Search

The biofidelity is an essential requirement of the application of human head finite element (FE) models to investigate head injuries under mechanical loadings. However, the influence of the foramen magnum boundary condition (FMBC) on intracranial dynamic responses under head impacts has yet to be fully identified until now. This study aimed to investigate the effect of different modeling methods of the FMBC on intracranial dynamic responses induced by forehead impact, especially the axonal injury associated dynamic responses. The total human model for safety (THUMS) was applied in this study. Two FE models with different FMBC modeling methods were developed from the THUMS model. Then, three forehead impact FE models were established respectively, including the original THUMS model. Further FE simulations were conducted to investigate the influence of FMBC modeling methods on intracranial dynamic responses. Though, difference between the intracranial dynamic responses (relative skull-brain motion and strain responses) at areas far from the foramen magnum were slightly, the corresponding difference at the brain stem area were distinctly. Meanwhile, the predicted axonal injury risk of the brain stem white matter was varying among each other. Different modeling methods of FMBC could result in different intracranial dynamic responses of the brain stem, and affect the axonal injury prediction. Therefore, the modeling of the FMBC should be further evaluated for the study of brain stem injury using human head FE models. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Head injuries are often fatal or of sufficient severity to pedestrians in vehicle crashes. Finite element (FE) simulation provides an effective approach to understand pedestrian head injury mechanisms in vehicle crashes. However, studies of pedestrian head safety considering full human body response and a broad range of impact scenarios are still scarce due to the long computing time of the current FE human body models in expensive simulations. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to develop and validate a computationally efficient FE pedestrian model for future studies of pedestrian head safety. Firstly, a FE pedestrian model with a relatively small number of elements (432,694 elements) was developed in the current study. This pedestrian model was then validated at both segment and full body levels against cadaver test data. The simulation results suggest that the responses of the knee, pelvis, thorax, and shoulder in the pedestrian model are generally within the boundaries of cadaver test corridors under lateral impact loading. The upper body (head, T1, and T8) trajectories show good agreements with the cadaver data in vehicle-to-pedestrian impact configuration. Overall, the FE pedestrian model developed in the current study could be useful as a valuable tool for a pedestrian head safety study. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]