1. Use of Programmed Ventricular Extrastimulus During Supraventricular Tachycardia to Differentiate Atrioventricular Nodal Re-Entrant Tachycardia From Atrioventricular Re-Entrant Tachycardia.
- Author
-
Ito H, Badhwar N, Patel AR, Hoffmayer KS, Moss JD, Pellegrini CN, Vedantham V, Tseng ZH, Tanel RE, Hsia HH, Lee RJ, Marcus GM, Gerstenfeld EP, and Scheinman MM
- Subjects
- Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Child, Female, Heart Ventricles physiopathology, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Retrospective Studies, Young Adult, Electrophysiologic Techniques, Cardiac methods, Heart Conduction System physiopathology, Tachycardia, Atrioventricular Nodal Reentry classification, Tachycardia, Atrioventricular Nodal Reentry diagnosis, Tachycardia, Supraventricular classification, Tachycardia, Supraventricular diagnosis
- Abstract
Objectives: This study hypothesized that early coupled ventricular extrastimuli (V
2 ) stimulation might yield a more robust differentiation between atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia (AVNRT) and atrioventricular re-entrant tachycardia (AVRT)., Background: Programmed V2 during supraventricular tachycardia are useful to differentiate AVNRT from AVRT by subtracting the ventriculoatrial (VA) interval from the stimulus to atrial depolarization (stimulus atrial [SA]) interval, but all such maneuvers have limitations., Methods: Patients with either AVNRT or AVRT were investigated. The entire tachycardia cycle length (TCL) was scanned with V2 delivered from the right ventricular apex. The SA-VA difference was calculated with V2 clearly resetting the tachycardia. The prematurity of V2 was calculated by dividing the coupling interval (CI) by the TCL., Results: A total of 210 patients (102 with AVNRT) were included. The SA-VA difference was >70 ms in all AVNRT patients and was <70 ms in all AVRT patients with right and septal accessory pathways (APs), except for those with decremental APs, in whom there was an overlap between AVNRT and AVRT with left APs. However, a SA-VA difference >110 ms with a CI/TCL of <65% distinguished AVNRT from AVRT using the left AP, with sensitivity and specificity of 87% and 100%, respectively. Ventricular overdrive pacing resulted in tachycardia termination or AV dissociation in 28% of patients compared with 15% of patients using the V2 technique (p = 0.008)., Conclusions: A SA-VA of >70 ms using the V2 technique differentiated AVNRT from AVRT using septal and right APs. Use of the V2 technique with a short CI differentiated AVNRT from AVRT using left APs. The V2 technique less frequently resulted in tachycardia termination compared with ventricular entrainment., (Copyright © 2018 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF