Search

Accurate estimation of evapotranspiration (ET) can be affected by cloud change, while cloud‐induced bias errors in ET change remain poorly understood. Here we evaluated seven ET data sets from satellite microwave and optical models, atmospheric reanalysis and land surface models over East Asia. Results showed that although the data sets estimated ET changes overall well under mild cloud increase, all of them had a systematic overestimation (by 73.8%–159.8%) and deteriorated capability of capturing ET change under heavy cloud increase, especially over dense vegetation with large cloud cover. Overestimated incident solar radiation under clouds contributed to the deteriorated performances of ET. Cloud‐induced change in radiation and its errors played larger role in summer ET change over densely vegetated lands, while those in air temperature and relative humidity were dominant jointly over grass and barren lands. These results can serve as a reference for improving ET models and their forcing inputs under clouds. Plain Language Summary: The change of cloud cover affects terrestrial evapotranspiration (ET), which is a fundamental process in the interaction between land and the atmosphere. ET can be estimated from satellite observations, reanalysis data sets and land surface models. Knowing the cloud‐induced errors in the estimation of ET and its drivers can be very helpful for us to improve the ET modeling under the changing cloud conditions. In this study, we evaluated seven ET data sets and their forcing data from clear sky to cloudy sky conditions over East Asia. We quantified the importance of incident radiation, air temperature and relative humidity inputs in ET data sets under cloudy sky using a machine learning algorithm. Our findings revealed that all ET data sets were overestimated systematically under heavy cloud increase. Cloud‐induced change in radiation was more important over densely vegetated lands, while air temperature and relative humidity played larger roles over grass and barren lands. The result highlights the importance of cloud effects on ET estimations. Key Points: Seven evapotranspiration (ET) data sets from satellite microwave and optical models, reanalysis and land surface models were evaluated under cloud changeAll data sets overestimated the absolute ET values and cloud‐induced changes in ET under heavy cloud increase conditionsSummer ET change under clouds was dominated by radiation in the southern dense vegetation, but by temperature and humidity in grass lands [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

NO x fire emissions greatly affect atmosphere and human society. The top-down NO x fire emission estimation is highly influenced by satellite fire observation performance (e.g., fire detection) by affecting the derivation of emission coefficient (EC) and fire radiative power (FRP) magnitude. However, such influence is lack of comprehensive study. Here, we developed an algorithm to evaluate such impacts in northeastern Asia using multi-source data during 2012–2019. Specifically, we extracted near-concurrent fire observations from MODIS and its successor VIIRS over their orbit-overlapping area and combined respectively with OMI NO 2 concentration to derive NO x EC. We compared EC between MODIS and VIIRS, and defined a synergetic effect index (SEI) to explore the combined effects on NO x fire emission estimation due to potentially different ECs and FRP between the two sensors. Finally, we applied EC to estimate NO x emission and made comparison between MODIS and VIIRS. Results show that: 1) both sensors derived considerably higher NO x EC for low-biomass vegetation fires (e.g., grassland fires) than other vegetation fires; however, MODIS EC is about 30% lower than VIIRS EC while similar values are derived for forest fires; 2) synergetic effects induced by different ECs and FRP magnitudes between the two sensors are more significant during fall and winter than in spring and summer; 3) annual NO x emissions based on MODIS EC are 15–23% lower than that from VIIRS EC during 2012–2019, while both are lower than the conventional bottom-up emission inventories GFED and FINN by an average of 23–44%; nevertheless, the EC-based NO x estimations presented high spatiotemporal correlation of R usually between 0.70 and 0.95 with GFED and FINN. These results reveal and quantify the critical impacts of satellite fire observation performance on EC derivation and fire emission estimation, which is helpful in reducing estimation uncertainty. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]