Search

Background and Purpose: This multicenter, phase 3 trial investigates whether the incorporation of concurrent paclitaxel and cisplatin together with a reduced total dose of radiotherapy is superior to standard fluorouracil-cisplatin based CRT., Materials and Methods: Patients with SCCHN, stage III-IVB, were randomized to receive paclitaxel/cisplatin (PacCis)-CRT (arm A; paclitaxel 20 mg/m 2 on days 2, 5, 8, 11 and 25, 30, 33, 36; cisplatin 20 mg/m 2 , days 1-4 and 29-32; RT to a total dose of 63.6 Gy) or fluorouracil/cisplatin (CisFU)-CRT (arm B; fluorouracil 600 mg/m 2 ; cisplatin 20 mg/m 2 , days 1-5 and 29-33; RT: 70.6 Gy). Endpoint was 3-year-disease free survival (3y-DFS)., Results: A total of 221 patients were enrolled between 2010 and 2015. With a median follow-up of 3.7 years, 3y-DFS in the CisFU arm and PacCis arm was 58.2% and 48.4%, respectively (HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.56-1.21, p = 0.52). The 3y-OS amounted to 64.6% in the CisFU arm, and to 59.2% in the PacCis arm (HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.54-1.24, p = 0.43). In the subgroup of p16-positive oropharyngeal carcinomas, 3y-DFS and 3y-OS was 84.6% vs 83.9% (p = 0.653), and 92.3% vs. 83.5% (p = 0.76) in arm A and B, respectively. Grade 3-4 hematological toxicities were significantly reduced in arm A (anemia, p = 0.01; leukocytopenia, p = 0.003), whereas grade 3 infections were reduced in arm B (p = 0.01)., Conclusion: Paclitaxel/cisplatin-CRT with a reduced RT-dose is not superior to standard fluorouracil/cisplatin-CRT. Subgroup analyses indicate that a reduced radiation dose seems to be sufficient for p16+ oropharyngeal cancer or non-smokers., Clinical Trial Information: NCT01126216; EudraCT Number 2005-003484-23., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Adjuvant radiotherapy in advanced head and neck squamous cell cancer (HNSCC) reduces the risk of local-regional failure and most likely increases the survival rate. Patients at high risk for tumor recurrence may benefit from more aggressive altered fractionation schedules in order to reduce the overall time from surgery to completion of radiotherapy. Here, we reviewed the results of six randomized trials addressing the above hypothesis., Methods: In the six trials of interest, a total of 988 patients with locally advanced HNSCC were randomly assigned to receive either accelerated or conventionally fractionated adjuvant radiotherapy. Hazard ratios (HR) were extracted from available publications for local-regional control, distant metastasis as well as overall-, cancer specific- and disease-free survival. Meta-analysis of the effect sizes was performed using fixed and random effect models. Acute and late side effects were categorized and summarized for comparison., Results: Accelerated radiotherapy did not improve the loco-regional control (n = 988, HR = 0.740, CI = 0.48-1.13, p = 0.162), progression-free survival (HR = 0.89, CI = 0.76-1.04, p = 0.132) or overall survival (HR = 0.88, CI = 0.75-1.04, p = 0.148) significantly. Acute confluent mucositis occurred with significant higher frequency with accelerated radiotherapy. Late side effects did not differ significantly in either group., Conclusion: Accelerated radiotherapy does not result in a significant improvement of loco-regional control or overall survival in high-risk patients. Acute but not late radiation toxicity were more frequent with the accelerated RT technique. In clinical practice accelerated postoperative radiation therapy might be a suitable option only for a subset of patients.

Purpose/objective(s): Intensification of radiotherapy and chemotherapy for head-and-neck cancer (HNC) may lead to increased rates of long term dysphagia as a severe side effect. Mucositis and consequent swallowing problems require artificial nutrition in many HNC patients undergoing radiotherapy or chemoradiation. It is unknown, which predict factors for prophylactic PEG tube insertion appear useful., Materials/methods: From an institutional database, 101 patients (72 male, 29 female, mean age 59.5years) were identified who underwent radiotherapy or chemoradiation for HNC. Primary end point of the investigation was the need for artificial nutrition for more than 4days during radiotherapy. Dose volume parameters of defined normal tissue structures potentially of relevance for swallowing ability as well as clinical factors were used to develop a predictive model using a binary multiple logistic regression model., Results: Whereas several dosimetric and clinical factors were significant predictors for the need of artificial nutrition on univariate analysis, on multivariate analysis only three factors remained independently significant: mean dose to the oropharynx+1cm circumferential margin, ECOG performance state (0-1 vs. 2-4), and the use of chemotherapy (yes vs. no)., Conclusions: Using a 3 parameter model we could distinguish HNC-patients with different risks for the need of artificial nutrition during radiotherapy. After independent validation, the model could be helpful to decision on prophylactic PEG tube insertion., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Induction chemotherapy with docetaxel, cisplatin and 5 FU (TPF) before radiotherapy (RT) or radio-chemotherapy (RT-CHX) has been shown to improve overall survival (OS) compared to induction chemotherapy with cisplatin and 5 FU in locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (HNSCC). Whether TPF induction before RT-CHX improves clinical outcome in comparison with RT-CHX alone is still a matter of debate. Recently, the results of 5 randomized trials addressing this question have become available., Methods: In the 5 trials of interest, in total 1022 patients with locally advanced HNSCC were randomly assigned to receive either TPF induction CHX followed by concurrent RT-CHX or concurrent RT-CHX alone. Platin or taxane based CHX was used during RT. 51.3% of the patients had oropharyngeal, 7.3% hypoharyngeal, 18.7% laryngeal, 19.4% oral cavity and 3.5% had other HNSCC. Published hazard ratios and hazard ratios extracted from available survival curves for OS and progression free survival (PFS) were basis of the meta-analysis. Meta-analysis of the effect sizes on OS and PFS was performed using a random effects model based on parameter estimates of log hazard ratios in Cox models and their standard errors., Results: Additional induction CHX with TPF before RT-CHX did neither result in a significant improvement of OS (Hazard Ratio: 1.010, 95% confidence limits (CL) 0.84-1.21, p=0.92), nor in a statistically significant benefit of PFS (Hazard Ratio: 0.91, 95% CL 0.75-1.1, p=0.32)., Conclusion: Additional induction CHX with TPF before RT-CHX does not improve OS and PFS in locally advanced HNSCC compared to definite RT-CHX., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: The concurrent administration of cetuximab to radiotherapy has recently been shown to improve the clinical outcome of head-and-neck cancer (HNC) patients. An aggravation of the radiation-induced skin toxicity was not described. Here, however, two cases with severe skin toxicity during the combined treatment are reported., Clinical Observations: In a small group of five patients with locally advanced HNC treated with irradiation and concurrent cetuximab, two cases of unusually severe radiation dermatitis were observed. Both patients developed confluent moist desquamations confined to the irradiation field at a dose of 40 Gy (CTC [Common Toxicity Criteria] grade 3), which progressed into an ulcerative dermatitis (grade 4) at 58 Gy and 46 Gy, respectively. Histopathology showed a vacuolic degeneration of basal keratinocytes, subepidermal blister formation, and mixed perivascular and interstitial inflammatory infiltrates leading to a complete loss of the epidermis. These cutaneous side effects led to the discontinuation of radiotherapy. Topical corticosteroids and systemic antibiotic treatment resulted in wound healing, which allowed the continuation of radiotherapy., Conclusion: These findings indicate that cetuximab may have the potential to enhance the severity of radiation dermatitis in HNC patients. A systematic monitoring of cutaneous side effects during radiotherapy plus cetuximab is advised in order to reliably estimate the frequency of severe (grade 3/4) radiation dermatitis.