Kim, Susan C., Becker, Stephen, Dieffenbach, Carl, Hanewall, Blair S., Hankins, Catherine, Lo, Ying?Ru, Mellors, John W., O'Reilly, Kevin, Paxton, Lynn, Roffenbender, Jason S., Warren, Mitchell, Piot, Peter, and Dybul, Mark R.
There are currently several ongoing or planned trials evaluating the efficacy of pre‐exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) as a preventative approach to reducing the transmission of HIV. PrEP may prove ineffective, demonstrate partial efficacy, or show high efficacy and have the potential to reduce HIV infection in a significant way. However, in addition to the trial results, it is important that issues related to delivery, implementation and further research are also discussed. As a part of the ongoing discussion, in June 2009, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation sponsored a Planning for PrEP conference with stakeholders to review expected trial results, outline responsible educational approaches, and develop potential delivery and implementation strategies. The conference reinforced the need for continued and sustained dialogue to identify where PrEP implementation may fit best within an integrated HIV prevention package. This paper identifies the key action points that emerged from the Planning for PrEP meeting., Introduction Recent data suggest that current efforts to prevent and treat HIV are beginning to yield results. Significant expansion of antiretroviral therapy has led to decreased mortality. There has been [...]