Search

Croatia is among the last countries in Europe to develop organized palliative care at the national level. Real changes in this area started after the parliamentary elections in 2011 and culminated in the 2013 adoption of the Strategic Plan for Palliative Care Development 2014–2016. The National Board for Palliative Care (NBPC), appointed by the Ministry of Health, was in charge of creating a scalable palliative care model and national guidelines. The Board drew on experiences from both neighbouring countries with similar societies and/or health care models (Bosnia and Herzegovina, Poland) and an international leader in palliative care (United Kingdom). It recognised that provision of palliative care in Croatia, thus far based on volunteering and isolated enthusiastic activities, needed to be improved through professionalization, regulation, and organized development. A variety of policy measures was used to implement these changes, including the introduction of professional guidelines and new payment models. The development of new palliative care structures and services significantly increased the number of patients who could access palliative care, from around 1–2% of patients needing such care in 2011 to 20–35% in 2014. It also ensured the provision of more appropriate services at each point of the palliative care pathway. The Strategy was extended for the 2017–2020 period.

There are various predictors of citizens’ satisfaction with health care system, but there are two main political factors: patient participation and institutional influence of their representative organizations, and political party affiliations (1-4). Some authors concluded that socio-demographic characteristics were only a minor predictor of satisfaction with health care system, but older age appeared to be one of the most consistent positive determinants of health care satisfaction (5-13). Women were found to be less satisfied with care than men because they were more frequent users of care and had higher expectations (14,15). Studies in post-communist states provide mixed evidence in this regard. In a 1991 cross-country survey study, most of the respondents believed that, while the market system was essential to economic development, policies that promoted social and economic egalitarianism were important (16). They also found that women, those with lower educational level, and those with lower income were more likely to be supportive of socialist principles. On the other hand, a study conducted in 1999 showed a change in value systems, with a majority of respondents from Poland and Hungary not favoring further redistribution of income, even at the expense of welfare (17). Furthermore, there was a positive correlation between education and positive attitude to health care competition. Still, in Hungary the older generations were predominantly against increases in health care competition. Since the early 1990s, the public level of satisfaction with the health care system reforms in Croatia has not matched the apparent success of the reform goals. A 1994 consumer survey found that a vast majority of lower- and middle-income Croats was skeptical of health care reforms (18). They attributed this to the legacy of universal access to health care, the view of health care access as a universal right, negative consequences on the patients, and lack of public understanding of the reforms. The same study (18) found the distribution of out-of-pocket payments and co-payment for health care to represent a regressive burden on those in the lower income group. Patient satisfaction was also low: 44% were dissatisfied with the quality of health facilities and 48% with the equipment (18). Similar face-to-face interviews found that citizens of Croatia did not hold a positive view of the health insurance reform (19). Their primary concern were limitations of their rights and the increase in the financial burden related to medical care. A 2005 survey found that during the presidential election campaign period health care was the second most important issue on the voters’ minds, closely following economy (20). Finally, a national survey on patients’ satisfaction with hospital and primary health care in 2006 showed considerable concerns with relations between patients and medical professionals, hospital accommodation, communication between primary and secondary health care, and corruption (21,22). In this study, we present and compare the results of a series of public opinions surveys conducted between 2005 and 2009. This is the first study that targeted public experiences and voters’ opinion as an evaluation of the health care sector in Croatia.

Objective To determine the progress in the development and implementation of health policies on a county level resulting from the learning-by-doing training provided through the County Public Health Capacity Building Program started in 2001 in Croatia. Methods Modular training using management tools, public health theory and practice, and SMDP's Healthy Plan-it™ tool, followed by the self-evaluation of the progress made by county teams in health needs assessment and health policy development, implementation, and assurance. Fifteen county teams consisting of politicians, executive officers, public health professionals, and community members. Results Twelve of 15 county teams completed the program. The teams made progress in the evaluated areas, although to a different extent, which did not depend on the amount of time they had or the governance experience. The differences in improvement depended on the differences in the strength of political, executive, and professional components of the teams. Teams with a strong political and/or executive component, but weak public health professional and community components made major improvements in policy development and/or assurance function, but performed less well in the health needs assessment and constituency building. The reversed was also true. Conclusion Learning-by-doing training program improved public health practices on a county level in Croatia.

The aim of this study is to identify factors that influence the success of the implementation of the primary and secondary prevention programs in Croatia by the visiting/community services. Two main sources of information were used: reports about regular visiting nurse services in Croatia and research about visiting nurse participation in the Croatian Adult Health Cohort Study (CroHort) 2008. Out of the total number 9, 070 respondents who participated in CAHS 2003 survey, during CroHort 2008 program 3, 229 (35.6%) participants were re-interviewed. The qualitative analysis was done with a sample of 34 visiting nurses, which participated in the CroHort 2008. Results show that there are three key problems which limit preventive programs: inability of the health care system to recognize the importance of the primary prevention ; visiting nurses’ lack capacity to implement prevention and populations’ lack of motivation and education.

Although decentralization is based on the simple idea that smaller organizations, properly structured and steered, are inherently more agile and accountable than larger organizations, in the health system this idea requires much more exploration (Saltman et al. 2007). Health systems are large and composed of several subsystems, including health care providers, health financing, and public administration. All of them have their own organizational patterns and values. Furthermore, inside each of them are further divisions, sometimes with almost opposite approaches: health promotion, disease prevention, clinical medicine, or palliative care. All of these subsystems and divisions could recognize decentralization as an opportunity or a threat.

Over the past decade, public opinion surveys have shown that Croats are deeply dissatisfied with their health care system and asses it to be one of the most important issues. However, health care hardly makes it into any political discourse in Croatia. This study analyzes the results of a public opinion survey conducted before the 2007 parliamentary elections to find out what the public sentiment on health care performance in Croatia is and to analyze the reasons why health care is not addressed by political actors. Evidence suggests that while health care is the most salient issue today, the public often understands it poorly. Thus, in a political environment of competing issues, and given the complexity of tacking health care in the policy arena, politicians strategically avoid discussing the issue.

Aim: To investigate the importance of issues related to health care provision in the 2005 Presidential elections in Croatia. Methods: A computer randomized, two-stage stratified telephone survey of a 1000 respondents sample of the Croatian voting population was surveyed in December 2004, 5 days prior to Presidential elections. Respondents were asked to rank priority areas in politics and specific priority areas in health care. Only responses from those voters who identified the two most likely candidates were used in analysis: candidates Stipe Mesić and Jadranka Kosor (center left and center right political options). Results were analyzed with chi-square test and binary logistic regression. Results: Citizens ranked health care issues as their second most important priority in politics, preceded only by economic issues. Top three priority areas recognized in health care were organization (24.7%), financing (23.2%) and corruption (24.3%). Ranking of priority areas in health care varied insignificantly between left and right wing candidate voters. However, right wing oriented voters were more likely to identify lack of finances as the top health priority in the multivariable model (Odds ratios 2.21, 95% CI 1.25 - 3.89). There were no other differences between the two candidate groups. Conclusion: Health and health care ranked as the second most important issue in the list of general priorities in Croatia. The study recorded a strikingly high level of homogeneity between specific health care priority areas in the two groups of voters. The phenomenon might be attributed to the magnitude and importance of issues that burden the basic functioning of the health care system: poor organization, inadequate financing and corruption. Public opinion on health care priorities might be a useful tool in determining priorities for policymaking, especially in transitional health care systems undergoing reforms.

Rural areas, where 47.6% of the Croatian population lives are not generally the focus of research; yet there are challenges which affect the rural population that often go unreported. These communities often exhibit disadvantages in many areas of health. The aim of this study is to examine the specific health needs and related determinants of rural populations influenced by transition that were affected by the consequences of war. The focus of the research is rural lifestyle, behaviour and cardiovascular risk factors in three villages of Sisa~ko-moslava~ka County. Results show that participants generally understand that their own lifestyles influence their health, but they often neglect to change their behaviour to improve their health. This can be explained through complex socio-economic conditions and traditional values of their heritage. These results suggest a need for further research on health status, attitude, and behaviour of Croatia’s rural population. Specific public health intervention and services for rural populations must be promoted.