Search

Imatinib is used for patients with SR-cGVHD. However, in 50% of cases imatinib is discontinued due to intolerance or inefficacy. In order to investigate nilotinib's role as salvage therapy in those patients, we conducted a prospective, multicenter, phase II study. (NCT02891395). Patients with SR-cGVHD were included to receive imatinib. Patients who stopped imatinib due to intolerance or inefficacy switched to Nilotinib. The primary endpoint was defined as the week-12 response rate to Nilotinib. The response was considered successful if superior to the 30% endpoint. Sixty-two patients started the IM-phase. Fourteen patients (22%) discontinued imatinib before week 12 due to: cGVHD progression (10%) or TKI-class-specific intolerance (12%). At week 12, we observed complete remission in 13 patients (21%) and partial response in 8 patients (13%). Twenty-nine patients switched to Nilotinib. Nilotinib response at week-12 was observed in 6 patients (21%) while 23 patients (79%) discontinued Nilotinib due to intolerance/cGVHD progression. The primary endpoint was not reached. This prospective study confirmed the efficacy of imatinib in patients with steroid refractory cGVHD. It failed to demonstrate the efficacy of nilotinib as a salvage therapy in patients who were intolerant/unresponsive to imatinib., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.)

In this article, we discuss again the definition, the risk factor and guideline to treat the graft failure, the poor graft function and erythrobalstopenia. Graft failure is a severe but rare complication after hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Despite disparity in the literature, we defined this complication and discussed the factor risks and recommendation for treatment based on new studies. Poor graft function is also a more frequent complication after HCT. New studies will soon be available to prove or not the current recommendation suggested in this article based on therapeutics medicine or cellular therapy. Erythroblastopenia, is a rarer complication post HCT. Despite anticipation for a better choice of compatibility donor/recipient, some patients still suffer from this complication., (Copyright © 2022 Société Française du Cancer. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Background: Haploidentical (haplo-) donors and cord-blood (CB) stem cells provide alternative transplant options in patients lacking an HLA-matched donor. In case of relapse or graft failure after a first alternative allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT), a second alternative HSCT (HSCT2) is rarely considered due to a high risk of toxicity., Methods: A retrospective French multicentre study was performed, including patients with hematologic malignancies who underwent two consecutive HSCT from alternative donors. All data were exported from the national ProMISE database between 2000 and 2016., Results: Forty-three patients (61.4%) received a CB-HSCT2 and 27 (38.6%) a haplo-HSCT2. Indications for HSCT were graft failure (51.4%) or disease progression (48.6%). Two-years probabilities of overall survival, progression-free survival and toxicity-related mortality were 18.5%, 17.8% and 55.8%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, complete remission status at HSCT2 and year of HSCT2 ≥ 2012 were significantly associated with a better outcome (with respectively hazard ratio [HR] = 0.42, p = .002 and HR = 0.5, p = .051)., Conclusions: Neither the indication of HSCT2 nor the source of stem cell was more advantageous towards overall patient survival. A salvage haploidentical or cord-blood stem cell transplantation is a high-risk procedure, that may be considered for patients achieving a complete remission before receiving the second HSCT., (© 2022 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: Despite therapeutic progress, 10 to 30% of adult patients with primary mediastinal B cell lymphoma (PMBCL) are primary refractory or experience early relapse (R/R). Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) thus remains a potentially curative option in this setting. Material and Methods: In this multicenter retrospective study, the outcomes of 33 French and Belgian adult patients allo-transplanted for R/R PMBCL between January 1999 and December 2018, were examined. Results: At allo-HSCT time, patients had received a median of 3 treatment lines, 50% of them were in complete response, 40% in partial response and 10% had a progressive disease. Forty-two percent of the donors were siblings and 39% matched related. The median follow-up for alive patients was 78 months (3.5-157). Considering the whole cohort, 2-year overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS) and graft-versus-host disease-free/relapse-free survival (GRFS) were 48% (95%CI: 33-70), 47% (95%CI: 33-68) and 38.5% (95%CI: 25-60) respectively. Cumulative incidence of relapse and non-relapse mortality rates were respectively 34% (95%CI: 18-50) and 18% (95%CI: 7-34). Disease status at transplant was the only factor predicting survivals, patients with progressive disease showing significant lower 2-year PFS (HR: 6.12, 95%CI: 1.32-28.31, p  = 0.02) and OS (HR: 7.04, 95%CI: 1.52-32.75, p  = 0.013). A plateau was observed for OS and PFS after 4 years with 10 patients alive after this date, suggesting that almost one third of the patients effectively salvaged and undergoing allo-SCT could be cured. Conclusion: This study indicates that allo-HSCT is a valid therapeutic option for R/R PMBCL, providing durable remissions.

The negative impact of high serum ferritin level (SFL) before and after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) on outcomes is well recognized. However, it is poorly documented in adults undergoing haploidentical HSCT (haplo-HSCT) with post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCY) for hematologic malignancies. The main objective was to assess the impact of pretransplantation and post-transplantation SFL on overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and nonrelapse mortality (NRM) in patients undergoing haplo-HSCT with PTCY. The secondary objective was to identify factors associated with outcomes after transplantation by comparing SFL with other parameters related to the status of patients or donors. This multicentric retrospective study included 223 consecutive patients who underwent haplo-HSCT with PTCY in 4 French centers (Nantes, Angers, Besançon, and Brest) between October 2013 and January 2020. The impact of SFL on OS, DFS, and NRM at different time points was assessed based on receiver operating characteristic curves. With a median follow-up of 37.6 months (interquartile range, 23.5 to 51.0 months), 3-year OS, DFS, and NRM were 48.1 ± 4%, 46.3 ± 4%, and 30.0 ± 3%, respectively. Pretransplantation SFL had no impact on outcomes irrespective of the cutoff tested. Considering patients alive at 3 months post-transplantation, an SFL ≥3500 µg/L at 3 months was statistically significantly associated with worse 3-year OS (32.7 ± 8.7% versus 53.4 ± 7.2%; P = .01) and DFS (30.1 ± 8.2% versus 53.1 ± 7.1%; P = .008), with a trend toward higher NRM (33.2 ± 8.6% versus 17.6 ± 5.4%; P = .10). Similarly, high SFL (≥2700 µg/L) at 6 months post-transplantation was associated with worse 3-year OS (56.1 ± 9.1% versus 79.2 ± 6.0%; P = .02) and DFS (53.6 ± 8.7% versus 74.9 ± 6.2%; P = .01), with a trend toward higher NRM (21.4 ± 7.4% versus 8.2 ± 4.0%; P = .10). In multivariate analysis, high 3-month and 6-month FL remained associated with lower OS and DFS, with a trend toward higher NRM. Pretransplantation SFL appears to have no impact on outcomes in haplo-HSCT with PTCY, in contrast to what is documented in the matched allo-HSCT setting. In contrast, in the haplo-HSCT setting, high SFL early post-transplantation is associated with lower survival and a trend toward higher NRM., (Copyright © 2021 The American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The association of Cyclosporine A (CsA) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) has increased in the setting of reduced intensity conditioning (RIC). Nevertheless, the use of CsA or CsA+MMF has not been reported in a large and uniform cohort. We analyzed 497 patients with acute myeloid leukemia in complete remission (CR) who underwent matched unrelated donor (MUD) hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). All patients received a fludarabine busulfan RIC regimen and anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) with either CsA alone or in combination with MMF. The cumulative incidence (CI) of grade II-IV acute GvHD was 27% (95% CI 21-33%) for CsA and 33% (95% CI 27-38%) for CsA+MMF (p = 0.25). The 2-year CI of chronic GvHD was 38% (95% CI 31-45%) and 33% (95% CI 28-39%) for the CsA and the CsA+MMF group, respectively (p = 0.26). On multivariate analysis, no statistically significant differences with respect to relapse incidence (RI), non-relapse mortality (NRM), leukemia-free survival (LFS), overall survival (OS), acute and chronic GvHD were found between the two groups, also when conducting a subgroup analysis in peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) recipients. Our results support the importance of randomized trial to identify patients who could benefit from the addition of MMF in MUD HSCT.