Search

Background Uncontrolled infections are known to be an absolute contraindication for liver transplantation; however, the posttransplant prognosis of recipients treated for pretransplant infection is unclear. The aim of this study was to analyze pretransplant infections among liver transplant recipients and to determine their impact on posttransplant clinical outcomes. Methods This study retrospectively analyzed 357 subjects who had undergone living-donor liver transplantation between January 2008 and May 2014. Results Among 357 recipients, 71 patients (19.8%) had 74 episodes of infectious complications before liver transplantation. These complications consisted of pneumonia (n = 13), spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (n = 12), catheter-related infection (n = 10), urinary tract infection (n = 12), biliary tract infection (n = 6), and skin and soft-tissue infection (n = 3). Twenty-six patients experienced 29 episodes of bacteremia, and the most common pathogens were coagulase-negative staphylococci (n = 8), followed by Klebsiella pneumoniae (n = 7), Staphylococcus aureus (n = 4), and Streptococcus species (n = 3). Twenty-one bacteremic episodes (70%) occurred within 1 month before transplantation (n = 4). Recipients with pretransplant infections had significantly more frequent posttransplant infections (71.8% [51 of 71] vs 47.2% [35 of 286]; P = .0001), posttransplant bacteremia (33.8% [24 of 71] vs 20.3% [58 of 286]; P = .015), and longer posttransplant intensive care unit stays (11.2 ± 10.7 days vs 7.3 ± 4.2 days; P = .0004) than those without pretransplant infections. However, episodes of rejection ( P = .36), length of hospitalization ( P = .10), 28-day mortality ( P = .31), and 1-year mortality ( P = .61) after transplantation were not significantly different between the 2 groups. Conclusions Pretransplant infection had an impact on posttransplant morbidity, although not on rejection and mortality. Alertness for posttransplant infection and proper management (including effective antimicrobial coverage) would improve patient morbidity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: The performance of the Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) and delta-MELD scores in predicting posttransplant survival has been variable and the results are conflicting, suggesting that posttransplantational factors are more important than pre- or peritransplantational factors in outcomes following liver transplantation (OLT). We assessed the value of posttransplant MELD and delta-MELD scores to predict short-term (90-day) posttransplant survival. We evaluated 279 consecutive patients undergoing living donor OLTs. The MELD scores were calculated serially from pretransplantation as well as 3, 7, and 14 days after transplantation. Twenty-seven (9.7%) among 279 patients died within 90 days after transplantation. Pretransplant MELD score was not associated with short-term posttransplant mortality. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve in predicting 90-day mortality was 0.637 for posttransplant 3-day MELD, 0.746 for posttransplant 7-day MELD, and 0.859 for posttransplant 14-day MELD score (P = .047, <.001, and <.001, respectively); AUROC was 0.582, 0.646, and 0.784 for 3-day, 7-day, and 14-day delta-MELD scores (P = .235, .034, <.001, respectively). Upon multivariate analysis, posttransplant 14-day MELD (≥20 vs <20), and 14-day delta-MELD scores (≥−3 vs <−3) were independent short-term prognostic factors with risk ratios of 18.875 (95% confidential interval [CI]: 4.625–77.028, P < .001) and 13.577 (95% CI: 2.641–69.791, P = .002), respectively. In conclusion, determination of posttransplant 14-day MELD and 14-day delta-MELD scores may afford suitable short-term prognostic predictors for patients following living donor OLT. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]