Search

Background and Objectives: Insufficient research attention has been paid to the diversity of informal caregivers, including sexual and gender minority caregivers. This study examined health effects of caregiving separately from sexual orientation or gender identity status, while stratifying by gender among cisgender adults. We hypothesized that compared with heterosexual cisgender noncaregivers, heterosexual caregivers and lesbian/gay/bisexual (LGB), and transgender (T) noncaregivers would report poorer health outcomes (i.e., self-reported health, and poor mental health days and poor physical health days), and LGBT caregivers would report the worst health outcomes., Research Design and Methods: This is a secondary data analysis of the 2015 and 2016 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System data from 19 U.S. states., Results: After adjusting for covariates and stratifying by gender among the cisgender sample, heterosexual caregivers, LGB noncaregivers and LGB caregivers had significantly higher odds of self-reported fair or poor health (adjusted odds ratios [aORs] 1.3-2.0 for women and 1.2 for men), poor physical health days (aORs 1.2-2.8 for women and 1.3-2.8 for men), and poor mental health days (aORs 1.4-4.7 for women and 1.5-5.6 for men) compared with heterosexual noncaregivers (reference group). By contrast, transgender caregivers did not have significantly poorer health than cisgender noncaregivers., Discussion and Implications: LGB caregivers reported the worst health compared with other groups on multiple measures, signifying they are an at-risk population. These results suggest the necessity to develop LGB appropriate services and programs to prevent poor health in LGB caregivers. Existing policies should also be inclusive of LGBT individuals who are caregivers., (© The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Gerontological Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Considerable research and public discourse on family caregiving portrays it as a stressful and burdensome experience with serious negative health consequences. A landmark study by Schulz and Beach that reported higher mortality rates for strained spouse caregivers has been widely cited as evidence for the physical health risks of caregiving and is often a centerpiece of advocacy for improved caregiver services. However, 5 subsequent population-based studies have found reduced mortality and extended longevity for caregivers as a whole compared with noncaregiving controls. Most caregivers also report benefits from caregiving, and many report little or no caregiving-related strain. Policy reports, media portrayals, and many research reports commonly present an overly dire picture of the health risks associated with caregiving and largely ignore alternative positive findings. As the pool of traditional family caregivers declines in the coming years, a more balanced and updated portrayal of the health effects of caregiving is needed to encourage more persons to take on caregiving roles, and to better target evidence-based services to the subgroup of caregivers who are highly strained or otherwise at risk. Recommendations are discussed for research that will better integrate and clarify both the negative and potential positive health effects of informal caregiving., (© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Gerontological Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Although poorer self-rated health (SRH) is associated with increased mortality, less is known about its impact on functioning. This study evaluated whether poorer SRH was associated with decline in walking speed and whether caregiving, often considered an indicator of chronic stress, modified this relation. The sample included 891 older US women from the Caregiver-Study of Osteoporotic Fractures. SRH was assessed at the baseline Caregiver-Study of Osteoporotic Fractures interview, conducted in 1999-2001, and was categorized as fair/poor or excellent/good. Rapid walking speed over 2, 3, or 6 m was measured at baseline and 2 annual follow-up interviews. Respondents with fair/poor SRH walked significantly slower at baseline than those with excellent/good health (mean = 0.8 (standard deviation, 0.3) vs. 1.0 (standard deviation, 0.3) m/second, P < 0.001). In adjusted linear mixed models of percentage change in walking speed, respondents with fair/poor SRH experienced a greater decline in walking speed than those with excellent/good SRH (-5.66% vs. -0.60%, P = 0.01). Caregivers with fair/poor SRH declined more than noncaregivers (-9.26% vs. -4.09%). High-intensity caregivers had the largest decline (-12.88%), whereas low-intensity caregivers in excellent/good SRH had no decline (2.61%). In summary, poorer SRH was associated with decline in walking speed in older women, and the stress of caregiving may have exacerbated its impact.

Objectives: To investigate the relationship between insomnia and 6-year survival among older, community-dwelling, white women., Design: Longitudinal study., Setting: The sample was selected randomly from a 20-census tract area of Baltimore, Maryland., Participants: In 1984, 778 women aged 65 years and older participated in the baseline survey; 613 were re-interviewed in 1985; 596 were reinterviewed in 1986., Measurements: Insomnia was measured as self-report of at least one of three sleep complaints: trouble initiating sleep, waking at night and trouble falling back to sleep, and waking too early. Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess the relationship between insomnia, as reported at the most recent of three interviews, and mortality., Results: Twenty-nine percent of the sample reported trouble initiating sleep, 22.4% reported waking at night and having trouble falling back to sleep, and 26.6% reported waking too early. Of the sample, 43.2% had insomnia at the baseline interview; 23.2% percent of respondents with insomnia at baseline died during the follow-up period compared with 22.0% of those without insomnia at baseline. Recent insomnia was not associated significantly with mortality in either crude analyses (Hazards Ratio (HR) = 1.11, 95% CI, 0.78-1.60) or analyses adjusted for age, prescription medication use, functional limitations, self-rated health, and number of chronic conditions (HR = 0.74, 95% CI, 0.50-1.09)., Conclusion: Our results, combined with the results from previous studies, suggest strongly that insomnia is not an indicator of approaching mortality in older community-dwelling populations.

Limited prospective data exist on how living arrangements are associated with change in functional health. This study evaluated whether elderly women living alone were less likely to experience functional decline when compared with women who lived with others. A total of 619 community-dwelling, white women from Baltimore, Maryland, aged 65-99 years at baseline were questioned annually from 1984 to 1986. Functional health was measured as the sum of limitations in seven physical and seven instrumental activities of daily living (Instrumental ADL). A total of 148 women experienced functional decline over the 2 years, primarily as a deterioration in Instrumental ADL. The association between living arrangement and change in Instrumental ADL depended on the level of physical impairment. Among women without severe impairment, Instrumental ADL deterioration was significantly less for those living alone compared with those living with spouses (odds ratio (OR) = 0.60, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.45-0.92) or nonspouse others (OR = 0.62, 95% CI 0.45-0.96). For women with severe impairment, however, those living alone had a greater decline in Instrumental ADL, especially when compared with those living with nonspouse others (OR = 5.13, 95% CI 1.23-21.28). These results suggest that, unless severely physically impaired, women living independently have less deterioration in functional health when compared with peers in alternate living arrangements.