Search

Managing the risk of wildfires is a growing concern in the western United States. Targeted grazing, or managing livestock grazing to achieve specific vegetation goals, is one possible tool to treat fuels, but few studies have evaluated its efficacy. The goal of this study was to test the effect of targeted grazing on herbaceous fuel loads and fire behavior by 1) implementing targeted grazing in a field experiment and 2) using a fire model (BehavePlus) to evaluate changes in fire behavior resulting from treatments. We applied targeted cattle grazing using low-stress herding and strategic placement of low-moisture block supplement on rugged rangelands in southwestern Arizona using a herd of 58 Red Angus cows and two bulls. Six of the cows were initially fitted with global positioning system collars. We tested two grazing treatments: 1) herding and supplement versus 2) no herding and no supplement on two pairs of study sites and replicated this for 2 years. Herding and supplement affected both the distribution of cattle and herbaceous fuel loads. Despite light utilization (26%) in treated sites, the BehavePlus fire model predicted that herding and supplement reduced fire rate of spread by more than 60% in grass communities and by more than 50% in grass/shrub communities. Fuel treatments dropped flame lengths below a 1.2-m critical threshold under the moderate fuel moisture scenario in grass communities and below a 2.4-m critical threshold in grass/shrub communities under both moderate and extreme fuel moisture scenarios. These results suggest that targeted grazing could reduce the potential cost of fighting fires in conditions similar to this study site. However, implementing this type of treatment on other sites will require careful calibration of animal numbers, supplement amounts, and length of herding periods relative to the specific context and goals.

Beef cattle grazing patterns are influenced by topography in that cattle generally select grazing sites near water while avoiding steep, rugged terrain; therefore, forage is often left ungrazed in the mountainous uplands whereas lowland riparian zones can be heavily grazed. Improving uniformity in beef cattle terrain-use provides opportunities to increase forage harvest and sustain sensitive ecosystems. Studies suggest that terrain-use by cattle may be improved using genomic selection as combinations of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) explained approximately 35% of the phenotypic variation in terrain-use indices that combined slope, elevation, and distance traveled from water. The objective of this study was to perform genome-wide association studies (GWAS) for six terrain-use traits (slope, elevation, vertical climb, distance traveled from water, rolling index, and rough index) in which we explored single-SNP associations, surveyed the genome in consecutive, one mega-base windows and examined quantitative trait loci (QTL) and underlying positional and functional candidate genes using bioinformatic tools to identify possible pleiotropic effects with other traits. Global positioning system (GPS) collars were used to track terrain-use patterns for 330 beef cows across 14 rangeland operations located in the western U.S. and Illumina BovineHD and BovineSNP50 SNP arrays were used to collect genomic data. Genotype quality control was conducted using PLINK software and association analyses were performed using BOLT, implementing a BayesC model. Quantitative trait loci detection was based upon the posterior inclusion probability (PIP) for individual loci and the proportion of total genetic variance explained by individual genomic windows. Analyses revealed 19 QTL that have been previously associated with health and production traits in dairy and beef cattle as well as 8 positional putative candidate genes that function in oxygen homeostasis, feed efficiency, and growth. These results suggest that beef cattle terrain-use traits are polygenic and may be pleiotropic with other production traits.

Conserving large carnivores throughout the world will often require that they share the landscape with livestock. Minimizing depredations and increasing tolerance by livestock producers will be critical for conservation efforts. To investigate factors influencing calf mortality and producer detection rates (i.e., number of livestock killed by predators, found by producers, and correctly classified as to cause of death), we monitored radio-tagged domestic calves at two sites in the Mexican wolf recovery area (East Eagle [EE] and Adobe Ranch [AR]). Study areas differed in grazing practices, density of predators (mountain lions, black bears, coyotes, and Mexican wolves), and amount of effort spent monitoring cattle. We radiotagged 618 calves over 3.5 years, and 312 calves over 2 years on the EE and AR, respectively. The overall proportion of radioed calves that died was higher on the EE (6.5%) than on the AR (1.9%). Predators (especially mountain lions) accounted for 85% of mortality on the EE and 0% on the AR. Calves selected by predators were on average 25 days younger than the surviving cohort. Our results indicate that year-round calving, especially in areas with high predator densities, are subject to higher losses primarily because calves are exposed to mortality agents for longer periods of time rather than having higher natural rates of mortality. We found a significant difference in producer detection rates between study sites, likely due to differences in the intensity of monitoring cattle between sites. On the EE, the producer detected 77.5% of mortalities and on the AR, the producer detected 33% of mortalities. Our results support changing husbandry practices to limit calving to a seasonal endeavor and that performance payment may be a better compensation strategy than ex post compensation schemes. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Free-grazing ruminants forage in environments containing multiple levels of complexity; the forage selection process operates at the landscape scale, when selecting feeding sites, and at the plant part level when selecting actual bites. Pen trials have shown that livestock associate visual cues with feeding sites, however, no field study has shown that animals generalise from training with visual cues in pens in order to choose feeding sites in the field. Our study tested nine beef heifers’ ability to generalise a learned visual cue association to select feeding sites in a rangeland setting offering a novel forage, Lehmann lovegrass (LL). Initially, animals were trained to associate high quality feed with a visual cue during pen trials. We then tested animal response to the cue before and after they gained 14-day grazing experience with LL. Two identical field experiments (i.e., novel, before animals had experienced foraging LL versus familiar, after the animals had 14-day grazing experience with LL) were conducted over 3-day periods. Each experiment consisted of 27, 10-min trials. Animals were tested in plots containing high quality (HQ) and low quality (LQ) LL patches. For each trial, one of three randomly selected scenarios was presented: (1) the visual cue was placed in the HQ patch, (2) the visual cue was placed in the LQ patch, or (3) no visual cue was placed in either patch. Dependent variables were first patch-type chosen, bite rate in each patch, and number of observations of grazing in each patch. Cue presence influenced initial patch choice, bite rate, and grazing tallies within patch type. Heifers took 212 more HQ bites than LQ bites when the cue was placed in the HQ patch ( P P P

We determined the cattle distribution patterns of dams (and foster dams) and their offspring while grazing a 1030 ha (about 3 km by 5 km) allotment during the summers of 1990–1993. Our primary objective in this 4-year field study was to determine whether yearling and adult offspring (and foster offspring) would return to the initial locations and associated habitat types that they were exposed to by their dams (or foster dams) early in life. We observed the dams' offspring for four consecutive summers (1990–1993) and the foster-dams' offspring for 3 consecutive summers (1991–1993). Cross-fostering was conducted to learn the relative importance of natural dams vs. foster dams as social models in influencing distribution patterns of offspring. Offspring were reared mostly in two different locations on the allotment by their dams or foster dams. Centroid analyses indicated that offspring in all 4 groups remained near the general location where they were reared as calves when they returned to the allotment as older animals (mean 0.5 to 1.2 km from dams' or foster dams' centroid). Peers apparently attenuated the dams' (and foster dams') influence on location and habitat use when offspring were yearlings. The effect of peers was manifested by an increase in distance from dams' or foster dams' centroid, and by a higher association index among yearlings, both of which reflected the collective experiences of offspring in the peer groups. Drought weakened the dams' and foster dams' influence on location and habitat use as water became scarce near their centroids, but drought amplified the dams' and foster dams' influence when water was not limited near their centroids. By the final year of the study, offspring in 3 of the 4 groups monitored were within 0.7 km from the dams' or foster dams' centroid (offspring in the fourth group were within 1.1 km from the foster dams' centroid). Collectively, our results suggest that experiences early in life affected cattle distribution, and that distribution at any point in time was a ‘snapshot’ of ongoing behavioral changes that were developing according to each individual's antecedent experiences and current environmental and social conditions. These results support the ‘working hypotheses’ that herding, selective culling, and water and shade development are important management techniques that can enhance dispersion and decrease use of sensitive areas on rangelands (e.g., riparian areas).

The Walker Basin Allotment grazing system in central Arizona is designed to allocate resource use under elk (Cervus elaphus L.) and cattle (Bos taurus L.) grazing. The grazing system was designed to promote biologically acceptable levels of forage use on the half of the allotment scheduled for cattle grazing and to rest the other half by attracting elk to pastures recently grazed by cattle. The objectives of our 2-year study were to determine whether the grazing system facilitated proper forage use as defined by recent forage use and residual stubble height guidelines (i.e., 30 to 40% use and an 8- to 10-cm stubble height) and whether the system rested one half of the allotment from elk and cattle grazing. Mean (+/- SEM) total elk and cattle forage use for western wheatgrass (Pascopyrum smithii Rydb.), the key forage species, was 32 and 61% +/- 7 in 1997 and 1998, respectively; corresponding mean (+/- SEM) stubble heights were 11 and 10 cm +/- 0.6. Mean total cattle and elk forage use in 1998 (61%) exceeded the 30 to 40% use guidelines. However, mean end-of-year stubble height was never below 10 cm. The grazing system did not provide half the allotment with complete rest; elk used all study pastures. Elk use was higher in pastures with heavier tree cover and steeper terrain in both years, regardless of where cattle grazing occurred. Elk grazing patterns were apparently more dependent on tree cover and topography than any changes in forage caused by the grazing system. DOI:10.2458/azu_jrm_v55i4_halstead

Forage use data can help rangeland and wildlife managers make informed decisions. However, managers need to know if forage use techniques that are commonly used to estimate ungulate herbivory under field conditions produce comparable results. The objective of this 2-year study was to directly compare forage use measurements obtained via the paired-plot method and 2 height-weight methods (using on-site height-weight curves and the pre-established United States Forest Service height-weight gauge). In June, July, and October of 1997 and 1998, we measured forage use of western wheatgrass (Pascopyrum smithii Rydb.) by cattle (Bos taurus L.) and wild ungulates, mainly elk (Cervus elaphus L.). On-site height-weight curves and the USFS gauge consistently produced lower estimates (overall means = 8 and 7%, respectively) than the paired-plot method (overall mean = 31%). Height-weight estimates did not differ (P > 0.05) when calculated with either on-site curves or the USFS gauge. Within sampling areas, paired-plot estimates were relatively more precise (mean CV = 63%) than on-site curves (mean CV = 238%) or the USFS gauge (mean CV = 271%). Selective grazing likely contributed to higher CVs for height-weight techniques. Our findings are important for rangeland and wildlife managers because the forage monitoring technique they use may influence the results obtained and, consequently, grazing management and wildlife harvest decisions. Managers should ensure that chosen monitoring techniques provide an appropriate evaluation of management goals and objectives. DOI:10.2458/azu_jrm_v53i5_halstead