Search

Background. In countries without a national organization for retrieval and distribution of organs of the deceased donors, problem of organ shortage is still not resolved. In order to increase the number of kidney transplantations we started with the program of living unrelated - spousal donors. The aim of this study was to compare treatment outcome and renal graft function in patients receiving the graft from spousal and those receiving ghe graft from living related donors. Method. We retrospectively identified 14 patients who received renal allograft from spousal donors between 1996 and 2009 (group I). The control group consisted of 14 patients who got graft from related donor retrieved from the database and matched than with respect to sex, age, kidney disease, immunological and viral pretransplant status, the initial method of the end stage renal disease treatment and ABO compatibility. In the follow-up period of 41 ± 38 months we recorded immunosuppressive therapy, surgical complications, episodes of acute rejection, CMV infection and graft function, assessed by serum creatinine levels at the beginning and in the end of the follow-up period. All patients had pretransplant negative cross-match. In ABO incompatible patients pretransplant isoagglutinine titer was zero. Results. The patients with a spousal donor had worse HLA matching. There were no significant differences between the groups in surgical, infective, immunological complications and graft function. Two patients from the group I returned to hemodialysis after 82 and 22 months due to serious comorbidities. Conclusion. In spite of the worse HLA matching, graft survival and function of renal grafts from spousal donors were as good as those retrieved from related donors.

Background/Aim. Due to improved methods for removal of ABO isoagglutinins and novel immunosuppressive protocols, short and long term outcome in blood group incompatible is similar to blood group compatible kidney transplantation. The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy of our original method for removal of ABO isoagglutinins from the blood in ABO-incompatible kidney allograft recipients. Method. Between 2006 and 2008 twelve patients were transplanted from ABO incompatible living donors. Titers of ABO isoagglutinins were 4-128 (IgG). Immunosuppressive therapy started 14 days before kidney transplantation with rituximab, followed by a triple therapy (prednisone + tacrolimus + mycophenolate mofetil) and the first plasma exchange (PE) procedure, in which one plasma volume was substituted with albumin and saline on day 7 before transplantation. For selective extracorporeal immunoadsorption, the removed plasma was mixed with donor blood type filtered red blood cells, centrifuged and the supernatant separated and preserved. In the next PE procedure, the removed plasma was replaced with immunoadsorbed plasma, and so on. Titers of ABO agglutinins, renal allograft function and survival were followed-up. Results. The pre-transplant treatment consisting of 1-5 PE procedures and immunosuppressive therapy resulted in target ABO agglutinins titers below 4. During a 10-24 month follow-up three patients had an early acute rejection, one patient acute rejection and hemolytic anemia, two patients surgical complications and one of them lost his graft. In the post-transplant period, the titers of ABO antibodies remained below 4. All the patients had stable kidney allograft function with mean serum creatinine ±SD of 129 ± 45 μmol/l at the end of the study. Conclusion. Our method for removal of ABO antibodies was effective in a limited series of patients and short-term follow-up.

Background/Aim. Cyclosporine (CyA) therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) through the measurement of drug concentration in blood two hours after the administration (C2), and/or according to the calculated value of the area under the concentration - time curve during the first four hours following administration (AUC0−4) shows favourable correlation with clinical manifestations in patients with kidney transplantation (Tx). The aim of this study was to analyze clinical efficiency and usability of TDM CyA through C2 and AUC0-4 in the group of our kidney transplanted patients during the first 24 months following Tx. Methods. The study included 50 patients who had undergone kidney Tx using living donors at the Clinic of Nephrology Military Medical Academy, from 1996 to 2003. The first group (group C2) consisted of 25 patients in whom CyA dose was adjusted according to the target C2 and AUC0−4 (calculated by the regression formula based on C1, C2 and C3), while the second group (group C0) consisted of 25 "historical" patients in whom the dose of this drug was adjusted according to C0. Results. On the 6th day the average daily dose of CyA in the group C2 was 10.1±0.8 mg/kg, while in the group C0 it was 7.6±1.6 (p < 0.05). One month following the Tx, daily drug doses were quite similar in the two observed groups (6.2 mg/kg in C0 and 6.6 mg/kg in group C2, p = NS). In the group C2, target C2/AUC 0−4 (C2 1 700 ng/ml, AUC0−4 4 400 ng·h/ml) on the sixth day was achieved in 36.3%, and on day 14 in 76% of the patients. The target AUC 0−4, in relation with C2, in each observed time interval was reached in the higher number of patients. Maximum CyA concentrations in the group C2 were registered 2 hours following the administration (C2), when compared with the concentrations registered after the first and the third hour (C1 and C3). In relation with C1 and C3, C2 concentration correlated most favorably with AUC 0−4, both on the 6th (r = 0.85) and on the 9th day (r = 0.87). During the first three months following the Tx, in the group C0, 10 episodes (40%) of acute cell rejection (AR) were registered, while in the group C2, two episodes (8%, p = 0.07) were registered; in the observed period covering the first two years, a total of 13 (52%) AR episodes in the group C0 and 5 AR episodes (20%) in the group C2 (p = 0.03) were registered. All of five episodes of steroid resistant AR were registered in the group C0. In the group C2, all five patients with AR had lower C2 during AR: the average C2 at the moment of AR was 933.8 ng/ml, and in the patients without rejections was 1 364.2 ng/ml (p = 0.008). In the same group, the average C0 at the moment of AR was 263.2 ng/ml, and 240.0 ng/ml (p = 0,486) in the patients without AR. In the C0 group, average C0 concentration at the moment of AR was 227.1 ng/ml, while in the patients without AR it was 227.7 ng/ml (p = 0.95). Totally 68% of the patients showed signs of acute CyA nephrotoxicity during the first year in the group C2, and 52% in the group C0 (p = 0.38). In seven patients (28%) of the group C2 and six patients of the group C0 (24%, p = 0.96) in the first two years following Tx, administration of CyA was interrupted due to nephrotoxicity. Overall graft function was good in both groups during the period of two years. One graft was lost in the group C0 due to chronic allograft nephropathy. The patients in the group C2 had better early and the same late graft function. Five patients in the group C2 who did not reach the target C2/AUC during the first 30 days, did not have more AR or worse graft function, comparing with the patients who reached the target concentrations. Conclusion. In the patients with CyA TDM through with the C2 and AUC0−4., AR frequency was considerably lower, and AR episodes had a milder flow than in those with CyA TDM through the C0. The drug concetration in blood two hours after administration (C2) was a good predictor of acute graft rejection, while C0 failed to point to the patients with the insufficient drug concentration. Higher drug doses were administered in the group C2 during the first month following Tx, and these patients did not show significantly higher frequency of acute nephrotoxicity and more frequent requirement of the drug use interruption. Graft function in both groups was good during the period of two years. CyA dose determination through C2 and AUC0-4 is efficient TDM method, relatively simple for use in day to day clinical practice.