Search

Cetuximab induces responses in about 13% of head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC). We describe the molecular mechanism of acquired resistance to cetuximab, which could be overcome by switching to a different anti-EGFR antibody. Biopsies were collected at three different time points: before the start of cetuximab (PRE-cetux), at acquired resistance to cetuximab (AR-cetux), and at acquired resistance to duligotuzumab (AR-duligo). Biopsies were analyzed using tumor and normal whole-exome sequencing, RNASeq, and targeted panel sequencing with ultra-deep coverage to generate differential mutation and expression profiles. WES and targeted sequencing analysis identified an EGFR p.G465R extracellular domain mutation in AR-cetux biopsy. Furthermore, RNASeq confirmed the expression of this mutation in the tumor tissue. This mutation prevented the binding of cetuximab to EGFR and was not present in PRE-cetux and AR-duligo biopsies, suggesting a potential mechanism of acquired resistance to cetuximab. Molecular dynamic simulations confirmed that duligotuzumab effectively binds EGFR with a p.G465R mutation. Interestingly, the p.G465R mutation improved the stability of the duligotuzumab-EGFR complex as compared to the wild-type EGFR. This is the first report of an EGFR ECD mutation associated with acquired resistance to cetuximab, posing a need for further validation. We suggest appropriate serial mutational profiling to identify ECD mutations should be considered for select patients with initial cetuximab benefit., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature America, Inc.)

Introduction: The aim of the present systematic review (SR) is to summarize Machine Learning (ML) models currently used to predict head and neck cancer (HNC) treatment-related toxicities, and to understand the impact of image biomarkers (IBMs) in prediction models (PMs). The present SR was conducted following the guidelines of the PRISMA 2022 and registered in PROSPERO database (CRD42020219304)., Methods: The acronym PICOS was used to develop the focused review question (Can PMs accurately predict HNC treatment toxicities?) and the eligibility criteria. The inclusion criteria enrolled Prediction Model Studies (PMSs) with patient cohorts that were treated for HNC and developed toxicities. Electronic database search encompassed PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, LILACS, and Gray Literature (Google Scholar and ProQuest). Risk of Bias (RoB) was assessed through PROBAST and the results were synthesized based on the data format (with and without IBMs) to allow comparison., Results: A total of 28 studies and 4,713 patients were included. Xerostomia was the most frequently investigated toxicity (17; 60.71 %). Sixteen (57.14 %) studies reported using radiomics features in combination with clinical or dosimetrics/dosiomics for modelling. High RoB was identified in 23 studies. Meta-analysis (MA) showed an area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUROC) of 0.82 for models with IBMs and 0.81 for models without IBMs (p value < 0.001), demonstrating no difference among IBM- and non-IBM-based models., Discussion: The development of a PM based on sample-specific features represents patient selection bias and may affect a model's performance. Heterogeneity of the studies as well as non-standardized metrics prevent proper comparison of studies, and the absence of an independent/external test does not allow the evaluation of the model's generalization ability., Conclusion: IBM-featured PMs are not superior to PMs based on non-IBM predictors. The evidence was appraised as of low certainty., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Patients with cetuximab-resistant, recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) have poor outcomes. This study hypothesized that dual blockade of mammalian target of rapamycin and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) would overcome cetuximab resistance on the basis of the role of phosphoinositide 3-kinase signaling in preclinical models of EGFR resistance., Methods: In this multicenter, randomized clinical study, patients with recurrent/metastatic HNSCC with documented progression on cetuximab (in any line in the recurrent/metastatic setting) received 25 mg of temsirolimus weekly plus cetuximab at 400/250 mg/m 2 weekly (TC) or single-agent temsirolimus (T). The primary outcome was progression-free survival (PFS) in the TC arm versus the T arm. Response rates, overall survival, and toxicity were secondary outcomes., Results: Eighty patients were randomized to therapy with TC or T alone. There was no difference for the primary outcome of median PFS (TC arm, 3.5 months; T arm, 3.5 months). The response rate was 12.5% in the TC arm (5 responses, including 1 complete response [2.5%]) and 2.5% in the T arm (1 partial response; P = .10). Responses were clinically meaningful in the TC arm (range, 3.6-9.1 months) but not in the T-alone arm (1.9 months). Fatigue, electrolyte abnormalities, and leukopenia were the most common grade 3 or higher adverse events and occurred in less than 20% of patients in both arms., Conclusions: The study did not meet its primary endpoint of improvement in PFS. However, TC induced responses in cetuximab-refractory patients with good tolerability. The post hoc observation of activity in patients with acquired resistance (after prior benefit from cetuximab monotherapy) may warrant further investigation., (© 2020 American Cancer Society.)

Background: This study assessed the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of the PI3K inhibitor buparlisib given concurrently with cetuximab in recurrent and metastatic (R/M) head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC)., Methods: Twelve patients with R/M HNSCC were enrolled. Patients were given oral buparlisib starting day 7 and daily thereafter. The dose of buparlisib was escalated in a 3 + 3 design followed by a dose expansion cohort of 6 patients. The MTD of buparlisib per protocol was 100 mg daily with cetuximab given intravenously every 14 days starting day 0., Results: Ten patients had ≥2 previous treatment regimens (11 with prior cetuximab). There were no dose limiting toxicities observed during dose escalation. One patient achieved a partial response and 4 achieved stable disease., Conclusion: Based on this pilot study, buparlisib at 100 mg daily plus cetuximab proved to be well-tolerated. Patients previously treated with cetuximab monotherapy showed benefit from this combination., (© 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)