Search

Background Although numerous studies have demonstrated a strong association between blood pressure (BP) and hemorrhagic complications of antithrombotic therapy, there is still a paucity of information regarding the status of BP control in hypertensive patients on antithrombotic therapy. Methods This cross-sectional, retrospective study was conducted at an outpatient clinic to examine BP control and its associated factors in hypertensive patients receiving or not receiving antithrombotic therapy. Results Of 26,803 outpatients who had scheduled visits in 2018, 7,800 hypertensive patients met the inclusion criteria, of whom 1,727 cases were on oral antithrombotic drugs. Then, target BP values were defined according to the Japanese Society of Hypertension Guidelines for the Management of Hypertension 2019. While BP values

Abstract Guidelines on the management of hypertension have been developed by various professional bodies and institutions to primarily address the issues of diagnosis, treatment, and control in order to rationalize and improve the management of hypertension. Hypertension guidelines across the world have recently been updated following the new and controversial lower blood pressure threshold of ≥130/80 mmHg for the diagnosis of hypertension adopted by the Americans. While there are differences between the major as well as between the Asian national guidelines, there were also many similarities. This paper discusses and highlights the differences and similarities between the major international guidelines of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association, of the European Society of Cardiology/European Society of Hypertension, and of the International Society of Hypertension and also compares them with the Asian guidelines.

Background Although numerous studies have demonstrated a strong association between blood pressure (BP) and hemorrhagic complications of antithrombotic therapy, there is still a paucity of information regarding the status of BP control in hypertensive patients on antithrombotic therapy. Methods This cross-sectional, retrospective study was conducted at an outpatient clinic to examine BP control and its associated factors in hypertensive patients receiving or not receiving antithrombotic therapy. Results Of 26,803 outpatients who had scheduled visits in 2018, 7,800 hypertensive patients met the inclusion criteria, of whom 1,727 cases were on oral antithrombotic drugs. Then, target BP values were defined according to the Japanese Society of Hypertension Guidelines for the Management of Hypertension 2019. While BP values <140/90 mmHg were observed in 63.0% and 61.6% of patients with and without antithrombotic therapy, respectively, only 31.1% and 23.4% of them displayed BP values <130/80 mmHg. Multivariable logistic analysis indicated that comorbidity with obesity was a significant correlate of insufficient BP control (target BP <130/80 mmHg) in hypertensive patients, irrespective of antithrombotic therapy (patients with antithrombotic therapy, odds ratio (OR) = 1.690, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.351–2.113; patients without antithrombotic therapy, OR = 1.475, 95% CI = 1.290–1.687). Conclusion The majority of patients exhibited BP values <140/90 mmHg, whereas BP values <130/80 mmHg were achieved only in a small proportion of the patients. Furthermore, obesity appeared to be one of the factors contributing to insufficient BP control in a real-world setting. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Der Internist is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Der Internist is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Although the awareness and control of hypertension have increased, improved achievement rates for target blood pressure (BP) levels remain an unmet need worldwide. Due to a multifactorial etiology of hypertension, BP targets cannot be reached with a single agent in most patients. Low adherence to antihypertensive treatment, which is in direct correlation with the number of medications prescribed, has been recognized as a major contributor to poor BP control. The need to improve BP control is reflected in the 2018 ESC/ESH Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension, which developed a simple and pragmatic treatment strategy for a more effective and faster lowering of BP to target levels - the most important issue in the management of hypertension. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim. (1) To investigate clinical characteristics of primary care patients with arterial hypertension (AH), according to the achievement of target blood pressure (BP) levels; (2) to assess the effectiveness of therapeutic measures aimed at achieving target BP and maintaining its long-term control. Material and methods. This retrospective analysis included the data from ambulatory medical records of 5558 AH patients, who attended primary care centres in 2007. Clinical characteristics were compared in patients with achieved vs. non-achieved target BP levels. According to the national AH guidelines (2004), the completeness of examination, pharmaceutical therapy tactics, and frequency of the follow-up were assessed in both groups. Results. Based on the 2007 data, target BP levels were maintained in 28% of AH patients. Mean BP level was 144/87 mm Hg. Patients with optimal BP levels, compared to their peers with inadequate BP control, had significantly (p

Purpose of Review: Detection of elevated blood pressure values in elderly patients represents a common clinical condition associated with an increased cardiovascular risk. This has been shown to be the case in both systodiastolic and isolated systolic hypertension as well. However, despite the evidence of the benefits of the blood pressure lowering intervention in terms of reduction of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, at least two issues related to antihypertensive drug treatment in aged individuals are still undefined: (1) the blood pressure threshold at which antihypertensive drug should be initiated and (2) the blood pressure goals of the therapeutic intervention. Recent Findings: The present paper will critically review the evidence available so far on these two issues as well as the position of current guidelines and consensus statements. Emphasis will be given to the analysis of the new data of the Systolic Blood Pressure Interventional Trial (SPRINT), which have recently demonstrated the benefits, even in individuals aged more than 75 years, of a tight blood pressure reduction to systolic blood pressure to 120 mmHg or less. The potential limitations of the trial will be also critically addressed and the expectations of ongoing clinical studies investigating the issue in elderly patients properly emphasized. Summary: Although of interest, the results of the SPRINT trial encompass a number of limitations which limit their applicability to the general elderly hypertensive population. A prudent approach will be to adopt in clinical practice the less intensive and more conservative targets recommended by current guidelines. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]