Search

OBJECTIVE Several studies have been published in 2009 suggesting a possible association between insulin glargine and increased risk of malignancies, including breast cancer. The objective of this study was to [...]

Objective: A wave of bombings struck France in 1995 and 1996, killing 12 people and injuring more than 200. The authors conducted follow-up evaluations with the victims in 1998 to determine the prevalence of and factors associated with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Method: Victims directly exposed to the bombings (N = 228) were recruited into a retrospective, cross-sectional study. Computer-assisted telephone interviews were conducted to evaluate PTSD, per DSM-IV criteria, and to assess health status before the attack, initial injury severity and perceived threat at the time of attack, and psychological symptoms, cosmetic impairment, hearing problems, and health service use at the time of the follow-up evaluation. Factors associated with PTSD were investigated with univariate logistic regression followed by multiple logistic regression analyses. Results: A total of 196 respondents (86%) participated in the study. Of these, 19% had severe initial physical injuries (hospitalization exceeding 1 week). Problems reported at the follow-up evaluation included attack-related hearing problems (51%), cosmetic impairment (33%), and PTSD (31%) (95% confidence interval= 24.5%-37.5%). Results of logistic regression analyses indicated that the risk of PTSD was significantly higher among women (odds ratio=2.54), participants age 35-54 (odds ratio=2.83), and those who had severe initial injuries (odds ratio=2.79) or cosmetic impairment (odds ratio=2.74) or who perceived substantial threat during the attack (odds ratio=3.99). Conclusions: The high prevalence of PTSD 2.6 years on average after a terrorist attack emphasizes the need for improved health services to address the intermediate and long-term consequences of terrorism.

The objective of this prospective case-control study was to identify and quantify demographic and clinical risk factors for venous ulcer disease, with special emphasis on heredity and physical activity. Patients [...]

PURPOSE: Recently, there have been several published case reports of esophagitis associated with the use of aminobisphosphonates. The objective of this study was to evaluate the upper gastrointestinal (GI) safety of cyclical etidronate, an alkylbisphosphonate, in routine clinical practice. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Information was obtained from 550 general practices in the United Kingdom that provide the medical records to the General Practice Research Database. A group of 7977 cyclical etidronate takers and 2 age-, gender-, and practice-matched control groups (1 with osteoporosis and 1 without) were analyzed. RESULTS: For cyclical etidronate takers, the average age was 71.6 years and total follow-up was 10,328 person-years. The risk of upper GI events (inflammation or ulcer of esophagus, stomach, or duodenum) was comparable between patients taking etidronate and the two control groups. The adjusted relative risk of upper GI events was 0.92 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.78 to 1.09) for etidronate takers compared with osteoporosis controls and 1.12 (CI 0.91 to 1.37) compared to nonosteoporosis controls. For esophagitis and esophageal ulcers, the relative risks were 0.83 (CI 0.64 to 1.08) and 0.97 (CI 0.71 to 1.31) respectively. The incidence of upper GI events during nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID), aspirin, or corticosteroid use was similar across the three groups. The upper GI risks of etidronate NSAID users were 0.71 (CI 0.45 to 1.11) and 2.06 (CI 0.98 to 4.35) compared with NSAID users in the two control groups. CONCLUSIONS: These results support the GI tolerability and safety profile of cyclical etidronate in routine clinical practice. Concomitant use of cyclical etidronate with NSAIDs, aspirin, or corticosteroids did not increase the incidence of upper GI events.

There have been claims of an increased risk for gestational trophoblastic disease (i.e., hydatidiform mole and choriocarcinoma) in Vietnam since the period of Agent Orange sprayings. In 1990, we conducted a case-control study in Ho Chi Minh City to investigate risk factors for gestational trophoblastic disease in Vietnam. Eighty-seven married women, all of whom had a recent pathologic diagnosis of gestational trophoblastic disease, identified in the Obstetrical and Gynecological Hospital, were included in the study. Eighty-seven married women who were admitted mainly in the surgery departments of the same hospital were the controls, and they were matched to cases for age and area of residence. Odds ratios (ORs), adjusted for matching variables and other potential confounders, were estimated with unconditional logistic regression. A statistically significant trend in risk was observed with previous live births (p = .01). Cases were found to eat less meat per wk (OR = 0.4, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] = 0.2-0.9 for [greater than or equal to] > five meat dishes) and to own fewer consumer goods than controls. An increase in risk was associated with the breeding of pigs (OR = 5.7, 95% CI = 1.2-27.6 for raising three or more pigs). A cumulative Agent Orange exposure index was constructed, using the patient's complete residence history. No significant difference was found between cases and controls for this index (OR = 0.7, 95% CI = 0.2-1.8 for high-exposure category), nor was such a difference noted for the agricultural use of pesticides., GESTATIONAL TROPHOBLASTIC DISEASE (GTD) includes hydatidiform mole (HM) and choriocarcinoma. Hydatidiform mole complicates pregnancy and is the main factor of choriocarcinoma, a highly malignant cancer. Hydatidiform mole originates during gametogenesis [...]

Results From the Surveillance of North American Pulmonary Hypertension Background: The use of appetite suppressants in Europe has been associated with the development of primary pulmonary hypertension (PPH). Recently, fenfiuramine [...]