Search

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) pathway has been shown to play a crucial role in several inflammatory conditions and host immune-inflammation status is related to tumor prognosis. This study aims to evaluate the prognostic significance of a four-gene inflammatory signature in recurrent/metastatic (R/M) head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) patients treated with the EGFR inhibitor cetuximab plus chemotherapy. The inflammatory signature was assessed on 123 R/M HNSCC patients, enrolled in the multicenter trial B490 receiving first-line cetuximab plus platinum-based chemotherapy. The primary endpoint of the study was progression free survival (PFS), while secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and objective response rate (ORR). The patient population was subdivided into 3 groups according to the signature score groups. The four-genes-signature proved a significant prognostic value, resulting in a median PFS of 9.2 months in patients with high vs. 6.2 months for intermediate vs. 3.9 months for low values ( p = 0.0016). The same findings were confirmed for OS, with median time of 18.4, 13.4, and 7.5 months for high, intermediate, and low values of the score, respectively ( p = 0.0001). When ORR was considered, the signature was significantly higher in responders than in non-responders ( p = 0.0092), reaching an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.65 (95% CI: 0.55-0.75). Our findings highlight the role of inflammation in the response to cetuximab and chemotherapy in R/M-HNSCC and may have translational implications for improving treatment selection.

Purpose: To describe outcomes of Electrochemotherapy as palliative treatment in patients with advanced head and neck (H&N) tumours., Methods: Ninety-three patients (120 treatment sessions) with H&N recurrent and/or metastatic neoplasm were treated. Treatment response was assessed 4 weeks after ECT with clinical examination and two months after the first evaluation with a CT scan of the H&N for deep lesions evaluation. The grade of bleeding and pain before, at the end of treatment and one week after ECT were evaluated., Results: Five percent of complete responses, 40% of partial responses were registered. Disease progression was seen in 20% of patients after the first ECT procedure, the remaining 34% of patients experienced stable disease. A good control of pain and bleeding was obtained, especially in patients with moderate symptoms before the treatment. No toxicities related to ECT were seen., Conclusions: ECT is an interesting antitumoral therapy in advanced chemo and radio-refractory H&N neoplasms. ECT is able to reduce frequent symptoms, such as pain and bleeding, improving quality of life without damage to healthy tissue and with limited side effects. Moreover, ECT reduces hospitalization time and may contribute to an overall reduction in healthcare costs associated with advanced H&N cancers care., (Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck (SCCHN) are neoplasms arising from the epithelium of the first aero-digestive tract. They are very heterogeneous both clinically and biologically. Classic and well acknowledged risk factors are alcohol and tobacco consumption and other forms of smokeless tobacco assumption, although lately the incidence of Human Papilloma Virus (HPV)-related SCCHN is rapidly increasing. HPV-related tumors are very different from their alcohol and tobacco-associated counterpart, as they show strong chemo and radio sensitivity and thus can often be treated with conservative treatment strategies. Moreover, peculiar biologic features characterize HPV-related tumors, such as wild type TP53, low expression of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR), wild type CCND1 and high expression of P16. In contrast, alcohol and tobacco related SCCHN show opposite features, together with higher number of chromosomal and genetic abnormalities, conferring them chemo and radio resistance., Methods: We have performed a narrative review of the PubMed database with the aim to study the mutational landscape of SCCHN., Results: Several lines of evidence support the existence of at least two genetically different types of SCCHN, one virus-related and the other alcohol and/or tobacco-related, characterized by both clinical and biological opposite features. Virus related SCCHN are very chemo and radiosensitive, so suitable for organ preserving strategy, which in the near future may be induction chemotherapy followed by association of chemotherapy and underpowered radiotherapy. Alcohol and tobacco related SCCHN are themselves strongly heterogeneous and can be divided in different entities on the basis of the "Driver" genetic aberration, responsible for carcinogenesis. The most frequently mutated genes in alcohol and tobacco-related SCCHN are TP53, NOTCH1, CCND1, CDKN2A, EGFR and PI3KCA., Conclusions: Virus-related SCCHN can be managed with chemo-radiotherapy. Alcohol and tobacco-related tumors should be further characterized on the basis of their "Driver Mutations" in order to select effective targeted therapies., (Copyright© Bentham Science Publishers; For any queries, please email at epub@benthamscience.net.)

Background: B490 (EudraCT# 2011-002564-24) is a randomized, phase 2b, noninferiority study investigating the efficacy and safety of first-line cetuximab plus cisplatin with/without paclitaxel (CetCis versus CetCisPac) in patients with recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (R/M SCCHN)., Patients and Methods: Eligible patients had confirmed R/M SCCHN (oral cavity/oropharynx/larynx/hypopharynx/paranasal sinus) and no prior therapy for R/M disease. Cetuximab was administered on day 1 (2-h infusion, 400 mg/m2), then weekly (1-h infusions, 250 mg/m2). Cisplatin was given as a 1-h infusion (CetCis arm: 100 mg/m2; CetCisPac arm: 75 mg/m2) on day 1 of each cycle for a maximum of six cycles. Paclitaxel was administered as a 3-h infusion (175 mg/m2) on day 1 of each cycle. After six cycles, maintenance cetuximab was administered until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). We assumed a noninferiority margin of 1.40 as compatible with efficacy., Results: A total of 201 patients were randomized 1 : 1 to each regimen; 191 were assessable. PFS with CetCis (median, 6 months) was noninferior to PFS with CetCisPac (median, 7 months) [HR for CetCis versus CetCisPac 0.99; 95% CI: 0.72-1.36, P = 0.906; margin of noninferiority (90% CI of 1.4) not reached]. Median overall survival was 13 versus 11 months (HR = 0.77; 95% CI: 0.53-1.11, P = 0.117). The overall response rates were 41.8% versus 51.7%, respectively (OR = 0.69; 95% CI: 0.38-1.20, P = 0.181). Grade ≥3 adverse event rates were 76% and 73% for CetCis versus CetCisPac, respectively, while grade 4 toxicities were lower in the two-drug versus three-drug arm (14% versus 33%, P = 0.015). No toxic death or sepsis were reported and cardiac events were negligible (1%)., Conclusion: The two-drug CetCis regimen proved to be noninferior in PFS to a three-drug combination with CetCisPac. The median OS of both regimens is comparable with that observed in EXTREME, while the life-threatening toxicity rate appeared reduced., Clinical Trial Number: EudraCT# 2011-002564-24., (© The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: Recurrent/metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) has a poor prognosis and the combination of cisplatin and cetuximab, with or without 5-fluorouracil, is the gold standard treatment in this stage. Thus, the concomitant use of novel compounds represents a critical strategy to improve treatment results. Histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACi) enhance the activity of several anticancer drugs including cisplatin and anti-Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (anti-EGFR) compounds. Preclinical studies in models have shown that vorinostat is able to down regulate Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) expression and to revert epithelial to mesenchimal transition (EMT). Due to its histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibiting activity and its safe use as a chronic therapy for epileptic disorders, valproic acid (VPA) has been considered a good candidate for anticancer therapy. A reasonable option may be to employ the combination of cisplatin, cetuximab and VPA in recurrent/metastatic SCCHN taking advantage of the possible positive interaction between histone deacetylase inhibitors, cisplatin and/or anti-EGFR., Method/design: V-CHANCE is a phase 2 clinical trial evaluating, in patients with recurrent/metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck never treated with first-line chemotherapy, the concomitant standard administration of cisplatin (on day 1, every 3 weeks) and cetuximab (on day 1, weekly), in combination with oral VPA given daily from day -14 with a titration strategy in each patient (target serum level of 50-100 μg/ml). Primary end point is the objective response rate measured according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). Sample size, calculated according to Simon 2 stage minimax design will include 21 patients in the first stage with upper limit for rejection being 8 responses, and 39 patients in the second stage, with upper limit for rejection being 18 responses. Secondary endpoints are time to progression, duration of response, overall survival, safety. Objectives of the translational study are the evaluation on tumor samples of markers of treatment efficacy/resistance (i.e. γH2AX, p21/WAF, RAD51, XRCC1, EGFR, p-EGFR, Ki-67) and specific markers of VPA HDAC inhibitory activity (histones and proteins acetylation, Histone deacetylase isoforms) as well as valproate test, histones and proteins acetylation of peripheral blood mononuclear cell, tested on blood samples at baseline and at different time points during treatment., Discussion: Overall, this study could provide a less toxic and more effective first-line chemotherapy regimen in patients with recurrent/metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck by demonstrating the feasibility and efficacy of cisplatin/cetuximab plus valproic acid. Moreover, correlative studies could help to identify responder patients, and will add insights in the mechanism of the synergistic interaction between these agents., Eudract Number: 2014-001523-69 TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02624128.

Background: In the phase III LUX-Head & Neck 1 (LHN1) trial, afatinib significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) versus methotrexate in recurrent and/or metastatic (R/M) head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) patients progressing on/after platinum-based therapy. This report evaluates afatinib efficacy and safety in prespecified subgroups of patients aged ≥65 and <65 years., Patients and Methods: Patients were randomized (2:1) to 40 mg/day oral afatinib or 40 mg/m(2)/week intravenous methotrexate. PFS was the primary end point; overall survival (OS) was the key secondary end point. Other end points included: objective response rate (ORR), patient-reported outcomes, tumor shrinkage, and safety. Disease control rate (DCR) was also assessed., Results: Of 483 randomized patients, 27% (83 afatinib; 45 methotrexate) were aged ≥65 years (older) and 73% (239 afatinib; 116 methotrexate) <65 years (younger) at study entry. Similar PFS benefit with afatinib versus methotrexate was observed in older {median 2.8 versus 2.3 months, hazard ratio (HR) = 0.68 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.45-1.03], P = 0.061} and younger patients [2.6 versus 1.6 months, HR = 0.79 (0.62-1.01), P = 0.052]. In older and younger patients, the median OS with afatinib versus methotrexate was 7.3 versus 6.4 months [HR = 0.84 (0.54-1.31)] and 6.7 versus 6.2 months [HR = 0.98 (0.76-1.28)]. ORRs with afatinib versus methotrexate were 10.8% versus 6.7% and 10.0% versus 5.2%; DCRs were 53.0% versus 37.8% and 47.7% versus 38.8% in older and younger patients, respectively. In both subgroups, the most frequent treatment-related adverse events were rash/acne (73%-77%) and diarrhea (70%-80%) with afatinib, and stomatitis (43%) and fatigue (31%-34%) with methotrexate. Fewer treatment-related discontinuations were observed with afatinib (each subgroup 7% versus 16%). A trend toward improved time to deterioration of global health status, pain, and swallowing with afatinib was observed in both subgroups., Conclusions: Advancing age (≥65 years) did not adversely affect clinical outcomes or safety with afatinib versus methotrexate in second-line R/M HNSCC patients., Clinical Trial Registration: NCT01345682 (ClinicalTrials.gov)., (© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology.)

Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is strongly associated with alcohol and tobacco consumption. Lately, the incidence of human papillomavirus (HPV)-related tumors has shown a significant increase, and HPV-related tumors show distinctive features if compared with the HPV-negative counterpart. Locally advanced HNSCC can be treated with concomitant chemoradiotherapy, but early recurrences sometimes occur. Relapses are often related to an intrinsic radioresistance of the tumors. Alterations in intracellular pathways, primarily involved in cell proliferation, apoptosis, and DNA repair, can lead to radioresistance. Preclinical and clinical evidence highlighted that 3 main pathways, including the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), the phosphotidylinositol-3-kinase (PI3K)/Akt/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), and the p53 signaling cascades, play a crucial role in radioresistance development. A future approach may consist in the association of radiotherapy (RT) and selective inhibition of the key pathways involved in radioresistance. Phase I, II, and III clinical trials are currently testing these novel treatment strategies., (© 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Background: Patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck (HNSCC) progressing after first-line platinum regimens have a poor prognosis and few treatment options. Afatinib, an irreversible ERBB family blocker, has shown efficacy in a phase 2 study in this setting. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of afatinib compared with methotrexate as second-line treatment in patients with recurrent or metastatic HNSCC progressing on or after platinum-based therapy., Methods: In this open-label, phase 3, randomised controlled trial conducted in 101 centres in 19 countries, we enrolled patients aged 18 years or older with histologically or cytologically confirmed HNSCC that was recurrent, metastatic, or both who had progressed on or after first-line platinum-based therapy, were not amenable for salvage surgery or radiotherapy, and who had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1. Previous treatment with more than one systemic regimen in this setting was not allowed; previous treatment with EGFR-targeted antibody therapy (but not EGFR-targeted tyrosine-kinase inhibitors) was allowed. We randomly assigned eligible patients in a 2:1 ratio to receive oral afatinib (40 mg/day) or intravenous methotrexate (40 mg/m(2) per week), stratified by ECOG performance status and previous EGFR-targeted antibody therapy for recurrent or metastatic disease. Randomisation was done centrally with an interactive voice or web-based response system. Clinicians and patients were not masked to treatment allocation; independent review of tumour response was done in a blinded manner. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival as assessed by an independent, central imaging review committee. Efficacy analyses were done in the intention-to-treat population and safety analyses were done in patients who received at least one dose of study drug. This ongoing study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01345682., Findings: Between Jan 10, 2012, and Dec 12, 2013, we enrolled 483 patients and randomly assigned 322 to afatinib and 161 to methotrexate. After a median follow-up of 6·7 months (IQR 3·1-9·0), progression-free survival was longer in the afatinib group than in the methotrexate group (median 2·6 months [95% CI 2·0-2·7] for the afatinib group vs 1·7 months [1·5-2·4] for the methotrexate group; hazard ratio [HR] 0·80 [95% CI 0·65-0·98], p=0·030). The most frequent grade 3 or 4 drug-related adverse events were rash or acne (31 [10%] of 320 patients in the afatinib group vs none of 160 patients in the methotrexate group), diarrhoea (30 [9%] vs three [2%]), stomatitis (20 [6%] vs 13 [8%]), fatigue (18 [6%] vs five [3%]), and neutropenia (1 [<1%] vs 11 [7%]); serious adverse events occurred in 44 (14%) of afatinib-treated patients and 18 (11%) of methotrexate-treated patients., Interpretation: Afatinib was associated with significant improvements in progression-free survival and had a manageable safety profile. These findings provide important new insights into the treatment of this patient population and support further investigations with irreversible ERBB family blockers in HNSCC., Funding: Boehringer Ingelheim., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Tobacco use and alcohol consumption are the main risk factors associated with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) development due to their cytotoxic and mutagenic effects on the exposed epithelia of the upper aerodigestive tract. Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) and high-risk human papillomaviruses (HPVs), both encoding viral oncoproteins able to interfere with cell cycle control, have been recognized as the etiological agents of nasopharynx carcinoma and a fraction of oropharyngeal carcinoma, respectively. Head and neck SCC is a deadly disease and despite innovative treatments represents a major challenge for patients. Recently, a number of genomic studies have highlighted the molecular heterogeneity of head and neck SCC based on methylation profiles, microRNA expression, mutated genes and new druggable pathways which may represent new targets for cancer-tailored therapies. To date, cetuximab is the only FDA-approved anti-epidermal growth factor receptor therapy for the treatment of head and neck SCC. In addition, a number of monoclonal antibodies targeting AKT, mTOR and PI3K pathways are under evaluation. Several therapeutic vaccines against HPV16 and EBV proteins are also under study. The purpose of this article is to review the epidemiology, pathogenesis and molecular features of head and neck SCC, with an emphasis on new therapies., (© 2015 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Integration of geriatric assessment into cancer clinical practice is strongly needed in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) due to the frequent discrepancy between chronologic and biologic age. Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) is a multidimensional assessment tool that examines age-related domains. These parameters can be well assessed by easier tests such as Activity Daily Living and Instrumental Activity Daily Living for functional status; Charlson Comorbidity Index for comorbidity; Mini Mental State examination for cognitive status; Mini Nutritional Assessment for nutritional status; Beers criteria for concomitant drug assumption. Early stage SCCHN is usually treated with either surgery or radiation therapy. Age is not an exclusion criteria for both modalities, but elderly patients have a higher complication rate. Patients with locally advanced SCCHN are preferably treated with concomitant cisplatin-radiotherapy, but the impact of chemotherapy on survival is lower with increasing patient age. The combination of cetuximab and radiation therapy can be a suitable option in elderly patients with locally advanced SCCHN. However, also in this group of patients, survival benefit is lower in elderly patients. Chemotherapy represents the mainstay of treatment in recurrent/metastatic SCCHN. However, elderly patients can receive more toxicity. Myelosuppression, diarrhea, mucositis, nephrotoxicity and neurotoxicity have to be early diagnosed and adequately treated. The initial approach for screening elderly SCCHN patients may benefit from relatively easy tests such as Vulnerable Elders Survey 13 (VES-13), which can screen patients who are to undergo full CGA.

Multidisciplinary team (MDT) is of paramount importance in the approach to patients with head and neck cancer. Its aim is to provide the best diagnostic work-up, tumor staging, and treatment. Furthermore, the prognosis of patients who are managed by MDT is usually better. MDT has a great value in all presentation settings. The role of the pathologist in the team is of utmost importance, in particular with regards to information provided on Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) status, which has a well acknowledged independent prognostic value mainly in oropharyngeal carcinoma. In early stage disease, namely in T1-2 N0 M0 patients, the meetings within the MDT mainly involve surgeons and radiation therapists. Surgery represents the mainstay of treatment, while radiation therapy is a suitable alternative, in particular in patients with advanced age, poor performance status and comorbidities. In locally advanced disease, surgeons, medical oncologists and radiotherapists are the key people, since different approaches have been carried out. In operable patients, adjuvant chemoradiation is indicated when resection margins are involved or close, or in presence of extracapsular nodal spread. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy, preceded or not by induction chemotherapy, is the favourite approach in this setting when surgery is strictly not indicated. In recurrent/metastatic disease chemotherapy and best supportive care are the main options, although local treatments, such as reirradiation and salvage surgery, are also worth considering. The standard chemotherapy treatment has finally evolved after about 30 years, and strong efforts are being pursued to further improve the outcome, mainly with the addition of new drugs.

Objectives: To replace 5-fluorouracil with capecitabine within a trial of induction chemotherapy followed by cetuximab plus radiotherapy (RT) in patients with locally advanced (LA) squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). Also, to replace cisplatin with cetuximab after induction chemotherapy., Methods: Docetaxel and cisplatin were given at 75 mg/m(2), while capecitabine was initially given at 500 mg/m(2) twice a day and subsequently escalated. The maximum tolerated dose was used for the phase II study., Results: Seven patients were enrolled. At dose level 1, two dose-limiting toxicities were observed in the first 4 patients (grade 4 neutropenia and grade 3 diarrhea). In both patients, capecitabine was withdrawn and toxicities resolved. Dose escalation was halted and a lower capecitabine dose (750 mg/m(2) daily) was selected. Two complete responses and five partial responses were observed after induction chemotherapy. Four patients were evaluable for response after cetuximab-RT (3 complete response and 1 partial response)., Conclusion: Combined chemoradiotherapy is still the gold standard in LA SCCHN and no studies currently support the use of early induction chemotherapy. Our study did not contribute toward addressing this issue since it was discontinued early because of toxicity., (Copyright © 2013 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck is a major health problem, and much effort is being made in the different settings of its presentation. Much of the recent progress has been made in locoregionally advanced inoperable disease, mainly with the optimal combination of concurrent chemoradiotherapy and with the introduction of new active drugs, such as docetaxel, in the induction phase of the treatment. The association of docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil (TPF) regimen is now acknowledged as being the gold standard of induction treatment. The subset of patients with recurrent/metastatic disease still carries a grim prognosis. For the time being, new biological therapies have not dramatically changed this scenario, even in combination with conventional treatments. Little is known about the role of docetaxel and, in general, of chemotherapy in the adjuvant setting, even though it is increasingly acknowledged that, beyond a certain risk, concurrent adjuvant chemoradiotherapy is required. The main aim of the research on head and neck cancer probably lies in the identification of biomolecular markers that are able to predict clinical behaviour, thus allowing appropriate treatment tailoring. The identification of human papilloma virus infection as the agent of a particular form of oropharyngeal cancer is an example of this strategy in consideration of the peculiar characteristics.

Two different doses of gefitinib, administered along with standard radiation therapy, were tested in locally advanced inoperable head and neck cancer with the aim of finding the maximum tolerated dose and assessing the toxicity and activity of the combination. The standard '3+3' design was used for the phase I study. Radiation therapy was given according to conventional dose and schedule. Gefitinib dose escalation was stopped if more than one-third of patients of a given cohort had dose-limiting toxicity. Dose-limiting toxicity was observed in three of four patients treated at the dose of 500 mg, and included grade 3 stomatitis in three patients and grade 3 liver toxicities in one patient. The dose level of 250 mg was recommended for the phase II study. Six confirmed objective responses were observed among 16 patients. Our results do not support further trials with gefitinib and radiation therapy, according to our schedule, in this patient population. Integration of gefitinib within chemoradiotherapy regimens and combination with other biological therapies may represent the next challenge.

Purpose: Rubitecan is an oral camptothecin analogue that has shown activity against a broad spectrum of human tumor xenografts and has been tested in several diseases., Patients and Methods: In the present study, 19 patients with incurable, recurrent or metastatic head and neck cancer were treated with rubitecan at the initial dose of 1.5 mg/m(2) x 5 days per week. An appropriate dose modification program was set up according to the observed toxicities., Results: Thirteen out of the 19 treated patients were formally evaluable for tumor response. Ten patients had a disease progression and three patients had a stabilization of disease as their best response. The mean duration of stable disease was 141 days. Median survival was 16 weeks (range 2-22 weeks). Three patients died during the study or less than a month after their last dose of study medication. Hematologic toxicity was serious in this study since four patients discontinued their participation because of severe anemia. The drug was also associated with grade 1-4 neutropenia, and with 1-3 thrombocytopenia., Conclusion: We conclude that rubitecan is not effective as a single-agent in recurrent or metastatic head and neck cancer with the doses and schedule used in this study.

Purpose of Review: To provide an update on novel compounds in head and neck cancer (HNC) therapy, with emphasis on biologic agents., Recent Findings: Cisplatin-5-fluorouracil (5-FU) is the standard chemotherapeutic approach in HNC. Strategies to improve its activity include the substitution of 5-FU with oral fluoropyrimidines; the substitution of cisplatin with different analogs or formulations; and the use of additional or alternative compounds. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is the most appealing target for novel therapies in HNC. Cetuximab, a chimeric anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody, has undergone evaluation in platinum-refractory recurrent or metastatic HNC with a satisfactory and consistent response rate (10-13%) across three different Phase II studies in association with platinum or as single agent. A recent Phase III placebo-controlled trial has shown better response rate for patients treated with cetuximab and cisplatin, with respect to those treated with cisplatin alone. EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are under investigation in HNC, and efforts are made to understand which molecular features are associated with objective responses. One appealing way to use EGFR TKIs is in combination with other biologic compounds, such as anti-angiogenic agents., Summary: New molecular-targeted therapies are inducing consistent, small improvements in HNC management. The major challenge regards how to better combine them with the final aim of obtaining long-term stabilization of advanced disease.

Purpose of Review: To provide an overview of recent clinical trials with monoclonal antibodies targeting epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in head and neck cancer (HNC) and in other tumors. To discuss future therapeutic strategies., Recent Findings: Cetuximab, a chimeric monoclonal antibody targeting EGFR, has induced improved locoregional control and survival in combination with radiotherapy in a phase III study in locally advanced inoperable HNC. The recent Bowel Oncology with Cetuximab Antibody (BOND) study has shown that the combination of irinotecan and cetuximab yields a better response rate and a longer time to progression with respect to cetuximab monotherapy in irinotecan-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer, pointing to both a cetuximab single-agent activity and a cetuximab potential for reversal of irinotecan resistance. Non-small cell lung cancer and pancreatic cancer represent further areas for cetuximab development. Bevacizumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody that targets VEGF. It is the first antiangiogenic drug to have induced a survival advantage in cancer therapy, within a randomized trial of irinotecan, 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin (IFL) combined with bevacizumab or placebo in metastatic colorectal cancer. The use of bevacizumab in HNC is supported by preclinical evidence of an angiogenic loop; a few clinical trials are exploring the feasibility and the therapeutic potential of a combination of bevacizumab and EGFR-targeted drugs., Summary: Monoclonal antibodies targeting EGFR and VEGF represent exciting therapeutic strategies that should be further evaluated both in combination with drugs acting on the same target at a different level and in combination with other antisignaling agents acting on different pathways.

Purpose of Review: The purpose of this review is to provide an update on novel medical treatments for head and neck cancer., Recent Findings: Despite the continuing introduction of new cytotoxic agents, such as antimetabolites (capecitabine, pemetrexed), and topoisomerase I inhibitors, the management of advanced head and neck cancer remains challenging. Epidermal growth factor receptor is an appealing target for novel therapies in head and neck cancer. Several rational approaches have been designed to abrogate epidermal growth factor receptor function, among which the development of small molecules, such as gefitinib or erlotinib, that inhibit tyrosine kinase activity, therefore abrogating the receptor's catalytic activity, autophosphorylation, and its engagement with signal transducers. The development of monoclonal antibodies, such as cetuximab, directed against the receptor's extracellular domain and competing for the binding of receptor ligands is another antireceptor strategy, because it induces epidermal growth factor receptor downregulation from the tumor cell surface. Gefitinib has been evaluated in a phase II study in head and neck cancer, at a dose of 500 mg/day. In this study, a 53% disease control rate was achieved, with a low toxicity. Currently, a phase II study at a dose of 250 mg/day is ongoing. A phase II study of erlotinib in advanced head and neck cancer has provided similar results to those of gefitinib, with a 46% control rate and an acceptable toxicity. Phase I studies of cetuximab have been carried out in advanced head and neck cancer, mainly combining the drug with chemotherapy or radiotherapy. Three phase II studies have evaluated the combination of cetuximab with platinum-based chemotherapy in pretreated patients with recurrent/metastatic head and neck cancer, with a control rate ranging from 29 to 66%. A phase III placebo-controlled trial has shown that the addition of cetuximab to cisplatin does not significantly improve median progression-free survival, despite a difference in the response rate between the two arms. Other molecular-targeted approaches in head and neck cancer include farnesyl transferase inhibitors, cell cycle regulators, and gene therapy., Summary: Novel targeted therapies are highly appealing in advanced head and neck cancer, and the most clever way to use them is a matter of intense investigation.

Recurrent/metastatic head and neck cancer is an area of high, unmet treatment need. There is a strong rationale for targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) in head and neck cancer as most of these tumors express high levels of EGFR relative to normal tissue, with high expression correlating with poor patient outcome. This rationale has been validated in extensive preclinical studies. Two small molecules with EGFR inhibitory activity, gefitinib ('Iressa', ZD1839) and erlotinib ('Tarceva', OSI-774), and a humanized monoclonal antibody against the EGFR extracellular domain, cetuximab ('Erbitux', C225), are in clinical trials for advanced head and neck cancer. The initial results of these trials are promising. Gefitinib and erlotinib show activity as monotherapy in patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck cancer, and have an acceptable safety profile compared with conventional chemotherapy. Gefitinib, which can be given at doses below the maximum tolerated dose, is associated with slightly lower rates of adverse events than erlotinib, which is dosed at the maximum tolerated dose. Combinations of cetuximab with radiotherapy or platinum-based chemotherapy have also shown activity in phase I/II studies. Both gefitinib and cetuximab have entered phase III studies. The results of these trials, which will mature over the next few years, will help determine the optimal use of EGFR agents in head and neck cancers.

High expression of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) has been implicated in the development of squamous-cell carcinomas of head and neck (SCCHN). ZD1839 ('Iressa') is an orally active, selective EGFR-TKI (EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor) that blocks signal transduction pathways implicated in proliferation and survival of cancer cells, and other host-dependent processes promoting cancer growth. We have demonstrated that ZD1839 induces growth arrest in SCCHN cell lines by inhibiting EGFR-mediated signaling. Cell cycle kinetic analysis demonstrated that ZD1839 induces a delay in cell cycle progression and a G1 arrest together with a partial G2/M block; this was associated with increased expression of both p27(KIP1) and p21(CIP1/WAF1) cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) inhibitors. The activity of CDK2, the main target of CIP/KIP CDK inhibitors, was reduced in a dose-dependent fashion after 24 h of ZD1839 treatment and this effect correlated to the increased amount of p27(KIP1) and p21(CIP1/WAF1) proteins associated with CDK2-cyclin-E and CDK2-cyclin-A complexes. In addition, ZD1839-induced growth inhibition was significantly reduced in cell transfectants expressing p27(KIP1) or p21(CIP1/WAF1) antisense constructs. Overall, these results as well as the timing of the effect of ZD1839 on G1 arrest and p27(KIP1) and p21(CIP1/WAF1) upregulation, suggest a mechanistic connection between these events., (Copyright 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.)

Background: The purpose of this study was to carry out two randomised phase II trials of S16020, a new olivacine derivative, tested as a single agent in patients with recurrent head and neck cancer, using methotrexate as the control arm to validate the results., Patients and Methods: S16020 at either 80 or 100 mg/m2 was administered as a 3-h infusion every 3 weeks. Methotrexate, 40 or 50 mg/m2, was given by bolus injection, weekly for a minimum of 6 weeks. In total, 36 patients were entered in the randomised studies (25 in an initial study, 11 in a confirmatory study) of whom 24 received S16020 and 12 received methotrexate., Results: A scheduled interim analysis showed one patient having a non-confirmed objective response with S16020 and three patients having a confirmed objective response with methotrexate. In the methotrexate group, there were no patients with severe non-haematological toxicity. With S16020, there was a high incidence of severe non-haematological toxicities, including asthenia, oedema of the face, oedema and pain at the tumour sites and erythematous rash; consequently, both studies were stopped., Conclusions: Both studies were stopped due to the poor anticipated benefit/risk ratio for S16020, although time to progression and overall survival time were similar in both treatment arms.

Background: Cisplatin (CDDP) is among the most active single agents against squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN), and it is still the reference drug in the induction chemotherapy setting, when used in combination with infusional 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). Raltitrexed has been shown to be devoid of clinical activity against SCCHN when used alone; however, both preclinical and early clinical data regarding the combination raltitrexed-CDDP hold promise. Thymidylate synthase is the target enzyme of both raltitrexed and 5-FU; however, the two drugs have distinct sites of action on the enzyme and the combination of the two agents may be synergistic. We have previously shown that the combination of raltitrexed, levofolinic acid (LFA) and 5-FU has clinical activity against SCCHN; in a subsequent phase I study, cisplatin was added, and the combination of CDDP plus raltitrexed on day 1, followed by LFA and 5-FU on day 2, was judged feasible and active, since a 67% response rate was shown across all dose levels, with a 100% response rate at the recommended dose for phase II., Methods: Patients with inoperable locally advanced or metastatic SCCHN, not pretreated with chemo- or radiotherapy were randomized to receive either CDDP 60 mg/m2 and raltitrexed 2.5 mg/m2 on day 1 and LFA 250 mg/m2 and 5-FU 900 mg/m2 on day 2 (arm A) or CDDP 65 mg/m2 and methotrexate 500 mg/m2 on day 1, and LFA 250 mg/m2 and 5-FU 800 mg/m2 on day 2 (arm B). Both treatments were repeated every 2 weeks. Evaluation for tumor response was performed after four cycles. According to Simon two-stage design, with a target complete response (CR) rate (p1) of 35%, at least 7 CR among the first 31 treated patients and 16 CR among the final sample size of 52 patients were required., Results: An interim analysis was performed when 36 patients were evaluable in each arm. In arm A, 10 CR (28%) and 19 partial responses (PR) (53%) were observed, for an overall response rate of 81%. In arm B, 3 CR (8%) and 12 PR (34%) were observed, for an overall response rate of 42%. The difference in both CR and overall response rate between the two arms was statistically significant (p = 0.03 and <0.001, respectively). Therefore, the accrual was stopped in arm B and continued only in arm A. Overall, 13 CR (21%) and 34 PR (56%) were observed among the 61 patients who were accrued in arm A, for an overall response rate of 77% (95% confidence interval 64-87%). Neutropenia was the main side effect in both arms (grade 3-4 in 45 and 23 patients in arm A and B, respectively). Extrahematologic toxicity was mild in both arms; however, 2 patients in arm B died due to toxicity (grade 4 mucositis in one case, grade 4 renal toxicity in the other)., Conclusions: Although response data for our experimental treatment look encouraging, the hypothesis of a 35% activity, expressed as capability to induce a CR, cannot be accepted. The results obtained in this study are not substantially different from those of other trials of CDDP-5-FU-based regimens, and our combination is unlikely to represent a major breakthrough when used in this setting., (Copyright 2002 S. Karger AG, Basel)

Background: Docetaxel is one of the most promising new drugs against squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN), while cisplatin is one of the most active single agents. A phase I study has shown the feasibility of the combination of the two drugs, and activity in SCCHN has been seen., Patients and Methods: Patients with locally advanced, inoperable, or metastatic SCCHN, never pretreated with radiotherapy or chemotherapy, received three courses of docetaxel 75 mg/m2 and cisplatin 100 mg/m2, every three weeks. Thereafter, responsive metastatic patients received additional chemotherapy, while patients with locally advanced disease underwent radiation therapy., Results: Forty-six patients (forty-five with locally advanced, one with metastatic disease) were entered into the study. Ten patients did not complete three courses of chemotherapy because of early death; one patient discontinued treatment after one course. Twenty-one objective responses were observed (46%, 95% confidence interval (CI): 31%-60%), including five complete responses (11%) and sixteen partial responses (35%). Following induction chemotherapy plus radiation therapy, 9 of 21 evaluable patients were rendered disease free, while 8 additional patients had a partial response. After a median follow-up of 18 months, the median duration of response was 12 months, (range 3-25+), and the median overall survival was 11 months. Six early deaths were considered possibly treatment-related (sepsis following grade 4 neutropenia in two cases, hypovolemic shock following severe diarrhea in four cases). Neutropenia was the most severe toxicity (grade 3-4 in 28 patients, median duration 4 days); diarrhea and vomiting were the most troublesome non-haematologic toxicities (grade 4 in 4 and 3 patients, respectively)., Conclusions: The combination of docetaxel and cisplatin is active in SCCHN, but toxicity is substantial. This schedule does not appear to offer any advantage compared with conventional regimens.

Background: The combination of cisplatin (CDDP) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) can be regarded as a reference regimen in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). Raltitrexed (Tomudex) is a direct and specific thymidilate synthase (TS) inhibitor, which has shown clinical activity against SCCHN in a previous phase I study, when combined with 5-FU and levo-folinic acid (LFA). Preclinical data support the combination of CDDP and raltitrexed. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the combination of cisplatin, raltitrexed. LFA and 5-FU in a phase I-II study., Patients and Methods: Patients with locally advanced or metastatic SCCHN were treated with a combination of cisplatin at the starting dose of 40 mg/m2. followed by raltitrexed at the starting dose of 2.5 mg/m2 on day 1; levo-folinic acid at fixed dose of 250 mg/m2, followed by 5-fluorouracil at the starting dose of 750 mg/m2 on day 2. Doses of the three cytotoxic agents were alternately escalated up to dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). Treatment was recycled every two weeks and given up to a maximum of eight courses; after chemotherapy, patients with locally advanced disease received a locoregional treatment., Results: Forty-five patients were entered into the study. Six dose levels were tested. At CDDP 50 mg/m2, raltitrexed 3 mg/m2, 5-FU 900 mg/m2, four out of six patients showed DLT, which was in all cases grade 4 neutropenia. Therefore, this dose level was defined as maximum tolerated dose (MTD). CDDP 60 mg/m2, raltitrexed 2.5 mg/m2, LFA 250 mg/m2, 5-FU 900 mg/m2 was the dose level recommended for phase II. CDDP, Raltitrexed and 5-FU mean actually delivered dose intensities at the selected dose level were 26, 1.05, and 378 mg/m2/week, respectively. Neutropenia was the main side effect and was observed even at the lowest dose levels. Nonhematologic side effects were mild. Nine complete responses (20%) and twenty-one partial responses (47%) were observed, for an overall response rate of 67% (95% confidence interval (95% CI): 51%-80%), according to intention to treat analysis. Fifteen of fifteen patients (100%) treated at the dose level selected for phase II had an objective response (5 complete responses, 10 partial responses)., Conclusions: The results of our dose escalation clearly demonstrate that it is possible to combine CDDP, raltitrexed, and modulated 5-FU at effective doses, without unexpected toxicities. The response data point to an impressive clinical activity, which will be better defined by an ongoing large phase II study.

Background: Pegylated liposome technology represents a favourable drug-carrier system, since stealth liposomal drugs have a reduced clearance with prolonged circulation half-life and selective drug accumulation in tissues with increased vascular permeability, such as tumor tissues. Caelyx is a pegylated liposome containing doxorubicin, which has been developed to target drug delivery to cancer cells, thus reducing toxicities. Biodistribution studies have shown a selective tumor uptake in patients with advanced head and neck cancer (HNC), thus justifying the present phase I study., Patients and Methods: Patients with recurrent or metastatic HNC were treated with Caelyx administered at the starting dose of 30 mg/m2 every three weeks and escalated by 5 mg/m2 per step. Dose escalation was stopped if more than a third of patients of a given cohort had dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), which was defined as grade 4 neutropenia or thrombocytopenia, grade 3 febrile neutropenia, grade 3 thrombocytopenia with bleeding, grade 3 non-hematologic toxicity (except for nausea and alopecia), or > 2 week delay in chemotherapy recycling. The above dose level was defined as maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and the dose level immediately below was recommended for phase II evaluation. Response was evaluated after three courses of chemotherapy., Results: Twenty-four patients were treated at five dose levels. At 50 mg/m2, three out of six patients had grade 3 stomatitis; therefore, this level was defined as MTD and 45 mg/m2 was the selected dose for phase II. Stomatitis occurred in 11 patients across all dose levels, considering all delivered cycles. Neutropenia occurred in 10 of 24 patients, but reached grade 4 in only 2 patients at fourth dose level. Skin toxicity, mainly appearing in the form of palmar-plantar erythrodysestesia, was the most frequent toxicity, occurring in 14 patients. Other side effects were mild. One complete response (4%) and seven partial responses (29%) were observed, for an overall response rate of 33% (95% confidence interval (95% CI): 16%-55%)., Conclusions: Caelyx is a safe and promising new treatment in HNC, that deserves further evaluation both alone and integrated within chemo-radiotherapy strategies.

In vitro studies have shown a schedule-dependent synergism between Tomudex and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). Incubation of different types of head and neck and colorectal cancer cells with levofolinic acid (LFA) plus 5-FU for 4 or 24 h, after 24-h incubation with Tomudex, produces a clear synergism. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the tolerability and activity of a combination of Tomudex, LFA, and 5-FU in advanced head and neck and colorectal cancer. Furthermore, the potential for 5-FU pharmacomodulation by Tomudex was also evaluated through an intrapatient assessment of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) activity and 5-FU AUC with and without pretreatment with Tomudex. Eligible patients were treated with Tomudex at the starting dose of 1.5 mg/m2 on day 1, LFA at a fixed dose of 250 mg/m2 on day 2, immediately followed by bolus 5-FU at the starting dose of 600 mg/m2. Tomudex and 5-FU doses were alternately escalated. Courses were repeated every 2 weeks. In the second course, LFA and 5-FU were administered on day 1 and Tomudex on day 2; further treatment was given according to the sequence used in the first course. Plasma 5-FU concentrations were analyzed on courses 1 and 2 using a high-performance liquid chromatography assay with UV detection. DPD activity was measured in peripheral blood mononuclear cells on courses 1 and 2 using incubation of cytosol with [14C]FU and quantitation of metabolite formation. Fifty-eight patients were enrolled in the study. Dose escalation was stopped at step 8, because of the occurrence of dose-limiting toxicity in two of three patients. The dose level immediately before (3 mg/m2 Tomudex, 1050 mg/m2 5-FU) was selected for further evaluation. Tomudex and 5-FU mean dose intensities actually delivered at the seventh step were 1.32 and 462 mg/m2/week, respectively. Six of 40 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer obtained an objective response (15%; 95% confidence interval, 6-30%). In particular, three complete responses and three partial responses were observed. Six of 17 patients with locally advanced or metastatic head and neck cancer obtained an objective response (1 complete response + 5 partial responses; 35%; 95% confidence interval, 14-62%). Median duration of response in colorectal cancer patients was 12 months. 5-FU AUC was not significantly different between the two courses (median intrapatient difference, 9.3%; P = 0.28). DPD activity in course 1 was significantly higher than course 2 (P = 0.041) in the 16 patients in which values were evaluable. The combination of Tomudex, LFA, and 5-FU is well tolerated and active in colorectal and head and neck cancer. The Tomudex mean dose intensity actually delivered is higher than usually achieved in monotherapy. The absence of a clear pharmacokinetic interaction suggests that the synergism of Tomudex and 5-FU might occur at the cellular level.

Background: Induction chemotherapy in locoregionally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) might improve survival with respect to radiation therapy alone. Furthermore, chemotherapy represents the only therapeutic option in metastatic head and neck carcinoma., Methods: To improve further the results that could be obtained with an induction regimen of cisplatin (CDDP) plus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), the authors treated 50 patients with locally advanced or metastatic SCCHN with a combination of CDDP 65 mg/m2 on Day 1, methotrexate 500 mg/m2 on Day 1, levofolinic acid 250 mg/m2 on Day 2, and 5-FU 800 mg/m2 on Day 2. Cycles were repeated every 2 weeks. The authors' aim was to increase the activity of CDDP plus 5-FU (PF) using a regimen that combined the three most active drugs in SCCHN and provided an adequate biochemical modulation of 5-FU, which was administered as an intravenous bolus infusion., Results: Forty objective responses were observed among 50 evaluable patients (80%; 95% confidence interval [C.I.], 66-90%), including 7 complete responses (14%; 95% C.I., 5-27%), and 33 partial responses (66%; 95% C.I., 51-79%). Locoregional treatment, consisting of radiotherapy or surgery, was given at the end of chemotherapy. On completion of induction chemotherapy and locoregional treatment, 42 of 46 patients (91%) were rendered disease free. After a median follow-up of 20 months, the median duration of response was 10 months, the median failure free survival was 10 months, and the median overall survival was 21 months. The treatment was generally well tolerated. Grade 3-4 neutropenia occurred in 25 patients (50%), but it was febrile in only 3 patients. Nausea and vomiting were well managed with serotonin-3 blocking agents. Severe mucositis was seldom observed and easily manageable, and it never required hospitalization., Conclusions: The high level of activity, the manageable toxicity, and the noteworthy survival data of this regimen compare favorably with most of the drug combinations used worldwide to treat similar patient populations, with the additional advantage of significantly lower cost.