Search

Background: The incidence of acute rejection and the morbidity of systemic cyclosporine (INN: cyclosporine) after lung transplantation is significant. Experimental evidence suggests that the allograft locally modulates the immune mechanisms of acute rejection. The purpose of this study was to determine whether aerosolized cyclosporine would prevent acute cellular rejection, achieve effective graft concentrations with low systemic drug delivery, and locally affect production of the inflammatory cytokines involved in acute rejection., Methods: Unilateral orthotopic left lung transplantation was performed in 64 rats (ACI to Lewis), which were divided into eight groups (each group, n = 8): group A, no treatment; groups B to D, aerosol cyclosporine 1 to 3 mg/kg per day, respectively; group E to H, systemic cyclosporine 2, 5, 10, and 15 mg/kg per day, respectively. After the animals were killed on postoperative day 2, 4, or 6, the transplanted lung, native lung, spleen, and blood were collected. Histologic studies, high-pressure liquid chromatography for trough cyclosporine concentrations, and reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction for cytokine gene expression were performed., Results: Untreated animals showed grade 4 rejection by postoperative day 6. Aerosol cyclosporine prevented acute rejection in a dose-dependent fashion, with group D animals (3 mg/kg per day) showing minimal grade 1 changes. Among animals receiving systemic cyclosporine, only group H (15 mg/kg per day) controlled (grade 1) rejection. However, aerosol cyclosporine, at an 80% lower dose, achieved significantly lower concentrations of cyclosporine in the graft (12,349 vs 28,714 ng/mg, p = 0.002004) and blood (725 vs 3306 ng/ml, p = 0.000378). Group F (systemic 5 mg/kg per day) had higher cyclosporine concentrations in the blood than group D (p = 0.004572) and similar tissue concentrations (p = 0.115180), yet had grade 2 rejection. Reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction demonstrated equivalent suppression of inducible nitric oxide synthase but a 20- to 25-fold higher expression of interleukin-6, interleukin-10, and interferon-gamma in group D versus group H recipient allografts., Conclusion: Local delivery of cyclosporine by aerosol inhalation dose-dependently prevented acute pulmonary allograft rejection. Effective graft levels and low systemic drug delivery required significantly lower doses than systemic therapy alone. The gene expression of proinflammatory cytokines involved in allograft rejection was suppressed by aerosol cyclosporine therapy.

This study evaluated the effectiveness of aerosolized cyclosporine as rescue therapy for refractory acute rejection in lung-transplant patients that is unresponsive to conventional therapy. Over 2 yr, nine allograft recipients with histologic evidence of persistent acute rejection and worsening pulmonary function were enrolled. Twenty-two patients with similar degrees of unremitting rejection served as historical controls. Aerosolization of cyclosporin A (300 mg in 4.8 ml propylene glycol) using an AeroTech II jet nebulizer was instituted daily for 12 consecutive days followed by a maintenance regimen of 3 d/wk. Cyclosporine and tacrolimus blood and plasma levels were maintained within therapeutic ranges throughout this trial. Efficacy was assessed by histologic grade of rejection, interleukin-6 (IL-6) mRNA expression by graft bronchoalveolar lavage cells, and pulmonary function testing before and during cyclosporine therapy. In seven patients, results were correlated to deposition of cyclosporine aerosol in the allograft(s) as measured by radioisotopic techniques. At a mean of 37 d after initiation of aerosolized cyclosporine, graft histology improved in eight of the nine patients. Cellular IL-6 mRNA expression decreased significantly in seven patients (mean IL-6/actin +/- SD, 40.96 +/- 118 versus 0.33 +/- 0.57 [p = 0.038]). Pulmonary function (FEV1), which had decreased posttransplant (over a mean of 347 d of observation) from a best value of 1.98 +/- 0.8 L to 1.59 +/- 0.6 L (p = 0.0077), improved over time (152 d) to a posttransplant value of 1.90 +/- 0.8 (p = 0.025). In the control subjects, FEV1 inexorably declined over a comparable period of observation (best posttransplant value 2.36 +/- 0.86 to 1.32 +/- 0.53, p < 0.0001). There was a strong correlation between cyclosporine deposition in the allograft and improvement in FEV1 (r = 0.900, p < 0.01). Fewer cycles of pulsed corticosteroids (1.4 +/- 0.9 versus 0.2 +/- 0.4, p = 0.011) and anti-thymocyte globulin 0.8 +/- 0.4 versus 0, p = 0.018) and reduced doses of oral prednisone (10.8 +/- 3.1 versus 6.1 +/- 4.2 mg/d, p = 0.026) were observed during treatment with aerosolized cyclosporine. Episodes of pneumonia also were reduced significantly during aerosol therapy (2.6 versus 0.95 episodes/100 d, p = 0.029). Nephrotoxicity and hepatotoxicity did not occur, and no patients withdrew from the study. Aerosolized cyclosporine appears to be safe and effective therapy for refractory acute rejection, but confirmation by a larger, randomized trial is necessary. The correlation observed between deposition of cyclosporine aerosol and physiologic improvement of lung function suggests that there is a dose-response relationship between the concentration of cyclosporine in the allograft and immunologic tolerance.

Background: Panel-reactive antibody (PRA) is commonly used before thoracic organ transplantation to estimate a potential recipient's degree of humoral sensitization., Methods: To assess the influence of an elevated PRA on survival and the incidence of rejection in pulmonary transplantation, the records of 247 patients that underwent single or double lung transplantation were reviewed., Results: Twenty-one of 247 patients (8.5%) had PRA values greater than 10%. Survival of this population was not significantly different from that of patients with low PRA levels: 74% (low PRA) vs 65% (elevated PRA) at 1 year and 58% in both groups at 3 years. The acute rejection rates (episodes/first 100 days) for the elevated and low PRA groups were 2.1 and 1.9, respectively (p = NS). Obliterative bronchiolitis developed in 38.9% of the high and 31.2% of the low PRA groups (p = NS). Six of 247 patients had a retrospective positive lymphocytotoxic cross-match result; three had PRA values greater than 10%. Patients with a positive cross-match result experienced similar survival and incidence of rejection as the remainder of the population. Among 957 patients evaluated for lung transplantation, 16 (1.7%) had a PRA (with dithiothreitol) greater than 15%. All had a history of pregnancy, blood transfusion, connective tissue disease, or previous transplantation., Conclusions: Humoral sensitization is uncommon in the lung transplantation population. A modestly elevated PRA does not predict survival or the development of acute rejection or bronchiolitis obliterans. PRA testing before lung transplantation should be reserved for those patients with specific risk factors for humoral sensitization.

Lung transplant recipients who have persistent acute cellular rejection are at increased risk for the development of chronic rejection, the leading cause of reduced long-term survival. This study evaluated the use of aerosolized cyclosporine as rescue therapy for unremitting acute rejection. Between June 1993 and March 1996, 18 patients with rejection that failed to resolve after therapy with pulse steroids and antilymphocyte globulin were enrolled in the study. Aerosolized cyclosporine A (300 mg) treatment was initiated for 10 consecutive days followed by a maintenance regimen of 3 days per week. Efficacy was assessed by graft histologic and pulmonary function testing. With the use of linear regression, results in these patients were compared with those in 23 control patients, matched for histologic acute rejection, who had continued to receive conventional rescue therapy. Two patients were unable to tolerate the treatments and were withdrawn from the study. Significant improvement in histologic rejection occurred in 14 of the remaining 16 patients after a mean of 37 days of aerosolized cyclosporine therapy. Measures of forced vital capacity and forced expiratory volume in 1 second (change in percent predicted/100 days plus or minus the standard error) increased over time in the treated patients whereas the condition of control patients declined despite repeated attempts at conventional rescue (forced vital capacity, aerosolized cyclosporine group, 4.6 +/- 2.9 vs control group -8.1 +/- 1.9, p = 0.001; forced expiratory volume in 1 second, aerosolized cyclosporine group, 2.1 +/- 4.4 vs control group -9.8 +/- 2.6, p = 0.043). Renal and hepatic toxicity during cyclosporine therapy was not observed. The incidence of acute histologic rejection (> or = A2) decreased from 2.49 +/- 0.68 episodes/100 days before aerosolized cyclosporine therapy to 0.72 +/- 0.3 episodes/100 days (p < 0.05). In summary, aerosolized cyclosporine is a safe and effective therapy for acute rejection that has failed to improve with conventional treatment.

This study evaluated aerosolized cyclosporine as rescue therapy for lung transplant recipients with unremitting chronic rejection. Nine patients with histologic active obliterative bronchiolitis and progressively worsening airway obstruction refractory to conventional immune suppression received aerosolized cyclosporine. Improvement in rejection histology was seen in seven of nine patients. We compared the changes in the FVC and FEV1 over time using linear regression analysis in these seven histologic responders and nine historical control patients. During the pretreatment period for both the experimental and control groups, the FVC and FEV1 declined at comparable rates. After aerosolized cyclosporine there was stabilization of pulmonary function, whereas in the controls there was continued decline. Cyclosporine blood levels were less than 50 ng/ml 24 h after an aerosolized dose of 300 mg in five patients receiving oral tacrolimus. Nephrotoxicity, hepatotoxicity, and a greater than expected rate of infection was not observed. This study suggests that aerosolized cyclosporine is safe and may be effective therapy for refractory chronic rejection in lung transplant recipients.

Background: Refractory rejection is a major cause of morbidity and death among lung transplant recipients. Traditional rescue therapies have proved only modestly successful. We recently demonstrated the safety of inhaled cyclosporine for patients with end-stage chronic rejection; this trial was extended to patients with refractory acute rejection. The present study was to determine whether effective inhaled cyclosporine therapy was correlated with suppression of cytokine gene expression., Methods: Twelve lung transplant recipients were studied. Maintenance therapy, cyclosporine or FK 506, azathioprine, and prednisone, was continued, and inhaled cyclosporine at a dose of 300 mg/day was added. Pulmonary function testing and histologic characteristics from transbronchial biopsy specimens were used to assess efficacy of therapy. Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) and peripheral blood cells were analyzed for the presence of messenger RNA by using 32P-labeled primers of cytokines interleukin-2 (IL-2), IL-6, IL-10, and interferon-gamma (gamma) via reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction., Results: Nine of 12 patients (five with acute rejection, four with chronic rejection) exhibited histologic resolution of rejection within 3 months of inhaled cyclosporine therapy. Pulmonary function (forced expiratory volume in 1 second) improved from pretherapy levels in the patients with acute rejection (p < 0.05). All of the nine histologic responders exhibited 4- to 150-fold decreases (p < 0.05) in IL-6 and interferon-gamma messenger RNA levels in the BAL, whereas the three patients who failed exhibited persistent or increased cytokine profiles. IL-2 and IL-10 in BAL and peripheral blood lymphocyte cytokines were not informative., Conclusions: These results indicate that inhaled cyclosporine is effective therapy for refractory pulmonary rejection and that its mechanism of action is associated with suppression of proinflammatory cytokines IL-6 and interferon-gamma within the allograft.

Transesophageal echocardiography identified malposition of an extracorporeal membrane oxygenation venous cannula across the interatrial septum into the left atrium and the presence of a clot within the cannula's lumen. Transesophageal echocardiography also guided the withdrawal of the cannula into the inferior vena cava.

The aim of the present study was to identify factors determining the delivery to and distribution of aerosolized cyclosporine A (CSA) in the lungs of patients with severe pulmonary allograft rejection. Five such patients inhaled a previously characterized radioaerosol consisting of 4 to 6 cc of CSA (50 mg/ml) in ethanol mixed with technetium-99m (99mTc) bound to human serum albumin, generated by an AeroTech II nebulizer. The total dose of CSA depositing in the lungs was determined with a previously described inspiratory/expiratory mass-balance filter technique. Regional distribution of drug within the lungs was measured using a gamma camera. In addition, the following physiologic parameters were measured: regional volume and ventilation using xenon-133 (133Xe) equilibrium and 133Xe washout, respectively, and regional perfusion using intravenous 99mTc macroaggregates. The relationships between these parameters and regional drug deposition were assessed using linear regression analysis. The lung dose ranged from 20 to 53 mg (0.097 to 0.175 mg CSA deposited per milligram placed in nebulizer). In recipients of single-lung allografts, preferential drug deposition occurred either in the allograft (two patients) or in the native lung (one patient). Marked nonuniformities in regional distribution were also apparent in two double-lung allograft recipients. There was a weak but statistically significant correlation between regional drug deposition and regional ventilation, as measured by 133Xe washout (r = -0.542, p = 0.014), suggesting that although regional ventilation is important, it is not the only factor determining regional deposition in these patients.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

With current immunosuppressive regimens, rejection is common after lung transplantation. Acute rejection is usually easily reversible with therapy, but chronic rejection often responds poorly and is the leading cause of late morbidity and mortality. Although the pathogenesis of chronic rejection is not fully understood and might be different from ACR, the studies summarized in this review support the concept that alloimmune responses are of fundamental importance. Acute rejection and infection, particularly with CMV, appear to promote changes within the allograft that increase the risk of chronic rejection. Although the progression of OB in some patients might be arrested with immunosuppression, a large percentage of patients with OB suffer from a continuous loss of lung function. Improvement in the long-term outcome of lung transplant recipients will require both better immunosuppressive agent and more specific therapy such as induction of donor-specific tolerance.

Proliferative responses to nonspecific mitogens were analyzed for 119 bronchoalveolar lavages and 108 concurrent peripheral blood samples from 35 lung transplant patients. The patients were classified at each time as normal, rejecting, or infected on the basis of trans-bronchial biopsy, culture results, clinical signs, and pulmonary function. During rejection episodes the bronchoalveolar lavage responses to concanavalin A and phytohemagglutinin were significantly increased (P less than 0.004 and P less than 0.006, respectively). The differences were less pronounced when rejection occurred within 30 days after bolus immunosuppressive therapy, either as immunoprophylaxis or as treatment for a previous rejection episode, and were not significantly different from normal. Differences in response during rejection were limited to the graft; analysis of circulating T cells was not helpful (P = NS). In contrast, markedly depressed responses to Con A and PHA were seen during infection. Significant differences were observed both in the graft (P less than 0.007) and in circulating lymphocytes (P less than 0.02), suggesting that global depression of mitogen response is associated with immunocompromise. Sequential analysis of 6 patients showed that individual changes in mitogen response paralleled those seen in the population (P less than 0.046, normal vs. rejection and P less than 0.043 normal). These findings suggest that mitogen assays of bronchoalveolar lavage lymphocytes and, to a lesser extent, PBL, are clinically useful in assessing intragraft immunocompetence and in distinguishing rejection from infection in lung transplant patients.

The transbronchial biopsy and clinical courses of 9 double-lung and 1 single-lung recipients surviving greater than 10 days were analyzed and compared to those of 15 heart-lung transplants performed during the same time period. Of these, 8 isolated lung (LT) and 11 heart-lung transplant (HLT) recipients survived greater than 50 days and were at risk of developing obliterative bronchiolitis believed to be a form of chronic rejection. Cyclosporine-based immunosuppression, in combination with azathioprine and steroids, was used for 22 of 25 patients. Two double-lung recipients and 1 heart-lung patient received FK506 as the sole immunosuppressive agent; 90% and 62% of LT, and 67% and 54% of HLT recipients developed acute and chronic rejection, respectively (P = NS). The average time to first episode of acute (30.2 days [LT] versus 21.5 days [HLT]) and chronic rejection (146 days [LT] versus 193.7 days [HLT]) was not different between groups (P = NS). Age (34.2 [LT] versus 29.1 [HLT]) and sex (M:F, 5:5 [LT] versus 5:10 [HLT]) were also not found to be discriminators. The histologic diagnosis of chronic rejection was associated with significant declines in FEV1.0 and FEF25-75 (P less than 0.02). There was only one instance of cardiac rejection among the heart-lung transplant recipients. Heart-lung and isolated lung transplant patients appear to be at similar risk for developing acute or chronic pulmonary rejection.

The pattern of lymphocyte growth from endomyocardial biopsies in 55 heart transplant recipients was shown to be correlated with the subsequent development of graft coronary disease. Persistent lymphocyte growth was observed in 39 patients, and 15 of these growers (or 41%) developed graft coronary disease. In contrast, only 1 of 15 patients (or 6%) with nongrower biopsies showed subsequent graft coronary disease. Thus, biopsy growth was associated with a higher incidence of subsequent GCD (p = 0.02). A comparison between the group of 15 growers with subsequent graft coronary disease and the 24 growers without subsequent graft coronary disease did not show any differences with respect to patient age, presence of coronary artery disease in the native heart, biopsy histology, donor alloreactivity of biopsy grown lymphocytes, and immunosuppressive drug regimen. On the other hand, the number of treated rejection episodes was significantly lower in the grower group with subsequent graft coronary disease (p = 0.04). These data support the concept that graft coronary disease may involve rejection and that more immunosuppression may lower its incidence. This concept is strengthened by findings showing that alloreactive T cells can be propagated from coronary arteries of cardiac allografts with graft coronary disease.