Search

Before 1996, most lawfully present noncitizens were eligible for the same prenatal Medicaid benefits as U.S. citizens. However, the 1996 Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act (PRWORA)-welfare reform-restricted benefits for certain lawful noncitizens for the first time. Welfare reform also gave states unprecedented authority to determine Medicaid eligibility. More recent federal policy changes have allowed states to cover some noncitizen pregnant women initially excluded under welfare reform. However, there are few comprehensive studies examining state implementation of these policy options. This study documents state-level trends in prenatal Medicaid and state-funded coverage options for low-income noncitizens just prior to and since welfare reform. While some states have substantially expanded prenatal coverage since PRWORA, wide variation remains. These findings have important implications for understanding the potential effects of the Affordable Care Act and Medicaid expansion on health care utilization and birth outcomes among pregnant noncitizens., (© The Author(s) 2015.)

States are increasingly the focus of health care spending reform efforts given political deadlock at the federal level. Using the Rhode Island All-Payer Claims Database (APCD) from 2016 to 2019, a modified National Uniform Claim Committee (NUCC) provider taxonomy, and the 2021 Restructured BETOS Classification System (RBCS), we evaluate professional spending trends in commercial and Medicaid populations, identify specialties and clinical service categories driving trends, and examine price and volume contributions to spending changes. We found that professional spending from 2016-2019 in Medicaid is increasing faster than professional spending in commercial (5.2% vs. 2.7% annually). We also found that nurse practitioner and physician assistant evaluation and management (E&M), behavioral health services E&M, anesthesia, diagnostic radiology imaging, and orthopedic procedures were among the largest areas of spending increase during the study period in Rhode Island. Threeyear trends showed heterogeneity in whether volume or price was primarily responsible for these spending increases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services' (CMS) State Innovation Models (SIMs) initiative funded 17 states to implement health care payment and delivery system reforms to improve health system performance. Whether SIM improved health information technology (HIT) and care management capabilities of physician practices, however, remains unclear. National surveys of physician practices (N = 2,722) from 2012 to 2013 and 2017 to 2018 were linked. Multivariable regression estimated differential adoption of 10 HIT functions and chronic care management processes (CMPs) based on SIM award status (SIM Round 1, SIM Round 2, or non-SIM). HIT and CMP capabilities improved equally for practices in SIM Round 1 (5.3 vs. 6.8 capabilities, p <.001), SIM Round 2 (4.7 vs. 7.0 capabilities, p <.001), and non-SIM (4.2 vs. 6.3 capabilities, p <.001) states. The CMS SIM Initiative did not accelerate the adoption of ten foundational physician practice capabilities beyond national trends. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Federalism has complicated the US response to the novel coronavirus. States' actions to address the pandemic have varied widely, and federal and state offi- cials have provided conflicting messages. This fragmented approach has surely cost time and lives. Federalism will shape the long-term health and economic impacts of COVID-19, including plans for the future, for at least two reasons: First, federalism exacerbates inequities, as some states have a history of underinvesting in social programs, especially in certain communities. Second, many of the states with the deepest needs are poorly equipped to respond to emergencies due to low taxes and distrust of government, leading to inadequate infrastructure. These dynamics are not new, but they have been laid bare by this crisis. What can policy makers do to address the inequities in health and economic outcomes that federalism intensifies? The first section of this article offers a case study of the Mississippi Delta to illustrate the role of federalism in perpetuating the connection between place, health, and economics. The second section examines challenges that safety net programs will face when moving beyond the acute phase of COVID-19. The final section explores near-, middle-, and long-term policy options to mitigate federalism's harmful side effects. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article discusses a study focusing on the views of state legislators on the Medicaid program in the U.S. Topics discussed include the legislators' priorities for Medicaid reform and policy changes; the difference in views of Democrats and Republicans regarding healthcare spending; and the preference of Republicans for cost-sharing for Medicaid recipients.