Search

The diagnosis of GH deficiency (GHD) in adults is established by laboratory testing in patients with an appropriate clinical history of hypothalamic pituitary disease. As the measurement of IGF-I and IGFBP-3 levels as well as the spontaneous GH secretion are not considered reliable parameters, the diagnosis of GHD in adults may be established by GH provocative tests, provided that a reproducible test with clear normative limits is available. The insulin tolerance test (ITT) is a reliable diagnostic test in adults, but is contraindicated in several clinical conditions which are often observed in adult patients with suspected GHD. The other classic GH provocative tests, except the glucagon test, have a poor diagnostic utility and should be abandoned. GHRH combined with arginine or GH secretagogues represent a potent, safe, reproducible and reliable test which should be preferable to the ITT as a first-choice diagnostic test for GHD.

Unlike normal subjects, in patients with anorexia nervosa (AN) the GH response to GHRH is refractory to the increasing and inhibitory effect of cholinergic agonists and antagonists, respectively. This cholinergic impairment could reflect malnutrition-induced exhaustion of acetylcholine (Ach) precursors. We studied whether treatment with glycerophosphocholine (GLY), an Ach precursor, could disclose the potentiating effect of pyridostigmine (PD) on the GH response to GHRH in AN. In 6 young women with AN (AW) we studied the GH response to iv GHRH (1.0 microg/kg) alone and combined with oral PD (120 mg) before and after 1 month of oral treatment with GLY (400 mg thrice daily). Eight age-matched normal women (NW) were studied as controls. Before GLY, basal GH levels in AW were higher (p < 0.05) than in NW. The GH response to GHRH in AW was higher (p < 0.05) than in NW. PD failed to modify the GHRH-induced GH rise in AW, while it enhanced it in NW (p < 0.05). One month treatment with GLY in AW did not modify the GH response to GHRH either alone or combined with PD. This study shows the existence of a derangement in the cholinergic control of somatotroph function in AN and indicates that treatment with Ach precursors does not exert any effect on this impairment. This could reflect primary alterations of cholinergic neurons, though the effectiveness of more prolonged treatment and/or higher doses of cholinergic precursors needs to be verified.

Growth hormone secretagogues (GHSs) are synthetic peptidyl and nonpeptidyl molecules with strong, dose-dependent, and reproducible growth hormone (GH)-releasing activity even after oral administration. GHSs release GH via actions on specific receptors (GHS-R) at the pituitary and, mainly, at the hypothalamic levels. GHSs likely act as functional somatostatin antagonists and meantime enhance the activity of GH-releasing hormone (GHRH)-secreting neurons. The GH-releasing effect of GHSs is independent of gender but undergoes marked age-related variations. Estrogens play a major role in enhancing the GH response to GHSs at puberty, which GHRH hypoactivity, somatostatinergic hyperactivity and impaired activity of the putative GHS-like ligand and receptors probably explain the reduced GH-releasing effect of GHSs in aging. The activity of GHSs is not fully specific for GH. Their slight prolactin-releasing activity probably comes from direct pituitary action. In physiological conditions, the ACTH-releasing activity of GHSs is dependent on central actions; a direct action on GHS-R in pituitary ACTH-secreting tumors likely explains the peculiar ACTH and cortisol hyperresponsiveness to GHSs in Cushing disease. GHSs have specific receptor subtypes in other central and peripheral endocrine and nonendocrine tissues mediating GH-independent biologic activities. GHSs influence sleep pattern, stimulate food intake, and have cardiovascular activities. GHs have specific binding in normal and neoplastic follicular derived human thyroid tissue and inhibit the proliferation of follicular-derived neoplastic cell lines. The discovery of ghrelin, a 28 amino acid peptide synthesized in the stomach but also in other tissues, has opened new fascinating perspectives of research in this field.

Adults with growth hormone (GH) deficiency (GHD) have impaired health, which improves with GH replacement. GHD in adulthood leads to impairment in body composition and structure functions as well as to deranged lipoprotein and carbohydrate metabolism leading to increased cardiovascular morbidity. Therefore the transition adolescent in whom severe GHD is confirmed has to continue GH replacement with an appropriate age-related dosage. All short children who have been treated with rhGH for classical and non-classical GHD should be suspected as potentially GHD in adulthood though only in classical organic and idiopathic forms is severe GHD likely to be confirmed. GHD must be shown biochemically by single provocative testing. Insulin-induced hypoglycemia (ITT) and GHRH + arginine are the tests of choice provided that appropriate cutoff limits are assumed; these tests show good specificity and sensitivity. Testing with GHRH + GH secretagogues is another reliable alternative. Low IGF-I levels can be definitive evidence of persistent severe GHD in patients with genetic GHD or panhypopituitarism, but normal IGF-I levels do not rule out severe GHD. Individual titration of the rhGH dose is recommended and measurement of IGF-I levels is needed for monitoring the adequacy of replacement. The mean GH dose for replacement in the transition adolescent, however, is still higher than in adulthood; after puberty the rhGH dose should be progressively decreased in the following years (probably up to 25 years old) in order to obtain optimal peak bone mass.

Objectives: The classical 'GH neurosecretory dysfunction' (GHNSD) refers to slowly growing children with normal GH responses to classical provocative tests but impaired spontaneous GH secretion over 24 h frequently leading to low IGF-I levels. Thus it has been assumed that these subjects have insufficiency of spontaneous GH secretion due to neuroendocrine abnormalities in spite of a normal releasable pool of GH. However, classical provocative tests do not reliably assess the maximal somatotroph capacity; thus it is still unclear if the GH pool is really preserved or not. GHRH + arginine test is more potent than the classical tests and evaluates the maximal secretory capacity of somatotroph cells. The GH response to this stimulus is reproducible and also independent of age and puberty., Design and Patients: We studied the GH response to GHRH (1 microgram/kg iv) + arginine (ARG, 0.5 g/kg iv) in 19 short children with GHNSD (14 boys and 5 girls, age: 12.1 +/- 0.7 years, pubertal stages I-III, HV-SDS between -1.6 and -4.9; GH peak > 10 micrograms/l after classical stimuli but mean GH concentration (mGHc) < 3 micrograms/l). The results in GHNSD were compared with those in 38 short children with idiopathic or organic severe GHD (GHD, 29 boys and 9 girls, age: 11.2 +/- 0.6 years, pubertal stages I-III, HV-SDS between -1.8 and -4.4; GH peak < 10 micrograms/l after 2 classical provocative tests) and in 83 children with normal or familial short stature (NC, 59 boys and 24 girls, age: 11.5 +/- 0.3 years., pubertal stages I-III; HV-SDS > 25th centile, normal IGF-I levels)., Results: Mean IGF-I levels in GHNSD (121.9 +/- 20.3 micrograms/l) were lower (P < 0.001) than those in NC (270.3 +/- 13.8 micrograms/l) but higher (P < 0.001) than those in GHD (72.0 +/- 4.0 micrograms/l). The mean GH concentration (mGHc) in GHNSD (2.1 +/- 0.1 micrograms/l) was lower (P < 0.01) than that in NC (4.9 +/- 0.5 micrograms/l) but higher (P < 0.01) than that in GHD (1.5 +/- 0.2 micrograms/l). On the other hand, the mean peak GH response to GHRH + ARG in GHNSD (43.7 +/- 3.7 micrograms/l) was markedly higher (P < 0.001) than that in GHD (8.2 +/- 0.9 micrograms/l) but significantly lower (P < 0.01) than that in NC (60. 4 +/- 2.7 micrograms/l). All GHD patients had peak GH responses to GHRH + ARG below the 3rd centile limit of normality (20 micrograms/l), while all GHNSD patients had peak GH responses within the normal range. No significant correlation was found between GH peak after GHRH + ARG, mGHc and IGF-I levels in each group., Conclusion: Our study demonstrates that short children with 'GH neurosecretory dysfunction' show reduction in the GH releasable pool evaluated by the provocative and potent GHRH + arginine test. However, the peak GH response to a single GHRH + arginine test in GH neurosecretory dysfunction is always within the normal range indicating that this test as well as classical stimuli does not distinguish normal subjects from GH neurosecretory dysfunction.

Background: Diagnosing GH deficiency in adults is difficult due to the age-related variations of GH/IGF-I axis and the influence of nutrition. Nowadays, GH replacement is allowed for patients with GH peak to provocative stimuli < 3 micrograms/L. Somatotrope insufficiency is present in hypopituitarism but also in obesity and hypercortisolism. However, to evaluate GH insufficiency in adults is difficult due to variations of GH and IGF-I levels as function of age and nutrition status., Methods: We aimed to verify the GH response to GHRH (1 mg/kg i.v.) combined with pyridostigmine (PD, 120 mg p.o.) or arginine (ARG, 0.5 g/kg i.v.), in 26 hypopituitaric patients (GHD), in 11 obese women (OB), in 8 women with Cushing's syndrome (CS), and in 72 control subjects (NS)., Results: IGF-I levels in GHD were lower than those in OB (p < 0.01) and in CS (p < 0.01) which, in turn, were lower to those in NS (p < 0.02). In NS, the GH peak responses to GHRH + PD and GHRH + ARG were similar and the minimum normal GH peak was 16.5 mg/L. GHD had GH responses similar, lower than those in NS (p < 0.01) and always below the normal limit. However, only 12/20 and 8/14 had peaks < 3 micrograms/L; conventionally, below this limit severe GH deficiency is shown and rhGH replacement is allowed. In OB, the GH responses to GHRH + PD and GHRH + ARG were similar, lower (p < 0.01) and higher (p < 0.01) than those in NS and GHD, respectively. Six out of 11 OB had GH peaks below the normal limits but nobody < 3 micrograms/L. In CS, the GH response to GHRH + PD was lower than that to GHRH + ARG (p < 0.01); both these responses were lower than those in NS (p < 0.01) and even in OB (p < 0.01) but higher than those in GHD (p < 0.01). All and 7/8 CS had GH peaks lower than normal limits after PD + GHRH and ARG + GHRH, respectively while 6/8 showed GH peak < 3 micrograms/L after PD + GHRH but only 1 after ARG + GHRH., Conclusions: Present data demonstrate that the maximal somatotrope secretory capacity is reduced in OB and even more in CS. From a diagnostic point of view, PD + GHRH and ARG + GHRH tests distinguish OB from severe GHD. As hypercortisolism impairs the activity of cholinesterase inhibitors, only ARG + GHRH, but not PD + GHRH is a reliable test to explore the maximal somatotrope secretory capacity in CS. Notably, even with the ARG + GHRH test, in CS the maximal somatotrope secretory capacity is sometimes so reduced as to overlap with that of severe GHD.

The aim of this review is to answer two questions. The first question is: is there any alternative provocative test equal to, or even better than, the insulin-tolerance test (ITT), the so-called gold standard, for the diagnosis of growth hormone deficiency (GHD) in adults and the elderly? The answer is 'yes'. In fact, when combined with arginine or pyridostigmine, growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH) becomes one of the most potent and reproducible tests for distinguishing patients with severe GHD from normal subjects. Owing to its tolerability and its suitability for use in the elderly, the GHRH + arginine test is the best alternative choice and is at least as sensitive as the ITT provided that appropriate cut-off limits are given. The second question is: is there any therapeutic approach alternative to recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH) for adult and elderly patients with GHD and/or for the somatopause? At present, the answer is 'no'. Growth hormone (GH)-releasing substances need the functional integrity of somatotroph cells to induce the release of growth hormone. Probably only patients with childhood-onset, isolated GHD (frequently hypothalamic-dependent) could benefit from treatment with GHRH or growth hormone secretagogues (GHS). Whenever restoration of the activity of the GH/insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) axis in the elderly would be of use, GHRH and/or GH secretagogues would be good candidates. In fact, the existence of a considerable pool of releasable growth hormone has been demonstrated in the elderly.

Growth hormone secretagogues (GHS) are synthetic, non-natural peptidyl and nonpeptidyl molecules with potent stimulatory effect on somatotrope secretion. They have no structural homology with growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH) and act via a specific receptor, which has now been cloned and is present at both the pituitary and hypothalamic level. This evidence strongly suggests the existence of a still unknown natural GHS-like ligand. Several data favour the hypothesis that GHS could counteract somatostatinergic activity at both the pituitary and hypothalamic level and/or, at least partially, via a GHRH-mediated mechanism. However, the possibility that they act via an unknown hypothalamic factor remains open. GH-releasing peptide-6 (GHRP-6) is the first hexapeptide studied extensively in humans. More recently, peptidyl superanalogues GHRP-1, GHRP-2 and hexarelin, and nonpeptidyl mimetics, such as the spiroindoline derivative MK-677, have been synthesized and their effects have been studied in humans. The GH-releasing activity of GHS is marked, dose related and reproducible after intravenous, subcutaneous, intranasal and even oral administration. The effect of GHS is partially desensitized but prolonged, intermittent oral administration increases insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) levels. The GH-releasing effect of GHS undergoes age-related variations; it increases from birth to puberty, remains similar in adulthood and decreases with ageing. The effect of GHS on GH release is synergistic with that of GHRH, while it is only partially refractory to inhibitory influences, which nearly abolish the effect of GHRH. GHS maintain their GH-releasing activity in some somatotrope hypersecretory states such as acromegaly, anorexia nervosa, hyperthyroidism and critical illness. The GH response to GHS has been reported clear although reduced in GH deficiency, obesity and hypothyroidism, while it is strongly reduced in patients with pituitary stalk disconnection or Cushing's syndrome. In short children, elderly subjects, critically ill patients and even in adult patients with GH deficiency an increase of IGF-I has been shown after GHS treatment. These data indicate that treatment with orally active GHS in humans enhances the activity of the GH-IGF-I axis and could be clinically useful.

Background: In anorexia nervosa (AN), growth hormone (GH) hypersecretion and low insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) levels are present. It is unclear whether this is due to a peripheral GH resistance and a reduced IGF-I negative feedback on GH secretion or to a primary hypothalamic dysfunction. In AN, in contrast to normal subjects, cholinergic antagonists and agonists, whose action is somatostatin (SS)-mediated, have reduced and absent effects on the GH response to growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH). Since arginine, another substance acting via inhibition of SS, maintains its potentiating effect on GH secretion in AN, it has been hypothesized that somewhat specific alteration of the SS-mediated cholinergic influence may be present in this condition. To further clarify the neural control of AH secretion in AN, we evaluated the effects of beta-adrenergic agonists and antagonists, which are known to inhibit and increase, respectively, the GHRH-induced GH secretion in normal subjects., Methods: We studied the effect of atenolol (ATE), a beta 1-adrenergic antagonist, and salbutamol (SALB), a beta 2-adrenergic agonist, on the GHRH-induced GH release in 10 patients with AN and in 10 normal age-matched women (NW)., Results: Basal GH levels were higher, whereas IGF-I were lower in AN than in NW. The GHRH-induced GH rise in AN was higher than that in NW. ATE significantly enhanced the GH response to GHRH in NW, but not in AN. The GH responses to GHRH after ATE pretreatment were similar in NW and in AN. The GH response to GHRH was inhibited by SALB in both NW and AN. The GH responses to GHRH after SALB pretreatment were similar in NW and AN., Conclusions: These data reveal an exaggerated somatotrope responsiveness to GHRH in AN that is not further increased by beta-adrenergic blockade, while is abolished by beta-adrenergic activation. This suggests that an impairment of beta-adrenergic influence on GH secretion is present in anorexia nervosa.

Objective: An increased basal growth hormone (GH) secretion and a parodoxical GH response to the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) have been reported in patients with liver cirrhosis. It has been suggested that the ratio between branched-chain amino acids (BCAAs) and aromatic amino acids (AAAs) (BCAA/ AAA ratio) may determine in part the brain concentration of the AAAs, since the BCAAs compete with the AAAs for entry across the blood-brain barrier, leading to the accumulation of false neurotransmitters such as octopamine and phenylethanolamine, which are able to stimulate GH secretion (via alpha 2-adrenergic stimulation). In this study we investigated the role of amino acids, particularly the BCAA/AAA ratio, in the paradoxical response of GH to the OGTT in patients with liver cirrhosis., Patients and Design: Twelve non-diabetic patients with biopsy-proven cirrhosis of the liver underwent an OGTT. Three of the five patients with a paradoxical response of GH to the OGTT underwent a second oral glucose administration associated with an infusion of BCAA solution from -30 min until 180 min., Results: During the OGTT, glucose and insulin levels increased from 4.8 +/- 0.2 to 9.6 +/- 0.7 mmol/l (P < 0.001) and from 18.8 +/- 2.6 to 104.4 +/- 13.8 mU/l (P < 0.005), respectively. GH levels increased from 8.6 +/- 2.6 to 22.4 +/- 10.8 mU/l although not significantly. Five patients had a paradoxical GH response to the OGTT. A negative correlation between serum GH values and BCAA/AAA ratio in the plasma at every time point of the OGTT was found. After co-administration of glucose and BCAA in three patients the BCAA/AAAs ratio increased, abolishing the paradoxical GH secretion., Conclusions: Our data suggest that in liver cirrhosis the altered BCAA/AAA ratio may influence the altered basal GH secretion and the paradoxical GH response to the OGTT, probably by an increase of adrenergic mediators in the brain. Moreover, the increase of BCAA/AAA ratio seems to be able to abolish the GH paradoxical response to the OGTT.

Objectives: Hexarelin (HEX) is a synthetic hexapeptide belonging to the growth hormone-releasing peptide (GHRP) family. The exact mechanism underlying the strong GH-releasing activity of GHRPs is still unclear, though it has been shown that they act both at the pituitary and the hypothalamic level, where they have specific receptors. To clarify the influence of the cholinergic system on the GH-releasing activity of GHRPs in man, we investigated the effects of pyridostigmine, a cholinergic agonist which stimulates GH secretion by inhibiting somatostatin release, on the GH response to various HEX doses., Design: We studied the GH release induced by various HEX doses (0.25, 0.5 and 2.0 micrograms/kg i.v.) and pyridostigmine (PD, 120 mg po), both alone and coadministered. The interactions between the lowest HEX dose or PD and the maximally effective GHRH dose (1.0 microgram/kg i.v.) were also studied., Subjects: Six normal male volunteers, aged 24-30 years, were studied., Measurements: Serum GH was measured in duplicate by immunoradiometric assay., Results: The GH response to HEX administration was dose-dependent. In fact, the GH response to 0.25 microgram/kg HEX (AUC, mean +/- SEM: 816.4 (235.6 mU/l/120 min) was lower, although not significantly, than that to 0.5 microgram/kg HEX (2154.6 +/- 491.6 mU/l/120 min), which, in turn, was lower (p < 0.05) than that after 2.0 micrograms/kg HEX (4819.2 +/- 668.0 mU/l/120 min). The GH rise after GHRH (1299.2 +/- 222.8 mU/l/120 min) was lower (P < 0.05) than that after 2.0 micrograms/kg HEX, but not different from the responses to either 0.25 or 0.5 microgram/kg HEX. PD induced a significant GH rise (559.0 +/- 129.8 mU/l/120 min, P < 0.05 vs saline), similar to that after 0.25 microgram/kg HEX, and lower than those after both 0.5 and 2.0 micrograms/kg HEX (P < 0.05 and p < 0.01, respectively) and GHRH (p < 0.05). PD pretreatment enhanced the GH response to the lowest HEX dose (1961.4 +/- 253.8 mU/l/120 min, p < 0.05) in an additive way, but failed to modify the GH response to either 0.5 or 2.0 micrograms/kg HEX (2753.6 +/- 444.6 and 5179.0 +/- 770.8 mU/l/120 min, respectively). Notably, the GH response to 0.25 microgram/kg HEX + PD was still lower (P < 0.05) than that to 2.0 micrograms/kg HEX. PD pretreatment as well as 0.25 microgram/kg HEX truly potentiated the GH response to GHRH to the same extent (4926.6 +/- 912.8 mU/l/120 min, p < 0.05 and 5958.8 +/- 750.0 mU/l/120 min, p < 0.05 respectively). The GH responses to PD + GHRH and 0.25 microgram/kg HEX + GHRH were similar to that after 2.0 micrograms/kg HEX alone., Conclusions: Our results demonstrate that pyridostigmine is able to enhance the GH response only to a very low dose Hexarelin which, in turn, potentiates the GHRH-induced GH rise to the same extent as pyridostigmine. As there is evidence that GHRPs do not inhibit hypothalamic somatostatin release, these findings are consistent with the hypothesis that they act by antagonizing somatostatin activity and/or through unknown factors. On the other hand, though there is evidence showing that GHRH activity is needed for GHRP action, our findings indicate that GHRPs act, at least partially, independently of GHRH.

Growth hormone-releasing peptides (GHRPs) are synthetic, non-natural peptides endowed with potent stimulatory effects on somatotrope secretion in animals and humans. They have no structural homology with GHRH and act via specific receptors present either at the pituitary or the hypothalamic level both in animals and in humans. The GHRP receptor has recently been cloned and, interestingly, it does not show sequence homology with other G-protein-coupled receptors known so far. This evidence strongly suggests the existence of a natural GHRP-like ligand which, however, has not yet been found. The mechanisms underlying the GHRP effect are still unclear. At present, several data favor the hypothesis that GHRPs could act by counteracting somatostatinergic activity both at the pituitary and the hypothalamic level and/or, at least partially, via a GHRH-mediated mechanism. However, the possibility that GHRPs act via an unknown hypothalamic factor (U factor) is still open. GHRP-6 was the first hexapeptide to be extensively studied in humans. More recently, a heptapeptide, GHRP-1, and two other hexapeptides, GHRP-2 and Hexarelin, have been synthesized and are now available for human studies. Moreover, non-peptidyl GHRP mimetics have been developed which act via GHRP receptors and their effects have been clearly demonstrated in animals and in humans in vivo. Among non-peptidyl GHRPs, MK-0677 seems the most interesting molecule. The GH-releasing activity of GHRPs is marked and dose-related after intravenous, subcutaneous, intranasal and even oral administration. The effect of GHRPs is reproducible and undergoes partial desensitization, more during continuous infusion, less during intermittent administration: in fact, prolonged administration of GHRPs increases IGF-1 levels both in animals and in humans. The GH-releasing effect of GHRPs does not depend on sex but undergoes age-related variations. It increases from birth to puberty, persists at a similar level in adulthood and decreases thereafter. By the sixth decade of life, the activity of GHRPs is reduced but it is still marked and higher than that of GHRH. The GH-releasing activity of GHRPs is synergistic with that of GHRH, is not affected by opioid receptor antagonists, such as naloxone, and is only blunted by inhibitory influences, including neurotransmitters, glucose, free fatty acids, gluco corticoids, recombinant human GH and even exogenous somatostatin, which are known to almost abolish the effect of GHRH. GHRPs maintain their GH-releasing effect in somatotrope hypersecretory states such as in acromegaly, anorexia nervosa and hyperthyroidism. On the other hand, their good GH-releasing activity has been shown in some but not in other somatotrope hyposecretory states. In fact, reduced GH responses after GHRP administration have been reported in idiopathic GH deficiency as well as in idiopathic short stature, in obesity and in hypothyroidism, while in patients with pituitary stalk disconnection or Cushing's syndrome the somatotrope responsiveness to GHRPs is almost absent. In short children an increase in height velocity has also been reported during chronic GHRP treatment. Thus, based on their marked GH-releasing effect even after oral administration, GHRPs offer their own clinical usefulness for treatment of some GH hyposecretory states.

The reliability of provocative stimuli of GH secretion in the diagnosis of GH deficiency is still controversial. Until now, normative values of GH response to various stimuli have not been established properly. In 472 children and adolescents with normal stature (n = 295, height SDS range -1.5 to 1.2) or normal short stature (n = 177, height SDS range -3.7 to -1.8), we studied the GH response to physical exercise, insulin-induced hypoglycemia, arginine (ARG), clonidine, levodopa, glucagon, pyridostigmine (PD), GHRH, PD + GHRH, and ARG + GHRH. The peak GH responses (range) to various stimuli were: 1) physical exercise: 3.0-28.3 micrograms/L; 2) insulin-induced hypoglycemia: 2.7-46.4 micrograms/L; 3) ARG: 0.5-48.4 micrograms/L; 4) clonidine: 3.8-86.0 micrograms/L; 5) levodopa: 1.9-40.0 micrograms/L; 6) glucagon: 1.9-49.5 micrograms/L; 7) PD: 2.5-35.0 micrograms/L; 8) GHRH: 2.7-102.7 micrograms/L; 9)PD + GHRH: 19.6-106.0 micrograms/L; and 10) ARG + GHRH: 19.4-120.0 micrograms/L. Our results show that all conventional stimuli of GH secretion frequently failed to increase GH levels, showing values lower than that arbitrarily assumed, so far, as minimum normal GH peak, i.e. 7 or 10 micrograms/L. When combined with PD or ARG (substances inhibiting hypothalamic somatostatin release), GHRH becomes the most powerful test to explore the secretory capacity of somatotrope cells (the GH response being always higher than 19 micrograms/L). Therefore, only GHRH combined with PD or ARG may be able to clearly differentiate normal children from patients with GH deficiency, though a normal GH response to these tests cannot rule out the existence of GH hyposecretory state because of hypothalamic dysfunction.

In hyperprolactinemic patients an exaggerated glucose-induced insulin secretion has been reported, but these results have not been confirmed by other researchers. On the other hand, there are few data concerning somatotrope secretion in this condition. In order to clarify these points, in seven normal weight hyperprolactinemic female patients (HP: age 18-46 years, body mass index = 21.8 +/- 0.6 kg/m(2), basal prolactin = 91.7 +/- 16.5 micrograms/l) we studied the effects of glucose load (100 g orally) and/or arginine (0.5 g/kg infused over 30 min) on insulin glucose and growth hormone (GH) levels. These results were compared with those obtained in seven patients with simple obesity (OB: age 23-48 years, body mass index = 38.3 +/- 2.6 kg/m(2)) in whom exaggerated insulin and low GH secretion are well known. Seven normal women (NS: age 26-32 years, body mass index = 20.6 +/- 1/9 kg/m(2)) were studied as controls. The insulin response to glucose in HP (area under curve = 11,460.8 +/- 1407.5 mU x min x l(-1)) was not significantly different from NS (7743.7 +/- 882.9 mU x min x l(-1)) and OB (14,504.8 +/- 1659.9 mU x min x l(-1)). The arginine-induced insulin release in HP and OB was similar (4219.4 +/- 631.7 and 4107.3 +/- 643.2 mU x min x l(-1), respectively), both being higher (p < 0.02) than in NS (2178.1 +/- 290.9 mU x min x l(-1). Glucose and arginine had an additive effect on insulin release in HP and NS (19,769.1 +/- 3249.6 and 10,996.6 +/- 1201.0 mU x min 1(-1), respectively) and a synergistic effect in OB (28 117.3 +/- 5224.7 mU x min x l(-1)). In HP the insulin response to the combined administration of glucose and arginine was not significantly different from the one in OB, and both were higher (p < 0.05) than in NS. The increase in glucose levels after glucose administered on its own or combined with arginine was higher (p < 0.02) and longer lasting in OB than in NS and HP. After arginine in OB, the glucose levels did not show the late decrease under baseline values observed in HP and NS. Glucose inhibited GH secretion both in HP and NS (p < 0.05), while arginine stimulated it in all groups, although the GH response in HP and NS was higher (p < 0.03) than in OB. The arginine-induced GH secretion was inhibited by glucose in HP and NS but not in OB. These results demonstrate that both in hyperprolactinemic patients and in obesity there is a clear increase in insulin secretion. The insulin hyperresponsiveness in hyperprolactinemia is more clearly demonstrated by combined stimulation with glucose and arginine. In spite of similar insulin hypersecretion in hyperprolactinemic and obese patients, GH secretion is reduced only in the latter; with these data the hypothesis that somatotrope insufficiency in obesity is due to hyperinsulinism is unlikely.

The activity of the GH-IGF-I axis undergoes an age-related reduction and in the elderly both spontaneous GH secretion and IGF-I levels are frequently low overlapping with those usually recorded in GH deficient patients. Hypoactivity of the GH-IGF-I axis could explain age-related changes in body composition, function and metabolism, as also indicated by evidence that treatment with rhGH reverses these alterations. The mechanisms underlying the hypoactivity of the GH-IGF-I axis in the aged likely include changes in nutrition and lifestyle, e.g. reduction of physical exercise. However, alterations of neurohormonal hypothalamic control of GH secretion, including reduced activity of GHRH-secreting neurons and somatostatinergic hyper-activity, seem to play a major role. The exaggerated somatostatinergic hyperactivity could be due, in turn, to the impairment of cholinergic activity found in the aging brain. Age-related variations in the activity of other neurotransmitters, such as catecholamines, amino acids, e.g. arginine, neuropeptides, e.g. galanin and/or a putative natural GHRP-like ligand, could play a key role in causing the reduced activity of the GH-IGF-I axis. It is still unclear whether it is of benefit to restore GH secretion in aging. As the pituitary GH releasable pool is preserved in the elderly, it would be more appropriate to increase GH by GH secretagogues such as the new synthetic GH-releasing peptides (GHRPs) or non-peptidyl GHRP mimetics which are active even with oral administration.

At present, the most appropriate method for diagnosing GH deficiency (GHD) in adults remains unclear. Recently, it has been demonstrated that GHD in adults can be identified by insulin tolerance test (ITT). Moreover, it has been described that the GHRH plus pyridostigmine (GHRH+PD) test is more accurate than an arginine, glucagon, levodopa, or GHRH test to diagnose GHD in adults. In the current study, firstly we reevaluated GH secretion by the GHRH+PD test in adults previously diagnosed as GH deficient in childhood. The study included 69 patients and 38 healthy subjects. After the GHRH+PD test, the patients and the healthy subjects had peak GH levels of 10.6 +/- 11.2 and 56.7 +/- 28.1 micrograms/L, respectively (P < 0.001). The patients were divided into two groups, responder patients and nonresponder patients, considering an arbitrary cut-off of 10 micrograms/L as the GH peak after the GHRH+PD test. Thirty-nine patients had GH peak below 10 micrograms/L (1.9 +/- 1.7 micrograms/L), whereas the remaining 30 patients above 10 micrograms/L (21.6 +/- 8.] micrograms/L; P < 0.001). Secondly, we compared the GHRH+PD test and the ITT in diagnosing GHD. Twenty-one of the 39 patients with a GH peak below 10 micrograms/L and 29 of the 30 patients with a GH peak above 10 micrograms/L after the GHRH+PD test underwent an ITT. The GH peak after insulin administration was 2.1 +/- 1.7 micrograms/L in nonresponder patients and 21.1 +/- 9.3 micrograms/L in responder patients after the GHRH+PD test (P < 0.001). Three of the responder patients to the GHRH+PD test were identified as GH deficient by the ITT. The relative diagnostic accuracies of the two tests to discriminate GH-deficient patients from healthy subjects were similar (ITT vs. GHRH test: sensitivity, 100%, specificity, 90%; GHRH+PD vs. ITT; sensitivity, 88%; specificity, 100%). In conclusion, in adults previously diagnosed as GH deficient, it is mandatory to reevaluate GH secretion. GHRH+PD and/or ITT are able to diagnose GHD in adults with similar accuracies. Taking into account the potential side-effects of the ITT, however, the GHRH+PD test is the most reliable and safe test to accurately diagnose GHD status in adults.

Pyridostigmine (PD), a muscarinic cholinergic agonist, and arginine (ARG) clearly increase the growth hormone (GH) response to growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH) in man. The current study was undertaken to investigate the value and safety of PD + GHRH and ARG + GHRH tests as well as the measurement of serum insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) in diagnosing GH deficiency in adults. Fifty-four patients considered GH deficient from extensive organic or idiopathic pituitary disease and 326 healthy adults were studied. The IGF-I concentrations were lower than the 3rd percentile of normal values in only 31 of the 54 (57.4%) patients with hypopituitarism. However, the IGF-I levels in hypopituitary patients and in normal subjects overlapped more frequently between 41 and 60 years (50%) and between 61 and 80 years (92.3%) as opposed to between 20 and 40 years (8.6%). In contrast to the IGF-I measurement, the ranges of peak GH responses to PD + GHRH and ARG + GHRH tests were clearly differentiated between the hypopituitary (0.2-6.8 and 0.1-9.5 microg/l, respectively) and normal (17.7-114 and 16.1-119 microg/l, respectively). However, the PD + GHRH test was reliable only in subjects of 20-40 years of age. In conclusion, IGF-I measurement had no value in the diagnosis of GH deficiency in adults aged over 40 years, but is reliable enough when young adults of 20-40 years of age are considered. Both PD + GHRH and ARG + GHRH testing should be considered more reliable biochemical measurements of GH deficiency. In contrast to the PD + GHRH test, the ARG + GHRH test is reliable throughout the adult lifespan and appears to be the most appropriate for patient compliance and safety.

Increased free fatty acid (FFA) levels of obese patients are likely involved in the pathogenesis of the growth hormone (GH) hyposecretion of obesity. To clarify their role, we studied the influence of inhibition of plasma FFA levels, induced by 500 mg oral acipimox (ACX), an antilipolytic drug, on the GH response to GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) alone or combined with arginine ([ARG] study A) in six normal women ([NS] aged 24 to 37 years; body mass index, 22.4 +/- 0.9 kg/m2) and six obese women ([OB] aged 21 to 40 years; body mass index 39.5 +/- 3.2 kg/m2). In a group of seven OB patients (aged 18 to 58 years; body mass index, 35.8 +/- 1.3 kg/m2), the effect of ACX on either GHRH- or GHRH+ARG-stimulated GH increase was also studied after a 4-day treatment with the same drug at 250 mg three times daily (study B). OB patients had baseline FFA levels higher than NS (0.77 +/- 0.06 v 0.44 +/- 0.09 mmol/L, P<.05). In study A, ACX reduced FFA levels to the same nadir in both groups (0.11 +/- 0.02 and 0.12 +/- 0.03 mmol/L, NS and OB subjects, respectively). In NS, ACX failed to significantly potentiate the GH response to either GHRH (1,371.9 +/- 425.2 v 1,001.8 +/- 229.0 micrograms/L x min) or GHRH+ARG (3558.4 +/- 1,513.7 v 3,045.9 +/- 441.8 micrograms/L x min), while in OB patients it increased the GH response to GHRH (797.6 +/- 277.3 v 353.8 +/- 136.7 micrograms/L x min, P<.01) and did not modify the response to ARG+GHRH (1,010.5 +/- 253.1 v 821.1 +/- 222.0 micrograms/L x min). In study B, ACX reduced FFA levels in OB patients (nadir, 0.09 +/- 0.04 mmol/L). This treatment strikingly increased the GH response to GHRH (1,734.0 +/- 725.4 v 271.5 +/- 112.8 micrograms/L x min, P<.01) and significantly potentiated that to ARG+GHRH (2,371.9 +/- 571.3 v 1,020.0 +/- 343.2 micrograms/L x min, P<.05). In conclusion, our present findings indicate that an acute reduction of plasma FFA levels in OB patients restores their somatotrope responsiveness, whereas it does not affect GH secretion in lean subjects. After prolonged treatment, ACX further improves GHRH-stimulated GH secretion in OB patients, suggesting that elevated FFA levels play a leading role in the GH hyposecretory state of obesity.

Beta-adrenergic receptors mediate the inhibitory influence of cathecolamines on GH secretion, probably via the stimulation of hypothalamic somatostatin release. Accordingly, beta-adrenergic agonists and antagonists inhibit and increase, respectively, the GH response to many stimuli, including GHRH, in man. Aim of the present study was to verify the effect, if any, of beta-adrenergic drugs on the GH response to Hexarelin, a synthetic GH-releasing hexapeptide. Interestingly, the GH-releasing effect of Hexarelin has been reported to be partially refractory to neuroendocrine manipulations known to strongly enhance or abolish the GHRH-induced GH release. In 6 normal male volunteers (aged 22-27 yr) we studied the interaction of the maximally effective iv dose of Hexarelin (HEX, 2 micrograms/kg iv at 0 min) with atenolol (100 mg po at -60 min) or salbutamol (0.08 mg/kg po at -60 min), which are beta-adrenergic antagonist and agonist, respectively. HEX induced a marked GH rise (AUC, mean +/- SE: 4573.2 +/- 588.8 micrograms.min/L), which was unchanged by atenolol (4706.2 +/- 928.2 micrograms.min/L) but blunted by salbutamol (2792.8 +/- 618.0 micrograms.min/L, p < 0.03). In conclusion, present data show that, in man, the GH-releasing effect of Hexarelin is not enhanced by beta-adrenergic blockade while is only blunted by the activation of beta receptors. According to other data, these results indicate that the potent GH-releasing activity of Hexarelin is, at least partially, refractory to beta-adrenergic-mediated manipulations of somatostatinergic activity.

Objective: Fasting is known to clearly increase both spontaneous and GHRH-stimulated GH secretion in normal subjects and this effect is likely to be due to hypothalamic mechanism(s). Our aim was to clarify the effect of a 3 or 4-day fast, on the GH response to GHRH alone or combined with arginine, an amino acid probably acting via inhibition of hypothalamic somatostatin release., Design: Two tests with GHRH (1 microgram/kg i.v.), administered either alone or in combination with arginine (ARG, 0.5 g/kg i.v.) were performed, in a randomized order at least 3 days apart. In obese women the two tests were repeated after a 3 or 4-day fast., Patients: Seven obese women (OB, aged 17-54 years, BMI 42.4 +/- 3.6 kg/m2, waist-hip ratio (WHR) 0.85 +/- 0.01) and ten healthy women, as control subjects (CS, aged 20-44 years, BMI 23.1 +/- 1.1 kg/m2, WHR 0.79 +/- 0.01) were studied., Measurements: Serum GH and IGF-I levels were measured by radioimmunoassay. The GH secretory responses were expressed either as absolute values (mU/l) or as areas under the curve (AUC, mU/l/h) calculated by trapezoidal integration. IGF-I concentrations were expressed as absolute values (microgram/l) with reference to a pure recombinant IGF-I preparation. Results are expressed as mean +/- SEM., Results: Basal GH and IGF-I levels in OB were lower than in CS (0.8 +/- 0.2 vs 4.8 +/- 1.0 mU/l, P < 0.0001 and 120.1 +/- 21.4 vs 188.7 +/- 13.1 micrograms/l, P < 0.02, respectively). The GHRH-induced GH rise in OB was lower (P < 0.00001) than in CS (AUC 340.2 +/- 81.0 vs 2125.0 +/- 199.6 mU/l/h). ARG increased the GHRH-induced GH rise in both groups, but in OB the GH response to ARG+GHRH (1458.4 +/- 439.0 mU/l/h, P < 0.03 vs GHRH alone) remained lower (P < 0.0001) than in CS (6396.2 +/- 772.2 mU/l/h, P < 0.01 vs GHRH alone). In spite of a reduction in body weight and IGF-I, insulin and glucose levels, in OB fasting failed to modify both the basal GH levels and the somatotroph responsiveness to GHRH when administered either alone or combined with ARG. An increase in free fatty acids (FFA) was also found after fasting., Conclusions: The results of this study demonstrate that in obesity the somatotroph hyporesponsiveness to GHRH, either alone or combined with arginine, is not improved by short-term fasting. As fasting is considered a CNS mediated stimulus to GH secretion, its ineffectiveness in obesity does not support a hypothalamic pathogenesis and suggests that long standing metabolic alterations, such as hyperinsulinaemia and/or elevated free fatty acids, could play a major role in causing GH insufficiency in obese patients.

It is known that spontaneous and stimulated GH secretion is reduced in obesity. On the other hand, it has been recently reported that, in obese subjects, plasma GH levels did not change during a hyperglycemic clamp. To further study the sensitivity of somatotrope cells to inhibitory influences in obesity, we studied the effect of somatostatin, pirenzepine, or glucose on the GH response to GHRH or arginine in 32 obese patients and 30 controls. Basal GH levels were lower in obese than in normal subjects (1.0 +/- 0.6 vs. 4.8 +/- 0.7 micrograms/L, P < 0.05), while insulin-like growth factor-I levels were similar in both groups (137.3 +/- 13.2 vs. 138.8 +/- 12.2 micrograms/L). In obese as well as in control subjects pirenzepine abolished the GH response to either GHRH (AUC0-120: 43.7 +/- 9.6 vs. 258.3 +/- 59.9 micrograms/L/h, P < 0.04 and 113.0 +/- 75.0 vs. 870.5 +/- 255 micrograms/L.h, P < 0.01, respectively) or arginine (6.5 +/- 2.5 vs. 118.7 +/- 55.9 micrograms/L.h, P < 0.05 and 47.7 +/- 7.3 vs. 334.0 +/- 157.5 micrograms/L.h, P < 0.01, respectively). Differently from pirenzepine, glucose blunted the GH response to either GHRH or arginine in control subjects (260.8 +/- 38.3 vs. 479.5 +/- 83.9 micrograms/L.h, P < 0.03 and 294.8 +/- 46.3 vs. 625.1 +/- 139.1 micrograms/L.h, P < 0.05, respectively), but failed to modify it in obese patients (193.7 +/- 39.4 vs. 172.4 +/- 33.6 micrograms/L.h and 121.1 +/- 43.4 vs. 155.1 +/- 39.7 micrograms/L.h, respectively). On the other hand, somatostatin deeply blunted the GHRH-induced GH release in obese patients (58.5 +/- 25.4 vs. 548.7 +/- 196.6 micrograms/L.h, P < 0.05) as well as in controls (181.4 +/- 44.4 vs. 759.7 +/- 46.6 micrograms/L.h, P < 0.04). In conclusion, our results show that, in obesity, the stimulated GH release is refractory to the inhibitory effect of glucose but not of pirenzepine, in spite of their likely common mechanism of action, i.e. increase of hypothalamic somatostatin release. Exogenous somatostatin is able to abolish GH secretion both in normal and obese subjects. These data suggest the existence of a peculiar inhability of hyperglycemia to trigger somatostatinergic release in obesity.

Secretion of growth hormone (GH) is excessive in acromegaly, but also in a number of other pathological states such as anorexia nervosa, insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM), liver cirrhosis, depression, renal failure and GH-insensitivity syndrome. Abnormalities in the neuroendocrine control of GH secretion and/or a state of insensitivity to GH contribute to hypersecretion of GH in these states, with the possible exception of acromegaly, which appears to be a primary pituitary disease. GH hypersecretion may also occur in neonates or adolescents with tall stature, thus reflecting particular physiological or paraphysiological conditions. In the cohort of brain neurotransmitters, catecholamines and acetylcholine reportedly play a major role in the control of neurosecretory GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) and somatostatin (SS)-producing neurons, and hence GH secretion. Activation of alpha 2-adrenoceptors or of muscarinic cholinergic receptors in the hypothalamus stimulates GH release, probably through stimulation of GHRH and inhibition of SS release, respectively. Activation of dopamine receptors likewise stimulates GH release, while activation of beta-receptors inhibits GH release through stimulation of hypothalamic SS function. This review discusses the involvement of brain catecholamines and acetylcholine in GH hypersecretory states, including anorexia nervosa, acromegaly, IDDM, liver cirrhosis, depression, renal failure and GH insensitivity syndrome, with a view to providing a fuller understanding of their pathophysiology and, whenever possible, diagnostic and therapeutic implications.

Beta adrenergic receptors mediate the inhibitory influence of catecholamines on GH secretion in man, likely via stimulation of hypothalamic somatostatin release. To further clarify the role of beta adrenergic receptors in the neural control of GH secretion, in 7 normal females (age 21-27 yr) we studied the interaction of salbutamol (SAL 0.08 mg/kg orally), a beta 2-adrenergic agonist, with GHRH (1 microgram/kg i.v.) and/or galanin (GAL 15 micrograms/kg i.v.), a neuropeptide endowed with a GH-releasing effect which is likely mediated by concomitant stimulation of GHRH- and inhibition of somatostatin-secreting neurons. SAL inhibited the GH response to GHRH (AUC: 282.6 +/- 102.7 vs 1083.6 +/- 176.5 micrograms/l/h, p < 0.05) and, although not significantly, that to GAL (263.9 +/- 103.7 vs 418.4 +/- 70.4 micrograms/l/h). GAL enhanced the GHRH-induced GH rise (2129.5 +/- 362.2 micrograms/l/h, p < 0.05) but SAL pretreatment inhibited this effect (1249.8 +/- 257.1 micrograms/l/h, p < 0.02) so that the GH response to the combined administration of GHRH, GAL and SAL overlapped with that to the neurohormone alone. In conclusion, our results show that the inhibitory influence of beta adrenergic activation on GH secretion overrides the stimulatory one of galanin. They strengthen the view that in man beta-adrenergic receptors and galanin modulate GH secretion having opposite influences aimed to balance the function of the GH-IGF-I axis.

The objective of this study was to verify the GH-releasing activity of a synthetic hexapeptide, hexarelin (HEX), before and during puberty. Ninety-six children (54 boys and 42 girls, aged 4.1-17.4 yr) were studied. Fifty-two of the children were prepubertal, and the other 44 were in pubertal stage II-IV. The GH response to 2 micrograms/kg HEX, iv (n = 56), was higher (P < 0.001) than that induced by 1 microgram/kg GHRH, iv (n = 33). The iv dose of 2.0 micrograms/kg HEX induced a greater GH increase (P < 0.02) than the 1.0 microgram/kg dose. The GH-releasing effect of 10 mg HEX, orally, was greater (P < 0.03) than that of 1.0 microgram/kg GHRH, iv (n = 7). The iv dose of 2 micrograms/kg HEX elicited an increase in GH levels that was higher in pubertal children than in prepubertal children (77.5 +/- 8.5 vs. 39.4 +/- 4.4 micrograms/L; P < 0.001). Before puberty, there was no sex-dependent difference in the GH response to HEX. It increased during puberty (P < 0.05 and P < 0.002 for boys and girls, respectively), when it was higher (P < 0.05) in girls than in boys. In contrast, GH responses to GHRH were not related to sex differences and/or puberty. In conclusion, HEX is a potent and reproducible stimulus of GH secretion in children. The effect of HEX increases in puberty, with girls showing a more marked GH response.

Objectives: The aim of this work was to clarify the mechanisms underlying growth hormone (GH) hyposecretion in Cushing's syndrome (CS) and in obesity. We studied the GH response to GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) alone and combined with arginine or pyridostigmine, two substances likely to inhibit hypothalamic somatostatin release., Design: Three tests with GHRH alone (1 microgram/kg i.v. at 0 min) and combined with arginine (ARG, 0.5 g/kg infused over 30 min) or pyridostigmine (PD, 120 mg orally at -60 min) were performed 3 days apart and in random order in eight women with CS (five with ACTH-dependent and three with ACTH-independent hypercortisolism, age 18-56, BMI 26.1 +/- 1.5 Kg/m2) and 11 with OB (age 17-54, BMI 42.9 +/- 2.2 Kg/m2). Eleven normal women (age 23-50, BMI 21.9 +/- 0.3 Kg/m2) were studied as controls (C)., Measurements: Serum GH and IGF-I levels were measured by radioimmunoassay. The GH secretory responses were expressed either as absolute values (micrograms/L) or as areas under the curve (AUC, micrograms/L/h) calculated by trapezoidal integration. IGF-I concentrations were expressed as absolute values (micrograms/L) with reference to a pure recombinant IGF-I preparation., Results: Basal GH levels in CS were similar to those registered in OB (mean +/- s.e.m. 0.7 +/- 0.1 vs 0.9 +/- 0.2 microgram/L) and lower than in C (3.4 +/- 0.5 microgram/L, P < 0.00001). On the other hand, IGF-I levels were similar in all groups. The GHRH-induced GH rise in CS was lower, though not significantly, to that observed in OB (AUC: 65.6 +/- 13.2 vs 192.5 +/- 61.7 microgram/L/h) and both GH responses were significantly lower than that of C (1029.9 +/- 98.0 micrograms/L/h, P < 0.00001). ARG enhanced the GHRH-induced GH release in CS (331.9 +/- 51.9 micrograms/L/h vs GHRH alone, P < 0.0001), OB (852.4 +/- 162.1 micrograms/L/h, P < 0.0001) and C (3362.6 +/- 386.0 micrograms/L/h, P < 0.0002). However, the GH response to GHRH plus ARG in CS was lower (P < 0.002) than that in OB which, in turn, was lower than that in C (P < 0.00001). Pyridostigmine significantly enhanced the GHRH-induced GH rise in C (2808.5 +/- 221.2 micrograms/L/h, P < 0.00001) and, to a lesser extent, in OB (627.3 +/- 84.7 micrograms/L/h, P < 0.0002) but not in CS (102.9 +/- 25.0 micrograms/L/h)., Conclusions: Our results indicate that the GH releasable pool is reduced in obesity and, to an even greater extent, in Cushing's syndrome. The inability of pyridostigmine and arginine to restore a normal GH response to GHRH in these conditions makes the existence of a hypothalamic somatostatinergic hyperactivity unlikely.

It is well known that both spontaneous and growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH)-stimulated GH secretion undergo an age-related decrease; in addition, there is supportive evidence that the GH hyposecretory state of aging is of hypothalamic origin. The aims of the study in 35 normal elderly subjects (20 males and 15 females aged 65-89 years) were to verify whether the low somatotrope responsiveness to GHRH (1 microgram/kg) can be primed by a daily GHRH treatment and whether the potentiating effect of both high intravenous (0.5 g/kg) and low oral (8 g) doses of arginine (ARG) on GH response to GHRH is maintained with time. In group A (N = 14) the GH response to GHRH on day 1 (AUC: 373.5 +/- 78.5 micrograms.l-1.h-1) was unchanged after 7 (3720 +/- 38 micrograms.l-1.h-1) and 15 days (377.9 +/- 63.8 micrograms.l-1.h-1) of daily GHRH administration. In group B (N = 6) the GH response to GHRH co-administered with iv ARG on day 1 (1614.2 +/- 146.2 micrograms.l-1.h-1) was higher (p < 0.05) than that of GHRH alone (group A) and persisted unchanged after 7 (1514.7 +/- 366.5 micrograms.l-1.h-1) and 15 days (1631.7 +/- 379.1 micrograms.l-1.h-1) of treatment. In group C (N = 15) the GH response to GHRH co-administered with oral ARG on day 1 (950.6 +/- 219.4 micrograms.l-1.h-1) was higher (p < 0.03) than that of GHRH alone (group A) but lower (p < 0.05) than that to GHRH plus iv ARG (group B).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

An increased spontaneous and stimulated growth hormone (GH) secretion is well documented in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. On the contrary, in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) conflicting results arise from literature. In 14 patients with NIDDM, 7 normal weight (NWD) and 7 obese (OD), we investigated the somatotrope responsiveness to GHRH (1 microgram/kg) alone or combined with arginine (ARG, 0.5 g/kg), which is able to enhance the GH response to GHRH, probably by inhibiting somatostatin release from hypothalamus. Baseline IGF-I, IRI FFA and glucose levels were also determined. Twelve healthy normal subjects (NS) and 12 obese patients (OP) were evaluated as control groups. GH but not IGF-I levels were higher (p < 0.05) in NS than in OP (1.5 +/- 0.5 vs 0.5 +/- 0.2 microgram/l). Insulin levels were higher (p < 0.05) in OP than in NS, NWD and OD (18.7 +/- 1.8 vs 8.7 +/- 0.5, 6.4 +/- 1.9 and 11.8 +/- 1.2 microU/l). FFA were higher (p < 0.05) in NWD. OD and OP than in NS (0.69 +/- 0.04, 0.70 +/- 0.04 and 0.65 +/- 0.06 vs 0.39 +/- 0.03 mmol/l). Plasma glucose was higher (p < 0.05) in diabetic patients than in normal and obese subjects. GH responses to GHRH in NWD, OD and OP were similar (AUC: 221.6 +/- 33.3, 206.0 +/- 35.9 and 177.2 +/- 57.3 micrograms/l/min, respectively) and all lower (p < 0.05) than that in NS (776.7 +/- 206.5 micrograms/l/min). ARG determined a significant increase of GHRH-induced GH release in all groups (p < 0.01).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Hexarelin (His-D-2-methyl-Trp-Ala-Trp-D-Phe-Lys-NH2) is a new potent synthetic growth hormone (GH)-releasing hexapeptide. The mechanism of action of hexarelin in man has never been evaluated. Hexarelin may act directly on specific pituitary receptors and indirectly on the hypothalamus. To elucidate its mechanism of action in man, we studied the interaction of hexarelin with glucose and free fatty acids (FFA), two metabolic factors known to inhibit both basal and GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) stimulated GH secretion. Glucose is thought to inhibit GH secretion via stimulation of endogenous somatostatin release, whereas FFA could also act directly on somatotrope cells. Therefore, we investigated the effect of oral glucose (100 g) and lipid-heparin infusion (250 mL of a 10% lipid solution + 2,500 U heparin) on the GH response to a maximal dose (2 micrograms/kg intravenously [IV]) of hexarelin or GHRH in six normal men. Hexarelin elicited a clear-cut GH response (mean +/- SEM; peak, 62.6 +/- 8.0 micrograms/L) that was higher (P < .01) than that observed after GHRH (peak, 19.8 +/- 2.4 micrograms/L). Although similar increases in plasma glucose were observed with the two peptides, oral glucose almost abolished the GH response to GHRH (peak, 5.6 +/- 0.9 micrograms/L, P < .01) while only blunting the somatotrope response to hexarelin (peak, 38.4 +/- 7.9 micrograms/L, P < .05). Similarly, lipid-heparin infusion nearly abolished the GH response to GHRH (peak, 4.9 +/- 1.0 micrograms/L, P < .01) while only blunting the somatotrope response to hexarelin (peak, 34.2 +/- 4.5 micrograms/L, P < .05).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Pirenzepine, a muscarinic antagonist probably acting via stimulation of hypothalamic somatostatin release, abolishes the growth hormone releasing hormone (GHRH)-stimulated growth hormone (GH) rise in normal subjects but only blunts it in patients with anorexia nervosa (AN). This finding suggested the existence in AN of an alteration of cholinergic system and/or somatostatinergic tone. To further investigate these mechanisms, in 11 AN women patients (age 18.8 +/- 0.9 years; BMI 13.4 +/- 0.4) we studied the GH response alone (1 microgram/Kg IV as a bolus at 0 min) and combined with pyridostigmine (PD, 120 mg orally, 60 min before GHRH administration), a cholinesterase inhibitor, or arginine (ARG 30 g infused over 30 min starting at 0 min), two compounds probably acting via inhibition of hypothalamic somatostatin (SS) release. The GH response to GHRH preceded by a previous (120 min before) neurohormone administration also was studied. All these tests also were performed in 20 normal age-matched women (age 22.0 +/- 1.8 yrs; BMI20.1 +/- 2.4). Basal serum GH levels were higher in AN patients than in normal volunteers (NV) (10.3 +/- 3.4 versus 2.8 +/- 0.3 microgram/L; p < 0.001), whereas plasma IGF-I levels were lower in AN patients than in NV (43.3 +/- 10.6 versus 172.4 +/- 13.9 micrograms/L; p < 0.00001). In AN patients, GHRH administration induced a GH rise higher, though not significantly, than that in NV [delta area under the curve (AUC) 1173.6 +/- 167.6 versus 834.6 +/- 188.1 micrograms/L/h]. The GH response to the second of two consecutive GHRH boluses was lower (p < 0.01) than that of the first one either in AN patients or in NV (67.6 +/- 27.4 and 53.1 +/- 25.7 micrograms/L/h, respectively).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Although both spontaneous and stimulated GH secretion undergo an age-related decline, the secretory capacity of somatotrope cells is preserved in human aging. In the present study we compared the GH responses to hexarelin, GHRH, and the combined administration of hexarelin and GHRH or arginine in young and elderly subjects. Thirteen young (24- to 30-yr-old) and 16 elderly (65- to 84-yr-old) normal males were divided into 2 groups. The first group (7 young and 8 elderly subjects) received the following as single iv injections during 3 different treatment sessions: hexarelin (2 micrograms/kg), GHRH (2 micrograms/kg), or hexarelin (2 micrograms/kg) plus GHRH (2 micrograms/kg). The second group (6 young and 8 elderly subjects) was administered single iv injections of hexarelin (2 micrograms/kg) or hexarelin (2 micrograms/kg) plus arginine (0.5 g/kg) during 2 different treatment sessions. In both groups basal IGF-I levels in the elderly were lower than those in young subjects (114.5 +/- 18.7 vs. 211.5 +/- 19.1 micrograms/L; P < 0.001). In the first group the GH response to hexarelin was greater in young compared to elderly subjects (area under the curve from 0-120 = 4849 +/- 601 vs. 2112 +/- 683 micrograms.min/L; P < 0.001). GHRH elicited a lower GH response than that induced by hexarelin in both young (1455 +/- 102 micrograms/h.L; P < 0.02) and elderly subjects (563 +/- 87 micrograms/min.L; P < 0.02). GHRH potentiated the somatotrope response to hexarelin in both young (7725 +/- 503 micrograms/min.L; P < 0.02) and elderly subjects (3895 +/- 612 micrograms/min.L; P < 0.02), but to a lesser extent in the latter (P < 0.001). In the second group, the GH response induced by hexarelin was also higher in young subjects than in elderly subjects (4819 +/- 668 vs. 1649 +/- 459 micrograms/min.L; P < 0.001). The GH response to hexarelin was potentiated by arginine in elderly (4139 +/- 1057 micrograms/min. L; P < 0.001), but not in young subjects (4743 +/- 774 micrograms/min.L). This study shows that the maximal effective dose of hexarelin releases more GH than the maximal effective dose of GHRH in both normal young and elderly subjects. The effect of hexarelin on GH secretion is age dependent, and the GH response to the combined administration of hexarelin and GHRH was significantly higher in young subjects compared to elderly subjects. Arginine does not potentiate the GH response to hexarelin in young subjects, whereas it significantly enhances it in elderly subjects.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

The reduced activity of the growth hormone (GH)-insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) axis in aging may contribute to changes in body composition. As this GH insufficiency is due to hypothalamic pathogenesis, the availability of GH-releasing peptides (GHRPs), such as GHRP-6 (His-D-Trp-Ala-Trp-D-Phe-Lys-NH2) which is active even after oral administration, might be useful to restore it. The aim of our study was to verify the effectiveness of oral administration of GHRP-6 in normal elderly subjects and to investigate whether its GH-releasing activity is maintained or vanishes after short-term oral treatment. Seven normal elderly women (aged 65-82 years) were studied. The effect of oral administration of 300 micrograms/kg GHRP-6 on GH secretion was investigated before and after 4 days of treatment with the hexapeptide given twice daily. The GH response to the maximal effective dose of GHRH (1 microgram/kg i.v.) also was studied. Before treatment, oral administration of 300 micrograms/kg GHRP-6 elicited a clear GH rise (peak 10.7 +/- 3.3 micrograms/l; AUC 353.1 +/- 90.6 micrograms.l-1.h-1), which was significantly higher (p < 0.01) than that induced by intravenous GHRH (peak 5.1 +/- 1.5 micrograms/l; AUC 106.5 +/- 43.9 micrograms.l-1.h-1). After 4 days of treatment with GHRP-6, the GH response to the hexapeptide was maintained, with a trend towards an increase (peak 16.8 +/- 2.9 micrograms/l; AUC 499.8 +/- 107.2 micrograms.l-1.h-1). The IGF-I levels were not increased significantly after treatment (77.1 +/- 8.4 vs 84.1 +/- 12.2 micrograms/l).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Objective: It is well known that acetylcholine and arginine stimulate GH secretion while activation of beta-adrenergic receptors inhibits GH secretion in man. We aimed therefore to ascertain whether or not the inhibitory influence of beta-adrenergic receptors on GH secretion would over-ride the stimulatory one of acetylcholine and arginine., Design: We studied the interaction of salbutamol, a beta 2-adrenergic agonist (SAL, 0.08 mg/kg orally) with pyridostigmine, a cholinesterase inhibitor (PD, 120 mg orally), or arginine (0.5 g/kg i.v.) on both basal and GHRH (1 microgram/kg i.v.)-stimulated GH secretion., Subjects: Fourteen healthy male volunteers, aged 20-35 years, were studied., Measurements: Serum GH was measured in duplicate by immunoradiometric assay., Results: In study A, SAL inhibited the GH response both to GHRH (P < 0.01) and ARG (P < 0.002). ARG enhanced the GHRH-induced GH rise (P < 0.01) but its effect was abolished (P < 0.02) by SAL pretreatment. In study B, SAL inhibited the GH response both to GHRH (P < 0.01) and PD (P < 0.02). PD enhanced the GH response to GHRH (P < 0.001) but its effect was abolished (P < 0.05) by SAL pretreatment. In both studies, the GH response to GHRH alone was similar to that to the neurohormone when combined with ARG + SAL or PD + SAL., Conclusion: Our results show that beta 2-adrenergic activation by salbutamol is able to inhibit not only the GH rise induced by GHRH, arginine and pyridostigmine, but even the potentiating effect of both arginine and pyridostigmine on the GH response to GHRH. They indicate that catecholamines, acetylcholine and arginine play a major role in GH secretion having opposite influences aimed to balance the function of the hypothalamus-GH-IGF-I axis in man.

Cholinergic pathways in the central nervous system positively influence growth hormone (GH) secretion. In fact pyridostigmine, a cholinesterase inhibitor, enhances both basal and GH-releasing hormone (GHRH)-induced GH secretion while, conversely, pirenzepine, an antagonist of muscarinic M1 receptors, inhibits the GH response to GHRH and to other physiological and pharmacological stimuli. The effect of the cholinergic system on GH secretion probably takes place via inhibition of the release of endogenous somatostatin. In this study in 36 normal adults (26 males and 10 females, age 22-35 years) we compared the effects of three cholinesterase inhibitors (pyridostigmine, 120 mg p.o., n = 19; neostigmine, 10 micrograms/kg i.v., n = 6; physostigmine, 12.5 micrograms/kg i.v., n = 6) and bethanechol, a direct muscarinic receptor agonist that is mainly active on muscarinic M3 receptors (25 micrograms/kg i.v., n = 5), on both basal and GHRH (1 microgram/kg i.v.)-stimulated GH secretion. Pyridostigmine, neostigmine and physostigmine induced a significant GH increase (peak vs. basal levels, mean +/- S.E.: 10.4 +/- 1.6 vs. 0.6 +/- 0.2 micrograms/l, P = 0.0001; 13.3 +/- 1.2 vs. 0.5 +/- 1.1 micrograms/l, P = 0.004; and 14.9 +/- 3.1 vs. 2.7 +/- 1.1 micrograms/l, P = 0.025;, respectively). These drugs also induced a similar potentiation of the GH response to GHRH (peak: 48.3 +/- 5.6 vs. 16.2 +/- 2.2 micrograms/l, P = 0.0001; 49.2 +/- 2.2 vs. 19.9 +/- 5.1 micrograms/l, P = 0.006; and 76.9 +/- 12.4 vs. 18.1 +/- 5.3 micrograms/l, P = 0.001, respectively).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

We evaluated the GH-releasing activity of hexarelin, a new synthetic hexapeptide, after i.v. (1 and 2 micrograms/kg), sc (1.5 and 3 micrograms/kg), intranasal (20 micrograms/kg), and oral (po; 20 and 40 mg) administration to 12 healthy young volunteers. Reference treatments were i.v. saline and GH-releasing hormone (GHRH; 1 microgram/kg). GH release (mean +/- SEM) after the i.v. dose of 1 microgram/kg hexarelin [area under the curve (AUC), 3175 +/- 506 micrograms/min.L] was about 2 times higher than that induced by 1 microgram/kg GHRH (AUC, 1544 +/- 161 micrograms/min.L; P < 0.001). Hexarelin (2 micrograms/kg, i.v.) elicited a further increase in GH levels (AUC, 4422 +/- 626 micrograms/min.L) compared to the 1 microgram/kg dose. The GH response to 2 micrograms/kg hexarelin, i.v., was very reproducible (AUC, 4016 +/- 563 vs. 3959 +/- 803 micrograms/min.L). The sc administration of hexarelin produced a dose-dependent GH response (AUC, 3180 +/- 392 and 4459 +/- 566 micrograms.min.L with 1.5 and 3 micrograms/kg, respectively). Intranasal administration of 20 micrograms/kg hexarelin induced GH release (AUC, 2642 +/- 452 micrograms/min.L) similar to that caused by 1 microgram/kg, i.v. Twenty and 40 mg hexarelin, po, produced a dose-related increase in GH levels (AUC, 2278 +/- 442 and 4079 +/- 514 micrograms/min.L). Biological bioavailabilities were 77.0 +/- 10.5%, 4.8 +/- 0.9%, and 0.3 +/- 0.1% for the sc, intranasal, and po routes, respectively. This study shows that the GH response to hexarelin administered by the i.v. route has a limited variability and is superior to the response to GHRH. The GH-releasing activity appeared to be dose dependent. Thus, hexarelin could be clinically useful to stimulate GH secretion in humans.

In man the GH-releasing hexapeptide His-DTrp-Ala-Trp-DPhe-Lys-NH2 (GHRP-6) has been shown to be active even after oral administration. On the other hand, it has been shown that arginine (ARG) totally restores the reduced somatotropic responsiveness to GHRH observed in aging. Based on the foregoing, in this study we verified the GH-releasing activity of oral GHRP-6 (300 micrograms/kg) in normal aging and the possible enhancing effect of 8 g oral ARG on the GH-releasing effect of GHRP-6. Eight young (age 24-32 yr) and 8 elderly (age 66-85 yr) subjects were studied. In all the GH response to GHRH (1 microgram/kg iv) was also studied. Both IGF-I levels and the GH response to iv GHRH were lower in elderly than in young subjects (mean +/- SE, IGF-I: 65.1 +/- 9.1 vs 142.9 +/- 9.4 micrograms/L, p < 0.0001; GH peak: 5.4 +/- 1.0 vs 13.6 +/- 0.8 micrograms/L, p < 0.0001). Oral GHRP-6 administration induced a GH rise in elderly which was lower, though not significantly, than that in young subjects (GH peak: 9.9 +/- 2.0 vs 16.2 +/- 5.4 micrograms/L). Oral ARG administration enhanced the GHRP-6-induced GH rise in elderly (GH peak: 22.1 +/- 3.3 micrograms/L, p < 0.01 vs GHRP-6 alone) while failed to modify it in young subjects (GH peak: 13.5 +/- 3.4 micrograms/L). The GH response to oral ARG+GHRP-6 in elderly was higher than that to all stimuli in young adults (p < 0.05).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Growth hormone (GH) hypersecretion has been described in diabetes mellitus and seems to be involved in the pathogenesis of diabetes complications. As pirenzepine (PZ), a cholinergic muscarinic antagonist, is able to inhibit GH hypersecretion in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM), we investigated whether PZ is also able to inhibit spontaneous and stimulated GH-release in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM). Ten non-obese well-controlled patients with NIDDM underwent in random order the following three double-blind one week treatments: placebo (PL), PZ at low dose (PL in the morning plus PZ 50 mg at 22 h) or high dose (PZ 50 mg at 8 h plus 100 mg at 22 h). Pirenzepine administration significantly (p < 0.05) decreased nocturnal GH release after both low and high dose (AUC, PL vs PZ: 107.3 +/- 26.5 vs 48.3 +/- 10.5 and 57.6 +/- 9.6 micrograms/L/h, respectively). The GH response to arginine infusion was significantly inhibited by PZ at high dose (AUC, 147.1 +/- 48.8 vs 444.7 +/- 194.3 micrograms/L/h, p < 0.01), but not at low dose. Glucose, insulin, glucagon and somatostatin responses to arginine infusion were not changed by pirenzepine treatment. In conclusion, the muscarinic blockade by PZ is able to inhibit the spontaneous and stimulated GH secretion also in NIDDM without affecting insulin secretion.

We studied the interaction between free fatty acids (FFAs) and arginine (ARG) on basal and growth hormone (GH)-releasing hormone (GHRH)-stimulated GH secretion in 14 normal subjects. Compared with placebo, ARG induced a significant increase of GH secretion (334.0 +/- 157.5 v 36.9 +/- 27.6 micrograms/L/h, P < .05). The increased levels of FFAs (1.9 +/- 0.4 mEq/L), obtained by the infusion of a lipid-heparin emulsion, abolished the effect of ARG (55.8 +/- 45.6 v 334.0 +/- 157.5 micrograms/L/h, P < .05). GHRH-induced GH secretion was potentiated by ARG (2,009.9 +/- 463.2 v 922.0 +/- 244.4 micrograms/L/h, P < .05) and suppressed by lipid-heparin infusion (106.2 +/- 28.3 v 922.0 +/- 244.4 micrograms/L/h, P < .01). Moreover, the lipid-heparin infusion inhibited the potentiating effect of ARG on the GHRH-induced GH increase (527.9 +/- 113.6 v 2,009.9 +/- 463.2 micrograms/L/h, P < .01). These results confirm the strong inhibitory effect of FFAs on GH secretion, showing that they are even able to inhibit the potentiating effect of ARG on the GH response to GHRH. Since ARG likely acts via inhibition of hypothalamic somatostatin release, the inhibitory effect of FFAs on GH secretion could take place directly at the pituitary level and/or at the hypothalamic level, counteracting the effect of ARG.

Reportedly, the responsiveness of somatotrope cells to GHRH is reduced in elderly humans but it is totally restored by arginine (ARG) which likely acts by inhibiting hypothalamic release of somatostatin. As this effect was observed after infusion of high doses of the amino acid, in this study, we compared the effect of iv administration of 30, 10 and 5 g ARG(group A, B and C, respectively) as well as oral administration of 8 g ARG(group D) on the GH response to 1 microgram/kg i.v.GHRH in 27 healthy elderly subjects (11 M and 16 F, age 70-86 yr, BMI 21-25 kg/m2). In group A (n = 7) 30 g i.v. ARG strikingly enhanced the GHRH-induced GH rise (peak, mean +/- SE: 41.5 +/- 4.4 vs 11.7 +/- 5.3 micrograms/L, p < 0.05). Similarly, in group B (n = 6) and D (n = 7) 10 g i.v. and 8 g oral ARG enhanced the GH response to GHRH (20.9 +/- 4.7 vs 8.3 +/- 2.8 micrograms/L, p < 0.03 and 31.0 +/- 5.3 vs 11.4 +/- 3.4 micrograms/L, p < 0.03, respectively). In contrast, in group C (n = 7) 5 g i.v. ARG failed to modify the GHRH-induced GH rise (6.0 +/- 1.6 vs 3.5 +/- 0.9 micrograms/L). The GH responses to GHRH alone did not significantly differ amongst groups; the GH responses to GHRH and ARG were not significantly different among groups A, B and D and were greater than the GH response in group C. These results show that the GH response to GHRH in elderly subjects is enhanced even by low iv doses of arginine and by the orally administered amino acid, the lowest effective dose being 8 g. Moreover, they imply that the combined administration of GHRH and arginine may be a useful approach to restore the impaired function of the GH-IGF axis in aging.

There is evidence that GH secretion is reduced in normal elderly subjects as well as in patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD). To clarify the mechanisms underlying this GH hyposecretory state in 14 elderly subjects (age 65-75 years) and 15 AD patients (age 61-78 years), we studied the effects of both pyridostigmine (PD, 120 mg orally), a cholinesterase inhibitor, and arginine (ARG, 0.5 g/kg i.v.), two substances likely acting via inhibition of hypothalamic somatostatin, on GH response to GHRH (1 microgram/kg i.v.). The GH response to PD alone was also studied. Twenty-two young healthy volunteers were studied as control group. Basal GH levels were similar in young, elderly and AD subjects (0.7 +/- 0.2, 0.8 +/- 0.2 and 0.9 +/- 0.2 microgram/l). IGF-I levels were lower (p < 0.005) in elderly (73.9 +/- 8.2 microgram/l) and in AD subjects (108.0 +/- 5.9 micrograms/l) than in young subjects (288.7 +/- 22.1 micrograms/l); however, they were higher (p < 0.01) in AD patients than in the elderly subjects. The PD-induced GH release did not significantly differ in young, elderly and AD subjects while the GH responses to GHRH in the elderly (AUC: 297.9 +/- 49.2 micrograms/l) and in AD subjects (437.6 +/- 93.5 micrograms/l/h) were lower (p < 0.01) than in young subjects (658.6 +/- 100.1 micrograms/l/h). PD potentiated the GH response to GHRH both in elderly and in AD subjects (901.7 +/- 222.4 and 1,070.3 +/- 207.2 micrograms/l/h, p < 0.005) but these responses were lower (p < 0.0001) than those recorded in young subjects (2,041.1 +/- 245.6 micrograms/l/h).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Growth hormone secretion is mainly regulated by the interplay of GHRH and somatostatin, two specific hypophysiotrophic neurohormones. In addition to GHRH and somatostatin, many neurotransmitters and neuropeptides influence GH secretion mainly by acting at the hypothalamic level. This paper focuses on the stimulatory role of acetylcholine, arginine and galanin as well as on the inhibitory influence of catecholamines which is mediated by the activation of beta-adrenergic receptors. Attention will be given to the age-related changes in the neural control of GH secretion from childhood to old age.

GH secretion was evaluated in 214 children and adolescents (age, 5-16 yr; 160 males and 54 females) with short stature (height, < or = 5th percentile) by assessing mean spontaneous overnight GH concentration (normal values, > or = 3 and 3.9 micrograms/L for prepubertal and pubertal subjects, respectively) and responsiveness to stimulation with GH-releasing hormone combined with pyridostigmine (normal peak values, > or = 20 micrograms/L). Plasma insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) was also measured. According to their GH secretory status, children were grouped as follows: group I, 154 subjects with normal spontaneous and stimulated GH (43 slow-growing and 111 normally growing); group II, 39 subjects with low spontaneous, but normal stimulated, GH (27 slow-growing and 12 normally growing); group III, 18 slow-growing subjects with low spontaneous and stimulated GH; and group IV, 3 subjects with normal spontaneous, but low stimulated, GH. The following conclusions were drawn. 1) Forty-five slow-growing subjects (21% of the total sample) had GH deficiency; 27 (12.6%) belonged to group II (with a preserved GH pituitary reserve, denoting a hypothalamic dysfunction) and 18 (8.4%) to group III (with a reduced GH pituitary reserve). 2) Forty-three slow-growing children in group I had normal GH secretion but low mean IGF-I, which may indicate nutritional problems or a biologically hypoactive GH molecule. 3) The remaining 111 subjects in group I (52%), with normal growth rate, but low mean parental height, were considered as having familial and/or constitutional short stature. GH responses after pyridostigmine plus GH-releasing hormone were normal in all children with a normal growth rate. These findings show that besides clinical evaluation, the assessment of spontaneous GH secretion, GH pituitary reserve, and IGF-I concentration allows proper pathophysiological characterization of short stature. By this approach, the frequency of GH deficiency in our sample was higher than commonly thought.

Aim of this study was to verify whether arginine (ARG), which likely inhibits hypothalamic somatostatin release, has an enhancing effect on the GHRH-induced GH rise, even when administered orally at low dose. To this goal we studied the effects of 4 g orally administered ARG, either hydrochloride (ARG-H) or aspartate (ARG-A), on both basal and GHRH (1 microgram/Kg i.v.)-stimulated GH secretion in 31 children with familial short stature (11 males and 20 females, aged 5.5-13.8 yr, pubertal stage I-III, and compared the results with those of i.v. infusion of 0.5 g/kg ARG-H. Oral ARG-H (Group A, n = 11) induced a significant increase of basal GH levels (4.2 +/- 1.3 vs 1.0 +/- 0.4 micrograms/L, p < 0.02) and enhanced the GH response to GHRH (41.1 +/- 8.6 vs 25.3 +/- 6.7 micrograms/L, p < 0.02). Oral ARG-A (Group B, n = 10) induced a slight, but not statistically significant increase in serum GH levels (3.4 +/- 1.5 vs 1.0 +/- 0.3 micrograms/L) and enhanced the GHRH-induced GH rise (49.7 +/- 9.8 vs 26.1 +/- 8.4 micrograms/L, p < 0.05). Intravenous ARG-H (Group C, n = 10) stimulated basal GH levels (6.2 +/- 1.2 vs 1.2 +/- 0.3 micrograms/L, p < 0.005) and increased the GHRH-induced GH rise (46.7 +/- 5.0 vs 17.1 +/- 2.3 micrograms/L, p < 0.005). This response was similar to those after oral ARG-H or ARG-A plus GHRH. No variation was observed in PRL levels after oral ARG (either ARG-H or ARG-A) and/or GHRH.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Spontaneous GH secretion as well as GH response to several stimuli including GHRH have been shown to be reduced in obesity. To clarify the pathogenesis underlying these alterations, in six obese patients (3 males and 3 females, age 20-44 yrs, BMI = 42.1 +/- 2.2) on unrestricted diet we studied the effect of 8 day GHRH pretreatment (1 micrograms/kg iv each day) on the acute somatotropic response to the neurohormone administered both alone and combined with arginine (ARG, 0.5 g/kg iv infused from 0 to 30 min) which likely inhibits the release of hypothalamic somatostatin. Before treatment the GH response to GHRH (AUC: 231.9 +/- 106.4 micrograms/l/h) was potentiated (p < 0.001) by ARG (932.6 +/- 166.2 micrograms/l/h). However, the GH responses to the neurohormone both alone and combined with ARG were lower (p < 0.02 and 0.002, respectively) than in normals (712.4 +/- 111.6 and 2608.3 +/- 453.2 micrograms/l/h, respectively). After repetitive GHRH administration, in obese subjects baseline GH and IGF-I levels were unchanged. Also the GH responses to GHRH both alone (217.3 +/- 68.1 micrograms/l/h) and combined with ARG (756.3 +/- 202.9 micrograms/l/h) were not modified. In conclusion, our data demonstrate the failure of GHRH pretreatment to improve the somatotrope hyporesponsiveness to GHRH both alone and combined with ARG suggesting the existence of a somatotropic defect in obesity.

In humans beta-adrenergic receptors mediate an inhibitory effect on somatotropic function, likely via stimulation of hypothalamic somatostatin release. Accordingly, salbutamol (SAL), a beta 2-agonist, given iv abolishes the GH response to GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) in adults. Taking into account that in bronchial asthma an alteration in the beta-adrenergic neural control of airways has been hypothesized, we aimed to verify whether, in asthmatic children, beta-adrenergic activation inhibits or not GH secretion. To this goal, we studied the effect of therapeutical doses of SAL on GH response to GHRH in 15 asthmatic children (12 M and 3 F, 5.9-11.1 yr, pubertal stage I-II). All children underwent a GHRH test (1 microgram/kg iv). Moreover, in 7 children (group A), SAL was administered orally (0.125 mg/kg) 1 h before GHRH, while in 8 (group B) by inhaled aerosol (2 mg) 30 min before GHRH. Oral SAL (group A) abolished the GHRH-induced GH rise (AUC, mean +/- SE 165.1 +/- 33.3 vs 959.9 +/- 158.1 micrograms/L/h; p < 0.03). In group B, the GH response to GHRH was only blunted by inhaled SAL (938.6 +/- 284.6 vs 1378.8 +/- 315.6 micrograms/L/h; p < 0.02). In conclusion, our data show that in asthmatic children, therapeutical doses of SAL exert a marked inhibitory effect on GH secretion. Further studies are needed to exclude detrimental effects of chronic treatment with beta 2-agonists on GH secretion and growth velocity in asthmatic children.

The effect of pyridostigmine (60 mg orally), arginine (0.5 g/kg iv) and propranolol (PROP, 40 mg orally) on GHRH (1 microgram/kg iv)-induced GH release was studied in seven short children. Pyridostigmine and arginine induced a similar potentiating effect on GHRH-induced GH rise (Peak, mean +/- SEM: 56.9 +/- 12.8 and 48.6 +/- 8.5 micrograms/L, respectively vs 12.3 +/- 1.6 micrograms/L; p < 0.05). Combination of GHRH with propranolol induced an increase of GH that was significant only with regard to peak (28.9 +/- 8.4 micrograms/L) but not to AUC. However, GH rises observed after GHRH combined with PD or ARG did not significantly differ from that recorded after coadministration of GHRH and PROP both for peak and AUC. Our results confirm that pyridostigmine and arginine have a striking potentiating effect on the GHRH-induced GH rise in children and show that the tests with GHRH + PD and GH + H + ARG are ore reliable than that with GHRH + PROP to explore the secretory capacity of somatotroph cells.

Recent evidence has shown that growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH) enables investigation of the pathophysiology of GH secretion in a variety of different states, but it cannot be used as a test for probing pituitary somatotrophic function, due to the extreme inter- and intra-subject variability in normal subjects. This task is better accomplished when compounds which deprive the pituitary of inhibitory (somatostatinergic) influences, e.g. pyridostigmine, arginine, etc., are given in combination with GHRH. Administration of GHRH in both animals and humans reveals a state of GH hyperresponsiveness in the immediate postnatal period, which is likely to be due to a reduced pituitary sensitivity to somatostatin. GH responses to GHRH are relatively constant throughout the different stages of pubertal development, though further studies are needed to confirm these findings, and decline after the third-fourth decade in men, after menopause in women. It is apparent that during aging the releasable pool of GH is preserved and that impaired GH secretion is due to defective hypothalamic GHRH function and a relative predominance of somatostatinergic function.

Patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (IDDM) show augmented GH secretion, which is implicated in the pathogenesis of microvascular complications. On the other hand, it is well known that beta-adrenergic receptors have inhibitory influence on GH secretion, likely via stimulation of hypothalamic somatostatin. Since the possibility of pharmacological suppression of GH secretion would be of value in IDDM, we investigated the effect of salbutamol (SAL, 4 mg orally at -60 min) on the GH response to GHRH (1 micrograms/kg iv at 0 min) in 6 well-controlled (mean HbA1c +/- SEM: 7.3 +/- 0.5%) patients with IDDM. Salbutamol was able to inhibit basal GH levels (p < 0.05) as well as to abolish the GHRH-induced GH rise. After SAL administration, a significant (p < 0.05) reduction of glucagon levels was also found. Our data show that the enhancement of beta 2 adrenergic activity by oral therapeutical doses of SAL inhibits basal and GHRH-stimulated GH secretion in patients with IDDM.