Search

Background: The burden of injuries is high in low-income and middle-income countries such as Malawi, where access to musculoskeletal trauma care is limited. Delayed treatment can worsen trauma-related disability. Understanding risk factors for delayed hospital presentation will assist in guiding trauma system development., Methods: We examined the records of 1,380 pediatric and adult patients with fractures who presented to the orthopaedic clinics of 2 urban referral hospitals and 2 rural district hospitals in Malawi. We used multivariate Poisson regression to evaluate the association between presentation to a hospital ≥2 days after the injury (delayed presentation) and 11 covariates: age, sex, education level, occupation, season of injury, day of injury, injury mechanism, injury type or extremity of injury, referral status, hospital of presentation, and estimated travel time., Results: Twenty-eight percent of pediatric patients and 34% of adult patients presented late. In the pediatric cohort, fall (relative risk [RR], 1.40 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.02 to 1.93]), sports injuries (RR, 1.65 [95% CI, 1.09 to 2.49]), tibial or fibular injuries (RR, 1.36 [95% CI, 1.05 to 1.77]), injury over the weekend (RR, 2.30 [95% CI, 1.88 to 2.80]), estimated travel time of ≥20 minutes (RR, 1.45 [95% CI, 1.16 to 1.81]), referral from another facility (RR, 1.46 [95% CI, 1.05 to 2.02]), and presentation to Kamuzu Central Hospital, Mangochi District Hospital, or Nkhata Bay District Hospital (RR, 1.34 [95% CI, 1.07 to 1.69]) independently increased the risk of delayed presentation. In the adult cohort, fall (RR, 1.85 [95% CI, 1.38 to 2.46]), injury over the weekend (RR, 1.80 [95% CI, 1.38 to 2.36]), estimated travel time ≥20 minutes (RR, 1.36 [95% CI, 1.03 to 1.80]), and presentation to Kamuzu Central Hospital (RR, 1.74 [95% CI, 1.30 to 2.33]) independently increased the risk of delayed presentation., Conclusions: Delayed presentation to the hospital after a musculoskeletal injury is common in Malawi. Interventions are needed to improve access to musculoskeletal trauma care, especially for pediatric patients with tibial or fibular injuries, all patients after falls, patients injured over the weekend, and patients living far from health facilities.

➤The burden of musculoskeletal trauma is high worldwide, disproportionately affecting the poor, who have the least access to quality orthopaedic trauma care.➤Orthopaedic trauma care is essential, and must be a priority in the horizontal development of global health systems.➤The education of surgeons, nonphysician clinicians, and ancillary staff in low and middle income countries is central to improving access to and quality of care.➤Volunteer surgical missions from rich countries can sustainably expand and strengthen orthopaedic trauma care only when they serve a local need and build local capacity.➤Innovative business models may help to pay for care of the poor. Examples include reducing costs through process improvements and cross-subsidizing from profitable high-volume activities.➤Resource-poor settings may foster innovations in devices or systems with universal applicability in orthopaedics., (Copyright © 2016 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated.)

Background: The burden of musculoskeletal trauma is growing worldwide, disproportionately affecting low-income countries like Malawi. However, resources required to manage musculoskeletal trauma remain inadequate. A detailed understanding of the current capacity of Malawian public hospitals to manage musculoskeletal trauma is unknown and necessary for effective trauma system development planning. Methods: We developed a list of infrastructure, manpower, and material resources used during treatment of adult femoral shaft fractures–a representative injury managed non-operatively and operatively in Malawi. We identified, by consensus of at least 7 out of 10 experts, which items were essential at district and central hospitals. We surveyed orthopaedic providers in person at all 25 district and 4 central hospitals in Malawi on the presence, availability, and reasons for unavailability of essential resources. We validated survey responses by performing simultaneous independent on-site assessments of 25% of the hospitals. Results: No district or central hospital in Malawi had available all the essential resources to adequately manage femoral fractures. On average, district hospitals had 71% (range 41–90%) of essential resources, with at least 15 of 25 reporting unavailability of inpatient ward nurses, x-ray, external fixators, gauze and bandages, and walking assistive devices. District hospitals offered only non-operative treatment, though 24/25 reported barriers to performing skeletal traction. Central hospitals reported an average of 76% (71–85%) of essential resources, with at least 2 of 4 hospitals reporting unavailability of full blood count, inpatient hospital beds, a procedure room, an operating room, casualty/A&E department clinicians, orthopaedic clinicians, a circulating nurse, inpatient ward nurses, electrocardiograms, x-ray, suture, and walking assistive devices. All four central hospitals reported barriers to performing skeletal traction. Operative treatment of femur fracture with a reliable supply of implants was available at 3/4 hospitals, though 2/3 were dependent entirely on foreign donations. Conclusion: We identified critical deficiencies in infrastructure, manpower, and essential resources at district and central hospitals in Malawi. Our findings provide evidence-based guidance on how to improve the musculoskeletal trauma system in Malawi, by identifying where and why essential resources were unavailable when needed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]