Search

Background: Elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) are a high-risk population for heart failure (HF), but the association between physical frailty and worsening prognosis, including HF development, has not been documented extensively., Methods and results: As part of the FLAGSHIP study, we enrolled 524 patients aged ≥70 years hospitalized for AMI and capable of walking at discharge. Physical frailty was assessed using the FLAGSHIP frailty score. The primary outcome was a composite outcome of all-cause death and HF rehospitalization within 2 years after discharge. The secondary outcome was all-cause death and HF rehospitalization. After adjusting for confounders, physical frailty showed a significant association with an increased risk of the composite outcome (hazard ratio [HR]=2.09, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.03-4.22, P=0.040). The risk of HF rehospitalization increased with physical frailty, but the association was not statistically significant (HR=2.14, 95% CI: 0.84-5.44, P=0.110). Physical frailty was not associated with an increased risk of all-cause death (HR=1.45, 95% CI: 0.49-4.26, P=0.501)., Conclusions: The findings suggest that physical frailty assessment serves as a stratifying tool to identify high-risk populations for post-discharge clinical events among ambulant elderly patients with AMI.

Background: The Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) has been reported to predict clinical outcomes in patients with heart failure (HF). However, whether the discriminative capacity of SPPB score for adverse outcomes varies according to the phenotypes of HF, such as HF with reduced, mid-range, and preserved left-ventricular ejection fraction (HFrEF, HFmrEF, and HFpEF) remains unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate the difference in discriminative capacity of SPPB score for predicting 2-year mortality among phenotypes of HF., Methods: We consecutively enrolled 542 adult patients admitted for HF (HFrEF, n = 187; HFmrEF, n = 94; HFpEF, n = 261). The patients underwent SPPB score when discharged from hospital. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality during the 2 years after hospital discharge. We assessed the discriminative capacity of SPPB score for predicting mortality by using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis., Results: A total of 95 events (17.5%) occurred during the follow-up period. The area under the curve of ROC (95% confidence interval) was 0.80 (0.71-0.88) in HFrEF, 0.61 (0.46-0.76) in HFmrEF, and 0.70 (0.61-0.79) in HFpEF group. After adjustment for potential confounders, the hazard ratios (95% confidence interval) of the lower SPPB score were 5.38 (2.34-14.6) in HFrEF group, 1.12 (0.36-3.29) in HFmrEF group, and 3.19 (1.68-6.22) in HFpEF group., Conclusions: Prognostic value of SPPB score varies according to the HF phenotype. SPPB score predicts mortality in patients with HFrEF and HFpEF, but not in patients with HFmrEF. These findings lead to more precise risk prediction by SPPB score in patients with HF., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)