Search

The aim of this study is to investigate whether or not delayed graft function (DGF) and pre-transplant sensitization have synergistic adverse effects on allograft outcome after deceased donor kidney transplantation (DDKT) using the Korean Organ Transplantation Registry (KOTRY) database, the nationwide prospective cohort. The study included 1359 cases between May 2014 and June 2019. The cases were divided into 4 subgroups according to pre-sensitization and the development of DGF post-transplant [non-pre-sensitized-DGF(-) (n = 1097), non-pre-sensitized-DGF(+) (n = 127), pre-sensitized-DGF(-) (n = 116), and pre-sensitized-DGF(+) (n = 19)]. We compared the incidence of biopsy-proven allograft rejection (BPAR), time-related change in allograft function, allograft or patient survival, and post-transplant complications across 4 subgroups. The incidence of acute antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) was significantly higher in the pre-sensitized-DGF(+) subgroup than in other 3 subgroups. In addition, multivariable cox regression analysis demonstrated that pre-sensitization combined with DGF is an independent risk factor for the development of acute ABMR (hazard ratio 4.855, 95% confidence interval 1.499-15.727). Moreover, DGF and pre-sensitization showed significant interaction (p-value for interaction = 0.008). Pre-sensitization combined with DGF did not show significant impact on allograft function, and allograft or patient survival. In conclusion, the combination of pre-sensitization and DGF showed significant synergistic interaction on the development of allograft rejection after DDKT., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

Background: Deceased-donor kidneys experience extensive injury, activating adaptive and maladaptive pathways therefore impacting graft function. We evaluated urinary donor uromodulin (UMOD) and osteopontin (OPN) in recipient graft outcomes., Methods: Primary outcomes: all-cause graft failure (GF) and death-censored GF (dcGF). Secondary outcomes: delayed graft function (DGF) and 6-month estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). We randomly divided our cohort of deceased donors and recipients into training and test datasets. We internally validated associations between donor urine UMOD and OPN at time of procurement, with our primary outcomes. The direction of association between biomarkers and GF contrasted. Subsequently, we evaluated UMOD:OPN ratio with all outcomes. To understand these mechanisms, we examined the effect of UMOD on expression of major histocompatibility complex II in mouse macrophages., Results: Doubling of UMOD increased dcGF risk (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02-1.2), whereas OPN decreased dcGF risk (aHR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.88-1). UMOD:OPN ratio ≤3 strengthened the association, with reduced dcGF risk (aHR, 0.57; 0.41-0.80) with similar associations for GF, and in the test dataset. A ratio ≤3 was also associated with lower DGF (aOR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.60-0.89) and higher 6-month eGFR (adjusted β coefficient, 3.19; 95% CI, 1.28-5.11). UMOD increased major histocompatibility complex II expression elucidating a possible mechanism behind UMOD's association with GF., Conclusions: UMOD:OPN ratio ≤3 was protective, with lower risk of DGF, higher 6-month eGFR, and improved graft survival. This ratio may supplement existing strategies for evaluating kidney quality and allocation decisions regarding deceased-donor kidney transplantation., Competing Interests: S.G.M. supported by the American Heart Association (18CDA34110151) and Patterson Trust Fund. P.P.R. supported by epidemiology consulting from COHRDATA related to dialysis outcomes. This study received grant/research support from Merck, CVS and initiated grants from Merck to the University of Pennsylvania to support the THINKER (kidney), USHER (heart), and SHELTER (lung) trials of transplanting organs from donors with Hepatitis C into Hepatitis C negative recipients. It initiated grants from CVS to the University of Pennsylvania to support studies of medication adherence. I.E.H. received NIH grant support from NCATS (UL1TR002538 and KL2TR002539). T.M.E.-A. received grant support from NIDDK and US Department of Veterans Affairs. M.D.D. obtained the salary support from NIDDK. S.M. received grant/research support from NIH (NIDDK/NIAID/NIHMD/NIBIB) and consulting fees from Angion Pharmaceuticals. A.Z.R. received NDAs with Pliant Therapeutics and xMD Diagnostics, advisory board of Escala Therapeutics. C.R.P. received consulting fee from Renalytix and grant/research support from National Institute of Diabetes and Digestion and Kidney Diseases, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and Data Safety and Monitoring Board of Genfit, Abbott. M.N.H. received grant support from NIH/NIDDK. The other authors declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2020 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Consider a theoretical situation in which 2 patients with similar baseline characteristics receive a kidney transplant on the same day: 1 from a standard criteria deceased donor, the other from a living donor. Which kidney transplant will last longer?, Methods: We conducted a population-based cohort study using linked administrative healthcare databases from Ontario, Canada, from January 1, 2005, to March 31, 2014, to evaluate several posttransplant outcomes in individuals who received a kidney transplant from a standard criteria deceased donor (n = 1523) or from a living donor (n = 1373). We used PS weighting using overlap weights, a novel weighting method that emphasizes the population of recipients with the most overlap in baseline characteristics., Results: Compared with recipients of a living donor, the rate of all-cause graft failure was not statistically higher for recipients of a standard criteria deceased donor (hazard ratio, 1.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.8-1.6). Recipients of a standard criteria deceased donor, compared with recipients of a living donor had a higher rate of delayed graft function (23.6% versus 18.7%; odds ratio, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.0-1.6) and a longer length of stay for the kidney transplant surgery (mean difference, 1.7 d; 95% CI, 0.5-3.0)., Conclusions: After accounting for many important donor and recipient factors, we failed to observe a large difference in the risk of all-cause graft failure for recipients of a standard criteria deceased versus living donor. Some estimates were imprecise, which meant we could not rule out the presence of smaller clinically important effects.

Background: Kidney delayed graft function (kDGF) remains a challenging problem following simultaneous liver and kidney transplantation (SLKT) with a reported incidence up to 40%. Given the scarcity of renal allografts, it is crucial to minimize the development of kDGF among SLKT recipients to improve patient and graft outcomes. We sought to assess the role of preoperative recipient and donor/graft factors on developing kDGF among recipients of SLKT., Methods: A retrospective review of 194 patients who received SLKT in the period from January 2004 to March 2017 in a single center was performed to assess the effect of preoperative factors on the development of kDGF., Results: Kidney delayed graft function was observed in 95 patients (49%). Multivariate analysis revealed that donor history of hypertension, cold static preservation of kidney grafts [versus using hypothermic pulsatile machine perfusion (HPMP)], donor final creatinine, physiologic MELD, and duration of delay of kidney transplantation after liver transplantation were significant independent predictors for kDGF. kDGF is associated with worse graft function and patient and graft survival., Conclusions: Kidney delayed graft function has detrimental effects on graft function and graft survival. Understanding the risks and combining careful perioperative patient management, proper recipient selection and donor matching, and graft preservation using HPMP would decrease kDGF among SLKT recipients., (© 2019 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: Calcium oxalate (CaOx) deposition in the kidney may lead to loss of native renal function but little is known about the prevalence and role of CaOx deposition in transplanted kidneys., Methods: In patients transplanted in 2014 and 2015, all for-cause renal allograft biopsies obtained within 3 months post-transplantation were retrospectively investigated for CaOx deposition. Additionally, all preimplantation renal biopsies obtained in 2000 and 2001 were studied., Results: In 2014 and 2015, 388 patients were transplanted, of whom 149 had at least one for-cause renal biopsy. Twenty-six (17%) patients had CaOx deposition. In the population with CaOx deposition: Patients had significantly more often been treated with dialysis before transplantation (89 vs. 64%; p = 0.011); delayed graft function occurred more frequently (42 vs. 23%; p = 0.038); and the eGFR at the time of first biopsy was significantly worse (21 vs. 29 ml/min/1.73m2; p = 0.037). In a multivariate logistic regression analysis, eGFR at the time of first biopsy (OR 0.958, 95%-Cl: 0.924-0.993, p = 0.019), dialysis before transplantation (OR 4.868, 95%-Cl: 1.128-21.003, p = 0.034) and the time of first biopsy after transplantation (OR 1.037, 95%-Cl: 1.013-1.062, p = 0.002) were independently associated with CaOx deposition. Graft survival censored for death was significantly worse in patients with CaOx deposition (p = 0.018). In only 1 of 106 preimplantation biopsies CaOx deposition was found (0.94%)., Conclusion: CaOx deposition appears to be primarily recipient-derived and is frequently observed in for-cause renal allograft biopsies obtained within 3 months post-transplantation. It is associated with inferior renal function at the time of biopsy and worse graft survival., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Uncontrolled donation after circulatory death (uDCD) increases organ availability for kidney transplant (KT) with short-term outcomes similar to those obtained from donation after brain death (DBD) donors. However, heterogeneous results in the long term have been reported. We compared 10-year outcomes between 237 KT recipients from uDCD donors maintained by normothermic extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (nECMO) and 237 patients undergoing KT from standard criteria DBD donors during the same period at our institution. We further analyzed risk factors for death-censored graft survival in the uDCD group. Delayed graft function (DGF) was more common in the uDCD group (73.4% vs 46.4%; P < .01), although glomerular filtration rates at the end of follow-up were similar in the 2 groups. uDCD and DBD groups had similar rates for 10-year death-censored graft (82.1% vs 80.4%; P = .623) and recipient survival (86.2% vs 87.6%; P = .454). Donor age >50 years was associated with graft loss in the uDCD group (hazard ratio: 1.91; P = .058), whereas the occurrence of DGF showed no significant effect. uDCD KT under nECMO support resulted in similar graft function and long-term outcomes compared with KT from standard criteria DBD donors. Increased donor age could negatively affect graft survival after uDCD donation., (© 2018 The American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.)

Background: resistive index (RI) is highly utilised to assess the graft function using Doppler ultrasonography. The RI has been shown as the best ultrasound parameter to assess kidney allograft dysfunction. Several studies have established the role of the RI as a predictor of transplant failure. However, these studies were using RI measurement in the later stages post transplantation. The present study has conducted to identify the association between early RI measurement and early graft function represented as delayed graft function (DGF) and immediate graft function (IGF), as well as long-term graft survival., Methods: an evidence-based clinical review of studies published before May 2018 was conducted from Medline, Science Direct, EMBASE and Cochrane databases. Studies on early measurement of RI whereby the primary or secondary goals of the study related to graft function and/or graft survival were included. Studies using late RI measurement and without RI value groups were excluded. The Mantzel-Haenzel method was used to analyse pooled risk ratio and 95% confidence interval, while the heterogeneity of the study was calculated through I2 value. Data analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.3., Results: nine studies with a total of 1802 patients who had undergone a kidney transplant were analysed. DGF was found in 19% (193/1015) of the low RI group and in 42.8% (337/787) of the high RI group (RR 2.04 (95% CI 1.72 - 2.41), p < 0.00001, I2 = 28%). IGF was found in 39.5% (62/157) of the low RI group and in 10.5% (28/268) of the high RI group (RR 0.26 (95% CI 0.17 - 0.40), p < 0.00001, I2 = 0%). Long-term graft survival, with follow up between 60-144 months, was found in 83% (701/845) of the low RI group and in 69.4% (395/569) of the high RI group (RR 0.82 (95% CI 0.72 - 0.93), p = 0.002, I2 = 63%)., Conclusion: the results of this study emphasise the association between early measurement of RI and early graft function, and long-term graft survival. An elevated RI provides the chance of recognizing the patients with poor long-term prognosis, from the first moment after kidney transplant.

Objective: To determine whether pre-transplant body mass index (BMI) affects renal allograft function and survival in pediatric renal transplant recipients., Study Design: This is a retrospective cohort study using the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network data from 2000 to 2013 to compare time to total allograft loss (allograft failure or death), prevalence of delayed graft function, prevalence of acute rejection, and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) post-transplant in pediatric renal transplant recipients categorized by BMI z-score., Results: A total of 8804 kidney transplant recipients met our inclusion criteria, and of those, 6% were underweight, 14% were overweight, and 17% were obese pre-transplant. The adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for allograft failure was significantly higher for obese recipients compared to normal weight recipients (HR 1.25, 95% CI 1.1, 1.42); for every 1 point increase in BMI z-score, there was a 7% increased hazard of allograft failure (HR 1.07; 95% CI 1.03-1.1, p < 0.001). The prevalence of delayed graft function and acute rejection increased with higher BMI z-score category; however, this difference did not reach statistical significance. eGFR at 1 and 5 years post-transplant decreased with higher BMI z-score although it was only statistically significant at 1 year., Conclusions: Obesity is prevalent in pediatric renal transplant recipients, and obese, but not overweight or underweight, pediatric renal transplant recipients have an increased risk of allograft failure. Implementation of effective obesity interventions in pediatric renal transplant recipients is of critical importance to improve longevity of the renal allograft.

Hypothermic machine perfusion (HPM) grants a better postoperative outcome in transplantation of organs procured from extended criteria donors (ECDs) and donors after cardiac death (DCD). So far, the only available parameter for outcome prediction concerning those organs is pretransplant biopsy score. The aim of this study is to evaluate whether renal resistance (RR) trend during HPM may be used as a predictive marker for post-transplantation outcome. From December 2015 to present, HMP has been systematically applied to all organs from ECDs and DCD. All grafts underwent pretransplantation biopsy evaluation using Karpinski's histological score. Only organs that reached RR value ≤1.0 within 3 hours of perfusion were transplanted. Single kidney transplantation (SKT) or double kidney transplantation (DKT) were performed according to biopsy score results. Sixty-five HMPs were performed (58 from ECDs and 7 from DCD/ECMO donors). Fifteen kidneys were insufficiently reconditioned (RR > 1) and were therefore discarded. Forty-nine kidneys were transplanted, divided between 21 SKT and 14 DKT. Overall primary nonfunction (PNF) and delayed graft function (DGF) rate were 2.9 and 17.1%, respectively. DGF were more common in kidneys from DCD (67 vs. 7%; P = 0.004). Biopsy score did not correlate with PNF/DGF rate (P = 0.870) and postoperative creatinine trend (P = 0.796). Recipients of kidneys that reached RR ≤ 1.0 within 1 hour of HMP had a lower PNF/DGF rate (11 vs. 44%; P = 0.033) and faster serum creatinine decrease (POD10 creatinine: 1.79 mg/dL vs. 4.33 mg/dL; P = 0.019). RR trend is more predictive of post-transplantation outcome than biopsy score. Hence, RR trend should be taken into account in the pretransplantation evaluation of the organs., (© 2018 International Center for Artificial Organs and Transplantation and Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Background: Kidney transplantation following uncontrolled donation after circulatory death (uDCD) presents a high risk of delayed graft function due to prolonged warm ischemia time. In order to minimise the effects of ischemia/reperfusion injury during warm ischemia, normothermic recirculation recently replaced in situ perfusion prior to implantation in several institutions. The aim of this study was to compare these preservation methods on kidney graft outcomes., Methods: The primary endpoint was the one-year measured graft filtration rate (mGFR). We collected retrospective data from 64 consecutive uDCD recipients transplanted over a seven-year period in a single centre., Results: Thirty-two grafts were preserved by in situ perfusion and 32 by normothermic recirculation. The mean ± SD mGFR at 1 year post-transplantation was 43.0 ± 12.8 mL/min/1.73 m 2 in the in situ perfusion group and 53.2 ± 12.8 mL/min/1.73 m 2 in the normothermic recirculation group (p = 0.01). Estimated GFR levels were significantly higher in the normothermic recirculation group at 12 months (p = 0.01) and 24 months (p = 0.03) of follow-up. We did not find any difference between groups regarding patient and graft survival, delayed graft function, graft rejection, or interstitial fibrosis., Conclusions: Function of grafts preserved by normothermic recirculation was better at 1 year and the results suggest that this persists at 2 years, although no difference was found in short-term outcomes. Despite the retrospective design, this study provides an additional argument in favour of normothermic recirculation.

Objectives: As the demand for kidney transplant allografts has increased, many centers are expanding the upper limit of acceptable body mass index for kidney donors. However, obesity is a risk factor for developing renal disease. Our goal was to quantify body mass index trends in donor nephrectomy patients and to institute nutrition counseling to promote sustainable weight loss to reduce the risk of metabolic syndrome-derived renal dysfunction., Materials and Methods: Ninety patients who underwent donor nephrectomy between 2007 and 2012 consented to having height and weight data collected at multiple time points. After data collection, each patient underwent a standardized nutrition counseling session. One year later, body mass index was reassessed., Results: Preoperatively, 52% of the patients were overweight or obese. The percentage of overweight and obese patients remained stable for 2 years after surgery. However, at 3, 4, and 5 years after surgery, these rates increased to 59%, 69%, and 91%. Each patient was counseled about obesity-related comorbidities and provided information about lifestyle modification. One year later, 94% of previously overweight patients and 82% of previously obese patients had a decrease in mean body mass index from 27.2 ± 4.0 kg/m2 to 25.1 ± 3.6 kg/m2., Conclusions: Living-donor nephrectomy patients are at risk of developing obesity, similar to the adult population. Nutrition counseling may be beneficial to help normalize body mass index in patients who have become overweight or obese to potentially prevent obesity-related comorbidities. All patients were evaluated by a nutrition specialist after surgery to review our donor nephrectomy nutrition brochure. Body mass index monitoring and primary care follow-up appear to be appropriate surveillance methods.

Background: Ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) leading to delayed graft function (DGF), defined by the United Network for Organ Sharing as dialysis in the first week (UNOS-DGF), associates with poor kidney transplant outcomes. Controversies remain, however, about dialysis initiation thresholds and the utility for other criteria to denote less severe IRI, or slow graft function (SGF)., Methods: Multicenter, prospective study of deceased-donor kidney recipients to compare UNOS-DGF to a definition that combines impaired creatinine reduction in the first 48 hours or greater than 1 dialysis session for predicting 12-month estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). We also assessed 10 creatinine and urine output-based SGF definitions relative to 12-month eGFR., Results: In 560 recipients, 215 (38%) had UNOS-DGF, 330 (59%) met the combined definition, 14 (3%) died, and 23 (4%) had death-censored graft failure by 12 months. Both DGF definitions were associated with lower adjusted 12-month eGFR (95% confidence interval)-by 7.3 (3.6-10.9) and 7.4 (3.8-11.0) mL/min per 1.73 m, respectively. Adjusted relative risks for 12-month eGFR less than 30 mL/min per 1.73 m were 1.9 (1.2-3.1) and 2.1 (1.1-3.7), with unadjusted areas under the curve of 0.618 and 0.627, respectively. For SGF definitions, postoperative day (POD) 7 creatinine had the strongest association with 12-month eGFR, and POD5 creatinine and creatinine reduction between POD1 and POD2 demonstrated modest separations in 12-month eGFR., Conclusions: Although UNOS-DGF does not adequately predict 12-month function on its own, our findings do not support changing the definition. Postoperative day 7 creatinine is correlated with 12-month eGFR, but large translational studies are needed to understand the biological link between IRI severity at transplant and longer-term outcomes.

Background: Donation after circulatory death (DCD) is current clinical practice to increase the donor pool. Deleterious effects on renal graft function are described for hypothermic preservation. Therefore, current research focuses on investigating alternative preservation techniques, such as normothermic perfusion., Methods: We compared continuous pressure-controlled normothermic ex vivo kidney perfusion (NEVKP) with static cold storage (SCS) in a porcine model of DCD autotransplantation. After 30 minutes of warm ischemia, right kidneys were removed from 30-kg Yorkshire pigs and preserved with 8-hour NEVKP or in 4°C histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate solution (SCS), followed by kidney autotransplantation., Results: Throughout NEVKP, electrolytes and pH values were maintained. Intrarenal resistance decreased over the course of perfusion (0 hour, 1.6 ± 0.51 mm per minute vs 7 hours, 0.34 ± 0.05 mm Hg/mL per minute, P = 0.005). Perfusate lactate concentration also decreased (0 hour, 10.5 ± 0.8 vs 7 hours, 1.4 ± 0.3 mmol/L, P < 0.001). Cellular injury markers lactate dehydrogenase and aspartate aminotransferase were persistently low (lactate dehydrogenase < 100 U/L, below analyzer range; aspartate aminotransferase 0 hour, 15.6 ± 9.3 U/L vs 7 hours, 24.8 ± 14.6 U/L, P = 0.298). After autotransplantation, renal grafts preserved with NEVKP demonstrated lower serum creatinine on days 1 to 7 (P < 0.05) and lower peak values (NEVKP, 5.5 ± 1.7 mg/dL vs SCS, 11.1 ± 2.1 mg/dL, P = 0.002). The creatinine clearance on day 4 was increased in NEVKP-preserved kidneys (NEVKP, 39 ± 6.4 vs SCS, 18 ± 10.6 mL/min; P = 0.012). Serum neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin at day 3 was lower in the NEVKP group (1267 ± 372 vs 2697 ± 1145 ng/mL, P = 0.029)., Conclusions: Continuous pressure-controlled NEVKP improves renal function in DCD kidney transplantation. Normothermic ex vivo kidney perfusion might help to decrease posttransplant delayed graft function rates and to increase the donor pool.

Introduction: Nowadays, the number of patients receiving a second graft is growing, and the management of failed grafts is still controversial., Objective: Our objective was to analyze the influence of graft nephrectomy on graft and patient survival., Materials and Methods: We retrospectively evaluated the demographic features and graft outcomes of 63 recipients who received second allografts between August 1985 and April 2013. They were divided into two groups: group A, those who underwent nephrectomy of failed graft (n = 21, 33.3%), and group B, those whose failed graft was retained (n = 42, 66.6%). χ 2 and Mann-Whitney U tests were used to compare demographic characteristics and graft features in both groups. Kaplan-Meier test was used to analyze graft and patient survival. Finally, univariate and multivariate analysis was done using Cox regression., Results: Demographic characteristics of donor and receptors were similar in both groups. Overall panel-reactive antibody (P = .040) showed statistically significant differences between groups (72.0 ± 25.3 in group A and 54.8 ± 30.0 in group B). Hemodialysis duration was longer in group A (P = .023, 112.2 ± 72.8 vs 70.9 ± 66.9 months). The percentage of patients who had delayed graft function was higher in group A (58.8% vs 27.3%, P = .029). Kaplan-Meier test found no differences between groups (P = .344); group A, 107.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 74.0 to 140.8) and group B, 82.7 months (95% CI 62.5 to 102.8). We found no differences in terms of patient survival (P = .798) with the Kaplan-Meier test. In group A, patient survival was 164.5 months (CI 137.7 to 191.31) and in group B, 152.0 months (95% CI 125.5 to 178.5)., Conclusions: Failed graft nephrectomy did not show a negative impact on graft and patient survival., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The effects of pretransplantation dialysis modality on graft function are key issues in end-stage renal disease patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate post-transplantation outcomes according to pretransplantation renal replacement therapy modality in deceased-donor kidney transplantation. Among 444 deceased-donor kidney transplant recipients in Severance Hospital between April 1993 and Dec 2014, 275 who maintained a unique dialysis modality (hemodialysis [HD; n = 178] or peritoneal dialysis [PD; n = 97]) until transplantation were enrolled. There were no significant differences in sex, age, human leukocyte antigen mismatch, cold ischemic time, or duration of dialysis between groups. There was also no difference in 5-year graft survival between HD and PD groups (87.7% vs. 82.3%, respectively; P = .148). On multivariate Cox regression for risk factors affecting graft survival, renal replacement therapy modality was not found to be a risk factor. However, the rate of delayed graft function was higher in the HD group than in the PD group (32.0% vs. 19.6%, respectively; P = .028). In addition, graft function at 1 week after transplantation in the PD group was superior to that in the HD group. The pretransplantation dialysis modality was found to affect both delayed graft function and early graft function, although not graft survival., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The impact of renal function recovery on graft survival was examined using estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) slope after kidney transplantation (GAP classification); this was compared to the conventional classification of immediate graft function (IGF), slow graft function (SGF), and delayed graft function (DGF)., Materials and Methods: Overall, 541 cases of cadaveric renal transplants were reviewed from a prospective transplant database. eGFR and its slope were measured using the harmonic mean over the first week post-transplantation. Next, 495 kidney transplant recipients from an independent institution were assessed to determine the prognostic value of graft function based on the eGFR slope., Results: The main discrimination of eGFR slopes occurred within the first 7 days. Three groups in the GAP classification (Good graft function, Average graft function, Poor graft function) were defined based on eGFR slope tertiles: good graft function (GGF), average graft function (AGF), and poor graft function (PGF) were defined based on the ΔCrCL per day over the first 7 days: <1 mL/min, 1-4 mL/min, and >4 mL/min, respectively. When applied to the validation cohort, the 5-year graft failure was 20% for the PGF group, 4% for the AGF group, and 3% for the GGF group. Multivariable Cox regression analysis demonstrated better prediction of long-term graft function with the new classification (C statistic 0.49 [old)] vs 0.61 [new])., Conclusion: The new GAP criteria were better at predicting long-term graft survival and renal function compared to the conventional classification system, and deserve further consideration in future studies., (Copyright © 2016. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Transplant tourism, a form of transplant commercialization, has resulted in serious short-term adverse outcomes that explain reduced short-term kidney allograft survival. However, the nature of longer-term outcomes in commercial kidney transplant recipients is less clear. To study this further, we identified 69 Canadian commercial transplant recipients of 72 kidney allografts transplanted during 1998 to 2013 who reported to our transplant center for follow-up care. Their outcomes to 8 years post-transplant were compared with 702 domestic living donor and 827 deceased donor transplant recipients during this period using Kaplan-Meier survival plots and multivariate Cox regression analysis. Among many complications, notable specific events included hepatitis B or C seroconversion (7 patients), active hepatitis and/or fulminant hepatic failure (4 patients), pulmonary tuberculosis (2 patients), and a type A dissecting aortic aneurysm. Commercial transplantation was independently associated with significantly reduced death-censored kidney allograft survival (hazard ratio 3.69, 95% confidence interval 1.88-7.25) along with significantly delayed graft function and eGFR 30 ml/min/1.73 m(2) or less at 3 months post-transplant. Thus, commercial transplantation represents an important risk factor for long-term kidney allograft loss. Concerted arguments and efforts using adverse recipient outcomes among the main premises are still required in order to eradicate transplant commercialization., (Copyright © 2016 International Society of Nephrology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Slow graft function (SGF) can influence overall prognosis in patients receiving deceased donor kidney transplantation (DKT). However, the impact of SGF on renal function remains uncertain. We investigated retrospectively renal function in cases with SGF compared with early graft function (EGF) and delayed graft function (DGF)., Methods: Renal function after transplantation was analyzed in 199 patients who underwent DKT. Patients were classified into 130 (65.3 %) cases with EGF, 27 (13.6 %) cases with SGF, 6 (3.0 %) cases with DGF and one dialysis (DGF1), and 36 (18.1 %) cases with DGF and two or more dialyses (DGF2)., Results: The 1-year estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) in the SGF group was lower than that in the EGF group (P = 0.027), but the rate of eGFR decline did not differ between the groups. The risk factors for renal function were evaluated using the area under the eGFR curve over 3 years (AUCeGFR). Donor age was negatively, and recipient age and the number of HLA matches were positively correlated with the AUCeGFR (all P < 0.05). A multivariate analysis revealed that the AUCeGFR was lower in cases of younger recipient age, older donor age, and acute rejection (all P < 0.05). The AUCeGFR was significantly lower in the SGF and DGF2 groups compared with the EGF group (P = 0.031 and 0.006, respectively)., Conclusions: SGF may be an independent risk factor for poor renal function after DKT. Moreover, it was comparable to DGF. Efforts should be dedicated to minimizing the development of SGF and DGF.

Delayed graft function (DGF) after kidney transplantation is not uncommon, and it is associated with long-term allograft impairment. Our aim was to compare renal perfusion changes measured with noninvasive functional MRI in patients early after kidney transplantation to renal function and allograft histology in biopsy samples. Forty-six patients underwent MRI 4-11 days after transplantation. Contrast-free MRI renal perfusion images were acquired using an arterial spin labeling technique. Renal function was assessed by estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and renal biopsies were performed when indicated within 5 days of MRI. Twenty-six of 46 patients had DGF. Of these, nine patients had acute rejection (including borderline), and eight had other changes (e.g., tubular injury or glomerulosclerosis). Renal perfusion was significantly lower in the DGF group compared with the group with good allograft function (231 ± 15 vs. 331 ± 15 ml·min(-1)·100 g(-1), P < 0.001). Living donor allografts exhibited significantly higher perfusion values compared with deceased donor allografts (P < 0.001). Renal perfusion significantly correlated with eGFR (r = 0.64, P < 0.001), resistance index (r = -0.57, P < 0.001), and cold ischemia time (r = -0.48, P < 0.01). Furthermore, renal perfusion impairment early after transplantation predicted inferior renal outcome and graft loss. In conclusion, noninvasive functional MRI detects renal perfusion impairment early after kidney transplantation in patients with DGF., (Copyright © 2015 the American Physiological Society.)

Background: Compared with the impact of delayed graft function (DGF) after renal transplantation, DGF after pancreas transplantation has not been fully evaluated., Methods: We retrospectively verified the impact of DGF on long-term pancreas graft survival in surgically successful cases. Pancreas graft failure was defined by the recipient's return to exogenous insulin administration., Results: Between May 2004 and April 2013, we performed 135 technically successful primary pancreas transplantations. Delayed graft function was defined as a total cumulative insulin requirement of 19 UI or greater within postoperative 7 days. Of the 135 recipients in our study cohort, 47 (34.8%) developed DGF after the pancreas transplantation. By multivariate analysis, DGF was found to be associated with a donor age of 30 years or older (odds ratio, 3.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.50-7.69; P=0.003) and the increased ratio of body mass index in a recipient to a donor (odds ratio, 26.1; 95% confidence interval, 2.53-270.0; P=0.006). There was a trend toward higher acute rejection (P=0.622) and mortality (P=0.49) rates in recipients with versus without DGF, although this did not reach statistical significance. Delayed graft function was found to be associated with a greater risk of overall pancreas graft failure (P=0.016) and death-censored graft failure (P=0.037)., Conclusion: Delayed graft function after pancreas transplantation was found to be associated with a greater risk of overall pancreas graft failure and death-censored graft failure.

Background: Long-term function of transplanted kidney is the factor determining quality of life for transplant recipients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of selected factors on time of graft function after renal transplantation within 15 years of observation., Methods: Preoperative and intraoperative factors were analyzed in 232 kidney recipients within a 15-year observation period. Analysis included age, sex, cause of recipient's renal failure, length of hemodialyses before transplantation, peak panel reactive antibodies test, human leukocyte antigen compatibility, cold ischemia time, delayed graft function occurrence, length and time of hemodialyses after transplantation, early graft rejection, creatinine level at days 1, 3, 7, 30, 90, and 180 after transplantation, and influence of these factors on the time of graft function. Statistical analysis was performed with the use of univariate and multivariate Kaplan-Meier test and Cox regression proportional hazards model, with P < .05 considered to be significant., Results: Univariate analysis showed significantly shorter renal graft function in the group of recipients with higher creatinine levels in all of the analyzed time periods and in patients experiencing delayed graft function. Length of time of hemodialyses after transplantation and number of dialyses had significant impact on worsening of late transplant results. Multivariate analysis reported that early graft rejection in the postoperative period is an independent factor improving late graft function: P = .002; hazard ratio (HR), 0.49 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.31-0.78). Higher creatinine level at day 90 after kidney transplantation is a predictive factor of late graft dysfunction: P = .002; HR, 1.68 (95% CI 1.2-2.35)., Conclusions: Creatinine level at day 90 after renal transplantation is the prognostic factor of long-term kidney function. Early transplant rejection leads to introduction of more aggressive immunosuppression protocol, which improves long-term transplant results.

Purpose: Although the use of kidney allografts from expanded criteria donors (ECD) has increased in recent years, the reported discard rates are also growing. The influence of ECD characteristics on transplant outcomes is still underevaluated., Methods: This retrospective study investigated the influence of preimplantation biopsy findings and delayed graft function (DGF) on patient and graft survivals and renal function at 36 months in a cohort of 372 ECD kidney transplant recipients., Results: Patient and graft survivals were 91.6 and 68.9 %. The incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection was 31 %. There were no differences in patient (88.6 vs. 91.1 vs. 94.7 vs. 78.6 %, p = 0.10) or graft (78.1 vs. 72.2 vs. 60.5 vs. 62.6 %, p = 0.14) survivals and renal function (41.7 ± 25.6 vs. 39.9 ± 29.9 vs. 38.1 ± 30.6 vs. 37.4 ± 29.2 mL/min, p = 0.79) comparing ECD kidneys with mild, moderate, and severe histological changes or with no preimplantation biopsy, respectively. However, severe scored transplants had the worst death-censored graft survival (OR 3.1, 95 % CI 1.4-6.9, p = 0.007). No significant differences in patient (86.2 vs. 83.4 %, p = 0.17) or graft (73.7 vs. 65.9 %, p = 0.06) survivals and renal function (38.9 ± 28.6 vs. 39.9 ± 28.4 mL/min, p = 0.72) were observed comparing patients with or without DGF. Multivariable analysis found diabetes history as the only independent risk factor for graft loss (OR 2.1, 95 % CI 1.3-3.3, p = 0.003) or patient death (OR 3.1, 95 % CI 1.5-5.8, p < 0.001)., Conclusions: Within the limitations of sample size and short follow-up time, in this cohort of ECD kidney transplant recipients the severity of histological changes observed in preimplantation biopsies was independently associated with graft loss.

Background: Delayed graft function (DGF) after renal transplantation can be diagnosed according to several different definitions, complicating comparison between studies that use DGF as an endpoint. This is a particular problem after transplantation with kidneys from donation after circulatory death (DCD) kidneys, because DGF is common, and its relationship to early graft failure may differ depending on the definition of DGF., Methods: The presence of DGF in 213 donation after brain death (DBD) and 312 DCD kidney transplants from October 2005 to August 2011 was determined according to 10 different, but widely used, definitions (based on dialysis requirements, creatinine changes, or both). The relationship of DGF to graft function and graft survival was determined., Results: The incidence of DGF varied widely depending on the definition used (DBD; 24%-70%: DCD; 41%-91%). For kidneys from DCD donors, development of DGF was only associated with poorer 1-year estimated glomerular filtration rate for 1 of 10 definitions of DGF, and no definition of DGF was associated with impaired graft survival. Conversely, for DBD kidneys, DGF, as defined in 9 of 10 different ways, was associated with poorer 1-year estimated glomerular filtration rate and inferior graft survival. Importantly, the predictive power for poorer transplant outcome was comparable for all definitions of DGF., Conclusion: No definition of DGF is superior. We suggest that the most widely used and most easily calculated definition--the use of dialysis in the first postoperative week--should be universally adopted as the definition of DGF clinically and as a study endpoint.

Ex vivo normothermic perfusion (EVNP) is a novel method of preservation that restores circulation and allows an organ to regain function prior to transplantation. The aim of this study was to assess the effects of EVNP in kidneys from marginal donors. Eighteen kidneys from extended criteria donors (ECD) underwent a period of EVNP immediately before transplantation. Kidneys were perfused with a plasma free red-cell based solution at a mean temperature of 34.6°C. The outcome of these kidneys was compared to a control group of 47 ECD kidneys that underwent static cold storage (CS). The mean donor age was 61 ± 1 years in the EVNP and 62 ± 6 years in the CS group (p = 0.520). EVNP kidneys were perfused for an average of 63 ± 16 min and all were transplanted successfully. The delayed graft function rate (DGF), defined as the requirement for dialysis within the first 7 days was 1/18 patients (5.6%) in the EVNP group versus 17/47 (36.2%) in the CS group (p = 0.014). There was no difference in graft or patient survival at 12 months (p = 0.510, 1.000). This first series of EVNP in renal transplantation demonstrates that this technique is both feasible and safe. Our preliminary data suggests that EVNP offers promise as a new technique of kidney preservation., (© Copyright 2013 The American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.)

Introduction: Delayed graft function (DGF) occurs more frequently in kidney transplants from donation after cardiac death (DCD) than from donation after brain death (DBD). We investigated the effect of DGF on posttransplantation outcomes among grafts from controlled DCD kidneys., Patients and Methods: This single-center retrospective study recruited 80 controlled DCD kidneys transplanted from January 2005 to December 2011. Mean patient follow-up was 28.5 months., Results: There were no primary nonfunction grafts; the DGF rate was 35.5%. Overall graft survival rates between groups with versus without DGF were 92.4% and 95.2% at 1 year, 92.4% and 87.1% at 3 years, and 84.7% and 87.1% at 5 years, respectively (P = not significant (NS)). Patients with versus without DGF showed the same survival rates at the corresponding time 92.4% vs 97.2%, 92.4% vs 93.9%, and 84.7% vs 93.9% (P = NS). Estimated glomerular filtration rate was significantly lower in the DGF compared with the non-DGF group at hospital discharge (29 vs 42 mL/min; P = .00) and at 6 months posttransplantation (46 vs 52 mL/min; P = .04), but the difference disappeared thereafter: 47 vs 52 mL/min at 1 year, 50 vs 48 mL/min at 3 years, and 54 vs 53 mL/min at 5 years (P = NS). DGF did not increase the risk of an acute rejection episode (29.6% vs 30.6%; P = NS) or rate of surgical complications (33.3% vs 26.5%; P = NS). However, DGF prolonged significantly the length of hospitalization in the DGF versus the non- DGF group (18.9 vs 13 days; P = .00). Donor body mass index (BMI) ≥ 30 kg/m(2), recipient BMI ≥30 kg/m(2), and pretransplantation dialysis duration increased the risk of DGF upon multivariate logistic regression analysis., Conclusions: Apart from the longer hospital stay, DGF had no deleterious impact on the future of kidney allografts from controlled DCD, which showed comparable graft and patient survivals, renal function, rejection rates, and surgical complications as a group without DGF. Therefore, DGF should no longer be considered to be a medical barrier to the use of kidney grafts from controlled DCD., (Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Assessment of graft function in experimental cardiac transplant has been underused by insufficient methods (echo-cardiography, magnetic resonance imaging). The isolated reperfused working-heart model is an excellent tool for hemodynamic evaluation of rodent hearts. So far, it has never been used in a cardiac transplant setting. Our study tries to combine the in vivo technique of a rat heart transplant model with the ex vivo method of an isolated working heart., Materials and Methods: Heterotopic heart transplants have been performed in rats with a nonsuture cuff technique. After 8 hours of cold ischemia and 24 hours of reperfusion, grafts were mounted on the working heart. To assess graft function, cardiac output was measured with increasing levels of afterload pressure. Nontransplanted hearts were mounted directly to the working heart apparatus to serve as a control group. Each heart was assessed subjectively by the Stanford score before being mounted on the working-heart apparatus., Results: The working-heart assessment detected significantly impaired graft function in the transplant group compared with control hearts. In contrast, functional assessment with the score-system could not detect any difference between transplanted and native hearts., Conclusions: The isolated working-heart model is an excellent tool for assessing graft function after experimental heart transplant in rodents.

Objectives: To compare transplant outcomes between expanded criteria donor kidneys and standard criteria donor kidneys., Materials and Methods: All adult renal transplants from deceased donors performed in Saudi Arabia over a 24-month period were included. Donor and recipient factors were recorded, and their effects on outcomes with expanded criteria donor and standard criteria donor kidneys were compared. Standard criteria donor kidneys were further subgrouped into optimal and suboptimal groups, and outcomes were compared., Results: A total of 280 deceased-donor kidney transplants were performed during the study period. Of these, 61 (21.8%) involved expanded criteria donor kidneys. Cold ischemia time and prevalence of delayed graft function were similar between expanded criteria and standard criteria kidneys (P = .7 and P = .8). Graft survival rates at 2 years were also similar (93.3% vs 94.6%; P = .8). Delayed graft function exerted a negative effect on 2-year graft survival in both the expanded group (hazard ratio, 4.9; 95% CI 3.2-7.5; P = .001) and the standard group (hazard ratio, 4.6; 95% CI 3.24-7.5; P = .001). No difference was found between the 2 standard criteria subgroups with respect to serum creatinine value at the end of follow-up (P = .8), delayed graft function prevalence (P =.5), or 2-year graft survival (P = .8). The only independent factor affecting graft survival was delayed graft function (P = .001). No independent effect was seen for expanded criteria donor versus standard criteria donor, donor serum creatinine level, or recipient age., Conclusions: Similar short-term outcomes were found for expanded criteria and standard criteria kidney recipients. Delayed graft function was associated with significant risk of graft loss in both groups, with decreases in 2-year graft survival of 33.3% and 18.3%. No difference was seen between the 2 subtypes of standard criteria donor kidneys.

Aim: To determine place of vitamin D in prevention and treatment of cardiorenal syndrome (CRS) and chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) in the aspect of myocardial and renal reparation., Methods and Material: In Russia and the Netherlands we included in a randomized placebo controlled study 120 vitamin D deficient [25(OH) vitamin D<40 mol/l] recipients of asystolic and cadaveric donors. Patients were divided in 4 groups: paricalcitol (2-4 g/day) group (n=28), calcitriol (1-6 g/day orally) group (n=28), diet (1200-1800 IU/day of vitamin D with multivitamins and from foodstuffs) group (n=26), placebo with diet control group (n=27)., Results: After 180 days degree of CAN according to the Banff classification was 1.24 and 1.22 in paricalcitol and calcitriol groups, respectively, compared with 1.43 and 1.68 in diet and placebo groups, respectively (p<0.05). Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) changed from 46.7 to 84.4, 81.4, 76.8, and 54.5 ml/min/1.73 m3 in paricalcitol, calcitriol, diet and placebo groups, respectively. Fluorescence activated cell scanning (FACS) analysis allowed to detect quantitative induction of SP+ cells amounting 7.4, 2.9 and 1.2%; 7.2, 2.7; and 1.1%; 6.1, 2.9 and 1.2%; 9.3, 1.3 and 0.7% of peripheral blood progenitors, renal epithelial cells, and cardiomyocytes in paricalcitol, calcitriol, diet and placebo groups, respectively. Levels of CD133, CD34, CD73, and CD105 were significantly elevated in patients of paricalcitol (median 161, range 0-834 copies), calcitriol (163, 0-721), and diet (119, 0-401) groups, compared with the placebo group (0,0-41), p<0.01. Level of nuclear vitamin D receptor (VDR) protein in renal tissue homogenizate and myocardium achieved 584, 599, 478, and 333 mole VRD/mg and 801, 715, 654, and 389 Φmole VRD/mg of protein in paricalcitol, calcitriol, diet and placebo groups, respectively (p<0.01). Circulating progenitor stem cells demonstrated comparatively high level of VDR expression--529, 526, 401, and 211 mole VRD/mg in CD133, CD34 cells; 432, 414, 303, and 290 mole VRD/mg in CD73, CD105 cells; 549, 558, 442, and 302 φmole VRD/mg in SP+ cells in paricalcitol, calcitriol, diet and placebo groups, respectively (p<0.05). Hypercalcemia was detected in 4(14%) patients in calcitriol group (p<0.001). Under influence of antihypertensive therapy arterial pressure decreased after transplantation from 180/101 to 143/87, 141/94, 147,102, and 165/101 mm Hg in paricalcitol, calcitriol, diet and placebo groups, respectively (p<0.01). NYHA heart failure functional class changed from 2.3 to 1.8, 1.9, 1.9, and 2.5 in paricalcitol, calcitriol, diet and placebo groups, respectively (p<0.01). In 6 months after transplantation average CCS scores were 533 (0-998), 611 (0-1712), 524 (122-1278) and 990 (120-1800) cells in paricalcitol, calcitriol, diet and placebo groups, respectively (p<0.05)., Conclusions: Vitamin D is an effective mean of prevention and treatment of CRS and CAN, stimulator of reparation of renal and myocardial tissues. Optimal for wide clinical practice is the use of active vitamin D analog paricalcitol (2-4 g/day) as well as special diet with multivitamins (up to 1800 IU of cholecalciferol).

Introduction: High blood pressure and arterial stiffness contribute independently to cardiovascular mortality in uremic patients. High blood pressure is an established risk factor for chronic allograft nephropathy, recently named interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy (IF/TA). We sought to assess whether heart afterload determinants: arterial stiffness and vascular resistance or impedance accelerate kidney graft failure upon long-term observation., Methods: Using a noninvasive method of blood pressure waveform analysis, (HDI/PulseWave/CR-2000), we studied 160 consecutive kidney transplant recipients, who were at least 3 months after transplantation, for systolic (SBP), diastolic, and mean blood pressure; pulse rate; systemic vascular resistance and impedance as well as large and small artery compliance. The associations of the hemodynamic parameters with relative increases in serum creatinine for every year of graft survival (ΔCreat) were assessed using multiple linear regression analysis. Relationships between systemic hemodynamics and kidney graft loss due to IF/TA were evaluated by Cox regression analysis, including serum creatinine, time after transplantation, delayed graft function, human leukocyte antigen mismatch, panel-reactive antibodies, cold ischemia time, donor age glomerular filtration rate as well as prescribed cardiovascular and immunosuppressive drugs., Results: Over 6.6±0.4 years of follow-up, excluding four noncompliant patients, 11 patients died and 32 lost their kidney grafts, including 25 due to IF/TA. ΔCreat (10.3%±22.0%/y) was independently and positively associated with the initial SBP (β=0.26; P=.001) and serum creatinine values (β=0.16; P=.04). The risk of graft loss due to IF/TA was greater among patients with an increased serum creatinine (relative risk [RR]=59.5 per nlog-unit increase; P<.001) or higher SBP (RR=51.1 per nlog-unit increase; P=.04). Besides SBP, no other hemodynamic parameter was associated with graft failure., Conclusions: The rate of kidney graft function deterioration and risk of transplant loss due to IF/TA are not independently influenced by systemic arterial compliance, resistance, or impedance. SBP appears to be the key circulatory parameter independently affecting the progression of IF/TA, and should be a therapeutic target., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The purpose of this study was to analyze the possible effects of machine perfusion (MP) versus cold storage (CS) on delayed graft function (DGF) and early graft survival in expanded criteria donor kidneys (ECD). As part of the previously reported international randomized controlled trial 91 consecutive heart-beating deceased ECDs--defined according to the United Network of Organ Sharing definition--were included in the study. From each donor one kidney was randomized to MP and the contralateral kidney to CS. All recipients were followed for 1 year. The primary endpoint was DGF. Secondary endpoints included primary nonfunction and graft survival. DGF occurred in 27 patients in the CS group (29.7%) and in 20 patients in the MP group (22%). Using the logistic regression model MP significantly reduced the risk of DGF compared with CS (OR 0.460, P=0.047). The incidence of nonfunction in the CS group (12%) was four times higher than in the MP group (3%) (P=0.04). One-year graft survival was significantly higher in machine perfused kidneys compared with cold stored kidneys (92.3% vs. 80.2%, P=0.02). In the present study, MP preservation clearly reduced the risk of DGF and improved 1-year graft survival and function in ECD kidneys. (Current Controlled Trials number: ISRCTN83876362)., (© 2011 The Authors. Transplant International © 2011 European Society for Organ Transplantation.)

Delayed graft function (DGF), especially long-lasting DGF, complicates kidney transplant outcome. Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) is an acute kidney injury marker; therefore, we tested whether urine NGAL could predict DGF, prolonged DGF (lasting over 14 days), or the quality of kidney function in transplant recipients without DGF (non-DGF). We collected urine samples from 176 recipients transplanted with deceased donor kidneys before and various days after transplantation. A total of 70 transplantations had DGF, of which 26 were prolonged. Patients who developed DGF had a significantly slower decrease in urinary NGAL compared with those without DGF, such that day 1 NGAL predicted DGF (area under the curve (AUC) 0.75) and predicted DGF in 15 of 112 cases with day 1 urine output over 1 l (AUC 0.70) and in 19 of 86 cases with a day 1 decrease in creatinine over 50 μmol/l (AUC 0.74). The urinary NGAL level on day 1 predicted prolonged DGF (AUC 0.75), which had significantly worse 1-year graft survival (73%), compared with shorter DGF (100%). In non-DGF, high day 3 NGAL (greater than the mean) was associated with significantly worse kidney function at 3 weeks compared with low NGAL, but not at 3 months and 1 year. NGAL did not correlate with long-term function in DGF. Hence, day 1 urinary NGAL predicted DGF even when it was not clinically expected early on, and importantly, it predicted prolonged DGF that led to worse graft survival.

Objectives: Graft loss owing to chronic allograft dysfunction is a major concern in renal transplant recipients. We assessed the affect of immune and nonimmune risk factors on death-censored graft loss in renal transplant recipients with chronic allograft dysfunction., Materials and Methods: We performed a retrospective, single-center study on 214 renal transplant recipients with chronic allograft dysfunction among 1534 renal transplant recipients at the Urmia University Hospital from 1997 to 2005. Data registry includes details from all renal transplants. The renal transplant recipient information is regularly updated to determine current graft function, graft loss, or renal transplant recipient's death. The selection criteria were a functional renal allograft for at least 1 year and a progressive decline in allograft function., Results: Increasing donor age (RR=1.066; P < .001), recipient age (RR=1.021, P = .00), recipient weight (RR=1.024; P = .029), and waiting time on dialysis to transplant (RR=1.047; P = .006), pretransplant hypertension (RR=3.126; P < .001), pretransplant diabetes (RR=5.787; P < .001), delayed graft function (RR=6.087; P < .001), proteinuria (RR=2.663; P = .001), posttransplant diabetes (RR=2.285; P = .015), posttransplant hypertension (RR=2.047; P = .017), and AR (RR=3.125; P < .001). Patients in stage 2 at the beginning of chronic allograft dysfunction relative to stage 1 (RR=4.823; P < .001) and patients in stage 3 at the beginning of chronic allograft dysfunction relative to stage 1 (RR=123.06; P < .001) were significant risk factors for death-censored graft loss. Using mycophenolate mofetil versus azathioprine reduced death-censored graft loss (RR=0.499; P = .001)., Conclusion: We found that age of donor, pretransplant hypertension, pretransplant diabetes, type of immunosuppression (mycophenolate mofetil vs azathioprine), delayed graft function, proteinuria, and stage of allograft dysfunction at the start of chronic allograft dysfunction are the major risk factors for late renal allograft dysfunction.

Background: In kidney transplantations, the identification of early postoperative parameters with high predictive power for the development of late allograft dysfunction has important implications for clinical practice. This study sought to determine these parameters in a single-center cohort., Methods: We studied 82 deceased donor renal transplantation. We assessed the following measures: dialysis-dependent delayed graft function (ddDGF), extended DGF, serum creatinine level at day 7, creatinine reduction ratio at day 7, urine output at day 1 and at day 7 posttransplantation (UO7)., Results: Only UO7 showed a significant result upon multivariate analysis (P < .0001). It was less influenced by dialysis with respect to measures based upon serum creatinine. By Receiver Operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, it showed an elevated area under the curve (0.811), with a cut-off value of 500 mL/24 h, showing high sensitivity (98.5%)., Conclusions: UO7 may be of clinical utility to assess the risk for subsequent renal dysfunction., (Copyright (c) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Current methods for predicting graft recovery after kidney transplantation are not reliable. We performed a prospective, multicenter, observational cohort study of deceased-donor kidney transplant patients to evaluate urinary neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL), IL-18, and kidney injury molecule-1 (KIM-1) as biomarkers for predicting dialysis within 1 wk of transplant and subsequent graft recovery. We collected serial urine samples for 3 d after transplant and analyzed levels of these putative biomarkers. We classified graft recovery as delayed graft function (DGF), slow graft function (SGF), or immediate graft function (IGF). Of the 91 patients in the cohort, 34 had DGF, 33 had SGF, and 24 had IGF. Median NGAL and IL-18 levels, but not KIM-1 levels, were statistically different among these three groups at all time points. ROC curve analysis suggested that the abilities of NGAL or IL-18 to predict dialysis within 1 wk were moderately accurate when measured on the first postoperative day, whereas the fall in serum creatinine (Scr) was not predictive. In multivariate analysis, elevated levels of NGAL or IL-18 predicted the need for dialysis after adjusting for recipient and donor age, cold ischemia time, urine output, and Scr. NGAL and IL-18 quantiles also predicted graft recovery up to 3 mo later. In summary, urinary NGAL and IL-18 are early, noninvasive, accurate predictors of both the need for dialysis within the first week of kidney transplantation and 3-mo recovery of graft function.

Objective: Renal allografts with excellent graft function show good long-term outcomes, while grafts with delayed function have been associated with poor long-term survivals, although few reports have analyzed outcomes among these groups. We compared first-week postoperative graft function among renal transplant patients to analyze the impact of slow graft function (SGF) and delayed graft function (DGF) on graft survival., Materials and Methods: Renal transplantations were performed from 362 unrelated, 46 related, and 163 deceased donors. Kidney transplant patients were divided into 3 groups according to their initial graft function. First-week dialyzed patients formed the DGF group. Nondialyzed patients were divided into a SGF or an excellent graft function (EGF) cohort according to whether the serum creatinine at day 7 was higher vs lower than 2.5 mg/dL, respectively., Results: Of the 570 renal transplant recipients, DGF was observed in 39 patients (6.8%), SGF in 64 (11.2%), and EGF in 467 (81.8%). There was no significant difference in SGF vs DGF between patients who received kidneys from unrelated vs related living or deceased donors. Graft survival was worse among the DGF than the SGF or EGF patients, with no significant difference between the last 2 groups. The 6-month graft survivals were 74%, 93%, and 96%; the 3-year graft survivals were 70%, 88%, and 90%, respectively (P < .001)., Conclusions: We observed a similar impact of EGF and SGF on kidney graft survival. Kidney transplant recipients who developed DGF showed worse graft survival than those with EGF or SGF.

We undertook this study to assess the rate of poor early graft function (EGF) after laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy (lapNx) and to determine whether poor EGF is associated with diminished long-term graft survival. The study population consisted of 946 consecutive lapNx donors/recipient pairs at our center. Poor EGF was defined as receiving hemodialysis on postoperative day (POD) 1 through POD 7 (delayed graft function [DGF]) or serum creatinine >/= 3.0 mg/dL at POD 5 without need for hemodialysis (slow graft function [SGF]). The incidence of poor EGF was 16.3% (DGF 5.8%, SGF 10.5%), and it was stable in chronologic tertiles. Poor EGF was independently associated with worse death-censored graft survival (adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 2.15, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.34-3.47, p = 0.001), worse overall graft survival (HR 1.62, 95% CI 1.10-2.37, p = 0.014), worse acute rejection-free survival (HR 2.75, 95% CI 1.92-3.94, p < 0.001) and worse 1-year renal function (p = 0.002). Even SGF independently predicted worse renal allograft survival (HR 2.54, 95% CI 1.44-4.44, p = 0.001). Risk factors for poor DGF included advanced donor age, high recipient BMI, sirolimus use and prolonged warm ischemia time. In conclusion, poor EGF following lapNx has a deleterious effect on long-term graft function and survival.

Objectives: Simultaneous pancreatic-renal transplant is an effective treatment for insulin-dependent patients with chronic renal failure. We sought to identify the main influences on pancreatic and patient survival rates after simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplants., Patients and Methods: The 1-year patient and pancreas survival rates of 150 patients who had undergone simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplant were analyzed by the Cox proportional hazards regression model and the Kaplan-Meier method. Uni and multivariate analyses were performed in terms of transplant-, recipient-, and donor-related risk factors., Results: At 1 year, patient and pancreatic allograft survival rates were 82% and 76.7%, respectively. Delayed graft function in the kidney (P = .001, HR 5.41), acute kidney rejection (P = .016, HR 3.36), and intra-abdominal infection (P < .0001, HR 4.15) were the main factors related to 1-year patient survival. Pancreatic allograft survival at 1 year was related to intra-abdominal infection (P < .0001, OR 12.83), vascular thrombosis (P = .002, OR 40.55), acute kidney rejection (P = .027, OR 3.06), donor sodium greater than 155 mEq/L (P = .02, OR 3.27), and dopamine administration exceeding 7.6 microg/kg/min (P = .046, OR 2.85)., Conclusions: Delayed kidney allograft function and intra-abdominal infection had an important effect on both patient and pancreatic allograft survival rates.

Delayed graft function is a potentially challenging problem especially in cadaveric kidney transplant recipients. It adversely impacts long-term graft survival. It is rarely seen in living kidney transplants. Recovery of graft function usually occurs within a month. The chances of recovery of graft function diminish with further prolongation of delayed function. In fact, recovery of graft function after 3 months has rarely been described, we report herein recovery of graft function after 132 days of nonfunction in a living related kidney transplant.

Various factors determine the graft- and patient survival after transplantation. HLA-matching and immunological factors are of importance for the short- and long-term survival. Apart from these obvious determinants, nonimmunological factors play an important role in defining the baseline organ quality as well as the recipients' status. The influence of these parameters on graft- and patient survival is still underestimated and is a topic of debate. On account of the increasing acceptance of marginal-donor organs these events are of increasing importance for graft survival and long-term function. We review nonimmunological causes for deteriorated graft function and graft loss after solid organ transplantation.

Background: The aim of our study was to examine, in a recent cohort of kidney transplant recipients who have received modern immunosuppressive therapy, the respective role of cold ischemia time (CIT) and delayed graft function (DGF) on acute rejection (AR) rates and long-term graft survival., Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the charts of 611 renal transplantations between 1996 and 2005. Most patients received a calcineurin inhibitor as maintenance therapy, either cyclosporine (43%) or tacrolimus (52%) and 76% of the patients received an antilymphocyte induction therapy. Study endpoints were DGF, first-year AR, and long-term graft survival. Uni- and multivariate analyses were performed to determine factors that may have influenced the study outcomes., Results: DGF was observed in 16.2% of patients. Both older donor age and longer CIT were significant risk factors for DGF. DGF rates were similar whether patients received a calcineurin inhibitor before transplantation or not. AR occurred in 16.5% of grafts during the first year. Independent predictors of AR by multivariate analysis were duration of dialysis, CIT, current panel-reactive lymphocytotoxic antibody more than 5%, and the number of human leukocyte antigen-A, B, and DR mismatches. Each hour of cold ischemia increases the risk of rejection by 4%. With respect to death-censored graft survival, three pretransplant parameters emerged as independent predictors of graft loss: younger recipient age, peak panel-reactive lymphocytotoxic antibody more than 5% and longer CIT. The detrimental effect of CIT on graft survival was entirely because of its propensity to trigger AR. When AR was added to the multivariate Cox model, CIT was no longer significant whereas first-year AR became the most important predictor of graft loss (Hazards ratio, 4.6)., Conclusion: Shortening CIT will help to decrease not only DGF rates but also AR incidence and hence graft loss. Patients with prolonged CIT should receive adequate immunosuppression, possibly with antilymphocyte preparations, to prevent AR occurrence.

Background: Since 1996, the allocation of grafts in France has been based on a hierarchical three-level system: national, regional and local. The objective of this study was to determine whether the shipment of cadaveric kidneys according to these new exchange rules affects allograft outcome in the Eastern region of France., Methods: This retrospective study analysed all renal transplants performed in the four centres of the French Eastern region during 3 years (1996 to 1998). All patients were followed up until death, return to dialysis, last information date or the end of June 2003. Information regarding the donors, recipients and treatments, as well as patient and graft outcome, was recorded. Factors associated with graft loss were analysed using Cox proportional hazard methods., Results: 542 transplants were analysed, 287 (53%) kidneys were transplanted locally, 229 (42.2%) kidneys coming from exchanges within the region and 26 (4.8%) from another region. There were statistically significant differences between the four centres for donors' and recipient' characteristics and for immunosuppressive treatment, but there was no difference between centres regarding patient survival (94.4% at 5 years), graft survival (83.7% at 5 years) or death-censored graft survival (87.8% at 5 years). Compared to locally transplanted grafts, shipped grafts had significantly better human leukocyte antigen (HLA) matching (2.5 +/- 1.3 versus 2.1 +/- 1.0 matches, P = 0.0005 but a longer cold ischaemia time (23.2 +/- 7.9 versus 19.2 +/- 7.8 h, P < 0.0001). Three independent factors were associated with a reduced graft survival: at least one acute rejection, delayed graft function and a shipped graft., Conclusion: The results of this study suggest that the shipment of cadaveric renal allografts in a regional distribution system is associated with better HLA matching but is a significant predictor of graft loss at 5 years. It would be advisable to restrict graft sharing to patients whose access to transplantation is limited, taking special care to avoid any additional factors having a detrimental effect on the outcome.

The survival and function of a kidney transplant are influenced by numerous immunological and nonimmunological factors. The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of a number of cadaveric donor parameters on transplanted kidney function, and in particular on the occurrence of delayed graft function (DGF) since DGF is one of the most important factors in long-term organ survival. This study looked at 143 patients who underwent kidney transplant of whom 32 displayed DGF. The creatinine levels in organ recipients, which were evaluated during a follow-up that ranged between 6 months and 4 years, were significantly higher among recipients who developed DGF after transplant (1.8 +/- 0.7 vs 1.4 +/- 0.4; P = .02). The following donor parameters were taken into consideration: history of diabetes and hypertension; creatinine levels; inotropie therapy; problems relating to hemodynamics (hypotension and/or cardiac arrest); and cold ischemia time. We observed that a donor history of hypertension (46.8% DGF vs 23.27% no DGF; P = .01) and high levels of donor creatinine prior to organ removal (1.9 +/- 1.2 mg/dL DGF vs 1.2 +/- 0.9 mg/dL no DGF; P = .007) were significant risk factors for DGF among kidney recipients. No significant differences were found for others factors between recipients with versus without DGF.