Search

Purpose: Upper extremity trauma is common, however the provision of emergency call for hand trauma can be challenging for hospital systems and hand surgeons. Over the past decade, the American Society for Surgery of the Hand (ASSH) has developed the Hand Trauma Network and an Emergency Hand Care Committee to refine care for hand trauma patients., Methods: The ASSH administered surveys to members about the provision of emergency hand call in 2010 and 2019. Demographic information was collected including surgeon age, years in practice, board certification, practice setting, and ACS trauma level. Other survey questions included willingness and obligation to take call, as well as barriers to providing emergency call. Financial aspects of call were also queried., Results: Survey responses were obtained from 672 surgeons in 2010 and 1005 surgeons in 2019. There was a decrease in surgeons with obligatory hand call from 2010 to 2019 (70% vs 50%, P < .05) and an increase in the number of surgeons not taking hand call in 2019 (34%) compared to 2010 (18%, P < .05). In both surveys, the main barrier for providing hand call was "lifestyle considerations," 39% (2010) and 47% (2019). There was no change in the percentage of surgeons working at facilities that provide 24/7 emergency hand call services or the percentage of hand surgeons paid to take call., Conclusions: Certain aspects of providing emergency hand surgery care have not changed substantially in the past decade, including the number of centers that provide emergency hand coverage. A greater number of surgeons are not taking any hand call. Further efforts are required to promulgate advances in hand trauma call by the ASSH., Clinical Relevance: The development of the ASSH Hand Trauma Network has not yet resulted in substantive improvement in the number of facilities that provide emergency hand coverage or the number of hand surgeons providing emergency hand care., (Copyright © 2021 American Society for Surgery of the Hand. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Firework injuries to the hand can be devastating due to the explosive and ballistic nature of these devices. The aim of this study was to describe the injury and treatment characteristics of patients requiring surgery for firework-related hand injuries and to investigate which factors are associated with an increased utilization of health care resources. Methods: A retrospective chart review of patients undergoing surgery for firework-related hand injuries at two American College of Surgeons level I trauma centers between 2005 and 2016 was performed. Twenty cases were identified. These patients were evaluated for demographics, injury characteristics, number and types of surgical interventions, length of stay, and utilization of health care resources. Bivariate analyses were performed to investigate which factors were associated with increased consumption of health care resources. Results: Injuries ranged from digital nerve injuries to traumatic amputation. Patients underwent a median of 3 surgical operations. More than half the patients underwent flap or skin graft coverage of a soft tissue defect. The median length of hospital stay was 7 days. Factors found to be associated with an increased utilization of surgical and hospital resources included a first web space injury, thumb fracture, and traumatic amputation of any digit. Conclusions: The morbidity inflicted by firework injuries to individual patients is substantial. Patients with severe injuries undergo a median of three surgical operations and have a long duration of initial hospital stay. Knowing which factors are associated with an increased utilization of resources can help prognosticate these preventable injuries.

Background: Burn injuries commonly affect the hand, and the development of adduction contractures of the first web space is frequent and deleterious, both functionally and aesthetically. Many corrective techniques and algorithmic approaches have been described to treat this problem, but there is no consensus on the optimal management., Methods: A retrospective review at a single high-volume pediatric burn center was undertaken to evaluate the clinical course of these patients. All pediatric patients undergoing initial release of burn scar contracture of the first web space from 2005 through 2015 were included in a retrospective cohort study., Results: The authors identified 40 patients with 57 burned hands. The initial approach to management was variable. Z-plasty or other local flap was the first technique used in 28 hands (49 percent), split-thickness skin graft in 19 hands (33 percent), full-thickness skin graft in seven hands (12 percent), groin flaps in two hands (4 percent), and a reverse radial forearm flap in one hand (2 percent). The mean numbers of total reconstructive procedures per hand including the initial procedure were as follows: groin flap, 4.0; full-thickness skin graft, 3.1; split-thickness skin graft, 2.1; Z-plasty, 1.4; and reverse radial forearm flap, 1.0., Conclusions: Successful reconstruction of the first web space must be addressed in the context of the entire hand. It is the authors' preference to use split-thickness skin grafting whenever a skin deficiency is present-only then should leading edge contractures be addressed with Z-plasty. Based on their experience, the authors recommend five principles that are essential to successfully treat postburn contractures of the first web space., Clinical Question/level of Evidence: Therapeutic, III.

Background: Local health care facilities are often unequipped to treat complex upper extremity injuries, and patients are therefore transferred to designated trauma centers. This study describes the characteristics of patients transferred to a Level I trauma center for hand and upper extremity injuries and to investigate the accuracy of the provided diagnosis at the time of referral., Methods: Adult patients transferred from outside facilities to the authors' Level I trauma center by means of direct contract with the on-call fellow for the care of hand and upper extremity injuries were identified. Patient- and injury-related information was prospectively collected at the time of referral before patient transfer, and again following diagnostic evaluation by a hand surgeon at the authors' institution., Results: Sixty-three patients were transferred to the authors' hand surgery service from outside facilities after direct contact with the on-call fellow. Most patients were referred by emergency medicine physicians [n = 47 (76 percent)], followed by midlevel emergency department providers (physician assistant or nurse practitioner) [n = 12 (19 percent)] or hand surgeons [n = 3 (5 percent)]. Six patients were transferred directly from a Level I trauma center. Twenty-one transferred patients (33 percent) had an inaccurate diagnosis at the time of referral. Factors associated with an inaccurate diagnosis included trauma level of the referring hospital and diagnoses of infection or dysvascularity., Conclusions: The diagnostic accuracy for hand injuries transferred from outside facilities by means of provider-to-provider communication is imperfect, and some injuries are misdiagnosed. Hand surgeons should continue to improve the triage and transfer process for patients with acute hand surgery injuries., Clinical Question/level of Evidence: Diagnostic, IV.

Digital replantation and revascularization have evolved significantly since the first published reports in the 1960s. Advances in techniques and instruments have made these once formidable procedures a routine part of hand surgery training. Despite this, the frequency of successful outcomes for replantation may be on the decline in the United States. This review summarizes key mechanisms and innovations used to maximize efficiency when presented with a digital replantation, from the moment the patient arrives in the emergency department until the time of discharge., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Secondary surgery following digital replantation and revascularization is common and is often performed to improve range of motion, tendon gliding, sensibility, and/or contour. In this article, the authors present the most common secondary procedures performed after digital replantation or revascularization and discuss current techniques. The importance of patient selection and postoperative compliance with ongoing hand therapy is paramount to achieving good outcomes., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The authors studied the rate of secondary surgery following replantation/revascularization or completion amputation in patients with traumatic upper extremity injuries. The authors hypothesized that there are no factors associated with secondary surgery after initial treatment and that travel distance to the authors' hospital does not influence the number of secondary operations., Methods: A multi-institutional retrospective study was performed including patients presenting from 2006 to 2014. The authors included 1254 patients and calculated the incidence of secondary surgery following initial operative management. The authors performed multivariable regression analysis to determine factors associated with secondary surgery and ordinal logistic regression tested the association of living at a further distance (>50 miles) and having zero, one, or multiple secondary operations., Results: The rate of secondary surgery was 25 percent for all patients: 51 percent following replantation/revascularization and 22 percent following completion amputation. The authors observed a trend for lower rate of secondary surgery over time among patients who underwent completion amputation. The mean number of secondary operations was 1.2 after replantation/revascularization versus 0.45 operations after completion amputation. Avulsion and multiple-digit injuries were associated with higher odds and Hispanic race was associated with lower odds of secondary surgery. Patients living more than 50 miles from the hospital had a higher likelihood of undergoing one or multiple secondary operations., Conclusions: Twenty-five percent of patients with traumatic, dysvascular digital injuries underwent secondary surgery following initial revascularization or completion amputation. Patients undergoing initial revascularization or replantation were more than twice as likely to undergo secondary surgery compared with those undergoing completion amputation., Clinical Question/level of Evidence: Risk, III.

Mangled hand injuries are defined as those with significant damage to multiple structures, which may be limb threatening. Historically these injuries resulted in amputation or death, but modern surgical and perioperative advances allow for complex reconstruction and the possibility of a sensate and functional limb. Evaluation begins with surveying for life-threatening injuries followed by a systematic approach to identify injured structures; management begins with preserving all parts, minimizing warm ischemia time, performing débridement, and planning an operative approach to optimize the chance of a functional limb. With careful surgical planning and a well-executed reconstruction, most limbs can be salvaged., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Level-I trauma centers are required to provide hand and microsurgery capability at all times. We examined transfers to our center to better understand distant patient referrals and, indirectly, study referrals in our region., Methods: Records were reviewed from 2010 to 2015 to evaluate patients transferred to our level-I institution for upper extremity amputation. Patients were referred from 6 states to our institution over this period. We measured the straight-line distance from each patient's transferring facility to our facility and compared this distance with the straight-line distances from the zip code of the transferring facility to the zip code of each level-I trauma center., Results: We had data for 250 transferred patients (91% male, 9% female). For 110 patients (44%), our hospital was the nearest level-I trauma center; however, for the remaining 140 patients (56%), other level-I trauma facilities were located closer to the referring hospital. Among these 140 patients, the mean distance of the referring facility to the nearest level-I trauma center (30 miles; SD, 27) was significantly different from the mean distance of the referring facility to our facility (71 miles; SD, 60). A median of 4 (range, 1-10) level-I trauma centers were bypassed before patients arrived at our center. Medicaid and "self-pay" patients were more likely to be transferred to our facility., Conclusions: Fifty-six percent of patients transferred to our hospital for upper extremity amputation had a level-I trauma center closer to their injury. Patients with upper extremity amputation are referred to our regional center despite the proximity of closer level-I trauma centers. This suggests that regional microsurgery expertise does not correlate with level-I trauma designation, and establishment of designated microsurgery centers and formal referral guidelines may be beneficial for management of these difficult injuries., Clinical Relevance: We believe that this study further supports the need for formal designation of regional centers of expertise for microsurgical hand trauma., (Copyright © 2017 American Society for Surgery of the Hand. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Thermal injuries of the hand can have a great impact on function. Initial treatment should focus on the prevention of contracture through the use of tissue-sparing techniques and optimized occupational therapy. Surgical intervention should follow the standard reconstructive ladder and can involve several techniques from simple to complex including minimally invasive techniques, such as laser and steroid injection, contracture release and skin grafting, and local tissue rearrangement and regional flaps as well as distant pedicled and free flaps. Reconstructive surgery of the hand, when performed well, can lead to meaningful functional improvement in severe burns., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Osteosynthesis and tendon repair are essential in upper extremity transplantation to optimally restore function. Transplant surgeons should be aware of all technical issues involved in osteosynthesis, tendon balancing, and tension setting as well as repair in an effort to optimize the function of the transplanted hand. Preoperative planning is vital to achieve good functional results. We present a case of successful osteosynthesis and side-to-side tendon repair, which led to a desirable functional outcome in hand transplantation.

Postoperative infections are uncommon after hand surgery. Infection can delay recovery and contribute to scarring and stiffness. Measures intended to reduce the risk of infection after hand surgery include hand washing, skin preparation, sterile technique, and prophylactic antibiotics. The role of prophylactic antibiotics for small, clean, elective hand surgery procedures lasting less than 2 hours is debated., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Summary: Patients with circumferential extremity burns may have a deficiency of cutaneous veins, which presents a challenge for both autologous reconstruction and vascularized composite allotransplantation. The authors present a 44-year-old, left-hand-dominant man with metacarpal level amputation of his left hand secondary to burn injury. Extensive prior débridement and skin grafting resulted in nearly total absence of cutaneous veins in the forearm. The patient underwent unilateral left hand transplantation with an allograft designed to include a volar forearm fasciocutaneous extension supplied by the radial artery and including the basilic vein to permit augmented venous drainage by means of anastomosis at the antecubital fossa. The volar forearm fasciocutaneous extension can increase vessel caliber and possibly improve reliability in the setting of hand transplantation and should be considered following severe burn injury.

Adequate soft-tissue coverage of the hand is paramount to achieve optimal aesthetic and functional results in patients with complex hand defects. In this article, the authors present four illustrative clinical cases and discuss potential reconstructive modalities. For each scenario, two surgical options are discussed: one established and one nontraditional method of reconstruction. The authors' preferred method and technical pearls for execution are presented.

Background: Academic institutions receive many patients transferred specifically for hand surgery evaluation. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the demographics and insurance status of patients transferred for this reason., Methods: A retrospective review was performed of 155 transferred and 1017 nontransferred patients with a primary hand diagnosis during 3 summer months at two urban academic institutions. Patients were evaluated for insurance status/type, medical comorbidities, employment status, and reason for transfer. Insurance was defined as present/absent and favorable/unfavorable, with unfavorable defined as Medicaid or state-sponsored insurance. Reason for transfer or presenting diagnosis was separated by category., Results: The mean age was similar between groups, but a higher percentage of transfer patients were men (69.9 percent versus 59.7 percent; p < 0.05). The percentage of insured patients was similar (92.9 percent versus 93.2 percent), but the number with no insurance or undesirable insurance was greater for transferred patients (30.1 percent versus 22.9 percent; p < 0.05). Patients with poor or no insurance were twice as likely to be inappropriately transferred (OR, 2.17; p = 0.03). Transferred patients were less likely to be employed (55.1 percent versus 64.8 percent; p < 0.05); however, the percentages of workers' compensation (13.5 percent versus 14.6 percent) and diabetes (6.41 percent versus 6.10 percent) cases were similar. Common reasons for transfer were closed fractures/dislocations (21.9 percent), infection (17.4 percent), and amputation/devascularization (17.4 percent)., Conclusion: Patients transferred to tertiary care centers for emergency upper extremity evaluation have a higher rate of undesirable or no insurance and are more likely to be male or unemployed.

Background: Firework injuries to the hand can be devastating due to the explosive and ballistic nature of these devices. The aim of this study was to describe the injury and treatment characteristics of patients requiring surgery for firework-related hand injuries and to investigate which factors are associated with an increased utilization of health care resources. Methods: A retrospective chart review of patients undergoing surgery for firework-related hand injuries at two American College of Surgeons level I trauma centers between 2005 and 2016 was performed. Twenty cases were identified. These patients were evaluated for demographics, injury characteristics, number and types of surgical interventions, length of stay, and utilization of health care resources. Bivariate analyses were performed to investigate which factors were associated with increased consumption of health care resources. Results: Injuries ranged from digital nerve injuries to traumatic amputation. Patients underwent a median of 3 surgical operations. More than half the patients underwent flap or skin graft coverage of a soft tissue defect. The median length of hospital stay was 7 days. Factors found to be associated with an increased utilization of surgical and hospital resources included a first web space injury, thumb fracture, and traumatic amputation of any digit. Conclusions: The morbidity inflicted by firework injuries to individual patients is substantial. Patients with severe injuries undergo a median of three surgical operations and have a long duration of initial hospital stay. Knowing which factors are associated with an increased utilization of resources can help prognosticate these preventable injuries. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Although fingertip injuries are common, there is limited literature on the epidemiology and hospital charges for fingertip injuries in children. This descriptive study reports the clinical features of and hospital charges for fingertip injuries in a large pediatric population treated at a tertiary medical center. Methods: Our hospital database was queried using International Classification of Diseases, Revision 9 (ICD-9) codes, and medical records were reviewed. Frequency statistics were generated for 1807 patients with fingertip injuries who presented to the emergency department (ED) at Boston Children’s Hospital (BCH) between 2005 and 2011. Billing records were analyzed for financial data. Results: A total of 1807 patients were identified for this study; 59% were male, and the mean age at time of injury was 8 years. Most commonly, injuries occurred when a finger was crushed (n = 831, 46%) in a door or window. Average length of stay in the ED was 3 hours 45 minutes, 25% of cases needed surgery, and, on average, patients had more than 1 follow-up appointment. About one-third of patients were referred from outside institutions. The average ED charge for fingertip injuries was $1195 in 2014, which would amount to about $320 430 each year (in 2014 dollars) for fingertip injuries presenting to BCH. Conclusion: Fingertip injuries in children are common and result in significant burden, yet are mostly preventable. Most injuries occur at home in a door or window. Although these patients generally heal well, fingertip injuries pose a health, time, and financial burden. Increased awareness and education may help to avoid these injuries. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: As emergency departments (EDs) become increasingly overwhelmed and specialist coverage in some EDs decreases, patients may be transferred to tertiary or quaternary facilities for specialized care to decrease patient load at transferring facilities. Our objective was to determine whether facilities that transferred patients for hand surgery had hand surgery coverage and to evaluate any nonmedical factors that might have been associated with transfer. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted for 1167 visits of hand and wrist patients seen in the EDs of two urban level-I trauma centers. The hand surgery capacity of referring facilities was determined by phone calls to the EDs. Univariate and multivariable analyses were conducted to identify nonmedical factors that could potentially affect the decision to transfer. Results: A total of 155 (13.3%) of 1167 patients arrived from other facilities for specialized hand care. These patients were significantly more likely to be male (p = 0.02), have noncommercial insurance (p = 0.04), require an interpreter (p = 0.01), and arrive between 6:00 P.M. and midnight (p = 0.03). In a multivariable analysis, sex and insurance status were significantly associated with transfer (p < 0.05). The subset of ninety-five patients who were transferred from other EDs was significantly more likely to be male (p < 0.01) and arrive on weekends (p < 0.01) or between 6:00 P.M. and midnight (p < 0.01). Of these patients, seventy-seven (81%) were transferred from an ED that reported partial or full hand surgery coverage. However, only eight (10.4%) received a hand surgery evaluation prior to transfer. Conclusions: The low percentage of patients receiving hand surgery evaluations prior to transfer suggests that referring hospitals are not using their own hand surgeon resources. Nonmedical factors, including noncommercial insurance and off-hour time of initial arrival, may be associated with the decision to transfer patients. Clinical Relevance: Identifying nonmedical factors associated with patient transfers and referrals can enlighten efforts to improve the quality and appropriate use of transfers for specialty care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]