Search

Aims: Improved cancer survivorship has led to a higher number of anthracycline‐induced cardiomyopathy patients with end‐stage heart failure. We hypothesize that outcomes following continuous‐flow LVAD (CF‐LVAD) implantation in those with anthracycline‐induced cardiomyopathy are comparable with other aetiologies of cardiomyopathy. Methods and results: Using the Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (INTERMACS) from 2008 to 2017, we identified patients with anthracycline‐induced cardiomyopathy who received a CF‐LVAD and compared them with those with idiopathic dilated (IDM) and ischaemic cardiomyopathies (ICM). Mortality was studied using the Cox proportional hazards model. Other adverse events were evaluated using competing risk models. Overall, 248 anthracycline‐induced cardiomyopathy patients underwent CF‐LVAD implantation, with a median survival of 48 months, an improvement compared with those before 2012 [adjusted hazards ratio (aHR): 0.53; confidence interval (CI): 0.33–0.86]. At 12 months, 85.1% of anthracycline‐induced cardiomyopathy, 86.0% of IDM, and 80.2% of ICM patients were alive (anthracycline‐induced cardiomyopathy vs. IDM: aHR: 1.12; CI: 0.88–1.43 and anthracycline‐induced cardiomyopathy vs. ICM: aHR: 0.98; CI: 0.76–1.28). Anthracycline‐induced cardiomyopathy patients had a higher major bleeding risk compared with IDM patients (aHR: 1.23; CI: 1.01–1.50), and a lower risk of stroke and prolonged respiratory support compared to ICM patients (aHR: 0.31 and 0.67 respectively; both P < 0.05). There was no difference in the risk of major infection, acute kidney injury, and venous thromboembolism. Conclusions: After receiving a CF‐LVAD, survival in patients with anthracycline‐induced cardiomyopathy is similar to those with ICM or IDM. Further research into differential secondary endpoints‐related disparities is warranted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Importance: Patient outcomes in heart failure clinical trials are generally better than those observed in real-world settings. This may be related to stricter inclusion and exclusion criteria in clinical trials. Objective: We study sought to characterize the clinical implications of differences between patients in clinical trials and those in a real-world registry of patients receiving left ventricular assist devices (LVADs). Design, setting, and participants: This retrospective cohort study included all patients in INTERMACS (the Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support) who were implanted with an axial flow LVAD from 2010 to 2015 to allow for equivalent comparisons. Main outcomes and measures: Differences in patient characteristics and 2-year rates of adverse outcomes with those reported in the ENDURANCE and MOMENTUM 3 clinical trials. Survival analyses were used to assess the relationships between prespecified patient factors and clinical outcomes. Results: Of the 10,937 LVAD recipients identified in INTERMACS between 2010–2015, 44% met at least 1 clinical trial exclusion criterion. The 2-year incidence of stroke and death amongst LVAD recipients in INTERMACS and the landmark clinical trials differed significantly (P<0.04, both). Nevertheless, patients who would have been excluded from the clinical trials did not have dramatically different 2-year mortality outcomes in INTERMACS [2y survival estimate: 66.4%, 95% CI (64.9–67.9%) versus 71.9%, 95% CI (70.6–73.1%)]. Clinical interventions driving a significantly increased risk of death were relatively rare (<5% of implants) and included mechanical ventilation, ECMO, severe thrombocytopenia, and dialysis. Conclusions and relevance: Most exclusion criteria used in LVAD clinical trials did not afford a substantially greater risk to patients in the real-world setting. In the relatively infrequent cases of end stage renal disease, thrombocytopenia, respiratory failure, and need for ECMO, the risks and benefits of LVAD therapy need careful weighting and further study. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is common in patients with end-stage heart failure receiving left ventricular assist devices (LVADs), but the benefit of concomitant tricuspid valve procedures (TVPs) remains uncertain. This study examined the impact of TVP at the time of LVAD implantation on clinical outcomes and quality of life (QOL) metrics. We included adult patients in the Interagency Registry for Mechanical Circulatory Support database with various degrees of TR who received continuous-flow LVADs from 2008 to 2017. Patients undergoing concomitant TVP were compared with those without the intervention in a stratified analysis. Descriptive analyses, survival analyses, and Andersen‒Gill hazard models were used as appropriate to examine associations with clinical and patient-centered QOL outcomes. Our analysis included 8,263 (53.1%) mild, 4,252 (33.3%) moderate, and 2,100 (13.5%) severe TR cases. TVP rate increased with severity: 8.6% of mild, 18.0% of moderate, and 43.9% of severe cases. TVP was not associated with survival benefit in cases of mild (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 0.97, 95% CI: 0.79–1.19, p = 0.75), moderate (aHR: 1.03, 95% CI: 0.88–1.20, p = 0.72), or severe (aHR: 1.20, 95% CI: 0.98–1.48, p = 0.08) TR. For patients with combined moderate or severe TR, TVP was associated with increased mortality (log-rank p < 0.01, aHR: 1.13, 95% CI: 1.00–1.27, p = 0.04). After adjusting for TR severity, TVP was associated with increased risk of bleeding, arrhythmia, and stroke (p < 0.01 each) and no improvements in QOL (p > 0.05). TVP at the time of LVAD implantation was not associated with either improved survival or QOL, and there were associations with increased risk of adverse events among patients with moderate and severe TR. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]