Search

Purpose: The purpose of this article is to review recent research from our laboratory on the topic of aging, and the ear-brain system, as it relates to hearing aid use and auditory rehabilitation. The material described here was presented as part of the forum on the brain and hearing aids, at the 2014 HEaling Across the Lifespan (HEAL) conference. Method: The method involves a narrative review of previously reported electroencephalography (EEG) and magnetoencephalography (MEG) data from our laboratory as they relate to the (a) neural detection of amplified sound and (b) ability to learn new sound contrasts. Conclusions: Results from our studies add to the mounting evidence that there are central effects of biological aging as well as peripheral pathology that affect a person's neural detection and use of sound. What is more, these biological effects can be seen as early as middle age. The accruing evidence has implications for hearing aid use because effective communication relies not only on sufficient detection of sound but also on the individual's ability to learn to make use of these sounds in ever-changing listening environments. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Hearing aid amplification can be used as a model for studying the effects of auditory stimulation on the central auditory system (CAS). We examined the effects of stimulus presentation level on the physiological detection of sound in unaided and aided conditions. P1, N1, P2, and N2 cortical evoked potentials were recorded in sound field from 13 normal-hearing young adults in response to a 1000-Hz tone presented at seven stimulus intensity levels. As expected, peak amplitudes increased and peak latencies decreased with increasing intensity for unaided and aided conditions. However, there was no significant effect of amplification on latencies or amplitudes. Taken together, these results demonstrate that 20 dB of hearing aid gain affects neural responses differently than 20 dB of stimulus intensity change. Hearing aid signal processing is discussed as a possible contributor to these results. This study demonstrates (1) the importance of controlling for stimulus intensity when evoking responses in aided conditions, and (2) the need to better understand the interaction between the hearing aid and the CAS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Auditory evoked cortical responses to changes in the interaural phase difference (IPD) were recorded using magnetoencephalography (MEG). Twelve normal-hearing young adults were tested with amplitude-modulated tones with carrier frequencies of 500, 1000, 1250, and 1500 Hz. The onset of the stimuli evoked P1m-N1m-P2m cortical responses, as did the changes in the interaural phase. Significant responses to IPD changes were identified at 500 and 1000 Hz in all subjects and at 1250 Hz in nine subjects, whereas responses were absent in all subjects at 1500 Hz, indicating a group mean threshold for detecting IPDs of 1250 Hz. Behavioral thresholds were found at 1200 Hz using an adaptive two alternative forced choice procedure. Because the physiological responses require phase information, through synchronous bilateral inputs at the level of the auditory brainstem, physiological “change” detection thresholds likely reflect the upper limit of phase synchronous activity in the brainstem. The procedure has potential applications in investigating impaired binaural processing because phase statistic applied to single epoch MEG data allowed individual thresholds to be obtained. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Older adults often have difficulty understanding speech in a noisy environment or with multiple speakers. In such situations, binaural hearing improves the signal-to-noise ratio. How does this binaural advantage change with increasing age? Using magnetoencephalography, we recorded cortical activity evoked by changes in interaural phase differences of amplitude-modulated tones. These responses occurred for frequencies up to 1225 Hz in young subjects but only up to 940 Hz in middle-aged and 760 Hz in older adults. Behavioral thresholds also decreased with increasing age but were more variable, likely because some older adults make effective use of compensatory mechanisms. The reduced frequency range for binaural hearing became significant in middle age, before decline in hearing sensation and the morphology of cortical responses, which became apparent only in the older subjects. This study provides evidence from human physiological data for the early onset of biological aging in binaural hearing. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]