Search

Purpose: Head and neck cancer (HNC) patients in radiotherapy require adaptive treatment plans due to anatomical changes. Deformable image registration (DIR) is used in adaptive radiotherapy, e.g. for deformable dose accumulation (DDA). However, DIR's ill-posedness necessitates addressing uncertainties, often overlooked in clinical implementations. DIR's further clinical implementation is hindered by missing quantitative commissioning and quality assurance tools. This study evaluates one pathway for more quantitative DDA uncertainties., Methods: For five HNC patients, each with multiple repeated CTs acquired during treatment, a simultaneous-integrated boost (SIB) plan was optimized. Recalculated doses were warped individually using multiple DIRs from repeated to reference CTs, and voxel-by-voxel dose ranges determined an error-bar for DDA. Followed by evaluating, a previously proposed early-stage DDA uncertainty estimation method tested for lung cancer, which combines geometric DIR uncertainties, dose gradients and their directional dependence, in the context of HNC., Results: Applying multiple DIRs show dose differences, pronounced in high dose gradient regions. The patient with largest anatomical changes (-13.1 % in ROI body volume), exhibited 33 % maximum uncertainty in contralateral parotid, with 54 % of voxels presenting an uncertainty >5 %. Accumulation over multiple CTs partially mitigated uncertainties. The estimation approach predicted 92.6 % of voxels within ±5 % to the reference dose uncertainty across all patients., Conclusions: DIR variations impact accumulated doses, emphasizing DDA uncertainty quantification's importance for HNC patients. Multiple DIR dose warping aids in quantifying DDA uncertainties. An estimation approach previously described for lung cancer was successfully validated for HNC, for SIB plans, presenting different dose gradients, and for accumulated treatments., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Associazione Italiana di Fisica Medica e Sanitaria. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background and Purpose: This study investigates whether combined proton-photon therapy (CPPT) improves treatment plan quality compared to single-modality intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) or intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) for head and neck cancer (HNC) patients. Different proton beam arrangements for CPPT and IMPT are compared, which could be of specific interest concerning potential future upright-positioned treatments. Furthermore, it is evaluated if CPPT benefits remain under inter-fractional anatomical changes for HNC treatments., Material and Methods: Five HNC patients with a planning CT and multiple (4-7) repeated CTs were studied. CPPT with simultaneously optimized photon and proton fluence, single-modality IMPT, and IMRT treatment plans were optimized on the planning CT and then recalculated and reoptimized on each repeated CT. For CPPT and IMPT, plans with different degrees of freedom for the proton beams were optimized. Fixed horizontal proton beam line (FHB), gantry-like, and arc-like plans were compared., Results: The target coverage for CPPT without adaptation is insufficient (average V95%=88.4 %), while adapted plans can recover the initial treatment plan quality for target (average V95%=95.5 %) and organs-at-risk. CPPT with increased proton beam flexibility increases plan quality and reduces normal tissue complication probability of Xerostomia and Dysphagia. On average, Xerostomia NTCP reductions compared to IMRT are -2.7 %/-3.4 %/-5.0 % for CPPT FHB/CPPT Gantry/CPPT Arc. The differences for IMPT FHB/IMPT Gantry/IMPT Arc are + 0.8 %/-0.9 %/-4.3 %., Conclusion: CPPT for HNC needs adaptive treatments. Increasing proton beam flexibility in CPPT, either by using a gantry or an upright-positioned patient, improves treatment plan quality. However, the photon component is substantially reduced, therefore, the balance between improved plan quality and costs must be further determined., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcome of patients with head and neck adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) treated using pencil beam scanning proton therapy (PBS PT) at our institution., Materials and Methods: Thirty-five patients who underwent treatment with PBS PT for ACC between 2001 and 2017 were included. Local control (LC), distant control (DC), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and their prognostic factors were evaluated. Adverse effects were prospectively assessed., Results: The median patient follow-up was 30 months. Prior to PT, 26 patients (74.3%) underwent surgery with R0/R1/R2 outcome in 5, 13 and 8 cases, respectively. Nine patients (25.7%) presented with inoperable disease. The 2-year LC, DC, PFS and OS was 92.2%, 77.8%, 74.3% and 88.8%, respectively. LC was influenced by patient age (p = 0.002) with a significant difference between local and distant failure (median 61.3 vs. 42.3 years, p = 0.005). Tumor T stage was a significant risk factor for PFS (p = 0.045) and tumor prognostic group affected OS (p = 0.049). No significant survival advantage for operable vs. inoperable disease could be identified. The acute and late grade 3 toxicity rates were 14.3% and 6.1%, respectively. No acute or late grade 4/5 toxicities were observed., Conclusions: PBS PT is an effective and safe treatment for patients with head & neck ACC in both definitive and adjuvant setting. Distant metastases are the main pattern of failure. Age, tumor stage and clinical stage had a significant negative impact on LC, OS and PFS., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To assess the radiation-induced optic neuropathy (RION) prevalence, following high dose pencil beam scanning proton therapy (PBSPT) to skull base and head and neck (H&N) tumours., Methods: Between 1999 and 2014, 216 adult patients, median age 47 years (range, 18-77), were treated with PBS PT for skull base or H&N malignancies, delivering ≥45 Gy RBE to the optic nerve(s) (ON) and/or optic chiasma (OC). The median administered dose to the planning target volume was 74.0 Gy RBE (range, 54.0-77.4). The median follow-up was 5.3 years (range, 0.8-15.9)., Results: RION was observed in 14 (6.5%) patients at a median time of 13.2 months (range, 4.8-42.6) following PBSPT. Most (92.9%) of RION were symptomatic. Most affected patients (11/14; 79%) developed unilateral toxicity. Grade 4, 3, 2 and 1 toxicity was observed in 10, 2, 1 and 1 patients, respectively. On univariate analyses, age (<70  vs ≥70 years; p < 0.0001), hypertension ( p = 0.0007) and tumour abutting the optic apparatus ( p = 0.012) were associated with RION. OC's V60 Gy RBE was of border line significance ( p = 0.06). None of the other evaluated OC-ON dose/volume metrics (Dmax, Dmean, V40-60) were significantly associated with this complication., Conclusion: These data suggest that high-dose PBS PT for skull base and H&N tumours is associated with a low prevalence of RION. Caution should be however exercised when treating elderly/hypertensive patients with tumours abutting the optic apparatus., Advances in Knowledge: This is the first study reporting the risk of developing RION following proton therapy with PBS technique, demonstrating the safety of this treatment.

Purpose: To determine the efficacy and feasibility of induction chemotherapy (ICT) with docetaxel, cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil followed by radiotherapy and cetuximab (C) in patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer., Patients and Methods: Forty-nine previously untreated patients with local advanced stage III and IV squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) received three courses of ICT consisting of docetaxel 75mg/m(2) day 1, cisplatin 75mg/m(2) day 1 and infusional 5-fluorouracil 750mg/m(2)/day on days 1-5 followed by radiotherapy plus C at 250mg/m(2)/week (after an initial loading dose of 400mg/m(2))., Results: After completion of ICT 44 of 49 patients received radiotherapy plus C. Three months after therapy completion tumour response was observed in 33 patients and after two years, 25 patients were in complete remission (CR). The most common grade 4 toxicity during the whole treatment period was dermatitis (30%), followed by mucositis (27%) and neutropenia (17%) without fever. One toxic related death was observed during ICT. Two-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate was 59% and two-year overall survival (OS) rate was 63%, respectively., Conclusion: Concurrent radiotherapy plus C after three courses of ICT was feasible and was associated with promising CR, PFS and OS rates. Further optimisation of dose and sequence is warranted., (Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To retrospectively assess the incidence of radiation dermatitis in patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) who received primary radiotherapy in combination with cetuximab in a curative intent., Patients and Methods: A total of 112 consecutively treated patients who received cetuximab in combination with radiotherapy at the Departments of Radiotherapy at the Medical University in Vienna and the Hospital Hietzing (Vienna) were analyzed. Radiotherapy was administered either as conventional radiotherapy (70 Gy in 7 weeks) or using a concomitant boost protocol (72 Gy in 6 weeks). The incidence of dermatitis and mucositis within the radiation portals in 103 eligible patients was compared with a historical control group treated at the Medical University of Vienna as well as with published data., Results: The incidence of grade 1/2, 3, and 4 dermatitis was 57%, 29%, and 1% in the radiotherapy plus cetuximab treated collective. The incidence of grade 1/2, 3, and 4 mucositis was 37%, 47%, and 4%, respectively. The incidence of grade 3 dermatitis during concurrent radiotherapy plus cetuximab was 29% in our patient collective. Only one case of grade 4 dermatitis was observed., Conclusion: These results do not statistically differ significantly from the incidence reported in the Bonner trial and indicate that cetuximab in combination with radiotherapy is well tolerated.