Search

Over the last two decades, numerous genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have been performed to unveil the genetic architecture of human complex traits. Despite multiple efforts aimed at the trans-biobank integration of GWAS results, no systematic analysis of the variant-level properties affecting the replication of known associations (or identifying novel ones) in genome-wide meta-analysis has yet been performed using biobank-scale data. To address this issue, we performed a systematic comparison of GWAS summary statistics for 679 complex traits in the UK Biobank (UKB) and FinnGen (FG) cohorts. We identified 37,148 index variants with genome-wide associations with at least one trait in either cohort or in the meta-analysis, only 3528 (9.5%) of which were shared between UKB and FG. Nearly twice as many variants (6577) were replicated in another dataset at the significance level adjusted for the number of variants selected for replication. However, as many as 9230 loci failed to be replicated. Moreover, as many as 5813 loci were observed as significant associations only in meta-analysis results, highlighting the importance of trans-biobank meta-analysis efforts. We showed that variants that failed to replicate in UKB or FG tend to correspond to rare, less pleiotropic variants with lower effect sizes and lower LD score values. Genome-wide associations specific to meta-analysis were also enriched in low-effect variants; however, such variants tended to be more common and have more consistent frequencies between populations. Taken together, our results show a relatively high rate of non-replication of genome-wide associations in the studied cohorts and highlight both widely appreciated and less acknowledged properties of the associations affecting their identification and replication. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) are a powerful tool for the identification of genes affecting human traits. Still, the interpretation of GWAS results is complicated, and new tools are actively being developed. Due to the scarcity of available datasets, simulation of GWAS data with known genetic effects is important as it enables accurate evaluation of such tools. In this study, we developed a flexible tool, bioGWAS, that provides a set of important functionalities for simulating GWAS results. We demonstrate that bioGWAS can efficiently generate GWAS results with predefined causal genes and biological processes and is capable of recapitulating the results of published GWAS studies. We thus believe that bioGWAS is an excellent method for testing bioinformatics software for GWAS results processing, as well as for the generation of datasets for educational purposes. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have proven to be a powerful tool for the identification of genetic susceptibility loci affecting human complex traits. In addition to pinpointing individual genes involved in a particular trait, GWAS results can be used to discover relevant biological processes for these traits. The development of new tools for extracting such information from GWAS results requires large-scale datasets with known biological ground truth. Simulation of GWAS results is a powerful method that may provide such datasets and facilitate the development of new methods. In this work, we developed bioGWAS, a simple and flexible pipeline for the simulation of genotypes, phenotypes, and GWAS summary statistics. Unlike existing methods, bioGWAS can be used to generate GWAS results for simulated quantitative and binary traits with a predefined set of causal genetic variants and/or molecular pathways. We demonstrate that the proposed method can recapitulate complete GWAS datasets using a set of reported genome-wide associations. We also used our method to benchmark several tools for gene set enrichment analysis for GWAS data. Taken together, our results suggest that bioGWAS provides an important set of functionalities that would aid the development of new methods for downstream processing of GWAS results. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In recent years, great advances have been made in the field of collection, storage, and analysis of biological samples. Large collections of samples, biobanks, have been established in many countries. Biobanks typically collect large amounts of biological samples and associated clinical information; the largest collections include over a million samples. In this review, we summarize the main directions in which biobanks aid medical genetics and genomic research, from providing reference allele frequency information to allowing large-scale cross-ancestry meta-analyses. The largest biobanks greatly vary in the size of the collection, and the amount of available phenotype and genotype data. Nevertheless, all of them are extensively used in genomics, providing a rich resource for genome-wide association analysis, genetic epidemiology, and statistical research into the structure, function, and evolution of the human genome. Recently, multiple research efforts were based on trans-biobank data integration, which increases sample size and allows for the identification of robust genetic associations. We provide prominent examples of such data integration and discuss important caveats which have to be taken into account in trans-biobank research. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Complications endangering mother or fetus affect around one in seven pregnant women. Investigation of the genetic susceptibility to such diseases is of high importance for better understanding of the disease biology as well as for prediction of individual risk. In this study, we collected and analyzed GWAS summary statistics from the FinnGen cohort and UK Biobank for 24 pregnancy complications. In FinnGen, we identified 11 loci associated with pregnancy hypertension, excessive vomiting, and gestational diabetes. When UK Biobank and FinnGen data were combined, we discovered six loci reaching genome-wide significance in the meta-analysis. These include rs35954793 in FGF5 ( p = 6.1 × 10 − 9 ), rs10882398 in PLCE1 ( p = 8.9 × 10 − 9 ), and rs167479 in RGL3 ( p = 5.2 × 10 − 9 ) for pregnancy hypertension, rs10830963 in MTNR1B ( p = 4.5 × 10 − 41 ) and rs36090025 in TCF7L2 ( p = 3.4 × 10 − 15 ) for gestational diabetes, and rs2963457 in the EBF1 locus ( p = 6.5 × 10 − 9 ) for preterm birth. In addition to the identified genome-wide associations, we also replicated 14 out of 40 previously reported GWAS markers for pregnancy complications, including four more preeclampsia-related variants. Finally, annotation of the GWAS results identified a causal relationship between gene expression in the cervix and gestational hypertension, as well as both known and previously uncharacterized genetic correlations between pregnancy complications and other traits. These results suggest new prospects for research into the etiology and pathogenesis of pregnancy complications, as well as early risk prediction for these disorders. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The COVID-19 pandemic has drawn the attention of many researchers to the interaction between pathogen and host genomes. Over the last two years, numerous studies have been conducted to identify the genetic risk factors that predict COVID-19 severity and outcome. However, such an analysis might be complicated in cohorts of limited size and/or in case of limited breadth of genome coverage. In this work, we tried to circumvent these challenges by searching for candidate genes and genetic variants associated with a variety of quantitative and binary traits in a cohort of 840 COVID-19 patients from Russia. While we found no gene- or pathway-level associations with the disease severity and outcome, we discovered eleven independent candidate loci associated with quantitative traits in COVID-19 patients. Out of these, the most significant associations correspond to rs1651553 in MYH14p = 1.4 × 10−7), rs11243705 in SETX (p = 8.2 × 10−6), and rs16885 in ATXN1 (p = 1.3 × 10−5). One of the identified variants, rs33985936 in SCN11A, was successfully replicated in an independent study, and three of the variants were found to be associated with blood-related quantitative traits according to the UK Biobank data (rs33985936 in SCN11A, rs16885 in ATXN1, and rs4747194 in CDH23). Moreover, we show that a risk score based on these variants can predict the severity and outcome of hospitalization in our cohort of patients. Given these findings, we believe that our work may serve as proof-of-concept study demonstrating the utility of quantitative traits and extensive phenotyping for identification of genetic risk factors of severe COVID-19. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]