Search

The aim of this study was to use video evidence of tackles in elite level rugby union to identify ball carrier proficiency characteristics, for both lower and upper body tackles, that have a higher propensity to result in Head Injury Assessments(HIA) for the tackler. HIA (n = 74) and non-HIA tackles (n = 233) were categorised as either front-on or side-on upper or lower body tackles and scored for ball carrying proficiency characteristics. Side-on tackles included tackles from behind. A Chi-Square test (p < 0.05) and Cramer's V were calculated to compare proficiency characteristics in HIA and non-HIA cases. For front-on upper body tackles, the ball carrier "fending into contact" (p < 0.01;ES = Moderate) and "explosiveness on contact" (p = 0.04;ES = Moderate) had a higher propensity to result in a HIA for the tackler. Fending into contact was exhibited in 47% of all upper body Tackle front-on HIA cases. The fending arm contacted the tackler's head in 67% of these cases. Fending into contact can potentially be dangerous and therefore emphasis should be placed on safe fending during tackle-based training drills. Referees should also be alert to arm-to-head contact during the fend. Given the low number of ball carrier characteristics identified, focus should be placed on tackler characteristics for HIA prevention strategies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Tackle height laws are an area of controversy in rugby union. It is reported that the tackler is at most risk of a Head Injury Assessment (HIA). Therefore, the aim of this study was to use match video evidence of tackles in elite level rugby union to examine the effect of tackle heights on HIA risk for the tackler.Design: Qualitative observational case-control study.Methods: Each HIA (n=74) and control tackle (n=965) was categorised based on tackle direction (front- or side-on), tackle type (arm, shoulder or smother) and tackle height (upper trunk, mid-trunk, lower trunk, upper leg or lower leg). The Relative Risk (RR), 95% Confidence Interval (CI) and probability (p) values were calculated for each tackle height.Results: Intended primary contact at the upper trunk of the ball carrier had a greater propensity to result in a HIA for the tackler for front-on upper body shoulder tackles (RR=1.48; 95%CI=1.16-1.90; p<0.01) and side-on upper body smother tackles (RR=2.30; 95%CI=1.82-2.92; p<0.01). Intended primary contact at the upper leg of the ball carrier had a greater propensity to result in a HIA for the tackler for front-on (RR=2.60; 95%CI=1.70-3.97; p<0.01) and side-on (RR=3.34; 95%CI=1.65-6.79; p<0.01) lower body shoulder tackles.Conclusions: To reduce tackler HIA risk, the results suggest tackling below the upper trunk for upper body tackles. The results also suggest tackling at the lower trunk for lower body tackles and avoiding the upper legs. Prevention strategies should place emphasis on tackling lower risk body regions such as the mid- and lower trunk. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: This study aimed to use match video evidence of tackles in elite-level rugby union to identify tackler proficiency characteristics, for both lower body and upper body tackles, that result in head injury assessments (HIA) for the tackler. Methods: A review of international rugby union matches (2013-2017) and Pro 12/European Rugby Champions Cup matches (2014-2017) from a professional rugby union club was conducted. HIA (n = 74) and non-HIA tackles (n = 233) were categorized as either front-on or side-on upper body or lower body tackles and were scored for tackling proficiency characteristics. A chi-square test (P G 0.05) and phi and Cramer_s V were calculated to compare HIA and non-HIA tackling proficiency characteristics. Results: In both front- and side-on upper body and lower body tackles, "head up and forward/face up" and "head placement on correct side of ball carrier" were identified as having a lower propensity to result in an HIA for the tackler. For both front-on and side-on upper body tackles, "identify/track ball carrier onto shoulder" and "shortening steps" were identified. In addition, "straight back, centre of gravity forward of support base" and "identify/track ball carrier onto shoulder" were identified for front-on and side-on lower body tackles, respectively. Conclusions: This study identified tackle characteristics that had a lower propensity to result in an HIA for the tackler in both front-on and side-on upper body and lower body tackles. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]