Search

Introduction: We present the evolution of GHD in adolescent males with persistent growth failure, in whom the diagnosis was established after a second GH stimulation test (GST)., Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review of children who presented for short stature (height less < 2SD for mean/mid-parental height) and/or growth failure (sustained growth velocity < 0 SD) to pediatric endocrinology at Mount Sinai Kravis Children's Hospital, New York and who had 2 GSTs. Data collected from electronic medical records were analyzed using SPSS v28.0., Results: Of 53 patients included, 42 were males. Average GH peak on initial GST was 15.48 ± 4.92 ng/ml, at 10.07 ± 2.65 years, mean height -1.68 ± 0.56SD(28% had <2SD), IGF-1 -1.00 ± 0.88SD. After 2.23 ± 1.22 years, at 12.04 ± 2.41years, height SDs decreased to -1.82 ± 0.63SD and IGF-1 was -1.08 ± 0.84SD. At repeat GST, average GH peak was 7.59 ± 2.12 ng/dL, with 36% ≤7 ng/dl and 32% in puberty. 12 males reached adult height of 0.08 ± 0.69 SD with a mean height gain of 1.83 ± 0.56SD(p<0.005), IGF-1 of -1.15 ± 0.81SD after 4.64 ± 1.4 years of GH., Conclusion: We offer evidence for Evolving Growth Hormone Deficiency (EGHD) through repeat GST in children with persistent growth slowdown, even with pubertal progression; emphasizing the need for careful longitudinal follow-up to make accurate diagnosis., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Chimatapu, Sethuram, Samuels, Klomhaus, Mintz, Savage and Rapaport.)

Normal growth is a complex dynamic process dependent on the coordination of multiple factors including genetics, nutrition and hormones that are all working in balance. This chapter will review selected features of commonly utilized genetic techniques such as chromosomal analysis, microarray analysis, targeted gene screening and whole exome sequencing that are being used to identify genes influencing growth. As genetic technologies continue to improve and become more accessible many of these techniques will help to provide a better understanding of mechanisms underlying abnormal growth and will eventually lead to novel management approaches for abnormal growth., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Growth is a good indicator of a child's health. Growth disturbances, including short stature or growth failure, could be indications of illnesses such as chronic disease, nutritional deficits, celiac disease or hormonal abnormalities. Therefore, a careful assessment of the various requirements for normal growth needs to be done by history, physical examination, and screening laboratory tests. More details will be reviewed about the GH-IGF axis, its abnormalities with special emphasis on GH deficiency, its diagnosis and treatment. GH treatment indications in the US will be reviewed and a few only will be highlighted. They will include GH deficiency, as well as the treatment of children born SGA, including the results of a US study using FDA approved dose of 0.48mg/kg/week. GH deficiency in adults will also be briefly reviewed. Treatment of patients with SHOX deficiency will also be discussed. Possible side effects of GH treatment and the importance of monitoring safety will be highlighted., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Context: Short stature homeobox-containing gene (SHOX) variants of unknown clinical significance occur frequently among children with short stature, yet their growth hormone (GH)/insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) status and response to GH have not been studied., Objective: To define GH and IGF-1 status in children with SHOX variants and assess their response to GH., Patients and Methods: This is a retrospective review of children with short stature. Children with SHOX variants were compared to those with no variants. Height standard deviation scores (SDS) and IGF-1 SDS at baseline and during GH treatment at 6, 12, and 24 months were analyzed. Growth velocity (GV), maximum GH dose, IGF-BP3, and changes in height SDS, IGF-1 SDS, and GV were compared., Results: Among 355 children, 83 (23%) had SHOX variants. Nineteen different SHOX variants were detected. There was no difference in age, height SDS, IGF-1 SDS, or IGF-BP3 between children with SHOX variants and those with normal SHOX. Height SDS, IGF-1 SDS, IGF-BP3, GV, and GH dose were not different between patients with SHOX variants and those without., Conclusions: The GH and IGF-1 characteristics of children with short stature were not different between children with SHOX+ variants and children with no variants. Although these findings suggest that SHOX variants are polymorphisms, studies prospectively comparing individual SHOX variants are needed., (© 2015 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Background/aims: Growth hormone (GH) treatment regimens for children with non-GH-deficient, idiopathic short stature (ISS) have not been optimized. To compare the efficacy, efficiency, and safety of an individualized, target-driven GH regimen with standard weight-based dosing after 4 years of treatment., Methods: This is a 4-year, open-label, multicenter, randomized trial comparing individualized, formula-based dosing of Genotropin® versus a widely used ISS dose of Genotropin®. Subjects were prepubertal, had a bone age of 3-10 years for males and 3-9 years for females, were naive to GH treatment, and had a height standard deviation score (Ht SDS) of -3 to -2.25, a height velocity <25th percentile for their bone age, and peak stimulated GH >10 ng/ml. After the first 2 years, the individualized-dosing group was further randomized to either 0.18 or 0.24 mg/kg/week., Results: At 4 years, subjects in all treatment regimens achieved similar average height gains of +1.3 SDS; however, the individualized dosing regimen utilized less GH to achieve an equivalent height gain., Conclusion: Individualized, formula-based GH dosing, followed by a dose reduction after 2 years, provides a more cost-effective growth improvement in patients with ISS than currently employed weight-based regimens., (© 2015 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

There are 9 recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH) products currently available for 10 US Food and Drug Administration-approved indications; each rhGH product is approved for 1 or more indications. Adult and pediatric patients with the various conditions for which rhGH is indicated, from idiopathic short stature (ISS) and growth hormone (GH) deficiency to short bowel syndrome and HIV/AIDS wasting, may benefit from rhGH treatment. In clinical practice, pediatric patients with GH deficiency or ISS make up the majority of the population receiving treatment with rhGH. Most rhGH products are provided through specialty pharmacies that often have to balance the needs of the patient, their own utilization objectives, and the availability of the rhGH on formulary from a particular payer. Often, a payer will prefer only 2 or 3 rhGH products to cover all 10 indications. As such, managed care professionals need to be more informed about the options available and should be familiar with the different indications to help educate patients about treatment. Additionally, healthcare providers should endeavor to identify and manage the care of appropriate patients who would potentially benefit from rhGH therapy, and should be aware of formulary options. Because many of the patients are children and young adults, adherence to treatment is a concern; patient education on the importance of treatment adherence should be ongoing. Various mechanisms are in place (eg, prior authorization requirements and case manager follow-up) to help ensure that rhGH products are used, and used appropriately. This publication includes highlights from a roundtable discussion by key opinion leaders (clinicians and managed care professionals) on how managed care policies and clinical guidelines on appropriate use of rhGH translate into real-world practice. Also discussed are the efficacy and safety of rhGH therapy for its pediatric indications, and the role of specialty pharmacies in managing patient access to therapy.

Evaluation of a child's growth is one of the most important aspects of the general pediatric visit. Concerns about abnormal growth are the leading reasons general pediatricians refer patients to a pediatric endocrinologist. There is wide variation in normal growth patterns and an even greater variety of conditions that manifest with growth abnormalities. Here, we review patterns of normal growth in the pediatric and adolescent populations. We then review abnormal patterns of growth that require further evaluation and possible treatment., (Copyright 2012, SLACK Incorporated.)

Since 2003, the GH MonitorSM, an observational registry, has collected data on pediatric subjects treated with Saizen (recombinant human growth hormone (r-hGH)) in the United States and Canada. This article provides an update on the demographic characteristics of subjects enrolled in the GHMonitorSM Registry. As of August 2007, 1733 subjects were enrolled (68.9% male). The most common primary diagnosis at screening was idiopathic growth hormone deficiency (56.5% of subjects).Of those subjects with available data, mean height standard deviation (SD) score was -2.1+/-1.0, mean weight SD score was -1.4+/-1.5, and mean body mass index SD score was -0.1+/-1.3. Among subjects in whom the presence or absence of other pituitary hormone deficiencies was recorded, 16.1% had multiple pituitary hormone deficiencies. Most patients reported high compliance with therapy (92.6% missed 0-3 doses per month); compliance was similar for all delivery devices (needle/syringe, cool.clickTM or one.clickTM) used. Two serious adverse events related to Saizen (hospitalization for placement of right frontal ventriculostomy and right frontal craniotomy for transcallosal resection of a large recurrent craniopharyngioma and left slipped capitofemoral epiphysis that required pinning of the right hip) were reported in the period from August 2006 to August 2007. This update of the GHMonitorSM Registry continues to provide insight into the characteristics of children treated with this agent and continued evidence of the efficacy and safety of Saizen in children.

Background: Previous studies of varied populations of non-uniformly defined children born small for gestational age (SGA) receiving different growth hormone (GH) regimens have found that GH treatment increased growth velocity and adult height and was safe. The GH dose was the major predictor of first year growth response., Aim: To identify pre- and within-treatment predictors of growth in well defined children born SGA treated with a fixed dose of GH., Methods: 139 short, prepubertal children born SGA (i.e. birth weight and/or length > or =2 standard deviations below the mean) received Genotropin (rhGH) at 0.24 mg/kg/wk for 1 month then an additional 11 months at a dose of 0.48 mg/kg/wk, the FDA-approved dose of GH for children born SGA., Results: Height improved significantly by month 3, with progressive improvement over the entire 12 months (median height SDS change of 0.78). Pretreatment predictors of growth included baseline bone age, IGFBP-3, total cholesterol, WBC and height SDS minus mid-parental height SDS. Within-treatment predictors of the change (Delta) height SDS at month 12 were the A height SDS at months 3 and 6 and growth velocity SDS at months 3 and 6., Conclusion: GH at 0.48 mg/kg/wk was well tolerated and improved growth in children born SGA; the Delta IGF-I was not predictive of the 12 month height SDS gain, while the Delta height SDS at 3 and 6 months were predictive. Underweight children grew as well as normal weight children, and both groups showed improved body composition following GH treatment.

Context: The process of epiphyseal fusion during puberty is regulated by estrogen, even in males., Objective: Our objective was to investigate whether anastrozole, a potent aromatase inhibitor, could delay bone age acceleration and increase predicted adult height in adolescent boys with GH deficiency., Methods: Fifty-two adolescent males with GH deficiency treated with GH were randomized to cotreatment with anastrozole or placebo daily for up to 36 months., Results: Fifty subjects completed 12 months, 41 completed 24 months, and 28 completed 36 months. Linear growth was comparable between groups; however, there was a significantly slower increase in bone age advancement from baseline in the anastrozole group vs. placebo group after 2 yr (+1.8+/-0.1 vs. +2.7+/-0.1 yr, P<0.0001) and after 3 yr (+2.5+/-0.2 vs. +4.1+/-0.1 yr, P<0.0001). This resulted in a net increase in predicted adult height of +4.5+/-1.2 cm in the anastrozole group at 24 months and +6.7+/-1.4 cm at 36 months as compared with a 1-cm gain at both time points in the placebo group. Estradiol and estrone concentrations increased less in the anastrozole group compared with placebo group. All boys on the aromatase inhibitor had normal tempo of virilization. Safety data, including glucose, and plasma lipid concentrations were comparable between groups., Conclusions: Anastrozole increases adult height potential of adolescent boys on GH therapy while maintaining normal pubertal progression after 2-3 yr. This treatment offers an alternative in promoting growth in GH-deficient boys in puberty. Long-term follow up is needed to elucidate fully the safety and efficacy of this approach.

In patients with childhood-onset growth hormone (GH) deficiency who have reached adult height, the transition from pediatric to adult healthcare is an appropriate time for reassessment of GH status. For patients in whom persistent GH deficiency (GHD) is established by appropriate testing, reinstitution of GH therapy or its continuation can improve quality of life, optimize body composition and bone mineral density, as well as reduce cardiovascular risks associated with GHD. Ongoing GH therapy should be individualized with attention paid to changes in serum insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I concentrations, body composition, and occurrence of adverse effects such as edema and arthralgia. GH deficient patients who discontinue childhood GH replacement therapy and are not restarted as adults should undergo long-term surveillance to detect possible adverse consequences (e.g. reduced bone mineral density) typically associated with interruption of GH treatment.

Unlabelled: Although most children born small for gestational age catch up in growth by age 2 y, up to 14% remain more than 2 standard deviations below the mean for height. Recombinant growth hormone is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration and by the European Agency for Evaluation of Medicinal Products for the treatment of children born small for gestational age who fail to manifest catch-up growth by 2 y or 4 y, respectively., Conclusion: We conclude from clinical studies that growth hormone therapy can induce catch-up growth in these children.

Growth hormone (GH) has been used for more than 40 years. GH improves height velocity in many conditions associated with impaired growth and corrects metabolic deficits attributable to GH deficiency (GHD). Many studies and surveillance programs exist to collect efficacy and safety data. GH has been demonstrated to have a relatively wide safety margin. Reported side effects, including pseudotumor cerebri, edema, slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE), worsening of scoliosis, gynecomastia, and hyperglycemia require careful monitoring. Currently, there are no data suggesting that GH therapy increases the risk of developing de novo, recurrent, or secondary malignancies. Patients who have a high intrinsic risk factor for the development of an adverse event need more vigilant surveillance.

At present, there are no uniform definitions for terms such as "small for gestational age" (SGA) and "catch-up growth" that can be used when evaluating children who are born small. Data suggest that growth hormone (GH) therapy can play a role in helping children born SGA achieve adequate height. For therapy to be successful, however, precise terminology must be defined and standardized, surveillance and identification of potential candidates must be performed, and treatment plans must be tailored to the unique needs of each patient. This manuscript focuses on each of these issues, and also identifies additional concerns that must be addressed as a consequence.

Immune functions, including cell surface markers, interleukin-2 receptor levels and responses of lymphocytes to mitogenic stimulation were evaluated in seven growth hormone deficient children ages 4-15 years, during treatment with biosynthetically derived human growth hormone. Treatment resulted in a decrease in % B cells and in % T total cells and also decreases in most individual patients' mitogen responses and interleukin-2 receptor levels. Most of the changes noted were transient and similar to those previously demonstrated during pituitary-derived human growth hormone treatment. Although not resulting in overt clinical manifestations in our patients, we think that potential interactions between growth hormone and immune functions need to be considered by physicians treating children with growth hormone. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]