1. Risk-corrected impact of mechanical versus bioprosthetic valves on long-term mortality after aortic valve replacement
- Author
-
Lund, Ole and Bland, Martin
- Subjects
Heart valve diseases -- Analysis ,Heart valve diseases -- Health aspects ,Anticoagulants (Medicine) -- Analysis ,Anticoagulants (Medicine) -- Health aspects ,Mortality -- Analysis ,Health - Abstract
To link to full-text access for this article, visit this link: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2006.01.043 Byline: Ole Lund, Martin Bland Abbreviations: AC, anticoagulation; AVR, aortic valve replacement; CL, confidence limit; INR, international normalized ratio; NYHA, New York Heart Association; SD, standard deviation; SVD, structural valve degeneration Abstract: Choice of a mechanical or biologic valve in aortic valve replacement remains controversial and rotates around different complications with different time-related incidence rates. Because serious complications will always 'spill over' into mortality, our aim was to perform a meta-analysis on overall mortality after aortic valve replacement from series with a maximum follow-up of at least 10 years to determine the age- and risk factor-corrected impact of currently available mechanical versus stented bioprosthetic valves. Author Affiliation: Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, United Kingdom. Article History: Received 12 October 2005; Accepted 13 January 2006 Article Note: (footnote) This study was supported by a grant from ATS Medical Inc, Minneapolis, Minn. , , and References are available online.
- Published
- 2006