Search

Objective: To describe the evolution of symptoms in patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis (sSAS) undergoing valve replacement, the predictors of the persistence of these symptoms, and their prognostic significance. The evolution of symptoms after intervention in sSAS and their association with outcome are unknown., Patients and Methods: Data from patients with sSAS who underwent intervention were collected. All-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality were considered events. The evolution of symptoms and their association with events were studied., Results: In this study, 451 consecutive patients with sSAS and no other valvular or coronary disease who were alive 30 days after intervention were included. Before valve replacement, 133 of the 451 patients (29.5%) had congestive heart failure requiring hospitalization. Of the remaining 318 patients, 287 (90.2%) had dyspnea on effort, 129 (40.6%) had angina, and 59 had syncope (18.6%). Symptoms disappeared after intervention in 192 of the 451 patients (42.6%) and remained in 259 (57.4%): 193 dyspnea, 9 angina, 17 syncope, and 60 admission for heart failure. Syncope on effort persisted in 4 of 33 patients (12.1%) and at rest in 11 of 20 (55.0%; P<.001). Age, body mass index, previous admission for heart failure, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease were independently related to persistence of symptoms. Over a median follow-up of 56 months in our cohort of 451 patients, 129 deaths were registered (28.6%), 40 of which were cardiovascular (8.9%). Age, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic kidney disease, atrial fibrillation, heart failure, and persistence of symptoms were independently associated with all-cause mortality., Conclusion: Symptoms attributed to SAS remain after intervention in a high proportion of patients, particularly dyspnea on effort and syncope at rest. The persistence of symptoms after intervention identifies patients with poor outcome., (Copyright © 2023 Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

There are known pathophysiologic and clinical differences according to sex in patients with aortic stenosis (AS). To evaluate if these differences persist after valve replacement, we conducted an observational study including 451 patients with symptomatic AS who survived aortic valve intervention (AVI) in two centers. Clinical data and mortality were evaluated at a mean follow-up of 5 years. 56% of patients were women. At baseline, women were older (80.6 vs. 78 years, p = 0.013), presented higher mean gradient (48 vs. 45 mmHg, p = 0.023), lower aortic valve area (0.70 vs. 0.74 cm2, p = 0.002) and higher systolic pulmonary artery pressure (36 vs. 33 mmHg, p = 0.016). They underwent percutaneous aortic valve replacement more frequently than men (47 vs. 35.9%, p = 0.017). At 5 years follow-up, women required more admissions due to heart failure (23 vs. 9%, p = 0.046) but they did not present higher cardiovascular nor overall mortality (27.7% vs. 29.8%, p = 0.741; 11.1 vs. 10.1%, p = 0.619, respectively). Female sex was an independent predictor of heart failure hospitalization at follow-up (HR 95% 1.16–4.22, p = 0.016). Women undergo AVI at a more advanced stage than men, resulting in a higher frequency of readmissions due to heart failure during the follow-up period, but not in higher mortality. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Prosthesis deterioration rate, years after a previous surgical valve replacement, is rising. Usually, the standard management is reoperation, but for very high risk patients an alternative has arisen: the valve-in-valve approach. We present an 84-year-old Caucasian woman with a mitral bioprosthesis (Mosaic II, number 29) since 1994. Over the last few months the patient displayed worsening heart failure symptoms, until her current admission in NYHA III–IV functional class, because of a severely degenerated mitral prosthesis (severe regurgitation, severe pulmonary hypertension). The transapical access, conventionally used for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (Edwards SAPIEN THV 23) was chosen, guided by transoesophageal echocardiography (TOE) with a new three-dimensional (3D) probe. After the procedure, the mitral regurgitation completely disappeared, an appropriate valve opening was achieved (valve area >2 cm2) and the patient was discharged 6 days later, remaining well in the outpatient follow-up. Only a restricted number of patients have been submitted to mitral transcatheter valve-in-valve implantation and to the best of our knowledge this is the first accurate description of the 3D TOE part, focusing on the surgeon requirements. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Infective endocarditis (IE) in patients with a valve-tube ascending aortic graft (AAG) is a rare entity with a challenging diagnosis and treatment. This study describes the clinical features, diagnosis and outcome of these patients. Between 1996 and 2019, 1654 episodes of IE were recruited in 3 centres, of which 37 patients (2.2%) had prosthetic aortic valve and AAG-IE (21 composite valve graft, 16 supracoronary graft) and conformed our study group. Patients with aortic grafts were predominantly male (91.9%) and the mean age was 67.7 years. Staphylococci were the most frequently isolated microorganisms (32%). Viridans group streptococci were only isolated in patients with composite valve graft. TEE was positive in 89.2%. PET/CT was positive in all 15 patients in whom it was performed. Surgical treatment was performed in 62.2% of patients. In-hospital mortality was 16.2%. Heart failure and the type of infected graft (supracoronary aortic graft) were associated with mortality. Mortality among operated patients was 21.7%. Interestingly, 14 patients received antibiotic therapy alone, and only one died. Mortality was lower among patients with a composite valve graft compared to those with a supracoronary graft (4.8% vs 31.3%; p = 0.03). In patients with AAG and prosthetic aortic valve IE, mortality is not higher than in other patients with prosthetic IE. Multimodality imaging plays an important role in the diagnosis and management of these patients. Heart failure and the type of surgery were risk factors associated with in-hospital mortality. Although surgical treatment is usually recommended, a conservative management might be a valid alternative treatment in selected patients. TEE: transesophageal echocardiography; PET-CT: positron emission tomography/computed tomography; CT: computed tomography. [Display omitted] • In patients with ascending aortic graft infections multimodality imaging has an important role for diagnosis and follow-up. • Heart failure is a frequent complication and is associated with an increased in-hospital mortality. • Prompt radical debridement and graft replacement when clinically indicated is advocated. • However, medical treatment is a valid therapeutic alternative in patients without IE complications or very high surgical risk. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]