Search

The aim of this study was to assess the ontogenetic changes in vitro in both the responsiveness of anterior pituitary tissue to growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH) and the critical role of GHRH in the long-term regulation of pulsatile GH secretion during perinatal porcine life. A superfusion system was used to apply three consecutive 10-min pulses of GHRH (the first of 1 nM and the other two of 10 nM) for 3 consecutive days in pituitary glands isolated from fetal (95- and 110-day) and neonatal (12-day) male pigs. In fetuses, total GHRH-induced GH release decreased progressively over the 3 days. However, in neonates, GH did not decrease until day 3, but remained higher than in fetuses. When each GH pulse was assessed individually, fetuses showed a similar pattern. GH secretion induced by the first GHRH pulse on days 1 and 2 was lower than that induced by the second and third pulses. By day 3, GH release lowered dramatically after all pulses. In contrast, in neonates no differences were observed among the GH levels induced by the three GHRH pulses at any day, although day 3 showed lower GH rates. In conclusion, during perinatal development, a desensitizing effect to long-term repetitive GHRH pulses was observed in both fetuses and neonates, but this effect was delayed in neonates. Thus, the capacity of somatotrope cells to maintain GH response to GHRH seems to be developmentally regulated during perinatal stages. Furthermore, the frequency of GHRH pulses, rather than the concentrations, might be a key factor to elicit desensitization., (Copyright © 2012 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Somatotropes comprise two morphologically and functionally distinct subpopulations of low (LD) and high (HD) density cells. We recently reported that GRF induces different patterns of increase in the cytosolic free Ca2+ concentration in single porcine LD and HD somatotropes, which for LD cells required not only Ca2+ influx but also intracellular Ca2+ mobilization. This suggested that GRF may activate multiple signaling pathways in pig LD and HD somatotropes to stimulate GH secretion. To address this question, we first assessed the direct GRF effect on second messenger activation in cultures of LD and HD cells by measuring cAMP levels and [3H]myo-inositol incorporation. Secondly, to determine the relative importance of cAMP- and inositol phosphate (IP)-dependent pathways, and of intra- and extracellular Ca2+, GRF-induced GH release from cultured LD and HD somatotropes was measured in the presence of specific blockers. GRF increased cAMP levels in both subpopulations, whereas it only augmented IP turnover in LD cells. Accordingly, adenylate cyclase inhibition by MDL-12,330A abolished GRF-stimulated GH release in both subpopulations, whereas phospholipase C inhibition by U-73122 only reduced this effect partially in LD cells. Likewise, blockade of Ca2+ influx with Cl2Co reduced GRF-stimulated GH secretion in both LD and HD somatotropes, whereas depletion of thapsigargin-sensitive intracellular Ca2+ stores only decreased the secretory response to GRF in LD cells. These results demonstrate that GRF specifically and differentially activates multiple signaling pathways in two somatotrope subpopulations to stimulate GH release. Thus, although the prevailing signaling cascade employed by GRF in both subpopulations is adenylate cyclase/cAMP/extracellular Ca2+, the peptide also requires activation of the phospholipase C/IP/intracellular Ca2+ pathway to exert its full effect in porcine LD somatotropes.

Porcine somatotropes can be separated by Percoll density gradient centrifugation into low (LD) and high density (HD) subpopulations that differ ultrastructurally and functionally. Here, we report the effects of growth hormone-releasing factor (GRF) on the cytosolic free calcium concentration ([Ca2+]i) of single LD and HD somatotropes. Resting [Ca2+]i in LD somatotropes was 2-fold higher than in HD cells. GRF induced [Ca2+]i increases in a similar percentage of somatotropes from both subsets. However, amplitude and kinetics of the responses were markedly different. In all responsive LD somatotropes, GRF evoked a rapid initial peak followed by a sustained plateau (plateau-type response). Blockade of extracellular Ca2+ entry by 3 mM EDTA, 2 mM CoCl2, or 100 microM verapamil completely abolished the plateau phase without affecting the initial Ca2+ spike. Conversely, only the plateau phase was preserved in thapsigargin (TG)-treated LD cells. The vast majority of GRF-responsive HD somatotropes exhibited a transient [Ca2+]i peak that returned gradually to baseline (transient-type response). This response was completely blocked by removal of extracellular Ca2+, whereas TG treatment had no effect. Taken together, our results indicate that the response of LD somatotropes to GRF depends on mobilization of Ca2+ of both extra- and intracellular origin, whereas that of HD somatotropes seems to be exclusively dependent on extracellular Ca2+ entry through L-type voltage sensitive Ca2+ channels (VSCC). These findings are the first to demonstrate a differential effect of GRF on Ca2+ mobilization in two somatotrope subpopulations, and suggest the existence of differences in the GRF receptor(s) expressed in each subpopulation and/or in the intracellular signalling pathways activated upon GRF binding.

Growth hormone (GH)-releasing hexapeptide (GHRP-6) belongs to the expanding family of synthetic GH secretagogues (GHSs). Previous studies have shown that non-peptidyl GHRP-6 analogues stimulate GH release in vivo in pigs, and interact synergistically with GH-releasing factor (GRF), but its direct effects on porcine somatotropes have not been addressed hitherto. In the present study, we have evaluated the response of cultured porcine pituitary cells to GHRP-6, and its interaction with GRF and somatostatin (SRIF). Secretory response of somatotropes was assessed by using two distinct techniques. GH released by monolayer cell cultures was evaluated by enzyme immunoassay, whereas that secreted by individual somatotropes was measured by immunodensitometry using a cell blotting assay. Our results demonstrate that both GHRP-6 and GRF stimulated GH release from monolayer cultures at doses equal to or above 10(-9) M. Use of cell immunoblot assay demonstrated that, like GRF, the hexapeptide acts directly upon porcine somatotropes to exert its action. Moreover, regardless of the technique applied, combined administration of GHRP-6 (10(-6) or 10(-9) M) and GRF (10(-8) M) resulted in an additive, but not synergistic, stimulatory GH response. Finally, SRIF (10(-7) M) inhibited the stimulatory effect of GHRP-6 alone or in combination with GRF. These results indicate that GHRP-6 directly and effectively stimulates GH secretion from porcine somatotropes in vitro, and acts additively when coadministered with GRF. Therefore, the synergistic stimulatory effect of GHSs and GRF reported in vivo in this species might require additional factors that are lacking in the in vitro situation.

The physiological mechanism underlying the enormously elevated fetal plasma GH concentrations in mammalian species is not well understood. We postulated that a decreased sensitivity to the inhibitory effects of somatostatin (SRIH) and insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) at the pituitary level during porcine fetal life might be one factor in the high plasma GH levels. Therefore, the acute effects of GH-releasing hormone (GHRH), SRIH, and IGF-1 on GH release from the porcine anterior pituitary (AP) were studied using a perifusion system. AP tissue pieces from male and female fetuses (95 days postcoitum) and piglets (10-12 days postpartum) were perifused (at least 6 replicates per treatment and sex) at a rate of 0.1 ml/min and fractions were collected at 10-min intervals. Tissue was subjected to various treatments in random order: a 10-min GHRH pulse (1 nM) with or without concomitant 40-min exposure to SRIH (1, 10 or 100 nM) or IGF-1 (1 or 10 nM) or exposure to SRIH or IGF-1 alone (10 nM each). None of the treatments revealed sex differences, therefore data from males and females were pooled. Exposure to GHRH resulted in a rapid stimulatory GH response both in fetuses (from 61.1 +/- 4.1 to 125.6 +/- 4.7 ng GH.80 min-1.mg-1 AP, p < 0.05) and neonates (from 58.1 +/- 5.3 to 104.6 +/- 4.5 ng GH.80 min-1.mg-1 AP, p < 0.05). Exposure to the lowest dose of SRIH or IGF-1 (1 nM) during GHRH pulse inhibited (p < 0.05) the GH response to GHRH in neonates (74.3 +/- 3.9 and 72.5 +/- 6.3 ng GH.80 min-1.mg-1 AP, respectively), but not in fetuses (115.9 +/- 5.8 and 118.7 +/- 5.4 ng GH.80 min-1.mg-1 AP, respectively). When high doses of SRIH (10 or 100 nM) or IGF-1 (10 nM) were used, the GHRH-induced GH release was totally blocked in neonates (p < 0.05). However, in fetuses the GH response was inhibited only during the first 40 min after GHRH, and a rebound or delay effect occurred during the next 40 min. Irrespective of these general findings, some individual profiles from fetuses (4 profiles) showed that 1 nM SRIH or IGF-1 could inhibit GHRH-induced GH secretion. In contrast, individual profiles from neonates indicated that high doses of SRIH (7 profiles) or IGF-1 (5 profiles) were unable to block GH release stimulated by GHRH. On the other hand, a paradoxical stimulation of GH was observed during treatment with SRIH alone in three individual profiles from fetuses. These data confirm our hypothesis that the highly elevated plasma GH levels in the porcine fetus in vivo (compared to neonates) may be explained, at least in part, by a decreased sensitivity to the inhibitory effects of SRIH and IGF-1 at the pituitary level during fetal life. Results from some profiles indicated individual variations in the maturation of the GH control system, and moreover, even a 'paradoxical' enhancement of GH release in some fetal GH profiles.