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Progression of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) is promoted by sympathovagal imbalance. Baroreflex activation therapy, i.e., electrical stimulation of baroreceptors at the carotid sinus, can restore sympathovagal balance. Large animal studies of baroreflex activation therapy revealed improvements in cardiac function, susceptibility to ventricular arrhythmias, and a survival benefit as compared to untreated controls. Recently, the first randomized and controlled trial of optimal medical and device therapy alone or plus baroreflex activation therapy in patients suffering from HFrEF was published. It demonstrated a reasonable safety profile in this severely ill patient population. Moreover, the study found significant improvements in New York Heart Association class, quality of life, 6-min walk distance, and NT-proBNP levels. This review provides an overview on baroreflex activation therapy for the treatment of HFrEF-from the concept and preclinical findings to most recent clinical data and upcoming trials.

Aims: Increased sympathetic and decreased parasympathetic activity contribute to heart failure (HF) symptoms and disease progression. Carotid baroreceptor stimulation (baroreflex activation therapy, BAT) results in centrally mediated reduction of sympathetic and increase in parasympathetic activity. Because patients treated with cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) may have less sympathetic/parasympathetic imbalance, we hypothesized that there would be differences in the response to BAT in patients with CRT vs. those without CRT., Methods and Results: New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class III patients with an ejection fraction (EF) ≤35% were randomized (1 : 1) to ongoing guideline-directed medical and device therapy (GDMT, control) or ongoing GDMT plus BAT. Safety endpoint was system-/procedure-related major adverse neurological and cardiovascular events (MANCE). Efficacy endpoints were Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Quality of Life (QoL), 6-min hall walk distance (6MHWD), N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and HF hospitalization rate. In this sample, 146 patients were randomized (70 control; 76 BAT) and were 140 activated (45 with CRT and 95 without CRT). MANCE-free rate at 6 months was 100% in CRT and 96% in no-CRT group. At 6 months, in the no-CRT group, QoL score, 6MHWD, LVEF, NT-proBNP and HF hospitalizations were significantly improved in BAT patients compared with controls. Changes in efficacy endpoints in the CRT group favoured BAT; however, the improvements were less than in the no-CRT group and were not statistically different from control., Conclusions: BAT is safe and significantly improved QoL, exercise capacity, NTpro-BNP, EF, and rate of HF hospitalizations in GDMT-treated NYHA Class III HF patients. These effects were most pronounced in patients not treated with CRT., (© 2015 The Authors European Journal of Heart Failure © 2015 European Society of Cardiology.)

Sympathovagal imbalance plays a major role in the progression of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. Baroreflex activation therapy (BAT) by electrical stimulation of baroreceptors located at the carotid sinus can reduce sympathetic and increase parasympathetic tone. This review provides an overview on the concept of BAT in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and available preclinical and clinical data. Animal studies of BAT in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction have demonstrated a decline in plasma norepinephrine, an improved left ventricular ejection fraction, a reduced susceptibility to induced ventricular arrhythmias and a survival benefit. First clinical data from uncontrolled studies suggest a relevant improvement in muscle sympathetic nerve activity, ejection fraction, 6-min walk distance, New York Heart Association (NYHA) class and hospitalization rate. BAT appears to be safe in this severely ill patient population.

Aims: The Neo™ System (CVRx) is an implantable device, CE certified for the treatment of resistant hypertension and investigationally used to treat systolic heart failure by electrical stimulation of the carotid baroreceptors. It is unknown whether interaction might exist between the Neo System and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs)., Methods and Results: Compatibility of the Neo device was tested in seven consecutive patients with pre-existing ICDs. Intra- and post-operative testing was completed with ICD and Neo settings programmed to provoke interaction. Intracardiac electrograms were printed to determine interaction with the ICD. Interaction testing during implantation and follow-up showed that there was no device-device interaction. No interaction was observed at maximum atrial and ventricular sensitivity settings and maximum Neo output settings., Conclusion: Combined therapy with the Neo device and at least in this study reported that transvenous ICD systems can be performed safely., (Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author 2014. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

We present a case of a patient with a baroreflex activation therapy (BAT) receiving a subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator (S-ICD). We anticipated two possible hazardous interactions between the two devices. Stimulation by the BAT could be adjudicated as noise and result in underdetection of ventricular arrhythmias or it might be misinterpreted as ventricular arrhythmias and lead to inappropriate shocks. Postop ensing occurred, the upper limit of pulse width of the BAT was limited because of noise detection by the S-ICD, but the upper limit of amplitude was limited by patient's discomfort. In this patient, the combination of a BAT and an S-ICD was safe. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims The Neo™ System (CVRx) is an implantable device, CE certified for the treatment of resistant hypertension and investigationally used to treat systolic heart failure by electrical stimulation of the carotid baroreceptors. It is unknown whether interaction might exist between the Neo System and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs). Methods and results Compatibility of the Neo device was tested in seven consecutive patients with pre-existing ICDs. Intra- and post-operative testing was completed with ICD and Neo settings programmed to provoke interaction. Intracardiac electrograms were printed to determine interaction with the ICD. Interaction testing during implantation and follow-up showed that there was no device–device interaction. No interaction was observed at maximum atrial and ventricular sensitivity settings and maximum Neo output settings. Conclusion Combined therapy with the Neo device and at least in this study reported that transvenous ICD systems can be performed safely. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

Embryonic Stem (ES) cells-derived cardiomyocytes can possibly be applied for cell therapy of diseases such as heart failure. Biodegradable scaffolds will significantly improve the expansion of sufficient functional ES cell-derived cardiomyocytes and may also increase the survival rate of cardiomyocytes after their transplantation. In the present study, we cultivated cardiomyocytes isolated from a transgenic a-myosin heavy chain (α-MHC) ES cell lineage expressing both puromycin resistance and enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) under the control of the α-MHC promoter in macroporous gelatine microspheres using small-scale bioreactors and proved that cardiomyocytes function after their cultivation in micropsperes. The average number of cultivated cells per microsphere was optimised once the most suitable agitation conditions and the optimal timeframe of cultivation were identified. Our study shows that 72% of CultiSpher-S beads were colonised by cardiomyocytes under optimal conditions. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) showed that colonization of the beads was not limited to the surface, but that cells also invaded the inner surfaces of the microspheres. Electrophysiological experiments demonstrated that the action potentials (APs) of α-MHC+ cardiomyocytes entrapped in microspheres were identical to action potentials of control cells. This attractive approach for cultivation and expansion of functional cardiomyocytes in biodegradable macroporous may offer a perspective for higher transplantation efficiencies of ES cell-derived cardiomyocytes. Copyright © 2008 S. Karger AG, Basel [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Background: Aldosterone plays a role in hypertension, the pathogenesis of heart failure and vascular injury. However, little information exists about the possible influence of aldosterone on bone marrow derived endothelial progenitor cells (EPC), which are involved in the repair of damaged endothelium. This study was designed to determine the long- term in vivo influence of aldosterone on the number of EPC. Methods: Male Wistar rats were equipped with a subcutaneous pump which released aldosterone (n =20) or placebo (n =20) over 28days. The animals were either fed with or without the aldosterone antagonist spironolactone (each n =10). EPC were identified by the uptake of ac-LDL and BS-1. The expression of VEGF-2 receptor, VEGF, HGF, SDF1 and the mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) in EPC was assessed by quantitative PCR. Finally, VEGF concentration was measured in the serum of all animals by ELISA. Results: The total number of EPC was significantly lowered by chronic aldosterone treatment. Spironolactone compensated the effect and lead to a 2-fold increase. While the SDF1 mRNA was not affected by aldosterone, HGF, MR2 and VEGF receptor mRNA were significantly downregulated in EPC. Strikingly spironolactone not only leads to increases in the mRNA expression in hyper-aldosteronemic animals but also exhibited significant increases above the control levels. Conclusion: The present data indicate that high levels of aldosterone impair the function and reduce the numbers of EPC and lead to a downregulation of VEGF and the VEGF receptor in vivo. Spironolactone antagonized these effects. MR blockade by spironolactone may therefore represent a future tool to enhance the response to cell based therapy. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]